<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Digg Is Still The Best</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mixx Democratizes Categories: Something Digg Should Have</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-2301604</link>
		<dc:creator>Mixx Democratizes Categories: Something Digg Should Have</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-2301604</guid>
		<description>[...] late November I wrote that Digg is still the best online social news voting site online, but upstart Mixx is trying very hard to change [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] late November I wrote that Digg is still the best online social news voting site online, but upstart Mixx is trying very hard to change [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nanda</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1861869</link>
		<dc:creator>nanda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 16:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1861869</guid>
		<description>Popdup.com is a new social media / bookmarking website for video,news,pictures and shopping.. You guys can connect,share your favorites on the web..

Its really funny...

YOu can create groups to organize same kinda buddies and bookmarks..

Build your own customized page , and share it with your friends...

http://www.popdup.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Popdup.com is a new social media / bookmarking website for video,news,pictures and shopping.. You guys can connect,share your favorites on the web..</p>
<p>Its really funny&#8230;</p>
<p>YOu can create groups to organize same kinda buddies and bookmarks..</p>
<p>Build your own customized page , and share it with your friends&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.popdup.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.popdup.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bartek Gniado</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1795767</link>
		<dc:creator>Bartek Gniado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1795767</guid>
		<description>[...] new competitor Mixx.com (Which I previously wrote about here and here), and despite some big names defending Digg I just simply can&#8217;t stand it anymore and must rant. So here is why Digg does indeed suck [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] new competitor Mixx.com (Which I previously wrote about here and here), and despite some big names defending Digg I just simply can&#8217;t stand it anymore and must rant. So here is why Digg does indeed suck [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andix</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1795692</link>
		<dc:creator>Andix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1795692</guid>
		<description>I never understood the fascination people have with Digg. For your tech nerd moments you are much better off visiting slashdot, techmeme or even reading some wikipedia articles. 

The Digg links and articles are 90% of the time weak, kiddie stuff. I have read only 1 or 2 truly interesting articles through Digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never understood the fascination people have with Digg. For your tech nerd moments you are much better off visiting slashdot, techmeme or even reading some wikipedia articles. </p>
<p>The Digg links and articles are 90% of the time weak, kiddie stuff. I have read only 1 or 2 truly interesting articles through Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1795007</link>
		<dc:creator>Cathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 12:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1795007</guid>
		<description>I like digg best. I am sure many people have the same opinion as me because I often hear that members at pozgroup.com talking about digg. Some of them even planning to create a special blog there to discuss about digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like digg best. I am sure many people have the same opinion as me because I often hear that members at pozgroup.com talking about digg. Some of them even planning to create a special blog there to discuss about digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PENIX</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793861</link>
		<dc:creator>PENIX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793861</guid>
		<description>As soon as Digg went mainstream, it started sliding downhill fast. It's the very nature of something that is aimed at broad appeal. Think bell curve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As soon as Digg went mainstream, it started sliding downhill fast. It&#8217;s the very nature of something that is aimed at broad appeal. Think bell curve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigMyPage</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793636</link>
		<dc:creator>DigMyPage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793636</guid>
		<description>I do agree with Duncan that Digg is still the best for variety and simplicity. Most of the time good stories do feature on the home page. because of its popularity, 1000s of spams circulate in the upcoming section and sorting through the spam, finding a good story and than reading the story in the source site before voting on it is time consuming. The shout feature in Digg enables diggers to engage in "scratch my back and i will scratch your back".After a story picks a little momentum, lots of votes are just crowd following- people voting on it without reading the story. For lots of diggers, digg is amusement, a game. Good stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do agree with Duncan that Digg is still the best for variety and simplicity. Most of the time good stories do feature on the home page. because of its popularity, 1000s of spams circulate in the upcoming section and sorting through the spam, finding a good story and than reading the story in the source site before voting on it is time consuming. The shout feature in Digg enables diggers to engage in &#8220;scratch my back and i will scratch your back&#8221;.After a story picks a little momentum, lots of votes are just crowd following- people voting on it without reading the story. For lots of diggers, digg is amusement, a game. Good stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793634</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793634</guid>
		<description>While Digg had first-mover advantage and the added bonus of the TechTV following, it's been slow to acknowledge and respond to some of the flaws they've introduced in subsequent updates.  The underlying technology isn't really all that advanced or hard to replicate ... it's just eyeballs that any potential buyer would be investing in.  

Where Digg suffers is that aside from the top-10 list, and a site like Reddit succeeds is that aside from Digg's Top 10 list, valuable content tends to fall off the top of the list very quickly and some truly newsworthy world-impacting content can get buried to page 2 or 3 very quickly only to be replaced by a top-10 list about why popcorn tastes great, or something equally mundane.  Reddit's algorithm to keep content towards the top seems to be a smarter approach.  

