<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook, Your Move</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chewing on Open Social &#171; Dimitri Glazkov</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-2399036</link>
		<dc:creator>Chewing on Open Social &#171; Dimitri Glazkov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 12:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-2399036</guid>
		<description>[...] of person and community-centric software on the Web. Ultimately, I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s a move in a game of chess, but a tiny step in the strategy that reaches much farther and wider than everyone&#8217;s favorite [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of person and community-centric software on the Web. Ultimately, I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s a move in a game of chess, but a tiny step in the strategy that reaches much farther and wider than everyone&#8217;s favorite [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wss.made4the.net: by Jeremy Thake</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-2297711</link>
		<dc:creator>wss.made4the.net: by Jeremy Thake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 03:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-2297711</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google OpenSocial storm brewing...&lt;/strong&gt;

The OpenSocial site went live on Thursday and I'm sure will  ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google OpenSocial storm brewing&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The OpenSocial site went live on Thursday and I&#8217;m sure will  &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhD &#187; Google&#8217;s OpenSocial.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1789669</link>
		<dc:creator>PhD &#187; Google&#8217;s OpenSocial.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1789669</guid>
		<description>[...] OpenSocial - which has clearly been attracting a lot of interest. Erik Schonfeld comments on TechCrunch, that no consumers have yet changed their social networking usage. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] OpenSocial - which has clearly been attracting a lot of interest. Erik Schonfeld comments on TechCrunch, that no consumers have yet changed their social networking usage. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook vs. Google: If you can&#8217;t join &#8216;em, beat &#8216;em&#8211;Google&#8217;s OpenSocial and Facebook Ads &#124; wannabeMogul.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1735087</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook vs. Google: If you can&#8217;t join &#8216;em, beat &#8216;em&#8211;Google&#8217;s OpenSocial and Facebook Ads &#124; wannabeMogul.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 08:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1735087</guid>
		<description>[...] makes itself the champion of open, Facebook continues to emphasize keeping it closed and private. TechCrunch warns that this move might make them the Apple of the social networking scene&#8211;as more and more developers see greater benefit from focusing on their OpenSocial apps that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] makes itself the champion of open, Facebook continues to emphasize keeping it closed and private. TechCrunch warns that this move might make them the Apple of the social networking scene&#8211;as more and more developers see greater benefit from focusing on their OpenSocial apps that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Transnets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenSocial: cÃ´tÃ© pile</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1728089</link>
		<dc:creator>Transnets &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OpenSocial: cÃ´tÃ© pile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 11:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1728089</guid>
		<description>[...] LinkedIn, Ning, Oracle, Orkut, Plaxo, Salesforce.com, Six Apart et Xing entre autres. Ã‡a fait beaucoup de monde [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LinkedIn, Ning, Oracle, Orkut, Plaxo, Salesforce.com, Six Apart et Xing entre autres. Ã‡a fait beaucoup de monde [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anshu's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1726948</link>
		<dc:creator>Anshu's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 20:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1726948</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rumors of Facebook Death are Highly Premature. Really?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Don Dodge opines 50M Facebook users don't care about OpenSocial APIs and tries to convince us that Facebook is not dead. Granted that Microsoft just spent $250M on Facebook so it must hurt to see all ......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rumors of Facebook Death are Highly Premature. Really?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Don Dodge opines 50M Facebook users don&#8217;t care about OpenSocial APIs and tries to convince us that Facebook is not dead. Granted that Microsoft just spent $250M on Facebook so it must hurt to see all &#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exapted</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1725859</link>
		<dc:creator>exapted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 06:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1725859</guid>
		<description>Checkmate will be when and if Google controls the standards for mobile web development. For most of the world identity=cellphone. Google has a grand plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Checkmate will be when and if Google controls the standards for mobile web development. For most of the world identity=cellphone. Google has a grand plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Bazinet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1725039</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bazinet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 21:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1725039</guid>
		<description>Facebook will carry on with business as usual partnered with a great company, Microsoft.  MS has 80000 employee and huge market cap led by very good technology industry leaders.

Myspace sucks and is one of the worst platforms out there.   Go look at their pages, nothing but a bunch of lonely women and petafiles.

