<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flock 1.0 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:40:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;all-digital-moves&#8221; &#187; Upgraded to Flock 1.2.4 &#124; Flock</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-2410130</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;all-digital-moves&#8221; &#187; Upgraded to Flock 1.2.4 &#124; Flock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-2410130</guid>
		<description>[...] Flock 1.0 Released [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Flock 1.0 Released [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flocking&#8230; &#171; Sasa&#8217;s spot</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1732718</link>
		<dc:creator>Flocking&#8230; &#171; Sasa&#8217;s spot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1732718</guid>
		<description>[...] I wasn&#8217;t a big user of social sites, so it was not attractive to me. This morning I read on TechCrunch that Flock 1.0 is out, so I decided to give it a try. Here&#8217;s my report [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wasn&#8217;t a big user of social sites, so it was not attractive to me. This morning I read on TechCrunch that Flock 1.0 is out, so I decided to give it a try. Here&#8217;s my report [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flock 1.0 disponible</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1727038</link>
		<dc:creator>Flock 1.0 disponible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 21:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1727038</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch    Prohibida su copia total con o sin fines comerciales. Copias parciales deben citar la fuente.   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch    Prohibida su copia total con o sin fines comerciales. Copias parciales deben citar la fuente.   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Barrera</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1726511</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Barrera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 13:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1726511</guid>
		<description>chrisco, you can use google sync for that. Choose just to sync your open tabs and you can safely close your FF and open it again later and get your tabs back :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>chrisco, you can use google sync for that. Choose just to sync your open tabs and you can safely close your FF and open it again later and get your tabs back <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flock 1.0 versione finale &#124; Manicalarga: notizie e consigli</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1724602</link>
		<dc:creator>Flock 1.0 versione finale &#124; Manicalarga: notizie e consigli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 16:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1724602</guid>
		<description>[...] Ne parla techcrunch [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ne parla techcrunch [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david8</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1722993</link>
		<dc:creator>david8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 01:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1722993</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always used firefox (on a windows PC with about 10 extensions) without any problems. But I&#039;ve installed flock today and a few extensions to test it out. I really like it. The feed reader is very nice and I like the flickr integration too. We&#039;ll see how it holds up with a good bit of use. I might be a permanent convert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always used firefox (on a windows PC with about 10 extensions) without any problems. But I&#8217;ve installed flock today and a few extensions to test it out. I really like it. The feed reader is very nice and I like the flickr integration too. We&#8217;ll see how it holds up with a good bit of use. I might be a permanent convert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1722918</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1722918</guid>
		<description>Weird, FF on the mac (2.0.0.9 as of today) rarely if ever crashes for me, either on my macbook or on the G5 and macbook pro in the office.

As for Flock I just don&#039;t see how they&#039;re going to drive serious adoption. There aren&#039;t enough people in the real world who are power users of the various social networking activities it aggregates.

I remember their answer to the question at TC40 re. how they were going to make money. Their model seems to be the same as Firefox&#039;s (revenue from Google for pushing Google search), but how big can that market really be? $75MM tops? And Mozilla already has $50MM of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird, FF on the mac (2.0.0.9 as of today) rarely if ever crashes for me, either on my macbook or on the G5 and macbook pro in the office.</p>
<p>As for Flock I just don&#8217;t see how they&#8217;re going to drive serious adoption. There aren&#8217;t enough people in the real world who are power users of the various social networking activities it aggregates.</p>
<p>I remember their answer to the question at TC40 re. how they were going to make money. Their model seems to be the same as Firefox&#8217;s (revenue from Google for pushing Google search), but how big can that market really be? $75MM tops? And Mozilla already has $50MM of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisco</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1722776</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1722776</guid>
		<description>On little tweak I&#039;d love to see come out in Firefox is: When you close the program with multiple tabs open a dialog box should appear asking if you want Firefox to reopen those tabs next time you launch the program.  Because when I use FF I use many, many tabs...  and when I want to shutdown the PC there are always tabs (usually articles) that I am not done with.  So what I have to do is Ctrl/Alt/Del ==&gt; pull up Task Manager (Windows XP) ==&gt; End Program (FF).  Then next time I launch FF it offers &quot;Restore&quot; option.  The latest version if IE provides the option I mentioned... hats off to MSFT on that.  I can&#039;t believe they came out with this instead of copying it from one of the others.  Something is wrong when they can roll out a handy feature faster than open source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On little tweak I&#8217;d love to see come out in Firefox is: When you close the program with multiple tabs open a dialog box should appear asking if you want Firefox to reopen those tabs next time you launch the program.  Because when I use FF I use many, many tabs&#8230;  and when I want to shutdown the PC there are always tabs (usually articles) that I am not done with.  So what I have to do is Ctrl/Alt/Del ==&gt; pull up Task Manager (Windows XP) ==&gt; End Program (FF).  Then next time I launch FF it offers &#8220;Restore&#8221; option.  The latest version if IE provides the option I mentioned&#8230; hats off to MSFT on that.  I can&#8217;t believe they came out with this instead of copying it from one of the others.  Something is wrong when they can roll out a handy feature faster than open source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoffrey Arone</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1722774</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoffrey Arone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 23:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1722774</guid>
		<description>Anyone who tried the beta 1.0 (and liked the features), should really try the regular 1.0.  A LOT of effort went into stabilizing and the performance and stability of the yesterday&#039;s release is excellent.  The facebook sidebar alone is reason to switch, and yes, I am biased!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who tried the beta 1.0 (and liked the features), should really try the regular 1.0.  A LOT of effort went into stabilizing and the performance and stability of the yesterday&#8217;s release is excellent.  The facebook sidebar alone is reason to switch, and yes, I am biased!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1722586</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1722586</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the tip. Have downloaded it and am giving it a test drive. So far so good!

