<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are You One Of Over 10,000 Donors to Wikimedia?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terbaik.Net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $3 Million Donation For The Sum Of All Human Knowledge</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-2053062</link>
		<dc:creator>Terbaik.Net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $3 Million Donation For The Sum Of All Human Knowledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-2053062</guid>
		<description>[...] should be significantly higher. In addition to this donation, Wikipedia has engaged in significant fundraising efforts over the last year. The foundation has 15 employees and hopes to grow to 25 by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] should be significantly higher. In addition to this donation, Wikipedia has engaged in significant fundraising efforts over the last year. The foundation has 15 employees and hopes to grow to 25 by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikimedia&#8217;s 2007 Financials Posted</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-2004012</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikimedia&#8217;s 2007 Financials Posted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 11:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-2004012</guid>
		<description>[...] income increased from $1.5 million in 2006 to $2.7 million (the period covered is prior to their recent fundraising effort). Donations of Google stock actually made up a material portion of contributions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] income increased from $1.5 million in 2006 to $2.7 million (the period covered is prior to their recent fundraising effort). Donations of Google stock actually made up a material portion of contributions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Desk sites &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wikimediaâ€™s 2007 Financials Posted</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1984834</link>
		<dc:creator>Desk sites &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wikimediaâ€™s 2007 Financials Posted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 18:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1984834</guid>
		<description>[...] income increased from $1.5 million in 2006 to $2.7 million (the period covered is prior to their recent fundraising effort). Donations of Google stock actually made up a material portion of contributions [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] income increased from $1.5 million in 2006 to $2.7 million (the period covered is prior to their recent fundraising effort). Donations of Google stock actually made up a material portion of contributions [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1725943</link>
		<dc:creator>Judson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 07:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1725943</guid>
		<description>Jesus, why do people think he can pay for everything himself? You do realize Wikipedia is a top ten website in traffic right? There are hundreds of servers, on a few continents. Are we assuming that's super cheap? Not to mention Wikimedia is a non-profit foundation, and Jimmy Wales isn't even the chair of the board... Non-profits don't "go public". Also, the content  is all freely licensed so even if the e foundation did something terrible, people could easily fork the text and start over without the foundation's permission at all. It's worth donating to. If you don't want to fine, but don't be an ass. This thread has seriously made me re-evaluate the comment quality on this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jesus, why do people think he can pay for everything himself? You do realize Wikipedia is a top ten website in traffic right? There are hundreds of servers, on a few continents. Are we assuming that&#8217;s super cheap? Not to mention Wikimedia is a non-profit foundation, and Jimmy Wales isn&#8217;t even the chair of the board&#8230; Non-profits don&#8217;t &#8220;go public&#8221;. Also, the content  is all freely licensed so even if the e foundation did something terrible, people could easily fork the text and start over without the foundation&#8217;s permission at all. It&#8217;s worth donating to. If you don&#8217;t want to fine, but don&#8217;t be an ass. This thread has seriously made me re-evaluate the comment quality on this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stanley miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1723471</link>
		<dc:creator>stanley miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 05:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1723471</guid>
		<description>yes! one can't even fathom what wales contribution is having on education.   the wales project is flushing the general knowledge bank and years*years*volumes of specialized knowledge at once.  at last! we can move on and learn something new.

google, the directory for the worldwide strip-mall of small business grabs headlines,  but it's wikipedia that will really change the world.

(p.s. I sold at $600)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes! one can&#8217;t even fathom what wales contribution is having on education.   the wales project is flushing the general knowledge bank and years*years*volumes of specialized knowledge at once.  at last! we can move on and learn something new.</p>
<p>google, the directory for the worldwide strip-mall of small business grabs headlines,  but it&#8217;s wikipedia that will really change the world.</p>
<p>(p.s. I sold at $600)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rollo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1722907</link>
		<dc:creator>Rollo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1722907</guid>
		<description>Yes. Despite its flaws, Wikipedia is a global treasure. I'm not embarrassed to say that. It's an honour to contribute to this amazing project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Despite its flaws, Wikipedia is a global treasure. I&#8217;m not embarrassed to say that. It&#8217;s an honour to contribute to this amazing project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1722647</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 22:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1722647</guid>
		<description>Wow... Provide a good and free service, ask for donations, and this is the kind of mob mentality you get?

No wonder more people don't donate their time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; Provide a good and free service, ask for donations, and this is the kind of mob mentality you get?</p>
<p>No wonder more people don&#8217;t donate their time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1722443</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 20:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1722443</guid>
		<description>-------------------------------------------------------
!! URGENT:  Don't donate to Wikimedia !!  
-------------------------------------------------------

• Wikimedia is ALREADY a very valuable asset to its owners.  When Wikimedia goes public, YOUR money will go directly in to THEIR pockets.

