<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft Wants To Create The Next Flickr</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 02:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Windows Vista News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1763819</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 01:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1763819</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Comment on Microsoft Wants To Create The Next Flickr by Justin...&lt;/strong&gt;

Did you see this post at www.techcrunch.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Comment on Microsoft Wants To Create The Next Flickr by Justin&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Did you see this post at <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com.." rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1763801</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 01:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1763801</guid>
		<description>How do you think? if the reason interferes with evolution, it too evolution? its soon be like  &lt;a href="http://ivbndu.247ihost.com/9d0bd0/50-cent-diss.html" rel="nofollow"&gt; 50 cent diss &lt;/a&gt;
.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you think? if the reason interferes with evolution, it too evolution? its soon be like  <a href="http://ivbndu.247ihost.com/9d0bd0/50-cent-diss.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/ivbndu.247ihost.com');"> 50 cent diss </a><br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bitelia &#187; Microsoft planea lanzar un competidor de Flickr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1751847</link>
		<dc:creator>Bitelia &#187; Microsoft planea lanzar un competidor de Flickr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1751847</guid>
		<description>[...] Enlace: Windows Live wants to build Flickr competitor &#124; Vía: TechCrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Enlace: Windows Live wants to build Flickr competitor | Vía: TechCrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: StockPhotoTalk &#124; Special Interest Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1751662</link>
		<dc:creator>StockPhotoTalk &#124; Special Interest Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1751662</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;QuickLinks For 2007-11-12...&lt;/strong&gt;

PhotoShelter Collection online: The newly launched PhotoShelter Collection enables photographers of all levels to benefit from a worldwide image-selling marketplace...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>QuickLinks For 2007-11-12&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>PhotoShelter Collection online: The newly launched PhotoShelter Collection enables photographers of all levels to benefit from a worldwide image-selling marketplace&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techticles</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1751266</link>
		<dc:creator>Techticles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 08:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1751266</guid>
		<description>Steve Ballmer is a genius, he doesn't need to be number 1 in everything to make Microsoft dominant. 

Numbers 1 - 4 in everything they do would ensure their dominance.

Everyone of you here is laughing at Steve Ballmer, well look at your bank account against his and look who's laughing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve Ballmer is a genius, he doesn&#8217;t need to be number 1 in everything to make Microsoft dominant. </p>
<p>Numbers 1 - 4 in everything they do would ensure their dominance.</p>
<p>Everyone of you here is laughing at Steve Ballmer, well look at your bank account against his and look who&#8217;s laughing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rickdog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1751126</link>
		<dc:creator>rickdog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 05:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1751126</guid>
		<description>i wonder is Ballmer is as goofy as he looks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i wonder is Ballmer is as goofy as he looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Wilensky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1751037</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Wilensky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 04:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1751037</guid>
		<description>Bravo, brvura @20:

'...paroxysms of agonizing frustration..." viz Microsoft.

How can we adequately characterize a company that has infinite access to talent, infinite resources, etc., who releases an abortion of an operating systems as it's coup de gras of years labours, follows and never innovates in the horizontal market, and yet.....profits and thrives?

I call it the manifest destiny of a critical mass. They can't but make money, even when throwing dung against the wall as a legacy of their previous masterful hegemony of the PC desktop, and  to a lesser extent, the back end architecture.

There is one exception and it is no guarantee of anything: Developer tools. They  make some decent, well integrated tools that are good for certain heavy client applications. But even this is eroding.  

For every Microsoft product profit center, there is an analogue or alternative not only in the open source front, but alternative tools in general. Notice, I have not mentioned Apple, oops, I just did.

I am -  was - an XP power user, then on a lark to setup a west coast office, bought a cheap Mac Mini; not because I wanted a Mac, I just needed a package that was easy to schlep back to the office.

Long story short: I installed Parallels, XP, and at first used the Mac side rarely, it was strange to me. But as time went on, I booted Windows less and less, and now, never. I am saved. 

And we have Vista machines in my office, so as you see, Msoft got its pound of flesh by virtue of a few new Lenovo Laptops we had to have. 