It also seems that Digg hasn't leveraged the power of people's networks to provide customzied content, and the associations between you and your "friends" or "fans" is a very flat one unless there's some intelligence added to really interpret likes and dislikes across your network of connections and use that information to vary what content is served down the road.  It doesn't seem like Digg is doing any of that right now.  Alas, it's a great site ... and there's a lot of promise .... but they're leaving themselves open to potential competitors by being slow to use the valuable data they've compiled on how their users use the site.

Dave
http://www.haha.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Digg had first-mover advantage and the added bonus of the TechTV following, it&#8217;s been slow to acknowledge and respond to some of the flaws they&#8217;ve introduced in subsequent updates.  The underlying technology isn&#8217;t really all that advanced or hard to replicate &#8230; it&#8217;s just eyeballs that any potential buyer would be investing in.  </p>
<p>Where Digg suffers is that aside from the top-10 list, and a site like Reddit succeeds is that aside from Digg&#8217;s Top 10 list, valuable content tends to fall off the top of the list very quickly and some truly newsworthy world-impacting content can get buried to page 2 or 3 very quickly only to be replaced by a top-10 list about why popcorn tastes great, or something equally mundane.  Reddit&#8217;s algorithm to keep content towards the top seems to be a smarter approach.  </p>
<p>It also seems that Digg hasn&#8217;t leveraged the power of people&#8217;s networks to provide customzied content, and the associations between you and your &#8220;friends&#8221; or &#8220;fans&#8221; is a very flat one unless there&#8217;s some intelligence added to really interpret likes and dislikes across your network of connections and use that information to vary what content is served down the road.  It doesn&#8217;t seem like Digg is doing any of that right now.  Alas, it&#8217;s a great site &#8230; and there&#8217;s a lot of promise &#8230;. but they&#8217;re leaving themselves open to potential competitors by being slow to use the valuable data they&#8217;ve compiled on how their users use the site.</p>
<p>Dave<br />
<a href="http://www.haha.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.haha.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webmaster Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793621</link>
		<dc:creator>Webmaster Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793621</guid>
		<description>Digg as many other bookmarking sites is turning more and more into a free media to promote useless sites and get free back links. That is why content quality is so low at times...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg as many other bookmarking sites is turning more and more into a free media to promote useless sites and get free back links. That is why content quality is so low at times&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ED</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793609</link>
		<dc:creator>ED</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793609</guid>
		<description>Sadly I am not working full time for my site. I thought to write something about Digg.com and Mixx.com yesterday, but just can't write it as fast as TechCrunch can. 

If you guys still interested, I wrote Digg.com vs Mixx.com:
http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_com_vs_Mixx_com_which_is_better

TechCrunch rocks, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly I am not working full time for my site. I thought to write something about Digg.com and Mixx.com yesterday, but just can&#8217;t write it as fast as TechCrunch can. </p>
<p>If you guys still interested, I wrote Digg.com vs Mixx.com:<br />
<a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg_com_vs_Mixx_com_which_is_better" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/tech_news/Digg....._is_better</a></p>
<p>TechCrunch rocks, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cqkgjytmwg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793464</link>
		<dc:creator>cqkgjytmwg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:52:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793464</guid>
		<description>cqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwgcqkgjytmwg 
cqkgjytmwgcqkgjytmwgcqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwgcqkgjytmwg<br />
cqkgjytmwgcqkgjytmwgcqkgjytmwg cqkgjytmwg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnonTroll</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793432</link>
		<dc:creator>AnonTroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:30:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793432</guid>
		<description>Digg is where it is today because it is the first mover in a new space. Up until a few months ago when a slew of new changes were introduced, Digg was shall we say, a fairly simplistic web 1.0 site. Even now with the new changes, taxonomy is still a big freaking mess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg is where it is today because it is the first mover in a new space. Up until a few months ago when a slew of new changes were introduced, Digg was shall we say, a fairly simplistic web 1.0 site. Even now with the new changes, taxonomy is still a big freaking mess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: remus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793417</link>
		<dc:creator>remus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793417</guid>
		<description>Digg will still be no1 for a long long time.Mixx has a lot of to work to reach that level.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg will still be no1 for a long long time.Mixx has a lot of to work to reach that level.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tketch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793390</link>
		<dc:creator>tketch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793390</guid>
		<description>Digg rocks. New content that is fresh, relavent to my interests and helps drive new traffic to my blog of people who are actually interested. A few tweaks would make it rock my world, but still a very good platform!
http://www.tekbite.com/2007/11/1st-generation-apple-problems.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg rocks. New content that is fresh, relavent to my interests and helps drive new traffic to my blog of people who are actually interested. A few tweaks would make it rock my world, but still a very good platform!<br />
<a href="http://www.tekbite.com/2007/11/1st-generation-apple-problems.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tekbite.com/2007/11.....blems.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793381</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793381</guid>
		<description>Another one to watch that in my opinion is better than Mixx is http://www.tagsum.com . It's been receiving great reviews, has more traffic than mixx, and is always adding new features. They also offer revenue share to reward the users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another one to watch that in my opinion is better than Mixx is <a href="http://www.tagsum.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tagsum.com</a> . It&#8217;s been receiving great reviews, has more traffic than mixx, and is always adding new features. They also offer revenue share to reward the users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brig Graff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793276</link>
		<dc:creator>Brig Graff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793276</guid>
		<description>yeah, I have to agree to some degree with 13. I think Digg is oftentimes plagued with sensationalist topics...making it interesting for quirky news headlines (especially about tech issues). But not a really useful daily site for me to visit. I wish it were otherwise!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, I have to agree to some degree with 13. I think Digg is oftentimes plagued with sensationalist topics&#8230;making it interesting for quirky news headlines (especially about tech issues). But not a really useful daily site for me to visit. I wish it were otherwise!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Woo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793250</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Woo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793250</guid>
		<description>techmine: I totally agree with you. Now I don't think that Digg is worth $200 million as reported.. What could possible the company do/wat are their potential?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>techmine: I totally agree with you. Now I don&#8217;t think that Digg is worth $200 million as reported.. What could possible the company do/wat are their potential?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techmine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793235</link>
		<dc:creator>techmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793235</guid>
		<description>Overall experience is bad on Digg. It is still one of my favorite sites for content discovery but the system/algorithm is hijacked by a bunch of people. Unless everybody is weighed the same, Digg will keep newcomers away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overall experience is bad on Digg. It is still one of my favorite sites for content discovery but the system/algorithm is hijacked by a bunch of people. Unless everybody is weighed the same, Digg will keep newcomers away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Woo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793218</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Woo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793218</guid>
		<description>Well, Digg still have huge amount of traffic on their site but I find it most annoying that there are simple too high expectations on the articles being submitted on their site. 