• Anybody who donates cash to Wikimedia is supporting their flawed and dangerous practice of deputizing users as special 'admins'.  These belligerent tyrants receive little automatic notifications whenever any 'hot issues' precious to them have been modified.  And here's the kicker –– if ANY modifications are not acceptable to an admin, he or she HAS THE POWER TO BLOCK further access to the article at will, and thus is able abusively control the point of view of the encyclopedia itself.   It's a nightmare.


My urgent message to Wikimedia management:

YOUR SITE is vulnerable to bias because of your practice of deputizing users as 'moderators' and 'admins'.  Here is the corrective action you need to take to fix this:

1)  ALL moderators should only have administrative access to a small, randomly-chosen SUBSET of articles within your encyclopedia.

2) This random subset should be ROTATED among your admins.

3) Admins should have TERM LIMITS, tenured inversely based on how often they block articles. 


Until Wikimedia owners take these necessary steps to improve the objectivity of their content, they will remain on my network's BANNED IP list and certainly won't ever see a DIME of my money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
!! URGENT:  Don&#8217;t donate to Wikimedia !!<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>• Wikimedia is ALREADY a very valuable asset to its owners.  When Wikimedia goes public, YOUR money will go directly in to THEIR pockets.</p>
<p>• Anybody who donates cash to Wikimedia is supporting their flawed and dangerous practice of deputizing users as special &#8216;admins&#8217;.  These belligerent tyrants receive little automatic notifications whenever any &#8216;hot issues&#8217; precious to them have been modified.  And here&#8217;s the kicker –– if ANY modifications are not acceptable to an admin, he or she HAS THE POWER TO BLOCK further access to the article at will, and thus is able abusively control the point of view of the encyclopedia itself.   It&#8217;s a nightmare.</p>
<p>My urgent message to Wikimedia management:</p>
<p>YOUR SITE is vulnerable to bias because of your practice of deputizing users as &#8216;moderators&#8217; and &#8216;admins&#8217;.  Here is the corrective action you need to take to fix this:</p>
<p>1)  ALL moderators should only have administrative access to a small, randomly-chosen SUBSET of articles within your encyclopedia.</p>
<p>2) This random subset should be ROTATED among your admins.</p>
<p>3) Admins should have TERM LIMITS, tenured inversely based on how often they block articles. </p>
<p>Until Wikimedia owners take these necessary steps to improve the objectivity of their content, they will remain on my network&#8217;s BANNED IP list and certainly won&#8217;t ever see a DIME of my money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1722239</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 19:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1722239</guid>
		<description>It could be loaded with ads and popups making 100 times as much money for Jimmy Wales and his foundation, or you can donate. Those people expecting something for nothing deserve NOTHING. If you hate his past, make a donation because it will keep Jimmy Wales from making hundreds of millions of dollars, maybe billions. Just look at the value of less popular websites, like Facebook, if you don't believe me.

