<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati Drops Content Older Than 6 Months Old</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 23:55:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GNC-2007-11-06 #315 &#124; Geek News Central</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-2702073</link>
		<dc:creator>GNC-2007-11-06 #315 &#124; Geek News Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-2702073</guid>
		<description>[...] Cool Mini Camcorder  Mini Vacuum Powered by USB Quicktime 7 Bugg Google GPhone is Vaporware Technorati data RIP at 6 Months ZiLok want to rent something? ICQ still King some places Shuttle on way Home Leopard application [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cool Mini Camcorder  Mini Vacuum Powered by USB Quicktime 7 Bugg Google GPhone is Vaporware Technorati data RIP at 6 Months ZiLok want to rent something? ICQ still King some places Shuttle on way Home Leopard application [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technorati rimuove dall&#8217;indice contenuti più vecchi di 6 mesi - Simone Carletti&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-2597848</link>
		<dc:creator>Technorati rimuove dall&#8217;indice contenuti più vecchi di 6 mesi - Simone Carletti&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 22:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-2597848</guid>
		<description>[...] Sarò all&#8217;antica, ma ho sempre creduto che non ci fosse risposta a questa domanda, o meglio, che la risposta fosse niente. Invece sbagliavo, questa domanda deve avere una risposta se Technorati ha deciso che vale la pena rimuovere i dati più vecchi di 6 mesi. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sarò all&#8217;antica, ma ho sempre creduto che non ci fosse risposta a questa domanda, o meglio, che la risposta fosse niente. Invece sbagliavo, questa domanda deve avere una risposta se Technorati ha deciso che vale la pena rimuovere i dati più vecchi di 6 mesi. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WinExtra - Is that another nail in the coffin?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-2459062</link>
		<dc:creator>WinExtra - Is that another nail in the coffin?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 05:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-2459062</guid>
		<description>[...] as Duncan Riley at TechCrunch points out that most people may not care because they have already switched to using Google&#8217;s BlogSearch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Duncan Riley at TechCrunch points out that most people may not care because they have already switched to using Google&#8217;s BlogSearch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Technorati’s total funding revealed - $21.6 to date in 3 rounds Web 2.0 Money: The Money &#38; Business Behind the Web 2.0 Innovations</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1918141</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Technorati’s total funding revealed - $21.6 to date in 3 rounds Web 2.0 Money: The Money &#38; Business Behind the Web 2.0 Innovations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 16:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1918141</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.niallkennedy.com/blog/2006/12/google-blog-search-technorati-market-share.html http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/ http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-v-technorati-and-hitwise-v-comscore/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.niallkennedy.com/blog/2006/12/google-blog-search-technorati-market-share.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.niallkennedy.com/blog/2006/12/google-blog-search-technorati-market-share.html'>http://www.nial...rket-share.html</a> <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/'>http://www.tech...n-6-months-old/</a> <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-v-technorati-and-hitwise-v-comscore/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/28/google-v-technorati-and-hitwise-v-comscore/'>http://www.tech...ise-v-comscore/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Supremus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1791807</link>
		<dc:creator>Supremus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1791807</guid>
		<description>Both Google BlogSearch and Technorati have a lot of Spam. Technorati has lost relevance today imo.

