<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2 Billion Photos On Flickr</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 04:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Some interesting Facebook facts at Charl Norman &#60;/ Social Media Entrepreneur &#62;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-2059702</link>
		<dc:creator>Some interesting Facebook facts at Charl Norman &#60;/ Social Media Entrepreneur &#62;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 17:30:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-2059702</guid>
		<description>[...] Facebook is 6th most trafficked site in the US and top photo sharing site with 4.1 billion photos uploaded. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Facebook is 6th most trafficked site in the US and top photo sharing site with 4.1 billion photos uploaded. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Biblioteki w serwisie Flickr : Biblioteka 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1982700</link>
		<dc:creator>Biblioteki w serwisie Flickr : Biblioteka 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 14:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1982700</guid>
		<description>[...] Serwis cieszy się ogromną popularnością – pod koniec ubiegłego roku zawierał już ponad dwa miliardy zdjęć, a 3-5 milionów nowych fotografii przybywa każdego [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Serwis cieszy się ogromną popularnością – pod koniec ubiegłego roku zawierał już ponad dwa miliardy zdjęć, a 3-5 milionów nowych fotografii przybywa każdego [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rochelle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1837838</link>
		<dc:creator>Rochelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1837838</guid>
		<description>Hay to eveery one out there owe read's this message!!!!

S..x</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hay to eveery one out there owe read&#8217;s this message!!!!</p>
<p>S..x</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Cross</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1795639</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Cross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1795639</guid>
		<description>When you comment on Flickr in terms of just the numbers of photos, you really miss the point.  It is the GROUPS that make Flickr the place to be, if you want to do more than show some pics to your buds and family members.  

Groups are the showcase for quality images.  You could search individual sites from now til doomsday and maybe find a few nice pics--go to a group and you'll see images from top imaging artists world wide displayed next to images from aspiring amateurs.  And you may not be able to tell the difference between the amateur and the professional.

Want to check out one great group.  Better Than Good.  Great variety, top quality, a little bit of an edge while not going into the offensive category.  Happy viewing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you comment on Flickr in terms of just the numbers of photos, you really miss the point.  It is the GROUPS that make Flickr the place to be, if you want to do more than show some pics to your buds and family members.  </p>
<p>Groups are the showcase for quality images.  You could search individual sites from now til doomsday and maybe find a few nice pics&#8211;go to a group and you&#8217;ll see images from top imaging artists world wide displayed next to images from aspiring amateurs.  And you may not be able to tell the difference between the amateur and the professional.</p>
<p>Want to check out one great group.  Better Than Good.  Great variety, top quality, a little bit of an edge while not going into the offensive category.  Happy viewing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flickr Releases New Geographical Features</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1770153</link>
		<dc:creator>Flickr Releases New Geographical Features</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1770153</guid>
		<description>[...] recently reported that Flickr had passed the two billion stored photos mark.    Flickr  Loading information about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] recently reported that Flickr had passed the two billion stored photos mark.    Flickr  Loading information about [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leap Year Photography</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1760824</link>
		<dc:creator>Leap Year Photography</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 15:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1760824</guid>
		<description>I just posted a photo. Make that 2 billion and 1! That sure is a lot of photos.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just posted a photo. Make that 2 billion and 1! That sure is a lot of photos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan waite</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1759547</link>
		<dc:creator>dan waite</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 10:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1759547</guid>
		<description>this is now what's up on yukesmooks flickr page of that photo... Dan 


TWO BILLIONTH

View yukesmooks' mapTaken in (See more photos here)Yes, this is the 2 billionth photo on flickr. It was taken in front of Market City in Chinatown Haymarket in Sydney. Thank you so much for everyone who congratulated me! xoxox
Prints &#38; Cards etc are available to purchase on www.redbubble.com/people/yukesmooks/art/360165-1-two-bill...
Shameless capitalism!!! 
Comments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is now what&#8217;s up on yukesmooks flickr page of that photo&#8230; Dan </p>
<p>TWO BILLIONTH</p>
<p>View yukesmooks&#8217; mapTaken in (See more photos here)Yes, this is the 2 billionth photo on flickr. It was taken in front of Market City in Chinatown Haymarket in Sydney. Thank you so much for everyone who congratulated me! xoxox<br />
Prints &amp; Cards etc are available to purchase on <a href="http://www.redbubble.com/people/yukesmooks/art/360165-1-two-bill..." rel="nofollow">http://www.redbubble.com/peopl.....ill&#8230;</a><br />
Shameless capitalism!!!<br />
Comments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: document.write("Markus Tressl");</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1757215</link>
		<dc:creator>document.write("Markus Tressl");</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 20:03:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1757215</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Der berühmteste Baum im Web 2.0...&lt;/strong&gt;