Furthermore, if you get too many 'bury' from voters, your site gets banned! and there are alliances between some top diggers to digg their articles which I think is pretty unfair..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Digg still have huge amount of traffic on their site but I find it most annoying that there are simple too high expectations on the articles being submitted on their site. </p>
<p>Furthermore, if you get too many &#8216;bury&#8217; from voters, your site gets banned! and there are alliances between some top diggers to digg their articles which I think is pretty unfair..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rudy23</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793212</link>
		<dc:creator>Rudy23</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793212</guid>
		<description>Guys. everyone knows you guys are tight with kevin rose and their crew but we really dont need a digg related article every other day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys. everyone knows you guys are tight with kevin rose and their crew but we really dont need a digg related article every other day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis Salem</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793201</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis Salem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793201</guid>
		<description>Digg is a nice website for entertainment purposes.  However, for real news content we are forced to go elsewhere.   They're readership is simply not diverse enough.   Therefore, there is an oligarchy of opinion.   Not to mention the editorial content that passes off as "news."  Digg is great, but I don't read it because I do not share it's political views.   Something has to be done about this before it is taken seriously by a mass audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg is a nice website for entertainment purposes.  However, for real news content we are forced to go elsewhere.   They&#8217;re readership is simply not diverse enough.   Therefore, there is an oligarchy of opinion.   Not to mention the editorial content that passes off as &#8220;news.&#8221;  Digg is great, but I don&#8217;t read it because I do not share it&#8217;s political views.   Something has to be done about this before it is taken seriously by a mass audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: שירות חדש שואב את הגולשים המאוכזבים &#171; ישראטק. חדשות טכנולוגיה - בעברית.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793182</link>
		<dc:creator>שירות חדש שואב את הגולשים המאוכזבים &#171; ישראטק. חדשות טכנולוגיה - בעברית.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793182</guid>
		<description>[...] כי על אף קיומם של שירותים זהים מזה זמן רב,&#160;ידו של Digg עדיין על העליונה. דנקן טוען כי Digg איכותי יותר בדירוג הכותרות&#160;שלו, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] כי על אף קיומם של שירותים זהים מזה זמן רב,&nbsp;ידו של Digg עדיין על העליונה. דנקן טוען כי Digg איכותי יותר בדירוג הכותרות&nbsp;שלו, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793159</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793159</guid>
		<description>Just wait until we release our "cloud" component Ziggx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wait until we release our &#8220;cloud&#8221; component Ziggx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dexter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793107</link>
		<dc:creator>Dexter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793107</guid>
		<description>Forget Digg and Mixx.  Get your news without the liberal filter...

Conservative Pulse is the only site out there!

http://www.conservativepulse.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget Digg and Mixx.  Get your news without the liberal filter&#8230;</p>
<p>Conservative Pulse is the only site out there!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.conservativepulse.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.conservativepulse.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ice</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793075</link>
		<dc:creator>ice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 13:31:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/25/why-digg-is-still-the-best/#comment-1793075</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have a list of their favorite Digg Like Sites, I'd like to review them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have a list of their favorite Digg Like Sites, I&#8217;d like to review them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.101 seconds -->
