<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PayPerPost&#8217;s Latest Gimmick &#8211; SocialSpark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:59:20 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: More paying sites to boost your earnings!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-2/#comment-2590810</link>
		<dc:creator>More paying sites to boost your earnings!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-2590810</guid>
		<description>[...] with bloggers who are willing to take pay per post type advertising and run with it. According to TechCrunch.com, SocialSpark is a network owned and managed by PayPerPost which has renamed it’s parent company [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] with bloggers who are willing to take pay per post type advertising and run with it. According to TechCrunch.com, SocialSpark is a network owned and managed by PayPerPost which has renamed it’s parent company [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PayPerPostの最新策略 - SocialSpark</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-2/#comment-2525534</link>
		<dc:creator>PayPerPostの最新策略 - SocialSpark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 03:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-2525534</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PayPerPostは親会社の社名をIZEAへと変更したのに続き、2008年1月には新たなソーシャルネットワークSocialSparkを開始する。ブロガーと広告主（同社によるとブロガーが8万5000人以上、広告主が1万1000人以上いるという）がプロフィールを用意する。するとサイトを訪れたユーザーが「広告主やブロガーが公開しているプロフィールや関係しているスポンサーの名前やブログに関わるをデータを見る」。「ソーシャルネットワークとしては初めて、広告主を中心に据えて一から作りあげたものだが、他のネットワーク内で行われているような無料で統制されたユーザー情報の流れは失っていない」とCEOのTed Murphyは語っている私にわかる範囲でこれを解釈すると、SocialSparkとは、広告主が、「ペイ・パー・ポスト」型の広告をしようというブロガーに接触するための場である、ということになる。ブロガーの素性を知り、オーディエンスの規模をみる。これは発想としては、何の問題もない。しかし、これがブロゴスフィアにさらに金をばらまき汚染を進めるきっかけになることを考えると、みんなにとってありがたいことではない。PayPerPostへ[原文へ]（翻訳: Nob Takahashi）  ShowListings(&#8221;arc3&#8243;);  ShowListings(&#8221;arc2&#8243;);      AddClipsUrl = &#8216;http://jp.techcrunch.com/archives/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/&#8217;; AddClipsTitle = &#8216;PayPerPostの最新策略 &#8211; SocialSpark&#8217;; AddClipsId = &#8216;2CBE02C952CFE&#8217;; AddClipsBcolor=&#8217;#78BE44&#8242;; AddClipsNcolor=&#8217;#D1E9C0&#8242;; AddClipsTcolor=&#8217;#666666&#8242;; AddClipsType=&#8217;1&#8242;; AddClipsVerticalAlign=&#8217;middle&#8217;;    次の投稿へ 前の投稿へ   レスポンス֤פSNSǡ֤餻פųݤ롣 at Welcome to BOL [Business On Line]11 月 12th, 2007 at 8:21 pm TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &raquo; SocialSpark：カラフルなサクラ4 月 8th, 2008 at 11:46 am   トラックバック [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trying out SocialSpark - Stock Market Analysis at DeepMarket</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-2/#comment-2225783</link>
		<dc:creator>Trying out SocialSpark - Stock Market Analysis at DeepMarket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-2225783</guid>
		<description>[...] PayPerPost&#8217;s Latest Gimmick - SocialSpark [via&#160;Zemanta] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PayPerPost&#8217;s Latest Gimmick &#8211; SocialSpark [via&nbsp;Zemanta] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SocialSpark : Ryan's Journey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-2/#comment-2181013</link>
		<dc:creator>SocialSpark : Ryan's Journey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-2181013</guid>
		<description>[...] atmosphere that connects advertisers to the people who blog/talk about their brands the most. Mike Arrington did a review over at TechCrunch, he said this is just something that pollutes the blogosphere because instead of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] atmosphere that connects advertisers to the people who blog/talk about their brands the most. Mike Arrington did a review over at TechCrunch, he said this is just something that pollutes the blogosphere because instead of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should IZEA Advertisements Be Accepted On TechCrunch? (Updated)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-2/#comment-2048011</link>
		<dc:creator>Should IZEA Advertisements Be Accepted On TechCrunch? (Updated)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 02:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-2048011</guid>
		<description>[...] the company now has other products which we have no particular issue with (example), and RealRank, a new way to rank participating blogs since Google has basically kicked them out of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the company now has other products which we have no particular issue with (example), and RealRank, a new way to rank participating blogs since Google has basically kicked them out of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: They Said, &#8220;Cheer Up, Things Could Be Worse.&#8221; So, I Cheered Up, And Sure Enough, Things Got Worse ! &#124; Cadillac Convertible</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-2/#comment-2037061</link>
		<dc:creator>They Said, &#8220;Cheer Up, Things Could Be Worse.&#8221; So, I Cheered Up, And Sure Enough, Things Got Worse ! &#124; Cadillac Convertible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 09:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-2037061</guid>
		<description>[...] PayPerPost&#8217;s Latest Gimmick - SocialSpark [via&#160;Zemanta] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PayPerPost&#8217;s Latest Gimmick &#8211; SocialSpark [via&nbsp;Zemanta] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: IZEA to launch SocialSpark in Jan &#8216;08 &#124; Online Presence - Let's Make Money Online</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-2/#comment-1950551</link>