Facebook is top-notch and MS as a big win here.  Google can try to get the other social networks but they are all only second best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook will carry on with business as usual partnered with a great company, Microsoft.  MS has 80000 employee and huge market cap led by very good technology industry leaders.</p>
<p>Myspace sucks and is one of the worst platforms out there.   Go look at their pages, nothing but a bunch of lonely women and petafiles.</p>
<p>Facebook is top-notch and MS as a big win here.  Google can try to get the other social networks but they are all only second best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google goes live with its plan to make the web social - Welcome to OpenSocial &#171; Curiouser and Curiouser</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1723320</link>
		<dc:creator>Google goes live with its plan to make the web social - Welcome to OpenSocial &#171; Curiouser and Curiouser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 04:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1723320</guid>
		<description>[...] Articles list here, TechCrunch&#8217;s Erick Schonfeld on Facebook&#8217;s possible reactions here) it appears that many people are skeptical that Google really has what it takes to succeed in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Articles list here, TechCrunch&#8217;s Erick Schonfeld on Facebook&#8217;s possible reactions here) it appears that many people are skeptical that Google really has what it takes to succeed in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oniitm55</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721914</link>
		<dc:creator>oniitm55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 17:15:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721914</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.oniitm.ru/" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ñêëàäñêîå îáîðóäîâàíèå&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.oniitm.ru/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.oniitm.ru');">Ñêëàäñêîå îáîðóäîâàíèå</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shibopi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721821</link>
		<dc:creator>Shibopi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721821</guid>
		<description>who cares about apps? facebook was popular before those crappy apps it now has. it doesnt need to join</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who cares about apps? facebook was popular before those crappy apps it now has. it doesnt need to join</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Lawrence</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721796</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Lawrence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721796</guid>
		<description>Looking at the way the cards are stacked, I think Facebook is missing at least one ace:

Facebook does not have a working and proven ad-network. 
After all, eyeballs is less than half of the equation.
Is it that easy to build a network to rival Google's? 

Not that I wish the Juggernaut any more power than it already has, but the leverage of their ad-network-muscle does seem a compelling advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking at the way the cards are stacked, I think Facebook is missing at least one ace:</p>
<p>Facebook does not have a working and proven ad-network.<br />
After all, eyeballs is less than half of the equation.<br />
Is it that easy to build a network to rival Google&#8217;s? </p>
<p>Not that I wish the Juggernaut any more power than it already has, but the leverage of their ad-network-muscle does seem a compelling advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Burg's Future Visions</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721693</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Burg's Future Visions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 15:52:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721693</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Open Social : Why Facebook Doesn't Need To Worry...&lt;/strong&gt;

The industry has been all abuzz over Open Social. EVERYONE seems to be viewing this as a showdown between Google--Friends and Facebook (and Microsoft). It isn't! Facebook is a network of users. People are on Facebook because their friends are...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Open Social : Why Facebook Doesn&#8217;t Need To Worry&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The industry has been all abuzz over Open Social. EVERYONE seems to be viewing this as a showdown between Google&#8211;Friends and Facebook (and Microsoft). It isn&#8217;t! Facebook is a network of users. People are on Facebook because their friends are&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721399</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721399</guid>
		<description>I also predict Facebook will open up on this.

Thanks for the coverage on this. There's been a lot of speculation and geek speak, but I've tried another angle: Explaining it to executives who will make the decision on this.

http://tinyurl.com/3dtqs6</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also predict Facebook will open up on this.</p>
<p>Thanks for the coverage on this. There&#8217;s been a lot of speculation and geek speak, but I&#8217;ve tried another angle: Explaining it to executives who will make the decision on this.</p>
<p><a href="http://tinyurl.com/3dtqs6" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/3dtqs6</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721368</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721368</guid>
		<description>Google has completely missed the mark on this API. Facebook will jump in and take care of google in they old-time NY mafia took care of competition. Google's Social Networking experiment will be "sleeping with the fishes" very soon. Bye bye Orkut, its been real nice knowing of your meager existence. 

Read more here 

http://techwaste20.blogspot.com/2007/11/social-networking-api.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has completely missed the mark on this API. Facebook will jump in and take care of google in they old-time NY mafia took care of competition. Google&#8217;s Social Networking experiment will be &#8220;sleeping with the fishes&#8221; very soon. Bye bye Orkut, its been real nice knowing of your meager existence. </p>
<p>Read more here </p>
<p><a href="http://techwaste20.blogspot.com/2007/11/social-networking-api.html" rel="nofollow">http://techwaste20.blogspot.co.....g-api.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick of cebu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721167</link>
		<dc:creator>nick of cebu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1721167</guid>
		<description>Hey Erick you forgot whose signature is on your paycheck? Dude you got some balls. Wouldn't be surprised if you're back in the labor market next week. 

