<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First OpenSocial Application Hacked Within 45 Minutes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 20:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Social Hacking &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social Me Still Too Social</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-2410384</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Hacking &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Social Me Still Too Social</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-2410384</guid>
		<description>[...] The &#8220;hack&#8221; involved is unbelievably simple, because the AJAX interface for Social Me is totally unsecured.  And it&#8217;s not even a POST request - I just enter a certain URL in my browser with a few query strings modified accordingly.  The server does nothing to validate who is making the request.  It reminds me of my original Emote hack. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The &#8220;hack&#8221; involved is unbelievably simple, because the AJAX interface for Social Me is totally unsecured.  And it&#8217;s not even a POST request - I just enter a certain URL in my browser with a few query strings modified accordingly.  The server does nothing to validate who is making the request.  It reminds me of my original Emote hack. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenZolder &#187; OpenSocial gehacked</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-2392136</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenZolder &#187; OpenSocial gehacked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 13:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-2392136</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007.....5-minutes/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BURAK ARIKAN &#187; Open Social to Distribute 3 Things: Myself, My Relationships, and My Life</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-2139231</link>
		<dc:creator>BURAK ARIKAN &#187; Open Social to Distribute 3 Things: Myself, My Relationships, and My Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-2139231</guid>
		<description>[...] OpenSocial API is up and hacked by some guy already. I am currently reading the protocols. From what I understand, Google servers are the gate keepers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OpenSocial API is up and hacked by some guy already. I am currently reading the protocols. From what I understand, Google servers are the gate keepers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cracked Nipple Cream</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-2035691</link>
		<dc:creator>Cracked Nipple Cream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 15:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-2035691</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Cracked Nipple Cream...&lt;/strong&gt;

Sometimes the nipple can become sore and cracked.  In this condition breastfeeding can be extremely painful and a quick and fast remedy is needed....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cracked Nipple Cream&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Sometimes the nipple can become sore and cracked.  In this condition breastfeeding can be extremely painful and a quick and fast remedy is needed&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yarışma</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1776728</link>
		<dc:creator>yarışma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1776728</guid>
		<description>thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saravanan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1751841</link>
		<dc:creator>Saravanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1751841</guid>
		<description>Hi its really cool, if you prepare like a tutorial and post it then it is very useful to developer.s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi its really cool, if you prepare like a tutorial and post it then it is very useful to developer.s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jung</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1740309</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 20:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1740309</guid>
		<description>@60: Data isn't stored central on Googles server. They still belong and are stored where they come from, where they are fetched up - like you music list from iLike on your MySpace profile. All in iLike data comes from the iLike servers. 

@58: Many many many good points.

@73: I advise you to look at http://michaeljung.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/links-for-11-08-07/  &#62;&#62; Web 2.0 Expo Berlin Presentation - Open Platforms and the Social Graph (David Recordon’s Blog)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@60: Data isn&#8217;t stored central on Googles server. They still belong and are stored where they come from, where they are fetched up - like you music list from iLike on your MySpace profile. All in iLike data comes from the iLike servers. </p>
<p>@58: Many many many good points.</p>
<p>@73: I advise you to look at <a href="http://michaeljung.wordpress.com/2007/11/08/links-for-11-08-07/" rel="nofollow">http://michaeljung.wordpress.c.....-11-08-07/</a>  &gt;&gt; Web 2.0 Expo Berlin Presentation - Open Platforms and the Social Graph (David Recordon’s Blog)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1737077</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1737077</guid>
		<description>That was a smooth reply from the architect but it sounds more like they had white-listed real hackable code as opposed to "real working" code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was a smooth reply from the architect but it sounds more like they had white-listed real hackable code as opposed to &#8220;real working&#8221; code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Brady:  A Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1736867</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Brady:  A Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 19:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1736867</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Why OpenSocial May Be Over-Hyped...&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#8217;ve been purposely avoiding writing anything about Google&#8217;s new OpenSocial project.  Why?  Because it had the potential to go in a few different directions and be used different ways, and I wanted the hype to die down before seeing what it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Why OpenSocial May Be Over-Hyped&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been purposely avoiding writing anything about Google&#8217;s new OpenSocial project.  Why?  Because it had the potential to go in a few different directions and be used different ways, and I wanted the hype to die down before seeing what it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David J's Brain</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1732507</link>
		<dc:creator>David J's Brain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 16:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1732507</guid>
		<description>@11: The fact that you can't differentiate between malicious hacking and humorous investigative hacking shows that you're a moron.  Would it be better if no benign hacking happened?  this guy clearly exposed a security hole which can now be fixed.  Instead of their idiotic initial denials Plaxo can now fix their code, which obviously was shipped too early under the pressure of some business moron that Arrington adores.

