Comments on: Senator Edwards: Defender Of Net Neutrality And Open Spectrum Allocations

By: Asif Khan

Asif Khan — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:04:18 +0000

People from Mumbai, Thane and Navi Mumbai please read this carefully. If you want a BPL postpaid (billing) sim card for free please fell free to contact me at asifkhans@in.com ot at 9930735691 if the number is not reachable as Vodafone has a very bad network where i stay you can also call me at 9222097209. Thank You and call soon as offer is limited still stock lasts. Free home/office document pickups and card delivery.

By: Asif Khan

Asif Khan — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:02:58 +0000

Hey Indian people want to become a millionaire in ten days please visit my site http://www.becomerich.tk pLEASE READ EACH AND EVERY WORD TO UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT AND HAVE FAITH IN YOURSELF Thank You

By: Interview (almost) With Congressman Dennis Kucinich | Holly Swanson

Interview (almost) With Congressman Dennis Kucinich | Holly Swanson — Tue, 14 Oct 2008 07:29:56 +0000

[...] positions on technical policies, something we’ve already done with Barack Obama, John McCain, John Edwards, Mitt Romney and Mike [...]

By: John Edwards - Should Congress pass legislation to mandate network neutrality on the Internet?

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:48:02 +0000

[...] Evidence that the opinion of John Edwards is:Yes Defender Of Net Neutrality And Open Spectrum AllocationsTechCrunch spoke to Edwards and found that he supports net neutrality [...]

By: TalkCrunch » Blog Archive » Carly Fiorina On TalkCrunch

TalkCrunch » Blog Archive » Carly Fiorina On TalkCrunch — Fri, 02 May 2008 03:37:11 +0000

[...] to get their on record position on ten key technology issues (Ron Paul, Barack Obama, John McCain, John Edwards, Mitt Romney, Mike Gravel and Dennis Kucinich). On January 29, just prior to Super Tuesday, we made [...]

By: TalkCrunch » Blog Archive » Interview (almost) With Congressman Dennis Kucinich

Sun, 06 Jan 2008 04:56:17 +0000

[...] positions on technical policies, something we’ve already done with Barack Obama, John McCain, John Edwards, Mitt Romney and Mike [...]

By: Mick Russom

Mick Russom — Tue, 27 Nov 2007 21:31:54 +0000

John Edwards thinks gun ownership is a privilege and not a right.

see: http://www.yout...h?v=fQFhdFfl6rM

Period. End. This is a dangerous power hungry authoritarian. Ron Paul FTW. These elites think they run society! The People run society per the constitution which secures the rights of the individual against the tyranny of this government we have now.

We are sick of people taking our rights away!

By: In-Vest Tech News » Blog Archive » Q&A With Senator Barack Obama On Key Technology Issues

Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:45:47 +0000

[...] score card is now even, with two democrat (Obama and Edwards) and two republican (Romney and McCain) [...]

By: David

David — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 20:57:37 +0000

exapted (#34) – I have to agree, there is already regulation… so corruption is inevitable. Additional regulation is not the answer.

The only “neutrality” we need in the net is neutrality from the government. Once Washington further restricts consumer choice by restricting market operation, any “neutrality” is abandoned.

By: asp script indir

asp script indir — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:09:02 +0000

thanks

By: www.CARversation.com

www.CARversation.com — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 05:16:19 +0000

i’m sorry is this a political blog??

By: Facebook, The Chinese Government and Net Neutrality « Allan Woodstrom’s Blog

Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:22:16 +0000

[...] an interview with Michael Arrington of TechCrunch, presidential candidate John Edwards said “I believe that if we do not guarantee net neutrality, [...]

By: Jay Rosen

Jay Rosen — Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:17:49 +0000

Thanks for doing this, and the interview series as a whole.

By: Justin

Justin — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:51:16 +0000

Hellary? You’re not even trying. Try “Hitlery” next time.

By: All My Mac (MA's "Asshole")

All My Mac (MA's "Asshole") — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:50:25 +0000

At least she’s not Bomber!

Okay, enough with the lame name defacing…

By: All My Mac (MA's "Asshole")

All My Mac (MA's "Asshole") — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:47:54 +0000

If this was a phone interview, why was it not recorded via audio? That would have made it seem a lot more candid.

By: damon

damon — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:05:59 +0000

to #37
- net neutrality is not a big issue in this campaign

to #38
- reduce carbon emissions by 80% blah blah blah, how about reducing the deficit, or the number of illegals, or the farm bill pork, etc…

By: James Bentley

James Bentley — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:40:30 +0000

“When it comes to clean energy, he wants to find ways to freeze demand for electricity and reduce our carbon emissions by 80% by 2050.”

Yet,

“He wants to see universal broadband available to all U.S. households by 2010″

Where is the electricity going to come to run all of these new computers, modems, monitors, etc.? Solar power or E85 maybe?

By: jeanthibca

jeanthibca — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:29:11 +0000

Surprising that net neutrality is such an issue in this campaign.

By: Andrew

Andrew — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:15:17 +0000

I am all for net-neutrality as a concept, but I think the last thing we need is government regulation. First its net neutrality from the gov’t, then its taxation of the internet.

Let the free market do its work,if one company chooses to have tiered networks, some of its competition will stay neutral

By: Dave

Dave — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:07:35 +0000

Barack Obama shares similar views but hes doing more for net neutrality. Go to barackobama.com or youtube and listen to some of his speeches. Barack Obama also had a recent interview at Google headquarters. The vids are on youtube.

Obama/Edwards 08

By: exapted

exapted — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:05:53 +0000

@31, David
I don’t see the status quo as a shining example of a free market – I see it as corporations colluding with politicians such that ordinary people with good ideas can’t implement their ideas.

By: Soda Pop

Soda Pop — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:32:50 +0000

He’s also planning on increasing taxes. Go with any of the mainstream candidates and its lip-service as usual and business as usual.

By: David

David — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:14:42 +0000

“…he wants to find ways to freeze demand…” two sentences later “…says he’s pro market…” WT___?

By: David

David — Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:11:28 +0000

I believe that if we do not guarantee net neutrality, the Internet could go the way of network television and commercial radio – with just a few loud corporate voices and no room for the grassroots and small entrepreneurs. I’m sorry, but anyone who thinks about this for half a second will realize that the reason tv and radio are controlled by a big few is precisely because of government regulation. When you take away business’ choices, you take away the consumer’s choice.

Net neutrality is just another flavor of regulation. None of the dire predictions about what will happen without NN haven’t even come close to happenning. There is certainly no need for preventative action on the part of big brother. Regulation (restriction of freedom) should always be considered as a desperate last resort to something that has no other mechanism of control. So far, the individuals making themselves heard through the market is handling this just fine, and it looks like future avenues for bandwidth will become more numerous, not less… and thus consumers will have the ultimate vote with their dollars.

Love ya Mike, but trust your libertarian instincts on this one.