I think its time for a &quot;social&quot; wiki style blog search engine. I dunno why it has not been done yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both Google BlogSearch and Technorati have a lot of Spam. Technorati has lost relevance today imo.</p>
<p>I think its time for a &#8220;social&#8221; wiki style blog search engine. I dunno why it has not been done yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blog-thing : Best of Feeds - 19 links - blogging, tips, google, opensocial, community</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1789832</link>
		<dc:creator>blog-thing : Best of Feeds - 19 links - blogging, tips, google, opensocial, community</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 19:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1789832</guid>
		<description>[...] [TECHNORATI] Technorati Drops Content Older Than 6 Months Old [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [TECHNORATI] Technorati Drops Content Older Than 6 Months Old [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Technorati Even Relevant Anymore? &#8212; BloggingNotes.net</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1784139</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Technorati Even Relevant Anymore? &#8212; BloggingNotes.net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 15:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1784139</guid>
		<description>[...] Technorati Dumps on Small Minded Bloggers after finding out recently that Technorati is going to dump posts that are more than six months old. So anything that I wrote between January and May of this year is no longer being indexed by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Technorati Dumps on Small Minded Bloggers after finding out recently that Technorati is going to dump posts that are more than six months old. So anything that I wrote between January and May of this year is no longer being indexed by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of Feeds - 19 links - blogging, tips, google, opensocial, community &#171; // Internet Duct Tape</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1750314</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of Feeds - 19 links - blogging, tips, google, opensocial, community &#171; // Internet Duct Tape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 22:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1750314</guid>
		<description>[...] [TECHNORATI] Technorati Drops Content Older Than 6 Months Old [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [TECHNORATI] Technorati Drops Content Older Than 6 Months Old [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Noah Slater</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1744563</link>
		<dc:creator>Noah Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 01:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1744563</guid>
		<description>You are using &quot;sic&quot; wrong. Instead of this:

The emphasis in the quote is mine but it’s the key line: “most people don’t [sic] notice.”

You should have put:

The emphasis in the quote is mine but it’s the key line: “most people [REPLACEMENT] notice.”

Using &quot;sic&quot; implies the original quote was in error, which it wasn&#039;t.

However, all of this presumes that a you needed to replace &quot;don&#039;t&quot; with &quot;didn&#039;t&quot; which you don&#039;t because it&#039;s correct in the both original and quoted context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are using &#8220;sic&#8221; wrong. Instead of this:</p>
<p>The emphasis in the quote is mine but it’s the key line: “most people don’t [sic] notice.”</p>
<p>You should have put:</p>
<p>The emphasis in the quote is mine but it’s the key line: “most people [REPLACEMENT] notice.”</p>
<p>Using &#8220;sic&#8221; implies the original quote was in error, which it wasn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>However, all of this presumes that a you needed to replace &#8220;don&#8217;t&#8221; with &#8220;didn&#8217;t&#8221; which you don&#8217;t because it&#8217;s correct in the both original and quoted context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1743881</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1743881</guid>
		<description>Of all the areas to look for economization, it doesn&#039;t seem to be that indexes should be one. How much space can possibly be consumed by textual data? I mean, reams and reams of data can be contained in a relatively small space and using data compression techniques this can become even more miniscule. What about offloading to a lower storage tier? e.g. SATA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the areas to look for economization, it doesn&#8217;t seem to be that indexes should be one. How much space can possibly be consumed by textual data? I mean, reams and reams of data can be contained in a relatively small space and using data compression techniques this can become even more miniscule. What about offloading to a lower storage tier? e.g. SATA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rollo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1737035</link>
		<dc:creator>Rollo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1737035</guid>
		<description>Jorge:  I stand corrected. Never thought I&#039;d learn a word dating from 1612 on this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jorge:  I stand corrected. Never thought I&#8217;d learn a word dating from 1612 on this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thilo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1733548</link>
		<dc:creator>Thilo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 00:07:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1733548</guid>
		<description>At the moment Technoratie is really struggeling. I hope they will come back to where they have been, I think they are really usefull.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the moment Technoratie is really struggeling. I hope they will come back to where they have been, I think they are really usefull.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Athloi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1733459</link>
		<dc:creator>Athloi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 23:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1733459</guid>
		<description>If blogs want to be taken more seriously, a searchable archive that can used to build up a peer-review trail on any topic might be really helpful! I hope Technorati figures it out and reverses this destructive, pointless course they (and Pete Doherty) are on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If blogs want to be taken more seriously, a searchable archive that can used to build up a peer-review trail on any topic might be really helpful! I hope Technorati figures it out and reverses this destructive, pointless course they (and Pete Doherty) are on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis Gospodnetic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1732919</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis Gospodnetic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 20:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1732919</guid>
		<description>@Duncan - do *you* *really* *ever* search for a blog (post) more than 6 months old, via Technorati or via GBS?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Duncan &#8211; do *you* *really* *ever* search for a blog (post) more than 6 months old, via Technorati or via GBS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technorati Deletes Index, Hopes Customers Won&#8217;t Notice&#124; Zoli&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1732739</link>
		<dc:creator>Technorati Deletes Index, Hopes Customers Won&#8217;t Notice&#124; Zoli&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1732739</guid>
		<description>[...] Any hopes of users not noticing are up in smoke: it&#8217;s on TechCrunch, TechMeme and a bunch of blogs including hyku &#124; blog, TeleRead, Susan Mernit&#8217;s Blog, Deep [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Any hopes of users not noticing are up in smoke: it&#8217;s on TechCrunch, TechMeme and a bunch of blogs including hyku | blog, TeleRead, Susan Mernit&#8217;s Blog, Deep [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1732590</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 17:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1732590</guid>
		<description>Is this Duncan guy a 12 year-old?  Or is he just Arrington&#039;s toady?  Cuz his critique of Technorati betrays his utter ignorance about Technorati&#039;s core promise: what&#039;s happening right NOW.

