November 14, 2007

Google-DoubleClick Deal Delayed in Europe

Erick Schonfeld

10 comments »

googleogo13.gifdoubleclick-logo.pngGoogle’s big move into display advertising is going to be delayed, maybe until April, if it gets approved at all. The European Commission is holding up Google’s acquisition of DoubleClick on antitrust concerns, fearing that Google’s current dominance of search advertising, combined with DoubleClick’s leading position in display advertising will create an unstoppable force.

Truth be told, that is precisely what Google is hoping for, although it must say the exact opposite to try to get the deal past regulators. Google CEO Eric Schmidt is crying that all of his rivals’ advertising deals (Microsoft-aQuantive, Yahoo-Right Media/BlueLithium, AOL-Tacoda/Quigo) have already been approved or face no similar scrutiny. But that misses the whole point of an antitrust review: to prevent the concentration of too much market power in any one company.

Those other deals don’t threaten to cement any one company’s market dominance, as the DoubleClick deal arguably does. (This must be the only time Steve Balmer is tickled that Google is being treated like the new Microsoft). There are also related privacy concerns, as tracking consumers across sites with ad cookies becomes the industry norm, but that is beyond the official purview of the European Commission.

In the U.S., the Federal Trade Commission has yet to approve the deal as well. But historically, it has been the European Commission that has always been tougher in approving big mergers because it doesn’t have as much enforcement teeth after a deal is already consummated. Its biggest influence (in terms of being able to squash a deal) is always at the initial approval stage, when it has to basically guess what the future may hold. In a sense, it is a futile exercise.

iab-pie-chart.pngWhile search and display advertising may make up the bulk of online advertising today (40 percent and 22 percent, respectively, according to the Interactive Advertising Bureau), who is to say that social ads or some other as-yet-to-be invented form of digital advertising won’t sweep the world and make the DoubleClick deal irrelevant? In all likelihood, the deal will go through with the European Commission demanding a set of tough, but ultimately misguided, concessions.

Are there concessions it should demand that would make sense and promote a more competitive digital advertising market? Or should it just stop holding Google back and let the market decide who to reward and who to punish? Comments are open.

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. Google Set To Get DoubleClick Approval As Christmas Present — Parking Domains

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Grip

    I think the EC should just let the deal go through and let the market decide. People are going to use Google for display advertising because they know how to make things simple and intuitive. Your average business owner would consider display advertising in it’s current form as confusing and complicated.

  2. gregory

    managing competition is certainly a consideration, but there seems a deeper level that there is nobody to oversee…

    just as putting your money in the bank is actually putting it under the control of the government, who, if you are a bad guy, can make sure that you never see it again - every time you make a move in googlespace, a bit of your life becomes public…

    i would actually trust the EC to bring up privacy concerns more readily than the FTC…. though privacy is not part of the review, it may well be a consideration when it comes to approval/disapproval …

  3. Brig Graff

    Yeah I can definitely see why they would want to kill the deal, or at least raise questions.

  4. Tech Narf

    I would like if there would be some concessions, but i seriously doubt it will happen! I definately don’t want to see Google alone controlling the entire market!

  5. tragicallyhip

    I’m not an attorney, but I’ve always understood the intent of antitrust laws differently than you describe. Its not about the concentration of market power that’s the problem, its the abuse of such concentration and resulting harm to consumers that is at issue. Microsoft didn’t get smacked solely because they had 95% of the desktop operating system market, its because they abused this position.

    Is Google abusing its position as the dominant force in search advertising? From my place in the cheap seats, it seems the answer is no. Is DoubleClick abusing its dominant position in online display ads? Again, this appears not to be the case. What would be the basis, then, for disallowing this acquisition? Potential anticompetitive behavior despite a lack of evidence that such would occur? A weak platform at best.

  6. stone

    Google uses their market position (today) to thwart competition by naming companies in the contracts.

  7. www.carversation.com

    i agree #6

  8. Moe Glitz

    Google needs to be thwarted as their business model of free entry - backed up by paid ads has ruined the business models of so many Web Companies.
    Think back to the late 90’s when so many Companies were doing great business around Storage Space and Subscription Models. But since Google has come on the scene, all of these Companies have closed down because they can not compete with Google’s Business Model.

    It’s not only Web Based Companies that Google has ruined, but also the Media Business, especially Newspapers and Magazines.
    By being a modern Web Based Media Company Google has more power than all of those ‘old school’ Media Businesses put together.

    Remember when some old newspaper or magazine would ask its readers to fill in some questionnaire about their likes or dislikes. Well Google has no time or need to ask its Users about such matters, as it uses all of its resources to find out everything about every single individual with its stealth services and knows everything about you with no questions asked.

    By acquiring Doubleclick, Google will learn so much more about everybody’s online lifestyle and use this information for the benefits of serving Advertisers interests above its Users.
    I don’t want a Big Brother scenario whenever I surf the internet. Which is why Europe is concerned about Google’s influence in dominating future Web Services.

    The big problem for Europe was when Eric Schmidt went over there before Google acquired Doubleclick and boasted that in the future ‘Google will know everything abut your online plans for today before you have even gone online’.
    This type of Big Brother Google Think-Tank quote has made everyone wary of Google’s future strategy.

    In the past Microsoft may have controlled the Desktop, but they have never tried to control your life.

  9. techpub

    .. i like this sentence “n the past Microsoft may have controlled the Desktop, but they have never tried to control your life.” nice one dude.google should not control our life