Personally, as soon as my net worth is back in credit in a few months, I will be making a donation of $25 (the average donation), and my income is far lower than the average.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be loaded with ads and popups making 100 times as much money for Jimmy Wales and his foundation, or you can donate. Those people expecting something for nothing deserve NOTHING. If you hate his past, make a donation because it will keep Jimmy Wales from making hundreds of millions of dollars, maybe billions. Just look at the value of less popular websites, like Facebook, if you don&#8217;t believe me.</p>
<p>Personally, as soon as my net worth is back in credit in a few months, I will be making a donation of $25 (the average donation), and my income is far lower than the average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prime</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1721808</link>
		<dc:creator>Prime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1721808</guid>
		<description>It is a good thing to support projects like this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a good thing to support projects like this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1721506</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 14:31:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1721506</guid>
		<description>Yep, whenever he throws up the fundraising banner I give $10.  Considering it's saved me several hundred dollars in books and subscription fees for pay information sites (not to mention inevitable late fees from libraries) and countless hours that would have been spent searching using less user-friendly methods, it has been quite the bargain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, whenever he throws up the fundraising banner I give $10.  Considering it&#8217;s saved me several hundred dollars in books and subscription fees for pay information sites (not to mention inevitable late fees from libraries) and countless hours that would have been spent searching using less user-friendly methods, it has been quite the bargain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth Finkelstein</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1721432</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth Finkelstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1721432</guid>
		<description>C'mon, the fact that Wales dabbled in the soft-core "Babe" biz is obviously a PR problem for him, but I'm surprised that the TechCrunch crowd would consider it a character flaw. It's not like he was Hugh Hefner or Larry Flynt - there's pretty good evidence he didn't make a fortune from it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon, the fact that Wales dabbled in the soft-core &#8220;Babe&#8221; biz is obviously a PR problem for him, but I&#8217;m surprised that the TechCrunch crowd would consider it a character flaw. It&#8217;s not like he was Hugh Hefner or Larry Flynt - there&#8217;s pretty good evidence he didn&#8217;t make a fortune from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: halcy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1721329</link>
		<dc:creator>halcy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 13:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1721329</guid>
		<description>Yes, in fact, I am one of them. Because when I saw the donation drive bar up on wikipedia, I thought about how often I really do use this site, it'd be a shame if I didn't chip in some money, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, in fact, I am one of them. Because when I saw the donation drive bar up on wikipedia, I thought about how often I really do use this site, it&#8217;d be a shame if I didn&#8217;t chip in some money, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick of cebu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1721086</link>
		<dc:creator>nick of cebu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 11:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1721086</guid>
		<description>Moi? Not very likely. Wikipedia is a terrific project and it has helped us tremendously, but it's a dog-eat-dog world out there, and my next project happens to be a wiki-killer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moi? Not very likely. Wikipedia is a terrific project and it has helped us tremendously, but it&#8217;s a dog-eat-dog world out there, and my next project happens to be a wiki-killer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720666</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 08:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720666</guid>
		<description>I just did. I did my graduation research paper using Wikipedia materials. It's probably one of my most visited sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just did. I did my graduation research paper using Wikipedia materials. It&#8217;s probably one of my most visited sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 42mb.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720641</link>
		<dc:creator>42mb.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 07:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720641</guid>
		<description>Google get millions targeted traffic from wikipedia, it is best resource for searcher too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google get millions targeted traffic from wikipedia, it is best resource for searcher too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jono</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720540</link>
		<dc:creator>Jono</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 07:13:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720540</guid>
		<description>I agree with 15. Wikipedia is one of the most useful sites on the web and the fact that they are trying to keep it as a resource by the people, for the people is commendable. As for his background as a porn star... who gives a flying f..k, get over yourselves?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with 15. Wikipedia is one of the most useful sites on the web and the fact that they are trying to keep it as a resource by the people, for the people is commendable. As for his background as a porn star&#8230; who gives a flying f..k, get over yourselves?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planet Malaysia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720405</link>
		<dc:creator>Planet Malaysia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 06:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720405</guid>
		<description>Yes I did :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I did <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720186</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 04:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720186</guid>
		<description>Wow... jealousy runs deep! I applaud his efforts to change the world, no matter his beginnings or past activities. You can't deny what he has accomplished for the human race. To all you religious zealots, get over yourselves and look at Jesus himself who said "let the first who is without sin cast the first stone".

Some people really need to get their head out of their ass. Yes, he can pay for everything himself many times over, yes he is using other peoples resources to build wikipedia up... but I believe the benefits of this foundation far out weight the negatives.

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; jealousy runs deep! I applaud his efforts to change the world, no matter his beginnings or past activities. You can&#8217;t deny what he has accomplished for the human race. To all you religious zealots, get over yourselves and look at Jesus himself who said &#8220;let the first who is without sin cast the first stone&#8221;.</p>
<p>Some people really need to get their head out of their ass. Yes, he can pay for everything himself many times over, yes he is using other peoples resources to build wikipedia up&#8230; but I believe the benefits of this foundation far out weight the negatives.</p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoopie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720133</link>
		<dc:creator>whoopie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720133</guid>
		<description>yes, for the last two years

best site on the web, hands down

one of few sites i NEED, not just want or like

wikipedia is a global treasure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, for the last two years</p>
<p>best site on the web, hands down</p>
<p>one of few sites i NEED, not just want or like</p>
<p>wikipedia is a global treasure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaynis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720118</link>
		<dc:creator>jaynis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:46:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720118</guid>
		<description>yes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Meoff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720106</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Meoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720106</guid>
		<description>Hell no - no $ for (ex) porn kings . . . Wales is the reason Wikipedia is soooo slimy . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell no - no $ for (ex) porn kings . . . Wales is the reason Wikipedia is soooo slimy . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720093</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720093</guid>
		<description>Christ, are you all 13? Even &lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/01/2245248" rel="nofollow"&gt;Slashdot's comments&lt;/a&gt; are more mature and well-informed than this swill.

So Bomis is cheesy. Wikipedia isn't just Jimmy Wales, and it's a worthy cause.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christ, are you all 13? Even <a href="http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/11/01/2245248" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/slashdot.org');">Slashdot&#8217;s comments</a> are more mature and well-informed than this swill.</p>
<p>So Bomis is cheesy. Wikipedia isn&#8217;t just Jimmy Wales, and it&#8217;s a worthy cause.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: faceloop</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720059</link>
		<dc:creator>faceloop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720059</guid>
		<description>wikipedia culture has morphed into dmoz culture.  cult-like editors with a nazi-like mentality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wikipedia culture has morphed into dmoz culture.  cult-like editors with a nazi-like mentality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Burt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720046</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 03:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/11/01/are-you-one-of-over-10000-donors-to-wikimedia/#comment-1720046</guid>
		<description>Wow .. google Bomis (Wales' previous stuff).... amazing</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow .. google Bomis (Wales&#8217; previous stuff)&#8230;. amazing</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.103 seconds -->