Das 2'000'000'000ste (ja, das sind Milliarden) Foto auf Flickr!Aufgenommen in Sydney, online gestellt vom User 'yukesmooks', mit dem fantastischen Titel 'Picture 098'.
......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Der berühmteste Baum im Web 2.0&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Das 2&#8242;000&#8242;000&#8242;000ste (ja, das sind Milliarden) Foto auf Flickr!Aufgenommen in Sydney, online gestellt vom User &#8216;yukesmooks&#8217;, mit dem fantastischen Titel &#8216;Picture 098&#8242;.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flickr: poza numarul 2.000.000.000. at feeddle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1756567</link>
		<dc:creator>flickr: poza numarul 2.000.000.000. at feeddle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 15:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1756567</guid>
		<description>[...] aceasta stire direct din flickr ca sa fie cu toata savoarea acestui serviciu. ideea e ca cineva azi de dimineata [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] aceasta stire direct din flickr ca sa fie cu toata savoarea acestui serviciu. ideea e ca cineva azi de dimineata [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: micfo.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1756289</link>
		<dc:creator>micfo.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1756289</guid>
		<description>Flickr is rocking, it's very nice community for both armature and professional   photographer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flickr is rocking, it&#8217;s very nice community for both armature and professional   photographer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Am Not Posting To Spam My Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1756227</link>
		<dc:creator>I Am Not Posting To Spam My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1756227</guid>
		<description>@22: If that's your idea of titillation then you do realise the Internet has a fair amount of actual pornography? Not many people are aware of this I know but it is out there somewhere.

I'd say 3.3 billion is a conservative estimate. Facebook photos made me stop going out with my housemates last year and bred in me an utter hatred of cameras generally which I didn't have before. This is because whereas people used to take pictures at special moments, now they take them every single minute so they can upload them to Facebook, and as everyone has a camera that means you and/or the people you're talking to/dancing with will be dragged into a huddle to gurn moronically at the soulsnatcher on average every five seconds.  F**k Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@22: If that&#8217;s your idea of titillation then you do realise the Internet has a fair amount of actual pornography? Not many people are aware of this I know but it is out there somewhere.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say 3.3 billion is a conservative estimate. Facebook photos made me stop going out with my housemates last year and bred in me an utter hatred of cameras generally which I didn&#8217;t have before. This is because whereas people used to take pictures at special moments, now they take them every single minute so they can upload them to Facebook, and as everyone has a camera that means you and/or the people you&#8217;re talking to/dancing with will be dragged into a huddle to gurn moronically at the soulsnatcher on average every five seconds.  F**k Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HonestForum.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1756141</link>
		<dc:creator>HonestForum.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 08:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1756141</guid>
		<description>why did flickr sell to yahoo again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why did flickr sell to yahoo again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander van Elsas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1756016</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander van Elsas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1756016</guid>
		<description>Well done Flickr. Shows that they really provide value to the user. I like Flickr. Their business model seems to be clean and working out well for them. It can't really fail, as a picture says more than a thousand words. Browsing pictures is a lot of fun, and although there are a lot of picures which lack quality (including my own), I'm amazed at the beauty of some of them out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done Flickr. Shows that they really provide value to the user. I like Flickr. Their business model seems to be clean and working out well for them. It can&#8217;t really fail, as a picture says more than a thousand words. Browsing pictures is a lot of fun, and although there are a lot of picures which lack quality (including my own), I&#8217;m amazed at the beauty of some of them out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1756013</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1756013</guid>
		<description>@20

actually id much rather browse through 4 billion drunk college girl photos than whatever is on flickr

