<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Murdoch To Turn WSJ Into Quasi Reuters/ AP</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mahesh sharma</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1724362</link>
		<dc:creator>mahesh sharma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 14:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1724362</guid>
		<description>It's pretty common practice for a media organisation to syndicate content across its mastheads.
WSJ's content would be significantly devalued if it was made available to competing publications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty common practice for a media organisation to syndicate content across its mastheads.<br />
WSJ&#8217;s content would be significantly devalued if it was made available to competing publications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1719691</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1719691</guid>
		<description>Murdoch is a morom!
Always avoid any news that they use his name in.

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Murdoch is a morom!<br />
Always avoid any news that they use his name in.</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shafqat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1718678</link>
		<dc:creator>Shafqat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 17:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1718678</guid>
		<description>#4 - you are right that the AP doesnt have its own paper or online paper. However Reuters does provide all its news online and compete with other online news sites. It the Reuters homepage. I'm actually surprised that AP hasn't done this already. I believe its to ensure they dont drive traffic away from their members.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#4 - you are right that the AP doesnt have its own paper or online paper. However Reuters does provide all its news online and compete with other online news sites. It the Reuters homepage. I&#8217;m actually surprised that AP hasn&#8217;t done this already. I believe its to ensure they dont drive traffic away from their members.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaronontheweb</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1718483</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaronontheweb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1718483</guid>
		<description>Do you mean that the WSJ will be less of a news paper and more of a wire service? AP/Reuters don't have their own original, complete papers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you mean that the WSJ will be less of a news paper and more of a wire service? AP/Reuters don&#8217;t have their own original, complete papers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shafqat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1718056</link>
		<dc:creator>Shafqat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1718056</guid>
		<description>This seems like a no-brainer to me. Smart move on the part of NewsCorp. Unfortunately, the major problem with these news wire (or quasi news wire) services is that you can go to 10 different news sites and you'll read the exact same piece of news. Diversity of content and opinion will definately suffer.

Shafqat
www.newscred.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems like a no-brainer to me. Smart move on the part of NewsCorp. Unfortunately, the major problem with these news wire (or quasi news wire) services is that you can go to 10 different news sites and you&#8217;ll read the exact same piece of news. Diversity of content and opinion will definately suffer.</p>
<p>Shafqat<br />
<a href="http://www.newscred.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.newscred.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1718055</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:51:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1718055</guid>
		<description>both :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>both <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Caswell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1718054</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Caswell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 13:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/murdoch-to-turn-wsj-into-quasi-reuters-ap/#comment-1718054</guid>
		<description>"however may indicate a sign of things to come."

Are you referring to more syndication happening or trying to drop a subtle hint about the paywall falling down?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;however may indicate a sign of things to come.&#8221;</p>
<p>Are you referring to more syndication happening or trying to drop a subtle hint about the paywall falling down?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.037 seconds -->
