October 29, 2007

Live Search Maps Getting Better At Giving Directions

Erick Schonfeld

26 comments »

livesearchmaps-logo.pngIn other mapping news (see EveryScape post), I love all the competition going on in online mapping between Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, and even MapQuest. The latest in the feature race comes from Microsoft’s Live Search Maps. In addition to finally releasing its 3D Bird’s Eye view a couple weeks ago (see video below), Microsoft has also upgraded some of the basic features of its maps. For one thing, it has fixed what I consider to be a major bug in most mapping apps: overly-detailed driving directions. You can now have the option of skipping the first nine “turn left at the stop sign two blocks from your house” type of directions and just start the guidance from the nearest major highway—which you probably know how to get to anyway. Thank you, Microsoft, for treating us like humans.

livesearhmap-abrv.png

In addition to the abbreviated directions,other improvements include:

—Landmarks are now given in driving directions that indicate you’ve gone too far.

—Black is the new red. Traffic speed is now shown with four colors (green, yellow, red, and black). Black means total standstill, versus red, which means creeping logjam.

—In some cases, Live Search Maps will now actually re-route your directions around bad traffic.

—Guided search gives you Yellow Page categories in a left-hand panel, and individual business details are now populated right on the map from sources like Judy’s Book or CitySearch.

—3D fly-throughs now support force feedback if you are using an Xbox 360 videogame controller, and buildings go transparent when you run into them.

—Microsoft even (admittedly) stole a line editing feature from Google Maps.

Competition is good. Here’s the video of Microsoft’s 3D Bird’s Eye view, which was first hinted at last May:

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. GlobalDR

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Bob

    Live was the best maps before these updates, now it blows the doors off all the others, Google, Yahoo.

  2. Velioncho

    Their Bird’s eye view is the best but unfortunately, overall live maps experience is not as great as gmaps.

    For example, often I use maps to find businesses ( restaurents etc) near an address. So first I gave address and got the map from Live Maps and then clicked business and entered, say Mcdonalds. Now clicking on directions giving me directions to the selected McDonalds from Miscrosoft’s office in Seattle.nasty.

    Also, it gives an additional screen to select fastest/shortest route before giving directions.Which world are you in? Giving the results quickly with good default choices is the norm these days, and give a choice to refine them.

    When you have such great features like Birds eye view, it is almost idiotic to loose user because you are not able to do small things like these.

    So I am still stuck to gmaps for the time being atleast.

  3. BeingParents

    There is always room for improvements. The is a core message of web 2.0. Also WE have the voice to influence those improvement. Web 2.0 is the people’s web.

    MS second mover instincts are finally catching up with them.
    In web 2.0 web the first movers have had the up hands so far.

  4. Michael

    The only thing Live Maps is still missing is the ability to embed custom maps (ie. collections) into a blog or web page.

    I would switch from Google Maps today if I could post my maps somewhere other than the Live site.

  5. Parker

    All I ask is they tell me where I can park!!!

  6. Alec

    I love that mapping technology is improving due to competition. I wish we had the same happening with operating systems.

    One thing I haven’t found on any mapping service, and one I’d LOVE, particularly when dealing with busy city streets, is a note on which side of the street the address happens to be when following the map sites directions. Many street address numbers are poorly marked and having to zip my head back and forth to try to identify the right side to look on is slightly dangerous.

  7. Rajan Tawate

    @1 seems to be a big MSFT fan.

    http://www.meetingflex.com

  8. Jamie Thomson

    Personally I think the best feature of this recent release is the ability to build a 3D tour of a collection. Driving directions..yeah…OK. Pretty good. Not THAT good though (IMO).

    Now if they could give 3D tours of driving directions (this isn’t yet possible) THAT would be cool.

    -Jamie

  9. Velioncho

    I am glad somebody other than Mike has covered this topic.
    If it were Mike, focal point would have been on one silly thing “Microsoft admittedly copying the edit feature from google maps”. Then again Google copied collection from microrsoft. Story would be on who copied whom? and who is lying rather than on what features are nice for the user.

  10. Steve Ballmer

    This is the best software of this kind by an order of magnitude!
    ps: It won’t work on macs or iPhones!

    http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com

  11. Richard Corsale

    functionality is always a nice feature :)

  12. Axel

    Only looks “cool” if you’re using one of Steve Ballmer’s approved operating systems, it seems. Oh well.

  13. Andrew

    It works on Mac if you use FireFox.

  14. Billy

    What’s a microsoft? What’s a “live search map”? Can I google it?

  15. Bob

    Hi, remember me, I’m Microsoft Bob. Now I do maps. Glad you like them. Don’t forget to install a bunch of my microsoft software when you visit my mapping site. (that is if your using windows, ha ha apple and linux weenies).

    Keep on Truckin’

    Sincerely,
    Microsoft Bob!

  16. Max

    This looks like they just applied Microsoft Photosynth to maps.

  17. Offthegrid

    Okay, since traffic.com doesn’t provide a black flow indicator for standstill traffic does this mean Live maps is using Inrix data mixed with traffic.com or are they just guessing when traffic is slower than traffic.com’s red flow indicator?

  18. Will

    I don’t consider “overly detailed driving instructions” to be a bug. It’s true that you probably don’t need instructions on how to get to the highway from your house but what if you’re looking up directions on how to get somewhere from a friend’s house? In that case, since you’re in an unfamiliar neighborhood I would think you would want very detailed instructions. Of course, it’s good to have an option to skip those types of directions but I’m glad they’re their in the first place.

  19. third

    @16

    Yep, you got that right. And it looks pretty amazing! I didn’t imagine that MS is brewing Photosynth for this.

  20. micfo.com

    I like this feature -Live Search Maps will now actually re-route your directions around bad traffic. That seems pretty useful.

  21. Richard Miller

    functionality together with great graphic features have always been an important component when it comes to mapping applications. Cool feature!

  22. Dan Schawbel

    Microsoft is making the right move here. The landscape looks true to real life, so I’m sure it will go over well with everyone.

  23. tim

    Though this was just posted on the Live Search blog, these feature were released a few weeks ago

    http://blog.kelseygroup.com/in.....arch-maps/

  24. Phillip Nakata

    I saw the earlier comment about not being able to embed live maps …. see this clever use of developer’s kit at virtualearth….

    http://virtualearth.spaces.live.com/blog/cns!2BBC66E99FDCDB98!8240.entry

    (embedding any ‘collection’ id within a sizable windows, with the option to have a side list of the collection items)

  25. NDWings

    This looks similar to the cool MapJack.com. And I like MapJack more because of its usability and simplicity compared to Everyscape.