Vista is, my dear friends, an abortion. And I bring that up on this thread, off topic as it is about Microsoft following by years a past  and established service that they cannot hope to capture, but to merely illustrate the following:

Even with virtually unlimited time and resources, the Msoft organization could not deliver a product that they should have crushed and seduce to greatness. All other failures are of a piece and follow from that observation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bravo, brvura @20:</p>
<p>&#8216;&#8230;paroxysms of agonizing frustration&#8230;&#8221; viz Microsoft.</p>
<p>How can we adequately characterize a company that has infinite access to talent, infinite resources, etc., who releases an abortion of an operating systems as it&#8217;s coup de gras of years labours, follows and never innovates in the horizontal market, and yet&#8230;..profits and thrives?</p>
<p>I call it the manifest destiny of a critical mass. They can&#8217;t but make money, even when throwing dung against the wall as a legacy of their previous masterful hegemony of the PC desktop, and  to a lesser extent, the back end architecture.</p>
<p>There is one exception and it is no guarantee of anything: Developer tools. They  make some decent, well integrated tools that are good for certain heavy client applications. But even this is eroding.  </p>
<p>For every Microsoft product profit center, there is an analogue or alternative not only in the open source front, but alternative tools in general. Notice, I have not mentioned Apple, oops, I just did.</p>
<p>I am -  was - an XP power user, then on a lark to setup a west coast office, bought a cheap Mac Mini; not because I wanted a Mac, I just needed a package that was easy to schlep back to the office.</p>
<p>Long story short: I installed Parallels, XP, and at first used the Mac side rarely, it was strange to me. But as time went on, I booted Windows less and less, and now, never. I am saved. </p>
<p>And we have Vista machines in my office, so as you see, Msoft got its pound of flesh by virtue of a few new Lenovo Laptops we had to have. </p>
<p>Vista is, my dear friends, an abortion. And I bring that up on this thread, off topic as it is about Microsoft following by years a past  and established service that they cannot hope to capture, but to merely illustrate the following:</p>
<p>Even with virtually unlimited time and resources, the Msoft organization could not deliver a product that they should have crushed and seduce to greatness. All other failures are of a piece and follow from that observation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niraj</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1750964</link>
		<dc:creator>Niraj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 03:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1750964</guid>
		<description>FYI, they're already creating the next generation of Flickr using Flickr data itself in Photosynth:

http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/01/microsoft-to-present-fly-through-photo-app-photosynth/

This would obviously not be a Flickr competitor in that it has a different audience and purpose, but the job description provided fits the development of this tool as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, they&#8217;re already creating the next generation of Flickr using Flickr data itself in Photosynth:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/08/01/microsoft-to-present-fly-through-photo-app-photosynth/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2006.....hotosynth/</a></p>
<p>This would obviously not be a Flickr competitor in that it has a different audience and purpose, but the job description provided fits the development of this tool as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Moy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1750816</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Moy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 02:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1750816</guid>
		<description>I am interested in Microsoft's plans, but I am not interested in the final product. Their plans show what Microsoft is attempting to achieve, so understanding that is worthwhile. But we already know their product will suck, so looking at that is a waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am interested in Microsoft&#8217;s plans, but I am not interested in the final product. Their plans show what Microsoft is attempting to achieve, so understanding that is worthwhile. But we already know their product will suck, so looking at that is a waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meneame.net</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1750312</link>
		<dc:creator>meneame.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 22:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1750312</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;¿Busca Microsoft crear el siguiente Flickr?...&lt;/strong&gt;

La oferta de trabajo que se puede leer en la web de Microsoft parece que busca crear una competencia directa de Flickr: Come make Windows Live the best place to share your digital memories! Heard of Flickr? YouTube? How about. Mac? This role will work ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>¿Busca Microsoft crear el siguiente Flickr?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>La oferta de trabajo que se puede leer en la web de Microsoft parece que busca crear una competencia directa de Flickr: Come make Windows Live the best place to share your digital memories! Heard of Flickr? YouTube? How about. Mac? This role will work &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web earnings</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1750005</link>
		<dc:creator>web earnings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1750005</guid>
		<description>This sounds good. I've been active blogger for PPP with my other blog. However dollar falling has made it less attractive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds good. I&#8217;ve been active blogger for PPP with my other blog. However dollar falling has made it less attractive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snyggast</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1749942</link>
		<dc:creator>Snyggast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1749942</guid>
		<description>wow some folks really believe Goog is being altruistic for offering OpenSocial. lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow some folks really believe Goog is being altruistic for offering OpenSocial. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Savoy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1749749</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Savoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1749749</guid>
		<description>it's a tragicomedy of sorts to watch Microsoft in  the  paroxysms          of agonizing  frustration in its utter failure to make the  slightest 
headway with any of the umpteenth insipid, half-ass  iterations               it continues to serve up to the public in the hopes that some- 
thing, please God!, is going to stick. So now, at least up until 
the next online killer app that strikes their fancy they've got 
their eyes on Flickr.