Think of it similarly to investigative reporting.  Would you rather a reporter expose a security hole at an airport or on principal have that information suppressed until a real 'bad guy' uses it.  There are plenty of real malicious hackers who will use Open Social and any other platform (Hypebook) for a list of real criminal exploits, the simplest of which would be identity theft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@11: The fact that you can&#8217;t differentiate between malicious hacking and humorous investigative hacking shows that you&#8217;re a moron.  Would it be better if no benign hacking happened?  this guy clearly exposed a security hole which can now be fixed.  Instead of their idiotic initial denials Plaxo can now fix their code, which obviously was shipped too early under the pressure of some business moron that Arrington adores.</p>
<p>Think of it similarly to investigative reporting.  Would you rather a reporter expose a security hole at an airport or on principal have that information suppressed until a real &#8216;bad guy&#8217; uses it.  There are plenty of real malicious hackers who will use Open Social and any other platform (Hypebook) for a list of real criminal exploits, the simplest of which would be identity theft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astonished</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1732487</link>
		<dc:creator>Astonished</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 16:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1732487</guid>
		<description>@83 - Perhaps, but I believe Plaxo still had to implement the APIs on their servers so their data could be accessed.  With this in mind, I imagine there would be ways to bolster security, server-side.  Finally, I am not going to get into a technical discussion, but there are ways of securing your Javascript functions as well.  Obfuscation at the least might have made Plaxo less likely to be the first cracked.  In the end, this news will leave the minds of those who care, and those who care aren't the end users at this point.

@84 - Absolutely, but who knows if the white hat was the first...probably won't be the last b/c in Joseph's defense, security is an endless battle.

Anyway, I have to say congratulations to the Plaxo team for taking the bold move and getting out there first.  It takes courage to deal with the possible downsides (you know people like me).  Anyway, any press is good right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@83 - Perhaps, but I believe Plaxo still had to implement the APIs on their servers so their data could be accessed.  With this in mind, I imagine there would be ways to bolster security, server-side.  Finally, I am not going to get into a technical discussion, but there are ways of securing your Javascript functions as well.  Obfuscation at the least might have made Plaxo less likely to be the first cracked.  In the end, this news will leave the minds of those who care, and those who care aren&#8217;t the end users at this point.</p>
<p>@84 - Absolutely, but who knows if the white hat was the first&#8230;probably won&#8217;t be the last b/c in Joseph&#8217;s defense, security is an endless battle.</p>
<p>Anyway, I have to say congratulations to the Plaxo team for taking the bold move and getting out there first.  It takes courage to deal with the possible downsides (you know people like me).  Anyway, any press is good right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Watkins</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1732451</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Watkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 16:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1732451</guid>
		<description>It's not the growing pains we need to be worried about, those will happen. If in a few months 'amateur hackers' are still running wild, then I'll start worrying...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not the growing pains we need to be worried about, those will happen. If in a few months &#8216;amateur hackers&#8217; are still running wild, then I&#8217;ll start worrying&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: שווה קריאה</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1732061</link>
		<dc:creator>שווה קריאה</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 13:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1732061</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;מערכת ה-OpenSocial הראשונה נפרצה תוך 45 דקות...&lt;/strong&gt;