But seriously, I think the crucial issue really is how ads are handled. Funnily enough, I haven't been able to find out anything about that. I woulda thought that would be FAQ No. 1. Are G just being laissez-faire? Or are they planning something???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Erick you forgot whose signature is on your paycheck? Dude you got some balls. Wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if you&#8217;re back in the labor market next week. </p>
<p>But seriously, I think the crucial issue really is how ads are handled. Funnily enough, I haven&#8217;t been able to find out anything about that. I woulda thought that would be FAQ No. 1. Are G just being laissez-faire? Or are they planning something???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constructive Deconstruction</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1720566</link>
		<dc:creator>Constructive Deconstruction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 07:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1720566</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Battle of the Social Networks: Will Googleâ€™s OpenSocial Affect Users?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Google should be launching OpenSocial soon and from what Iâ€™ve gathered, itâ€™s going to be a common API that works across a conglomerate of social networks. Seems to me like itâ€™s a reaction to the unstoppable Facebook phenomenon. Question is, will ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Battle of the Social Networks: Will Googleâ€™s OpenSocial Affect Users?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Google should be launching OpenSocial soon and from what Iâ€™ve gathered, itâ€™s going to be a common API that works across a conglomerate of social networks. Seems to me like itâ€™s a reaction to the unstoppable Facebook phenomenon. Question is, will &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Wilsch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1720338</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Wilsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 05:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1720338</guid>
		<description>@Josh, that was not my question.... why is not Hi5, MySpace, or other much bigger players getting quoted, I saw 3 quotes from Ning, by far the smallest of the bunch of those in on the agreement. Great PR for Ning, good positioning, &#38; more power to them; just would have thought the PR quotes would be from the larger players on how great this was blah blah...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Josh, that was not my question&#8230;. why is not Hi5, MySpace, or other much bigger players getting quoted, I saw 3 quotes from Ning, by far the smallest of the bunch of those in on the agreement. Great PR for Ning, good positioning, &amp; more power to them; just would have thought the PR quotes would be from the larger players on how great this was blah blah&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exapted</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1720257</link>
		<dc:creator>exapted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 05:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1720257</guid>
		<description>@36
"Okay, havent trawled through all replies, but why doesnâ€™t facebook just open its platform to all other social networksâ€¦.google has nothing then."

That would be an interesting move. Perhaps eventually Google would be forced to use the Facebook API in its applications and Facebook would own the defacto ID and social networking standards.

"Having said this, if they all open up, then arent they all in theory dumped right back out on the internet again, which is the biggest open network there is, people first try to close, then open, then I am sure they will try to close it again."

But technologies mature and become commodities. Eventually people will stop quibbling so much over the basic ID and social networking standards, and there will be the equivalent of "platform wars" over open standards for natural language processing, language translation, etc. There is always a convergence of some standards and the creation of new, quite different standards that often utilize the more mature standards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@36<br />
&#8220;Okay, havent trawled through all replies, but why doesnâ€™t facebook just open its platform to all other social networksâ€¦.google has nothing then.&#8221;</p>
<p>That would be an interesting move. Perhaps eventually Google would be forced to use the Facebook API in its applications and Facebook would own the defacto ID and social networking standards.</p>
<p>&#8220;Having said this, if they all open up, then arent they all in theory dumped right back out on the internet again, which is the biggest open network there is, people first try to close, then open, then I am sure they will try to close it again.&#8221;</p>
<p>But technologies mature and become commodities. Eventually people will stop quibbling so much over the basic ID and social networking standards, and there will be the equivalent of &#8220;platform wars&#8221; over open standards for natural language processing, language translation, etc. There is always a convergence of some standards and the creation of new, quite different standards that often utilize the more mature standards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exapted</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1720197</link>
		<dc:creator>exapted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1720197</guid>
		<description>If social applications don't matter, then there is no game change or paradigm shift and there is not much to ponder. But in my view many web applications of the future are going to be inherently social and eventually things will open up. So social web standards matter a great deal.

But I guess the question is whether Google's OpenSocial API matters right now. I think it does. Facebook doesn't actually dominate social networking. Companies and individuals are going to want to develop social applications for all social networks and OpenSocial is going to provide an efficient means of doing so.

With OpenSocial, anyone could create a social networking site and expect many of the OpenSocial applications will work on it. There will surely be lots of new social networks in China in the coming several years. I bet Google will open up their social networking API to China ASAP.

Many business applications are inherently social in nature. Perhaps investment banks will create social networks on which to run market strategy games. Perhaps e-commerce sites will use the standard in their offerings so that they can more easily port their applications to different web properties.