It's downright embarrassing to observe Balllmer in the throes 
of what appears the heat of Vulcan mating season, berserk
and  irrational wherever he goes, the manifestations of what 
surely must be Microsoft's  remarkable ineptitude outside the desktop that weighs so heavily on his mind.

It boggles the mind to consider the litany of loser offerings 
they have had the myopic audacity to dredge up in the 
megalomaniac delusion that the power they yield like a 
Sword of Damocles over their legions of groveling,
subservient desktop users will somehow miraculously manage 
to extend itself  beyond the hegemony of the desktop death-grip
they rule over with impunity. 

The reality of Microsoft in the infinite trail of abject failure outside
the realm of the desktop is its emphatic corporate legacy  as 
nothing but a usurper of ideas, a pillager of concepts, an imitator, and a poor one at that, an impostor, a corporate charlatan bereft 
of a scintilla of creativity, of imagination, nothing but a fierce, fearsome predator-bully, its ability and capacity to strike fear 
within us all as its most formidable offering of all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a tragicomedy of sorts to watch Microsoft in  the  paroxysms          of agonizing  frustration in its utter failure to make the  slightest<br />
headway with any of the umpteenth insipid, half-ass  iterations               it continues to serve up to the public in the hopes that some-<br />
thing, please God!, is going to stick. So now, at least up until<br />
the next online killer app that strikes their fancy they&#8217;ve got<br />
their eyes on Flickr.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s downright embarrassing to observe Balllmer in the throes<br />
of what appears the heat of Vulcan mating season, berserk<br />
and  irrational wherever he goes, the manifestations of what<br />
surely must be Microsoft&#8217;s  remarkable ineptitude outside the desktop that weighs so heavily on his mind.</p>
<p>It boggles the mind to consider the litany of loser offerings<br />
they have had the myopic audacity to dredge up in the<br />
megalomaniac delusion that the power they yield like a<br />
Sword of Damocles over their legions of groveling,<br />
subservient desktop users will somehow miraculously manage<br />
to extend itself  beyond the hegemony of the desktop death-grip<br />
they rule over with impunity. </p>
<p>The reality of Microsoft in the infinite trail of abject failure outside<br />
the realm of the desktop is its emphatic corporate legacy  as<br />
nothing but a usurper of ideas, a pillager of concepts, an imitator, and a poor one at that, an impostor, a corporate charlatan bereft<br />
of a scintilla of creativity, of imagination, nothing but a fierce, fearsome predator-bully, its ability and capacity to strike fear<br />
within us all as its most formidable offering of all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick of cebu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1749615</link>
		<dc:creator>nick of cebu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:06:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1749615</guid>
		<description>This is why I get annoyed when MS use the word "innovate" in conjunction with any of their products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why I get annoyed when MS use the word &#8220;innovate&#8221; in conjunction with any of their products.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: børge</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1749449</link>
		<dc:creator>børge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1749449</guid>
		<description>The next Flickr has already been created, and it's called Ipernity ( http://ipernity.com ). I don't understand the international version of TC hasn't profiled this fantastic social photo/video/audio sharing site, TC France has:
http://fr.techcrunch.com/2006/05/22/ipernity-une-nouvelle-alternative-francaise-a-myspace/

Admittedly it's a Flickr rip off, but it's such a so-much-better-than-original rip off!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The next Flickr has already been created, and it&#8217;s called Ipernity ( <a href="http://ipernity.com" rel="nofollow">http://ipernity.com</a> ). I don&#8217;t understand the international version of TC hasn&#8217;t profiled this fantastic social photo/video/audio sharing site, TC France has:<br />
<a href="http://fr.techcrunch.com/2006/05/22/ipernity-une-nouvelle-alternative-francaise-a-myspace/" rel="nofollow">http://fr.techcrunch.com/2006/.....a-myspace/</a></p>
<p>Admittedly it&#8217;s a Flickr rip off, but it&#8217;s such a so-much-better-than-original rip off!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 42mb.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1749166</link>
		<dc:creator>42mb.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 13:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1749166</guid>
		<description>I think better they should buy flickr rather than making a clone site like flickr, it would be really hard for them to make such largest community like flickr, that is not easy job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think better they should buy flickr rather than making a clone site like flickr, it would be really hard for them to make such largest community like flickr, that is not easy job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pj</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748728</link>
		<dc:creator>pj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 10:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748728</guid>
		<description>"How about. Mac?"