Brian Wilson, Zolve.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the tip. Have downloaded it and am giving it a test drive. So far so good!</p>
<p>Brian Wilson, Zolve.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joshua Walters</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1722568</link>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Walters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1722568</guid>
		<description>Ive been a loyal Flock fan since I saw it in PC Mag (or PC World, cant quite remember) a few months ago and I gave it a try.

I LOVE the silvery interface, and the fact that I can use most of my FireFox extensions.

When I got my invite to the beta (haha, they did send out invites to those who signed up, we got it before you!) I just HAD to download 1.0 and find out about those Facebook features. 

I must say they are great, although Im a tad disappointed it never told me I needed to upgrade to the new version. Oh well, Im getting the final build now. No big deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ive been a loyal Flock fan since I saw it in PC Mag (or PC World, cant quite remember) a few months ago and I gave it a try.</p>
<p>I LOVE the silvery interface, and the fact that I can use most of my FireFox extensions.</p>
<p>When I got my invite to the beta (haha, they did send out invites to those who signed up, we got it before you!) I just HAD to download 1.0 and find out about those Facebook features. </p>
<p>I must say they are great, although Im a tad disappointed it never told me I needed to upgrade to the new version. Oh well, Im getting the final build now. No big deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vor</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1722198</link>
		<dc:creator>vor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1722198</guid>
		<description>Charles, name one firefox feature that is sacrificed in flock. To my knowledge flock does everything firefox does plus a whole lot more. And if you try to install extensions to get some of the same functionality they won&#039;t be properly integrated or performance optimized. And there are no web clipboard, mediabar, or search flyout extensions, all of which flock has innovated. Flock has made my web browsing so much more efficient and enjoyable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles, name one firefox feature that is sacrificed in flock. To my knowledge flock does everything firefox does plus a whole lot more. And if you try to install extensions to get some of the same functionality they won&#8217;t be properly integrated or performance optimized. And there are no web clipboard, mediabar, or search flyout extensions, all of which flock has innovated. Flock has made my web browsing so much more efficient and enjoyable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason M. Lemkin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1722050</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason M. Lemkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 18:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1722050</guid>
		<description>Camino on Mac seems to cure more of FF ills (even flash rendering, if that is possible) with fewer compatibility issues than Safari</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Camino on Mac seems to cure more of FF ills (even flash rendering, if that is possible) with fewer compatibility issues than Safari</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1721965</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1721965</guid>
		<description>I agree that the Firefox crashes are probably attributable to add-ons. Aside from crashes, I&#039;ve found that some add-ons will suddenly suck up 70-90% of my CPU cycles (as measured by Activity Manager on an OS X Mac), so that I can&#039;t do anything else without shutting down Firefox first.

I like to try new add-ons, but I shut them down right away if I don&#039;t consider them really beneficial.

I think the Firefox people need to put some quality control measures in place instead of blindly letting anyone submit an add-on for the general public.

I&#039;ve been looking at Flock too, and am impressed so far. Mind you, it may be more stable than Firefox because it sacrifices so many Firefox features.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the Firefox crashes are probably attributable to add-ons. Aside from crashes, I&#8217;ve found that some add-ons will suddenly suck up 70-90% of my CPU cycles (as measured by Activity Manager on an OS X Mac), so that I can&#8217;t do anything else without shutting down Firefox first.</p>
<p>I like to try new add-ons, but I shut them down right away if I don&#8217;t consider them really beneficial.</p>
<p>I think the Firefox people need to put some quality control measures in place instead of blindly letting anyone submit an add-on for the general public.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been looking at Flock too, and am impressed so far. Mind you, it may be more stable than Firefox because it sacrifices so many Firefox features.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Onlinetoyz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1721816</link>
		<dc:creator>Onlinetoyz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1721816</guid>
		<description>Flock? Firefox? Opera? on a Mac?