This is a big deal. Lets see if it reaches critical mass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If social applications don&#8217;t matter, then there is no game change or paradigm shift and there is not much to ponder. But in my view many web applications of the future are going to be inherently social and eventually things will open up. So social web standards matter a great deal.</p>
<p>But I guess the question is whether Google&#8217;s OpenSocial API matters right now. I think it does. Facebook doesn&#8217;t actually dominate social networking. Companies and individuals are going to want to develop social applications for all social networks and OpenSocial is going to provide an efficient means of doing so.</p>
<p>With OpenSocial, anyone could create a social networking site and expect many of the OpenSocial applications will work on it. There will surely be lots of new social networks in China in the coming several years. I bet Google will open up their social networking API to China ASAP.</p>
<p>Many business applications are inherently social in nature. Perhaps investment banks will create social networks on which to run market strategy games. Perhaps e-commerce sites will use the standard in their offerings so that they can more easily port their applications to different web properties.</p>
<p>This is a big deal. Lets see if it reaches critical mass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Panamajack</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1720113</link>
		<dc:creator>Panamajack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1720113</guid>
		<description>Why do people who have a hate on for FB/social junk READ and COMMENT on articles about them ? 

Techcrunch had 23 posts yesterday (Nov. 1), 2-3 with references to Facebook. IGNORE THEM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people who have a hate on for FB/social junk READ and COMMENT on articles about them ? </p>
<p>Techcrunch had 23 posts yesterday (Nov. 1), 2-3 with references to Facebook. IGNORE THEM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Bauser</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1719919</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Bauser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 02:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1719919</guid>
		<description>If applications were the only reason people used Facebook, then OpenSocial would be a huge problem for Facebook.  But in the real world, Facebook was already outperforming most of the OpenSocial gang &lt;i&gt;before&lt;/i&gt; it launched the applications platform.

What really matters is what OpenSocial accomplishes &lt;i&gt;after&lt;/i&gt; it spreads silly applications all over the place.  People go to social network sites to see and manage their social graphs.  If Google and its little gang run around screaming about how OpenSocial will increase interoperability, but don't use OpenSocial to improve people's social graphing experience, OpenSocial is just going to seem like so much hype.

So, the biggest variable in this equation:  How much do LinkedIn, Hi5, and rest &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; want to share users?  Will they encourage users to export data to other networks?  Will they let users friend other sites' users?

So, does anybody think all those competitors are really going to be &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; open?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If applications were the only reason people used Facebook, then OpenSocial would be a huge problem for Facebook.  But in the real world, Facebook was already outperforming most of the OpenSocial gang <i>before</i> it launched the applications platform.</p>
<p>What really matters is what OpenSocial accomplishes <i>after</i> it spreads silly applications all over the place.  People go to social network sites to see and manage their social graphs.  If Google and its little gang run around screaming about how OpenSocial will increase interoperability, but don&#8217;t use OpenSocial to improve people&#8217;s social graphing experience, OpenSocial is just going to seem like so much hype.</p>
<p>So, the biggest variable in this equation:  How much do LinkedIn, Hi5, and rest <i>really</i> want to share users?  Will they encourage users to export data to other networks?  Will they let users friend other sites&#8217; users?</p>
<p>So, does anybody think all those competitors are really going to be <i>that</i> open?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iqbal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1719748</link>
		<dc:creator>Iqbal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 01:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1719748</guid>
		<description>Okay, havent trawled through all replies, but why doesn't facebook just open its platform to all other social networks....google has nothing then.

Having said this, if they all open up, then arent they all in theory dumped right back out on the internet again, which is the biggest open network there is,  people first try to close, then open, then I am sure they will try to close it again.

Iqbal</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, havent trawled through all replies, but why doesn&#8217;t facebook just open its platform to all other social networks&#8230;.google has nothing then.</p>
<p>Having said this, if they all open up, then arent they all in theory dumped right back out on the internet again, which is the biggest open network there is,  people first try to close, then open, then I am sure they will try to close it again.</p>
<p>Iqbal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berlin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1719668</link>
		<dc:creator>Berlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1719668</guid>
		<description>@31 

Facebook is more popular than porn:
http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1678586,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@31 </p>
<p>Facebook is more popular than porn:<br />
<a href="http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1678586,00.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.time.com/time/busin.....86,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1719656</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/facebook-your-move/#comment-1719656</guid>
		<description>Hold on one second here!
Facebook is utterly unstopable now that MS is onboard!
We are "ad-vising" them and throwing in some of our "special sauce" software!

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hold on one second here!<br />
Facebook is utterly unstopable now that MS is onboard!<br />
We are &#8220;ad-vising&#8221; them and throwing in some of our &#8220;special sauce&#8221; software!</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.099 seconds -->