		<dc:creator>IZEA to launch SocialSpark in Jan &#8216;08 &#124; Online Presence - Let's Make Money Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1950551</guid>
		<description>[...] can read mixed reviews about it at Mashable, TechCrunch, and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can read mixed reviews about it at Mashable, TechCrunch, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-2/#comment-1791680</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 19:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1791680</guid>
		<description>can I get paid to vote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>can I get paid to vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Westfall</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-2/#comment-1789161</link>
		<dc:creator>James Westfall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 08:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1789161</guid>
		<description>This is what Pay-Per-Post should have been in its first iteration. There&#039;s nothing truly novel, special, or &quot;ground-breaking&quot; in SocialSpark. All of these new features should&#039;ve made v1. They do get a point for a neat web 2.0-ey name, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what Pay-Per-Post should have been in its first iteration. There&#8217;s nothing truly novel, special, or &#8220;ground-breaking&#8221; in SocialSpark. All of these new features should&#8217;ve made v1. They do get a point for a neat web 2.0-ey name, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamaipanese</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-2/#comment-1762950</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamaipanese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1762950</guid>
		<description>as long as the advertising is disclosed I see no problem with this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as long as the advertising is disclosed I see no problem with this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-2/#comment-1762046</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 01:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1762046</guid>
		<description>I never heard of this pay per post concept. I think I&#039;ll try it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never heard of this pay per post concept. I think I&#8217;ll try it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Andrews</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1755995</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 06:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1755995</guid>
		<description>I think people have a right to earn an extra income by doing paid posting. What does it really pollute? People can always click away as they have always done unless it&#039;s of interest to them. If it&#039;s just an out an out ad fest from start to finish then I would agree, no one likes all potatoes and no meat unless your a vegetarian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think people have a right to earn an extra income by doing paid posting. What does it really pollute? People can always click away as they have always done unless it&#8217;s of interest to them. If it&#8217;s just an out an out ad fest from start to finish then I would agree, no one likes all potatoes and no meat unless your a vegetarian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Adair</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1754144</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Adair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1754144</guid>
		<description>They seem to have made their $10m investment last very well. I really enjoy their video podcast. Good luck to them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They seem to have made their $10m investment last very well. I really enjoy their video podcast. Good luck to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Money Blurbs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1753286</link>
		<dc:creator>Money Blurbs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 04:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1753286</guid>
		<description>Social Spark is much better than its predecessor. It has in post disclosure, no-follow links (if advertiser requires it), banner ads etc. Its a well thought out system and I am sure will please all the advertisers and search engines as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Social Spark is much better than its predecessor. It has in post disclosure, no-follow links (if advertiser requires it), banner ads etc. Its a well thought out system and I am sure will please all the advertisers and search engines as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lori</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1752164</link>
		<dc:creator>Lori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 18:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1752164</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m looking forward to it.  Really, I wish you would just quit trying to find the negative all the time.  I mean come on, there are MUCH more important things to worry about in life than crapping all over paid to blog companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to it.  Really, I wish you would just quit trying to find the negative all the time.  I mean come on, there are MUCH more important things to worry about in life than crapping all over paid to blog companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: share.websitemagazine.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1751792</link>
		<dc:creator>share.websitemagazine.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1751792</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PayPerPost’s Latest Gimmick...&lt;/strong&gt;