What&#039;s wrong with using Safari? Especially the new Safari 3 is much faster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flock? Firefox? Opera? on a Mac?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s wrong with using Safari? Especially the new Safari 3 is much faster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand C</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1721795</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1721795</guid>
		<description>I had also experienced the Firefox 2.x crashing problem a few months back.  After installing on multiple machines, it seems to me that Firefox only had problems on machines with &quot;dirty registries&quot;.  Not once have I had an issue with Firefox 2.x on a freshly installed Windows version.  And I never had problems on Linux (Fedora/Unbuntu) or Mac.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had also experienced the Firefox 2.x crashing problem a few months back.  After installing on multiple machines, it seems to me that Firefox only had problems on machines with &#8220;dirty registries&#8221;.  Not once have I had an issue with Firefox 2.x on a freshly installed Windows version.  And I never had problems on Linux (Fedora/Unbuntu) or Mac.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sanmat</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1721413</link>
		<dc:creator>sanmat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1721413</guid>
		<description>I have been using flocks earlier version and currently on flock 1.0 beta version. So far its been a great experience, except the feeds which doesn&#039;t get updated  to at least the current date. I couldn&#039;t figure out how to make it work automatically run, so that when i open the feeds, i have the latest ones.

http://blogkatt.blogspot.com/2007/10/flock-10-for-rescue.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been using flocks earlier version and currently on flock 1.0 beta version. So far its been a great experience, except the feeds which doesn&#8217;t get updated  to at least the current date. I couldn&#8217;t figure out how to make it work automatically run, so that when i open the feeds, i have the latest ones.</p>
<p><a href="http://blogkatt.blogspot.com/2007/10/flock-10-for-rescue.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://blogkatt.blogspot.com/2007/10/flock-10-for-rescue.html'>http://blogkatt...for-rescue.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Germano</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1721363</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Germano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1721363</guid>
		<description>I am testing out the browser and I really like it. For some odd reason my Inside Facebook favicon uses TechCrunch&#039;s TC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am testing out the browser and I really like it. For some odd reason my Inside Facebook favicon uses TechCrunch&#8217;s TC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Henshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1721314</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Henshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:59:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1721314</guid>
		<description>The new version is really nice. It&#039;s a huge improvement from version .7 and later versions. We have a good review of the 1.0 release (with pics) here:

http://sitening.com/blog/2007/11/02/review-flock-browser/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new version is really nice. It&#8217;s a huge improvement from version .7 and later versions. We have a good review of the 1.0 release (with pics) here:</p>
<p><a href="http://sitening.com/blog/2007/11/02/review-flock-browser/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://sitening.com/blog/2007/11/02/review-flock-browser/'>http://sitening...-flock-browser/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom L</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1721286</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1721286</guid>
		<description>One could argue that the FF team has a Little Bo Peep costume in the closet too &quot;Mr. Ballmer&quot;....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One could argue that the FF team has a Little Bo Peep costume in the closet too &#8220;Mr. Ballmer&#8221;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1721221</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 12:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1721221</guid>
		<description>When are you people gonna get it?
They are calling you stupid sheep! Flock, Flock?
Sheesh

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When are you people gonna get it?<br />
They are calling you stupid sheep! Flock, Flock?<br />
Sheesh</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com'>http://fakestev...er.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick of cebu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1721078</link>
		<dc:creator>nick of cebu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:20:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1721078</guid>
		<description>Typing this from Flock. Pretty good and intuitive so far. Note: When I installed Quirk&#039;s SearchStatus, without which I cannot browse, it didn&#039;t work using the Mozilla version, but it installed just fine with the Firefox version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typing this from Flock. Pretty good and intuitive so far. Note: When I installed Quirk&#8217;s SearchStatus, without which I cannot browse, it didn&#8217;t work using the Mozilla version, but it installed just fine with the Firefox version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: howard scott</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1720987</link>
		<dc:creator>howard scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1720987</guid>
		<description>i&#039;ve personally ditched flock and gone back to a pure firefox installation on my mac.  flock seems to have some very odd behaviour in relation to flash running on multiple tabs, and it causes the whole browser system to &quot;pause&quot; - for want of a better word - almost like the connection has timed out.  it&#039;s all in the browser though.  so i didtched it and went back to FF.  which doesn&#039;t have that problem at all.  for me, i&#039;ll avoid flock till i get confirmation it&#039;s stable beyond v1.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;ve personally ditched flock and gone back to a pure firefox installation on my mac.  flock seems to have some very odd behaviour in relation to flash running on multiple tabs, and it causes the whole browser system to &#8220;pause&#8221; &#8211; for want of a better word &#8211; almost like the connection has timed out.  it&#8217;s all in the browser though.  so i didtched it and went back to FF.  which doesn&#8217;t have that problem at all.  for me, i&#8217;ll avoid flock till i get confirmation it&#8217;s stable beyond v1.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Nork</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1720969</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Nork</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1720969</guid>
		<description>I have problems with the FF memory leak.  Has Flock addressed this issue at all?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have problems with the FF memory leak.  Has Flock addressed this issue at all?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sasha Kovaliov</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/comment-page-1/#comment-1720962</link>
		<dc:creator>Sasha Kovaliov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/flock-10-released/#comment-1720962</guid>
		<description>Why don&#039;t just you use Opera? Crashes never, surfs whatever!:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why don&#8217;t just you use Opera? Crashes never, surfs whatever!:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