granted, i COULD scroll back more than 6 months worth of posts at Techcrunch, but then I&#039;d just have more than 6 months worth of this guy&#039;s stupidity!

do some research junior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this Duncan guy a 12 year-old?  Or is he just Arrington&#8217;s toady?  Cuz his critique of Technorati betrays his utter ignorance about Technorati&#8217;s core promise: what&#8217;s happening right NOW.</p>
<p>granted, i COULD scroll back more than 6 months worth of posts at Techcrunch, but then I&#8217;d just have more than 6 months worth of this guy&#8217;s stupidity!</p>
<p>do some research junior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Support this story on Stirrdup</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1732362</link>
		<dc:creator>Support this story on Stirrdup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1732362</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Technorati Drops Content Older Than 6 Months Old...&lt;/strong&gt;

This story has been submitted to Stirrdup.  Your support can help it become hot....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Technorati Drops Content Older Than 6 Months Old&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This story has been submitted to Stirrdup.  Your support can help it become hot&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge Barrios</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1732348</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge Barrios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 15:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1732348</guid>
		<description>Rollo, 

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/recency</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rollo, </p>
<p><a href="http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/recency" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/recency'>http://www.m-w....tionary/recency</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Am Not Posting To Spam My Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1732137</link>
		<dc:creator>I Am Not Posting To Spam My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1732137</guid>
		<description>Duncan,

I&#039;m not saying it&#039;s derivative. I&#039;m saying it looks rubbish. The image would have served its purpose without trying to insert the company logo (I would hope most of us are intelligent enough to get the joke and not fill up the comments with &quot;duh why is there a picture of a tractor?&quot;), and the black text on part-dark-part-light background and obvious cut-and-paste job wouldn&#039;t have distracted attention from the picture, which is otherwise funny and well placed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying it&#8217;s derivative. I&#8217;m saying it looks rubbish. The image would have served its purpose without trying to insert the company logo (I would hope most of us are intelligent enough to get the joke and not fill up the comments with &#8220;duh why is there a picture of a tractor?&#8221;), and the black text on part-dark-part-light background and obvious cut-and-paste job wouldn&#8217;t have distracted attention from the picture, which is otherwise funny and well placed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard Owens</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1732055</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard Owens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:35:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1732055</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve only ever used Technorati for one thing and one thing only -- to find the MOST RECENT posts either linked to my blog or on a particular subject.

To me that is the CORE functionality of Technorati.

Google blog search doesn&#039;t do that as well because it is FILLED with SPAM.  Though is does find some stuff Technorati misses.

Where Technorati has made a mistake is getting away from natural search for SUBJECT search and gone to reliance on tags, at least for one of my commonly used search terms.

That has driven me more to blogpulse.

