<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attack of the Splogs—One Of Our Posts Copied 152 Times Without Attribution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:54:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: That Whining Sound You Hear Is The Death Wheeze Of Newspapers &#171; KPI Agent</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2821039</link>
		<dc:creator>That Whining Sound You Hear Is The Death Wheeze Of Newspapers &#171; KPI Agent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 09:57:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2821039</guid>
		<description>[...] there certainly is wholesale theft going on. It happens to newspapers, it happens to TechCrunch, and it happens to all big publishers on the Web. But don’t be confused. That is not what is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there certainly is wholesale theft going on. It happens to newspapers, it happens to TechCrunch, and it happens to all big publishers on the Web. But don’t be confused. That is not what is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fair Syndication - On the Right Track? &#171; Splog Spot Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2718098</link>
		<dc:creator>Fair Syndication - On the Right Track? &#171; Splog Spot Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:10:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2718098</guid>
		<description>[...] on the side of the consortium they say that they are fighting for the said right, getting these splog sites to get their claimed earnings from ads but steering some of the profits down the line to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on the side of the consortium they say that they are fighting for the said right, getting these splog sites to get their claimed earnings from ads but steering some of the profits down the line to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content! &#171; shankarsoma; Change the View</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2709704</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content! &#171; shankarsoma; Change the View</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 06:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2709704</guid>
		<description>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So. &#124; Tech-Framers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2709030</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So. &#124; Tech-Framers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2709030</guid>
		<description>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So. &#124; TechgearX.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2708960</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So. &#124; TechgearX.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2708960</guid>
		<description>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Techeroid &#187; Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2708854</link>
		<dc:creator>Techeroid &#187; Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2708854</guid>
		<description>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So. &#124; UpOff.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2708848</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So. &#124; UpOff.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2708848</guid>
		<description>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: infoyourway.com &#187; Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2708821</link>
		<dc:creator>infoyourway.com &#187; Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2708821</guid>
		<description>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2708782</link>
		<dc:creator>Should Ad Networks Pay Publishers For Stolen Content? The Fair Syndication Consortium Thinks So.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2708782</guid>
		<description>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fair Syndication Consortium is initially trying to address a legitimate problem on the Web: the proliferation of splogs (spam blogs) and other sites which do nothing more than republish the entire feed of news sites and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; That Whining Sound You Hear Is The Death Wheeze Of Newspapers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2692335</link>
		<dc:creator>The Far Edge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; That Whining Sound You Hear Is The Death Wheeze Of Newspapers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 03:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2692335</guid>
		<description>[...] there certainly is wholesale theft going on. It happens to newspapers, it happens to TechCrunch, and it happens to all big publishers on the Web. But don’t be confused. That is not what is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there certainly is wholesale theft going on. It happens to newspapers, it happens to TechCrunch, and it happens to all big publishers on the Web. But don’t be confused. That is not what is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deutsche Printpresse läuft berserk &#171; Der Don</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2691061</link>
		<dc:creator>Deutsche Printpresse läuft berserk &#171; Der Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 06:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2691061</guid>
		<description>[...] there certainly is wholesale theft going on. It happens to newspapers, it happens to TechCrunch, and it happens to all big publishers on the Web. But don’t be confused. That is not what is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there certainly is wholesale theft going on. It happens to newspapers, it happens to TechCrunch, and it happens to all big publishers on the Web. But don’t be confused. That is not what is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Entendez-vous la complainte de l&#8217;industrie de la presse?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2688125</link>
		<dc:creator>Entendez-vous la complainte de l&#8217;industrie de la presse?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2688125</guid>
		<description>[...] contenus sont dérobés ici ou là. Cela arrive aux journaux et même à certains grands blogs (comme TechCrunch), mais ne nous méprenons pas, les millions de blogs et Google ne volent pas. C&#8217;est [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] contenus sont dérobés ici ou là. Cela arrive aux journaux et même à certains grands blogs (comme TechCrunch), mais ne nous méprenons pas, les millions de blogs et Google ne volent pas. C&#8217;est [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That Whining Sound You Hear Is The Death Wheeze Of Newspapers &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2688111</link>