גוגל יצאה לפני ימים ספורים את מערכת OpenSocial, אשר תאפשר לבנות מערכות חברתיות בקלות תוך שימוש בסטנדרטים. אך תוך 45  דקות  המערכת הראשונה שעשתה שי...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>מערכת ה-OpenSocial הראשונה נפרצה תוך 45 דקות&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>גוגל יצאה לפני ימים ספורים את מערכת OpenSocial, אשר תאפשר לבנות מערכות חברתיות בקלות תוך שימוש בסטנדרטים. אך תוך 45  דקות  המערכת הראשונה שעשתה שי&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swordfish Blog &#187; Google’s OpenSocial Hacked!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1731506</link>
		<dc:creator>swordfish Blog &#187; Google’s OpenSocial Hacked!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 09:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1731506</guid>
		<description>[...] Looks like someone got working on Google’s Opensocial API. Within 45 minutes of releasing &#8220;emote&#8221;, Plaxo’s OpenSocial application got hacked… [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Looks like someone got working on Google’s Opensocial API. Within 45 minutes of releasing &#8220;emote&#8221;, Plaxo’s OpenSocial application got hacked… [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OpenSocial Hacked Again</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1731112</link>
		<dc:creator>OpenSocial Hacked Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 06:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1731112</guid>
		<description>[...] same person who hacked the RockYou OpenSocial application on Plaxo just 45 minutes after it was publicly released is at it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] same person who hacked the RockYou OpenSocial application on Plaxo just 45 minutes after it was publicly released is at it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Hacking</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1731009</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Hacking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 05:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1731009</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RockYou&#8217;s Emote on Plaxo...&lt;/strong&gt;

Date: Friday, November 2, 2007
Initial hack: 45 minutes
Vulnerabilities:

Able to change current Emote status for any user
Able to access Emote history and current status for any user
Able to insert HTML, including JavaScript, into Emote pages

Coverag...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RockYou&#8217;s Emote on Plaxo&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Date: Friday, November 2, 2007<br />
Initial hack: 45 minutes<br />
Vulnerabilities:</p>
<p>Able to change current Emote status for any user<br />
Able to access Emote history and current status for any user<br />
Able to insert HTML, including JavaScript, into Emote pages</p>
<p>Coverag&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: computer-datenrettung.de</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1730071</link>
		<dc:creator>computer-datenrettung.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1730071</guid>
		<description>But isn`t it better a white hat hacker discover the security bugs, than a black hat one does ist? So they can fix the bugs and secure their systems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But isn`t it better a white hat hacker discover the security bugs, than a black hat one does ist? So they can fix the bugs and secure their systems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grumpy Security Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1729429</link>
		<dc:creator>Grumpy Security Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1729429</guid>
		<description>@82 - Maybe you didn't notice, it was not Plaxo's code, it was a 3rd party app that used OpenSocial APIs on Plaxo. Now Perhaps we can blame Google for allowing this to happen in the API or Plaxo for jumping in with both feet on a new API but the code is all RockYou's fault.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@82 - Maybe you didn&#8217;t notice, it was not Plaxo&#8217;s code, it was a 3rd party app that used OpenSocial APIs on Plaxo. Now Perhaps we can blame Google for allowing this to happen in the API or Plaxo for jumping in with both feet on a new API but the code is all RockYou&#8217;s fault.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astonished</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1729218</link>
		<dc:creator>Astonished</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:46:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1729218</guid>
		<description>To Joseph Smarr (Plaxo’s "Chief Platform Architect"):

Please, if your listening, be smart enough to be humble when hacked.  Stating how you are doing things to keep "would-be hackers" out is a great way to encourage them to come after you.  If you get caught with your pants down, don't insult the people who did it.  What you write is equivalent to saying "screw you amateurs, bet you can't do it again because I'm so smart".

Also, when you say "I want to err on the side of caution" it seems like a bunch of B.S. after your code gets violated and laughed at for not having error checking.