No. How about .Mac? 

- pj
(it's subtle difference, I'll grant you...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How about. Mac?&#8221;</p>
<p>No. How about .Mac? </p>
<p>- pj<br />
(it&#8217;s subtle difference, I&#8217;ll grant you&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leonardo Cassarani</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748522</link>
		<dc:creator>Leonardo Cassarani</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 08:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748522</guid>
		<description>This is ridiculous. We have all of that already, it's called Flickr, Picasa, and just about a thousand other names. What prompted Google to release OpenSocial was the need for a way for developers (and, ultimately, users) to deal with the staggering amount of social networks around the Net. What Microsoft is doing by replicating others' good ideas is just creating a need for another OpenSocial.

Question is, how can they always be so dumb and unaware of the direction the market is taking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ridiculous. We have all of that already, it&#8217;s called Flickr, Picasa, and just about a thousand other names. What prompted Google to release OpenSocial was the need for a way for developers (and, ultimately, users) to deal with the staggering amount of social networks around the Net. What Microsoft is doing by replicating others&#8217; good ideas is just creating a need for another OpenSocial.</p>
<p>Question is, how can they always be so dumb and unaware of the direction the market is taking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Z</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748445</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 07:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748445</guid>
		<description>Yahoo should have bought Facebook for six billion. They scoffed instead. Now see who is having the last laugh? 

The Microsoft deal makes it worth over 20 billion. Another opportunity squandered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo should have bought Facebook for six billion. They scoffed instead. Now see who is having the last laugh? </p>
<p>The Microsoft deal makes it worth over 20 billion. Another opportunity squandered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axel Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748418</link>
		<dc:creator>Axel Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 07:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748418</guid>
		<description>Oh, I know: Let's call it Ballmr!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I know: Let&#8217;s call it Ballmr!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: san</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748391</link>
		<dc:creator>san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 07:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748391</guid>
		<description>flickr is irreplacable - ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>flickr is irreplacable - ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron B. Hockley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748154</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron B. Hockley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 05:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748154</guid>
		<description>Why can't Microsoft do something new?  Why is it that they are always trying to catch up; why are they trying to go out and clone Flickr or YouTube or whomever?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why can&#8217;t Microsoft do something new?  Why is it that they are always trying to catch up; why are they trying to go out and clone Flickr or YouTube or whomever?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adair</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748122</link>
		<dc:creator>adair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 04:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748122</guid>
		<description>not gonna happen. that job is not going far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not gonna happen. that job is not going far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gregory</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748097</link>
		<dc:creator>gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 04:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748097</guid>
		<description>i downloaded windows live writer yesterday, and what opens first is a windows live homepage... i cannot say why, but it felt creepy, like the gate that leads to a chute that leads to a corral, and my first instincts were, no!, and i deleted that out of my system as fast as i could...

odd, why such a response should be... is it in the design?, am i feeling the intention behind the design subliminally?

either way, it felt like it was something they made for &lt;i&gt;their&lt;/i&gt; advantage, not mine.... so, thanks but no thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i downloaded windows live writer yesterday, and what opens first is a windows live homepage&#8230; i cannot say why, but it felt creepy, like the gate that leads to a chute that leads to a corral, and my first instincts were, no!, and i deleted that out of my system as fast as i could&#8230;</p>
<p>odd, why such a response should be&#8230; is it in the design?, am i feeling the intention behind the design subliminally?</p>
<p>either way, it felt like it was something they made for <i>their</i> advantage, not mine&#8230;. so, thanks but no thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i'm Ronald Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748092</link>
		<dc:creator>i'm Ronald Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 04:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/10/microsoft-wants-to-create-the-next-flickr/#comment-1748092</guid>
		<description>Everybody wants to create 'the next' Flickr.
Get in line Microsoft.

MS is a big square - they don't know how to create appeal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody wants to create &#8216;the next&#8217; Flickr.<br />
Get in line Microsoft.</p>
<p>MS is a big square - they don&#8217;t know how to create appeal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.106 seconds -->