which do you really think is worth more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@20</p>
<p>actually id much rather browse through 4 billion drunk college girl photos than whatever is on flickr</p>
<p>which do you really think is worth more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buster</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755883</link>
		<dc:creator>buster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755883</guid>
		<description>3.3 billion of 4.1 billion on facebook are of drunk college girls/guys with a bud light in tow. i'd put more stock in flickr's 2 billion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3.3 billion of 4.1 billion on facebook are of drunk college girls/guys with a bud light in tow. i&#8217;d put more stock in flickr&#8217;s 2 billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zuckenburg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755742</link>
		<dc:creator>Zuckenburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755742</guid>
		<description>Oh a facebook reference, how un f**king surprising. Can you get any more unoriginal mike?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh a facebook reference, how un f**king surprising. Can you get any more unoriginal mike?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anatoly</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755730</link>
		<dc:creator>Anatoly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755730</guid>
		<description>@2 Mike: It doesnt behoove you to critique other people grammatical/spelling mistakes, given the kind of mistakes your own people make when writing posts. 

Maybe you should look at your pixoo picture before you develop an attitude..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@2 Mike: It doesnt behoove you to critique other people grammatical/spelling mistakes, given the kind of mistakes your own people make when writing posts. </p>
<p>Maybe you should look at your pixoo picture before you develop an attitude..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Joyce</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755715</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Joyce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755715</guid>
		<description>The number of facebook photos is staggering.  I agree that there is some truly amazing work on flickr, but apparantly millions of facebook users have no need for a separate photo sharing site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The number of facebook photos is staggering.  I agree that there is some truly amazing work on flickr, but apparantly millions of facebook users have no need for a separate photo sharing site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techmine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755657</link>
		<dc:creator>techmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755657</guid>
		<description>I agree with Mr. Crash. Facebook photos hardly figure anywhere. 2 billion flickr photos are worth many billions on Facebook. But one good thing about Facebook is, there is no limit on number of photos uploaded....am I right???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Mr. Crash. Facebook photos hardly figure anywhere. 2 billion flickr photos are worth many billions on Facebook. But one good thing about Facebook is, there is no limit on number of photos uploaded&#8230;.am I right???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Crash</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755646</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Crash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755646</guid>
		<description>Just as a point of comparison...

The vast bulk of pictures taken on facebook are, quite frankly, trash.

Many on flickr also suck - but the number of photos worth actually looking at is far more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just as a point of comparison&#8230;</p>
<p>The vast bulk of pictures taken on facebook are, quite frankly, trash.</p>
<p>Many on flickr also suck - but the number of photos worth actually looking at is far more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon F</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755622</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755622</guid>
		<description>Anyone know how many active users on Flickr and what percentage are tagged?  It seems a lot of the photos are uploaded by a small population of users.  Image search still sucks on the search engines so I wonder how much search revenue is generated by Flickr.  With Webshots being spun out of CNET for 40 MM, I wonder if this can be a good business for Flickr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone know how many active users on Flickr and what percentage are tagged?  It seems a lot of the photos are uploaded by a small population of users.  Image search still sucks on the search engines so I wonder how much search revenue is generated by Flickr.  With Webshots being spun out of CNET for 40 MM, I wonder if this can be a good business for Flickr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuts4all.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755615</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuts4all.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755615</guid>
		<description>It would be funny if the image that was 2 billion would be something else.

I'm sure I contributed to around 2% of the images on it. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be funny if the image that was 2 billion would be something else.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure I contributed to around 2% of the images on it. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ree Tanjuatco</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755580</link>
		<dc:creator>Ree Tanjuatco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755580</guid>
		<description>You just could not resist the temptation of comparing Facebook or inserting a line about fb do you? :-D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just could not resist the temptation of comparing Facebook or inserting a line about fb do you? <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tyler Wright</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755467</link>
		<dc:creator>Tyler Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755467</guid>
		<description>It has the beautifully minimalist title “Picture 098.”

Haa!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has the beautifully minimalist title “Picture 098.”</p>
<p>Haa!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fyi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755458</link>
		<dc:creator>fyi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 00:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/13/2-billion-photos-on-flickr/#comment-1755458</guid>
		<description>it's 'yukesmooks'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s &#8216;yukesmooks&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.273 seconds -->