Finally, KISS...learn it especially when publicly responding.  You said too much, especially "this stuff is not always easy to keep straight".  Really?? The difference between a "viewer" and "owner"?  Wow, Chief Platform Architect...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Joseph Smarr (Plaxo’s &#8220;Chief Platform Architect&#8221;):</p>
<p>Please, if your listening, be smart enough to be humble when hacked.  Stating how you are doing things to keep &#8220;would-be hackers&#8221; out is a great way to encourage them to come after you.  If you get caught with your pants down, don&#8217;t insult the people who did it.  What you write is equivalent to saying &#8220;screw you amateurs, bet you can&#8217;t do it again because I&#8217;m so smart&#8221;.</p>
<p>Also, when you say &#8220;I want to err on the side of caution&#8221; it seems like a bunch of B.S. after your code gets violated and laughed at for not having error checking.</p>
<p>Finally, KISS&#8230;learn it especially when publicly responding.  You said too much, especially &#8220;this stuff is not always easy to keep straight&#8221;.  Really?? The difference between a &#8220;viewer&#8221; and &#8220;owner&#8221;?  Wow, Chief Platform Architect&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnofScribbleSheet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1728840</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnofScribbleSheet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1728840</guid>
		<description>This is good for competition, more apps being made quicker and quicker gives users options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good for competition, more apps being made quicker and quicker gives users options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yasam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1727351</link>
		<dc:creator>Yasam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 02:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1727351</guid>
		<description>Nice article for applications   http://lapnol.Blogspot.Com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article for applications   <a href="http://lapnol.Blogspot.Com" rel="nofollow">http://lapnol.Blogspot.Com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Measham</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1727106</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Measham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 22:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1727106</guid>
		<description>#10: Not Surprising  

OpenSocial *is* inherently insecure. It does not take any great hacker to see that. This guy is just getting the publicity for something dozens of developers have noticed over the weekend.

The platform loads an iframe with the visitor id and owner id in the URL. As well as all the owner's preferences. But there is NO WAY to verify those details. Therefore anything you can do to your own app, you can do to someone else's install of it. All you need to do is change the visitor id to be the owner id of the page you're looking at.

Also, because of the way it works, all JS is sent to the iframe for every view. If you're a visitor to the profile, you get the same JS sent to you as if you're the app owner going to the canvas view. And you get access to all the same preferences. This means you can do *anything*.

So yes, OpenSocial *is* inherently insecure (and yes, they already know about it .. there's a fix coming, but no details on what it is and it isn't going to be in the next few hours.)

I've taken down my app until this is all sorted out as it left my users vulnerable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#10: Not Surprising  </p>
<p>OpenSocial *is* inherently insecure. It does not take any great hacker to see that. This guy is just getting the publicity for something dozens of developers have noticed over the weekend.</p>
<p>The platform loads an iframe with the visitor id and owner id in the URL. As well as all the owner&#8217;s preferences. But there is NO WAY to verify those details. Therefore anything you can do to your own app, you can do to someone else&#8217;s install of it. All you need to do is change the visitor id to be the owner id of the page you&#8217;re looking at.</p>
<p>Also, because of the way it works, all JS is sent to the iframe for every view. If you&#8217;re a visitor to the profile, you get the same JS sent to you as if you&#8217;re the app owner going to the canvas view. And you get access to all the same preferences. This means you can do *anything*.</p>
<p>So yes, OpenSocial *is* inherently insecure (and yes, they already know about it .. there&#8217;s a fix coming, but no details on what it is and it isn&#8217;t going to be in the next few hours.)</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve taken down my app until this is all sorted out as it left my users vulnerable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1726283</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1726283</guid>
		<description>Whitelist != Open</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whitelist != Open</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1726231</link>
		<dc:creator>Art</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 10:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1726231</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://gungerm.110mb.com." rel="nofollow"&gt;gun germ and steel the fates of human society&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gungerm.110mb.com." rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/gungerm.110mb.com.');">gun germ and steel the fates of human society</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARC</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1725734</link>
		<dc:creator>ARC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 04:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/02/first-opensocial-application-hacked-within-45-minutes/#comment-1725734</guid>
		<description>So I'm a 29yo child and adolescent psychiatrist in fellowship with the organizational answer for your points fabricio using dynamic psychiatric principles applied to snp development. I just can't get anyones attention. How do I go about entering discussions and getting someone's ear that matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I&#8217;m a 29yo child and adolescent psychiatrist in fellowship with the organizational answer for your points fabricio using dynamic psychiatric principles applied to snp development. I just can&#8217;t get anyones attention. How do I go about entering discussions and getting someone&#8217;s ear that matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.097 seconds -->
