November 15, 2007

The New Focus Group: Mzinga Launches at TechCrunch Boston

Erick Schonfeld

16 comments »

mzinga-logo.pngAt our TechCrunch Boston MeetUp, a company is launching called Mzinga that brings white-label social networks to consumer research. Mzinga, which means “beehive” in Swahili, is actually the combination and rebranding of two existing companies: Knowledge Planet (Web-based corporate learning) and Shared Insights (Web communities). Right out of the gate, the company already has a healthy business with $17 million in annual revenues and 100 employees. And CEO Rick Faulk says the company is “nearly profitable.”

Mzinga lets corporations create social networks for their most ardent customers or alumni and retirees. It offers a menu of social modules that companies can add to their sites, including blogs, wikis, surveys, polls, calendars, forums, tag clouds, file uploading tools, individual profile pages, group pages, and idea-management tools with Digg-like voting. Faulk used to be the chief marketing officer at WebEx, and Mziinga already powers the community portion of its site. WebEx’s most hardcore customers can join and give feedback there about future features that WebEx should implementing.

This must be the month that social networks go corporate because last week another white-label social network launched called Networked Insights. Like Mzinga, it lets companies create a place on their sites where customers can hang out and talk about their products. But it uses semantic analysis sand concept matching to extract meaning from all the chatter, and ranks conversations or comments based on how many interactions are associated with it. So a loud, whiny customer who complains a lot about a product in comments, but nobody else is joining in or linking off him, counts less than the quiet customer who only made one insightful post that spurred a torrent of other comments, links, ratings, and invitations to others to join the discussion.

Of course, being able to capture all of these discussions and mine them for meaning make them potentially more powerful than any focus group. The trick will be to get a representative sample of a company’s customers to participate, as opposed to just the most opinionated or the ones who are already brand fanatics.

we-are-smarter.pngCorporate social networks may not be sexy, but they could be a goldmine. Networked Insights charges $200,000 a year and up to build a social network for your brand (pricing is based on the number of interactions). Mzinga will charge $1,000 a month for its self-serve offerings and $15,000 a month for full service (or $180,000 per year), where Mzinga builds the site, then recruits, and manages the community. Faulk is finding plenty of takers for the more expensive option. “What we are finding is that companies like to write a check to make it successful,” he says, sounding a bit like someone who cannot believe his own luck.

Faulk is also taking a social approach to marketing. Mzinga’s software was used to create a site for the express purpose of crowdsourcing a book. The book, We Are Smarter Than Me, was written by 5,000 different people and published by Wharton. It was released on September 24th, and already the first print run of 15,000 is nearly sold out, says Faulk. The book is about—what else—how to use crowds to help your business.

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. More Consolidation in the White Label Social Networking Space: Mzinga Acquires Prospero
  2. Listen To Top Indie Songs On Your iPhone
  3. Terbaik.Net » Blog Archive » Creating the Social Media Broadcast (Sonecast)

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Antje Wilsch

    feel like i’m losing my mind… i look at the TC page, then I look again later and there are new stories where there was no story before. I think the top story is the latest one, then I might scroll down again & there’s a new story. It’s disconcerting.

  2. Alan Wilensky

    You bombed their site! Kaboom.

  3. www.carversation.com

    cool

  4. Bruce Judson

    Great post. Your comments on the more expensive version are particularly noteworthy. Yes, busy people and companies will pay a lot for the the total solution. The less a customer has to do to gain value– the more value you provide.

    Also, it’s useful to think about how much a company would need to spend on additional employees, who receive overhead and benefits, to operate the self-service solution–and probably achieve a less successful result. My guess is that it is more than the extra cost of $17,000 a month.

    Bruce Judson
    Founder, Search Free Apps
    http://www.SearchFreeApps.com

  5. US Web Hosting

    ranking conversations/comments throughout the interaction seems cool idea.

  6. Sam

    Antje, I agree and have noticed that “feature” for some time. It seems to be related to page views where the sstory with more page views will slode to the top. It has never been explicitly stated what the strategy is exactly and one has to guess that is to avert ‘gaming the system’.

    Back to the topic. If a company doesn’t have a brand worth engaging, it won’t be engaged no matter how expertly it is implemented.

    “What we are finding is that companies like to write a check to make it successful”, as if writing a check will make it successful? Please name one, just one, success story.

    There is no reason a company couldn’t have this system built for $5-10K. The real value is in “recruiting and managing” the community (I hope those are your words Erik, that is not how I like to be thought of as a loyal customer). However, if the marketing group at a particular organization does not *know* their customers as well as this 3rd party, I’d suggest some staffing changes are in order.

    If this company found success at my company, I would feel that I failed at my job.

  7. julia

    Hello Erick,

    I have a question about Techcrunch MeetUps. Do you have a page/website where the events are announced? I checked Meetup.com and Eventbrite but search results didn’t return anything.

  8. Steve Ballmer

    “white-label social networks to consumer research”

    … this some kinda racist thing?

  9. Sam

    julia, try email. totally off-topic.

  10. I Am Not Posting To Spam My Blog

    “And CEO Rick Faulk says the company is “nearly profitable.””

    Bwahahahahaha. Some of us more churlish types would call that “loss-making”. Oh well, by TechCrunch standards I guess that does count as a “healthy business”.

    Incidentally, we are not smarter than me. For starters, me know to put the subject in the nominative and to expand a subordinate clause if me am not sure whether a pronoun is subject or object. I.e. “we are not smarter than I [am].”

    Secondly, to paraphrase Tommy Lee Jones in Men in Black, I am smart, we are dumb, panicky, dangerous animals and you know it. (More distinguished philosophers have said much the same thing over the years, but I like this version best.)

    That said, this is one of the less stupid ideas to make money off social networking… if there are enough brands whose customers would actually use a social network on their site to generate revenue. Personally my brand loyalty is nil, but the dumb and panicky herd can, with sufficient mental beatings, be made loyal enough to brands for this to work.

  11. Denise

    Mzinga says they do lots of customer communities, but I think if you probe, you will find that they’ve only done WebEx and maybe a few more. They are an exercise in hyperbole. Instead, check out Passenger, Communispace, and Market Tools, who have been doing this for a while.

  12. XrumerZ

    Programma dlia rassilki obievlenii na forumi i blogi baza 170 000 forumov i blogov RU programma Xrumer 4.0! Stoimost 50$ ICQ 458411483

  13. Idetrorce

    very interesting, but I don’t agree with you
    Idetrorce