		<dc:creator>That Whining Sound You Hear Is The Death Wheeze Of Newspapers &#124; CHARGED's Digital Lifestyle at Work or Play</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 16:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2688111</guid>
		<description>[...] there certainly is wholesale theft going on. It happens to newspapers, it happens to TechCrunch, and it happens to all big publishers on the Web. But don&#8217;t be confused. That is not what is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there certainly is wholesale theft going on. It happens to newspapers, it happens to TechCrunch, and it happens to all big publishers on the Web. But don&#8217;t be confused. That is not what is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That Whining Sound You Hear Is The Death Wheeze Of Newspapers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2688024</link>
		<dc:creator>That Whining Sound You Hear Is The Death Wheeze Of Newspapers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2688024</guid>
		<description>[...] there certainly is wholesale theft going on. It happens to newspapers, it happens to TechCrunch, and it happens to all big publishers on the Web. But don&#8217;t be confused. That is not what is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] there certainly is wholesale theft going on. It happens to newspapers, it happens to TechCrunch, and it happens to all big publishers on the Web. But don&#8217;t be confused. That is not what is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology News for November 9, 2007 &#124; Tips Dr.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2597290</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology News for November 9, 2007 &#124; Tips Dr.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 07:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2597290</guid>
		<description>[...] Attack of the Splogs—One Of Our Posts Copied 152 Times Without Attribution Here at TechCrunch, there is nothing we love more than when one of our posts gets linked to and talked about. And like the majority of other blogs out there, we try to be good citizens by linking back to any source from which we excerpt. But there is a growing minority of spam blogs, or splogs, that indiscriminately take entire posts from other blogs and present them as their own. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Attack of the Splogs—One Of Our Posts Copied 152 Times Without Attribution Here at TechCrunch, there is nothing we love more than when one of our posts gets linked to and talked about. And like the majority of other blogs out there, we try to be good citizens by linking back to any source from which we excerpt. But there is a growing minority of spam blogs, or splogs, that indiscriminately take entire posts from other blogs and present them as their own. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: منتديات</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2578909</link>
		<dc:creator>منتديات</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 16:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2578909</guid>
		<description>thanks , For you it`s graet job</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks , For you it`s graet job</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TagEdge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Posts Have Been Copied Without Proper Attribution</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2492127</link>
		<dc:creator>TagEdge &#187; Blog Archive &#187; My Posts Have Been Copied Without Proper Attribution</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 16:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2492127</guid>
		<description>[...] blog that I respect and religiously read every day, among some several other technology blogs, has posted a post pertaining to this issue. They called it spam blogs, or splogs, that indiscriminately take entire [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog that I respect and religiously read every day, among some several other technology blogs, has posted a post pertaining to this issue. They called it spam blogs, or splogs, that indiscriminately take entire [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blight Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Profits From MySpace Attackers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-2005627</link>
		<dc:creator>Blight Watch &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Profits From MySpace Attackers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-2005627</guid>
		<description>[...] make a fairly convincing case that Google Adsense has been the single largest factor driving the creation of Splogs and MFA Webspam. Googles contribution to Virtual Blight goes beyond monetizing bad content for spammy webmasters. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] make a fairly convincing case that Google Adsense has been the single largest factor driving the creation of Splogs and MFA Webspam. Googles contribution to Virtual Blight goes beyond monetizing bad content for spammy webmasters. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bilgi yarışması</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-1776719</link>
		<dc:creator>bilgi yarışması</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-1776719</guid>
		<description>There is a simple solution for this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a simple solution for this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wade</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-1755910</link>
		<dc:creator>wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-1755910</guid>
		<description>By the way... they also have an RSS to that page...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way&#8230; they also have an RSS to that page&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wade</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-1755909</link>
		<dc:creator>wade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 04:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-1755909</guid>
		<description>We have this problem. There is a, well almost a mirror of our blog, out there. Every post we do, in it&#039;s entirety... 