PayPerpost, which has renamed it’s parent company IZEA, says they’ll be launching a new social network in January 2008 called SocialSpark....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PayPerPost’s Latest Gimmick&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>PayPerpost, which has renamed it’s parent company IZEA, says they’ll be launching a new social network in January 2008 called SocialSpark&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1751566</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1751566</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;i would and will use PPP once my site is ready to launch BUT i will require 2 important things from bloggers

1- be 100% neutral, i want you opinion even if its negative.
2- you MUST state in the blog that:
A- I paid for a neutral review.
B- I requested that you state it in your blog.

is that still wrong?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have seen advertisers ask for essentially these criteria through PPP, although the &#039;neutral&#039; tone category in PPP is perceived by most bloggers to include constructive criticism but not truly negative commentary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>i would and will use PPP once my site is ready to launch BUT i will require 2 important things from bloggers</p>
<p>1- be 100% neutral, i want you opinion even if its negative.<br />
2- you MUST state in the blog that:<br />
A- I paid for a neutral review.<br />
B- I requested that you state it in your blog.</p>
<p>is that still wrong?</p></blockquote>
<p>I have seen advertisers ask for essentially these criteria through PPP, although the &#8216;neutral&#8217; tone category in PPP is perceived by most bloggers to include constructive criticism but not truly negative commentary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seovice</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1751498</link>
		<dc:creator>Seovice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1751498</guid>
		<description>IZEA&#039;s on the right track, now it&#039;s a question of will the online community embrace their platform? Read my post about it on http://www.seovice.ning.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IZEA&#8217;s on the right track, now it&#8217;s a question of will the online community embrace their platform? Read my post about it on <a href="http://www.seovice.ning.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.seovice.ning.com'>http://www.seovice.ning.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Get Paid 2 Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1751246</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Paid 2 Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 07:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1751246</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;TechCrunch does not like IZEA new SocialSpark...&lt;/strong&gt;

Tech Crunch blog does not really like new idea from Pay Per Post now under the new mother company called IZEA. PPP will launch a social network called SocialSpark. 
 
&#8220;Advertisers and bloggers can interact in this social space and maybe agree on ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>TechCrunch does not like IZEA new SocialSpark&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Tech Crunch blog does not really like new idea from Pay Per Post now under the new mother company called IZEA. PPP will launch a social network called SocialSpark. </p>
<p>&#8220;Advertisers and bloggers can interact in this social space and maybe agree on &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1751050</link>
		<dc:creator>anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1751050</guid>
		<description>It would be wonderful to know if this hatred you have for them is really real.
There is information to be shared, but fear of repercussions is huge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be wonderful to know if this hatred you have for them is really real.<br />
There is information to be shared, but fear of repercussions is huge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david hyman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1750972</link>
		<dc:creator>david hyman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1750972</guid>
		<description>almost everything one reads in the newspapers is paid for via p.r. firms. so, perhaps this cuts out the middleman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>almost everything one reads in the newspapers is paid for via p.r. firms. so, perhaps this cuts out the middleman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ice</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1750875</link>
		<dc:creator>ice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 03:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1750875</guid>
		<description>I have a blog that gets ok traffic 100k+, but I would like to add some other advertising other than adsense ads.  Not nessecerily in post, but more like blog sponsors, exactly like how tech crunch does it.   The problem is it&#039;s hard to orchestrate that contact between me and advertisers.  Does this new featured from PPP help that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a blog that gets ok traffic 100k+, but I would like to add some other advertising other than adsense ads.  Not nessecerily in post, but more like blog sponsors, exactly like how tech crunch does it.   The problem is it&#8217;s hard to orchestrate that contact between me and advertisers.  Does this new featured from PPP help that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1750803</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 02:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1750803</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t write paid posts??? My eyes must be deceiving me. Darn these trifocals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t write paid posts??? My eyes must be deceiving me. Darn these trifocals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meneame.net</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1750522</link>
		<dc:creator>meneame.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 00:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1750522</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Una red social creada para conectar a Bloggers y a los anunciantes dispuestos a pagar por posts (Ingles)...&lt;/strong&gt;

Para los que estén interesados en monetizar su blog acá parece nacer una nueva fuente de ingresos si es que estan dispuestos a vender sus contenidos....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Una red social creada para conectar a Bloggers y a los anunciantes dispuestos a pagar por posts (Ingles)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Para los que estén interesados en monetizar su blog acá parece nacer una nueva fuente de ingresos si es que estan dispuestos a vender sus contenidos&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yelp Sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/comment-page-1/#comment-1750387</link>
		<dc:creator>Yelp Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/payperposts-latest-gimmick-socialspark/#comment-1750387</guid>
		<description>frankly yelp is much worst than ppt.  there is no disclosure from the shills on that site that they work for the company.  at least on ppt there is some disclosure, on yelp there is pure deceit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>frankly yelp is much worst than ppt.  there is no disclosure from the shills on that site that they work for the company.  at least on ppt there is some disclosure, on yelp there is pure deceit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