But, frankly, I don&#039;t get the &quot;blog search&quot; is Technorati core functionality assertion.  I&#039;ve never seen it that way, and I&#039;ve been using Technorati almost from the beginning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve only ever used Technorati for one thing and one thing only &#8212; to find the MOST RECENT posts either linked to my blog or on a particular subject.</p>
<p>To me that is the CORE functionality of Technorati.</p>
<p>Google blog search doesn&#8217;t do that as well because it is FILLED with SPAM.  Though is does find some stuff Technorati misses.</p>
<p>Where Technorati has made a mistake is getting away from natural search for SUBJECT search and gone to reliance on tags, at least for one of my commonly used search terms.</p>
<p>That has driven me more to blogpulse.</p>
<p>But, frankly, I don&#8217;t get the &#8220;blog search&#8221; is Technorati core functionality assertion.  I&#8217;ve never seen it that way, and I&#8217;ve been using Technorati almost from the beginning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Dalka - Creating Revenue and Retention - Chicago GSB MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1731963</link>
		<dc:creator>David Dalka - Creating Revenue and Retention - Chicago GSB MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1731963</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Death of Blog Search Part 3 - Technorati Cuts Data...&lt;/strong&gt;

You&#8217;ve seen me talk about this before. Now the new CEO not only hasn&#8217;t fixed the Typepad duplicate counting problems, there are dozens of links that aren&#8217;t being counted. It&#8217;s cutting it&#8217;s most valuable asset. Historical d...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Death of Blog Search Part 3 &#8211; Technorati Cuts Data&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>You&#8217;ve seen me talk about this before. Now the new CEO not only hasn&#8217;t fixed the Typepad duplicate counting problems, there are dozens of links that aren&#8217;t being counted. It&#8217;s cutting it&#8217;s most valuable asset. Historical d&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1731851</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1731851</guid>
		<description>23
why is it every time I do an image I&#039;ve been doing in that format for the better part of 5 years on blogs does some one like you come along and suggest that its got something to do with Uncov? Sure, Uncov will probably like this post but get the memo that Uncov isn&#039;t original nor do they own the rights to funny graphics or lolcat pics! The image for the record is suppose to signify the wheels falling off from Technorati, and it was Photoshop thank you :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>23<br />
why is it every time I do an image I&#8217;ve been doing in that format for the better part of 5 years on blogs does some one like you come along and suggest that its got something to do with Uncov? Sure, Uncov will probably like this post but get the memo that Uncov isn&#8217;t original nor do they own the rights to funny graphics or lolcat pics! The image for the record is suppose to signify the wheels falling off from Technorati, and it was Photoshop thank you <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I Am Not Posting To Spam My Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1731817</link>
		<dc:creator>I Am Not Posting To Spam My Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1731817</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s with the awful picture? Was the Technorati logo inserted with MS Paint? Uncov.net are probably not shaking in their boots. Oh, and the use of the present tense - which was throughout the paragraph, not just in the sentence you sicced up on - is perfectly correct if the situation is continuing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with the awful picture? Was the Technorati logo inserted with MS Paint? Uncov.net are probably not shaking in their boots. Oh, and the use of the present tense &#8211; which was throughout the paragraph, not just in the sentence you sicced up on &#8211; is perfectly correct if the situation is continuing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rollo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1731525</link>
		<dc:creator>Rollo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 09:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1731525</guid>
		<description>As Duncan invents new uses for &quot;sic&quot;, the Technorati guy has invented a whole new word without anyone noticing: &quot;recency&quot; [sic].</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Duncan invents new uses for &#8220;sic&#8221;, the Technorati guy has invented a whole new word without anyone noticing: &#8220;recency&#8221; [sic].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joining Dots</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/comment-page-1/#comment-1731454</link>
		<dc:creator>Joining Dots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 09:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/05/technorati-drops-content-older-than-6-months-old/#comment-1731454</guid>
		<description>Well I had Technorati search on my blog for looking up older blog posts. My most popular one is 2 years old now (http://www.joiningdots.net/blog/2005/10/what-does-web-20-mean.html) and continues to get referenced all over the web. I&#039;ll be switching back to Google. Technorati has no relevance any more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I had Technorati search on my blog for looking up older blog posts. My most popular one is 2 years old now (<a href="http://www.joiningdots.net/blog/2005/10/what-does-web-20-mean.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.joiningdots.net/blog/2005/10/what-does-web-20-mean.html'>http://www.join...eb-20-mean.html</a>) and continues to get referenced all over the web. I&#8217;ll be switching back to Google. Technorati has no relevance any more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