Our blog
http://blog.outdoorzy.com

Outdoorzy Poser!!!
http://www.newsalloy.com/feed/203753/

Nutz!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have this problem. There is a, well almost a mirror of our blog, out there. Every post we do, in it&#8217;s entirety&#8230; </p>
<p>Our blog<br />
<a href="http://blog.outdoorzy.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://blog.outdoorzy.com'>http://blog.outdoorzy.com</a></p>
<p>Outdoorzy Poser!!!<br />
<a href="http://www.newsalloy.com/feed/203753/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.newsalloy.com/feed/203753/'>http://www.news...om/feed/203753/</a></p>
<p>Nutz!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Paul Weber</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-1754405</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Paul Weber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-1754405</guid>
		<description>I have this problem all the time.  I have my CC licence information on the bottom of my posts on my blog and in my feeds -- so my name and licence show up on the bot splogs, thus giving me credit at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have this problem all the time.  I have my CC licence information on the bottom of my posts on my blog and in my feeds &#8212; so my name and licence show up on the bot splogs, thus giving me credit at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Kemmish</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-1751725</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Kemmish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-1751725</guid>
		<description>&quot;second - we aren’t going to start suing people for doing this. It would be an incredible waste of time, and it wouldn’t even slow the copying let alone kill it. The search engines need to evolve to deal with this kind of stuff, and effectively keep it invisible. But the problem is those google ads…Google makes money of these sites. A lot of it in the aggregate. So they have an economic incentive NOT to fix the problem.&quot;

The only interpretation that the first half of this paragraph bears is that you&#039;re content for this plagiarism to happen.  So why raise it in the first place?

The second half of the paragraph is a neat illustration of why economies based on ideas proposed by people who can&#039;t follow a thought through to the end generally collapse in a heap.  In what sense is plagiarism &quot;money for old rope&quot; that being paid by Madison Avenue to write narcissistic op-ed pieces isn&#039;t?  Big fleas have littler fleas, upon their backs to bite &#039;em....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;second &#8211; we aren’t going to start suing people for doing this. It would be an incredible waste of time, and it wouldn’t even slow the copying let alone kill it. The search engines need to evolve to deal with this kind of stuff, and effectively keep it invisible. But the problem is those google ads…Google makes money of these sites. A lot of it in the aggregate. So they have an economic incentive NOT to fix the problem.&#8221;</p>
<p>The only interpretation that the first half of this paragraph bears is that you&#8217;re content for this plagiarism to happen.  So why raise it in the first place?</p>
<p>The second half of the paragraph is a neat illustration of why economies based on ideas proposed by people who can&#8217;t follow a thought through to the end generally collapse in a heap.  In what sense is plagiarism &#8220;money for old rope&#8221; that being paid by Madison Avenue to write narcissistic op-ed pieces isn&#8217;t?  Big fleas have littler fleas, upon their backs to bite &#8216;em&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Hickok</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-1750431</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Hickok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 23:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-1750431</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t worry Michael Arrington...these intellectually lazy people can steal your blog post content, but obviously they can&#039;t respond in these comments as eloquently or as compelling as you do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t worry Michael Arrington&#8230;these intellectually lazy people can steal your blog post content, but obviously they can&#8217;t respond in these comments as eloquently or as compelling as you do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Cook</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/comment-page-3/#comment-1749835</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/09/attack-of-the-splogs%e2%80%94one-of-our-posts-copied-152-times-without-attribution/#comment-1749835</guid>
		<description>Finally, albeit somewhat reluctantly because it verges on spam. My full post on this is at http://heresypornographyandtreason.blogspot.com/2007/11/fighting-sploggers-techcrunch-and.html

If Erick feels this is over the line he has my permission to remove it.

--Rick Cook</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, albeit somewhat reluctantly because it verges on spam. My full post on this is at <a href="http://heresypornographyandtreason.blogspot.com/2007/11/fighting-sploggers-techcrunch-and.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://heresypornographyandtreason.blogspot.com/2007/11/fighting-sploggers-techcrunch-and.html'>http://heresypo...crunch-and.html</a></p>
<p>If Erick feels this is over the line he has my permission to remove it.</p>
<p>&#8211;Rick Cook</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
