<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wall Street Journal Gets Cozy With Digg</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Wall Street Journal gets cozy with Digg &#171; Pajamas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-2445999</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wall Street Journal gets cozy with Digg &#171; Pajamas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-2445999</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using Digg &#38; The Wall Street Journal Together: Review with Screenshots &#124; Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-2441884</link>
		<dc:creator>Using Digg &#38; The Wall Street Journal Together: Review with Screenshots &#124; Bob Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 14:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-2441884</guid>
		<description>[...] founder Kevin Rose announced that Digg buttons will now be available on the Wall Street Journal website (WSJ.com). Not only that, but anyone will have free access to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] founder Kevin Rose announced that Digg buttons will now be available on the Wall Street Journal website (WSJ.com). Not only that, but anyone will have free access to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using Digg &#38; The Wall Street Journal Together: Review with Screenshots &#124; TechConsumer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-2408821</link>
		<dc:creator>Using Digg &#38; The Wall Street Journal Together: Review with Screenshots &#124; TechConsumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-2408821</guid>
		<description>[...] founder Kevin Rose announced that Digg buttons will now be available on the Wall Street Journal website (WSJ.com). Not only that, but anyone will have free access to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] founder Kevin Rose announced that Digg buttons will now be available on the Wall Street Journal website (WSJ.com). Not only that, but anyone will have free access to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: berard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1791293</link>
		<dc:creator>berard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 14:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1791293</guid>
		<description>This enabled me to create a proxy that allows reading all WSJ articles for free :

http://mediastech.com/index.php/2007/11/read-wsjcom-for-free/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This enabled me to create a proxy that allows reading all WSJ articles for free :</p>
<p><a href="http://mediastech.com/index.php/2007/11/read-wsjcom-for-free/" rel="nofollow">http://mediastech.com/index.ph.....-for-free/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lerg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1763371</link>
		<dc:creator>Lerg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1763371</guid>
		<description>How odd of WSJ. Digg, in general, has become the domain of the radical left. In general, I've stopped using Digg recently because most of the articles that were at odds with the far-left political viewpoints were systematically buried. WSJ is not exactly left leaning, in that they are usually fairly pro-company/management. It will be interesting to see how WSJ articles fair against the bury posse's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How odd of WSJ. Digg, in general, has become the domain of the radical left. In general, I&#8217;ve stopped using Digg recently because most of the articles that were at odds with the far-left political viewpoints were systematically buried. WSJ is not exactly left leaning, in that they are usually fairly pro-company/management. It will be interesting to see how WSJ articles fair against the bury posse&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1757883</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1757883</guid>
		<description>Awesome.  More publicity to Digg!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome.  More publicity to Digg!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahen Mckinny</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1757670</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahen Mckinny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1757670</guid>
		<description>ohh yes it will come with, Guess they will try and give only a few articles away to try and gain some customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ohh yes it will come with, Guess they will try and give only a few articles away to try and gain some customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1756782</link>
		<dc:creator>dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1756782</guid>
		<description>once again, as i read a post like this on your blog which covers - in this case - the placement of a small button on a web site, i have to ask myself, "who really gives a flying shit?" toilet paper with writing on it is more interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>once again, as i read a post like this on your blog which covers - in this case - the placement of a small button on a web site, i have to ask myself, &#8220;who really gives a flying shit?&#8221; toilet paper with writing on it is more interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake "Fake Michael Arrington"</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1756233</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake "Fake Michael Arrington"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1756233</guid>
		<description>#10, Marc:
That was what I was going to say.  I'm surprised that the free access wasn't mentioned in this article - but they happened so close together.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#10, Marc:<br />
That was what I was going to say.  I&#8217;m surprised that the free access wasn&#8217;t mentioned in this article - but they happened so close together.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1756064</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 07:22:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1756064</guid>
		<description>This is the Digg Blog if anyone is interested...

http://blog.digg.com/?p=98</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the Digg Blog if anyone is interested&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.digg.com/?p=98" rel="nofollow">http://blog.digg.com/?p=98</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Savoy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1756033</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Savoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1756033</guid>
		<description>Murdoch Says WSJ Web Site to Drop Fees
(AP) -- News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch said Tuesday he 
intends to make access to The Wall Street Journal's Web site 
free, dropping subscription fees in exchange for anticipated 
ad revenue. 
http://www.physorg.com/news114174612.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murdoch Says WSJ Web Site to Drop Fees<br />
(AP) &#8212; News Corp. Chairman Rupert Murdoch said Tuesday he<br />
intends to make access to The Wall Street Journal&#8217;s Web site<br />
free, dropping subscription fees in exchange for anticipated<br />
ad revenue.<br />
<a href="http://www.physorg.com/news114174612.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.physorg.com/news114174612.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755965</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 05:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755965</guid>
		<description>Here's a review with screenshots:

http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/11/14/using-digg-the-wall-street-journal-together-review-with-screenshots/

The most interesting thing is the window that pops up after you’ve submitted. It shows one column of the recently popular stories from the WSJ.com on Digg and another column of upcoming WSJ stories on Digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a review with screenshots:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techconsumer.com/2007/11/14/using-digg-the-wall-street-journal-together-review-with-screenshots/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techconsumer.com/20.....reenshots/</a></p>
<p>The most interesting thing is the window that pops up after you’ve submitted. It shows one column of the recently popular stories from the WSJ.com on Digg and another column of upcoming WSJ stories on Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tuts4all.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755830</link>
		<dc:creator>tuts4all.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:53:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755830</guid>
		<description>@ uberinvestor..

Nice job at removing any credit for pligg.  You should at least state in your about us page something of a thanks for pligg especially since your using their default yget template.

&#62;.&#62;

ON TOPIC: I agree with Jobe Roberts.  Digg is not the quality that WSJ offers.But perhaps digg will change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ uberinvestor..</p>
<p>Nice job at removing any credit for pligg.  You should at least state in your about us page something of a thanks for pligg especially since your using their default yget template.</p>
<p>&gt;.&gt;</p>
<p>ON TOPIC: I agree with Jobe Roberts.  Digg is not the quality that WSJ offers.But perhaps digg will change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberinvestor.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755820</link>
		<dc:creator>uberinvestor.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755820</guid>
		<description>Another site which is the financial version of digg is called http://www.uberinvestor.com.  This recently launched site is doing extremely well generating more than 10,000 page views a day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another site which is the financial version of digg is called <a href="http://www.uberinvestor.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.uberinvestor.com</a>.  This recently launched site is doing extremely well generating more than 10,000 page views a day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jobe Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755813</link>
		<dc:creator>Jobe Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 03:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755813</guid>
		<description>Most of the popular Digg posts aren't anywhere near WSJ quality, I think they're targeting the completely wrong market / social bookmarking service.  They should be aiming at Newsvine or the like, a different audience which would probably equally ignore WSJ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the popular Digg posts aren&#8217;t anywhere near WSJ quality, I think they&#8217;re targeting the completely wrong market / social bookmarking service.  They should be aiming at Newsvine or the like, a different audience which would probably equally ignore WSJ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmmm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755669</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmmm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:14:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755669</guid>
		<description>Start the Murdoch's going to buy Digg rumors now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Start the Murdoch&#8217;s going to buy Digg rumors now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuts4all.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755613</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuts4all.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755613</guid>
		<description>I decided to go see for myself and noticed that digg already has some articles submitted and if you scroll down to the bottom of the page the article is written on there is a "Digg This" icon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I decided to go see for myself and noticed that digg already has some articles submitted and if you scroll down to the bottom of the page the article is written on there is a &#8220;Digg This&#8221; icon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuts4all.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755609</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuts4all.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755609</guid>
		<description>Interesting that they would do this.  Guessing they are not gaining enough visitors..

Quoted from digg's blog: "...you’ll now have full (free) access to the articles submitted to Digg."

Guess they will try and give only a few articles away to try and gain some customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that they would do this.  Guessing they are not gaining enough visitors..</p>
<p>Quoted from digg&#8217;s blog: &#8220;&#8230;you’ll now have full (free) access to the articles submitted to Digg.&#8221;</p>
<p>Guess they will try and give only a few articles away to try and gain some customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Wall Street Journal Gets Cozy With Digg &#160;&#187;TechAddress</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755605</link>
		<dc:creator>The Wall Street Journal Gets Cozy With Digg &#160;&#187;TechAddress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755605</guid>
		<description>[...] Source:Techcrunch There&#8217;s a new sheriff in town at the venerable Wall Street Journal, and they certainly seem willing to try new things. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source:Techcrunch There&#8217;s a new sheriff in town at the venerable Wall Street Journal, and they certainly seem willing to try new things. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755601</link>
		<dc:creator>Ariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/the-wall-street-journal-gets-cozy-with-digg/#comment-1755601</guid>
		<description>They should buy Digg.. that will be trying new things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should buy Digg.. that will be trying new things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.072 seconds -->
