<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Automattic Spurns $200 Million Acquisition Offer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 07:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Workspace</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-2400324</link>
		<dc:creator>Workspace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 21:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-2400324</guid>
		<description>[...] [i] “Automattic Spurns $200 Million Acquisition Offer”, Michael Arrington, October 2007, http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [i] “Automattic Spurns $200 Million Acquisition Offer”, Michael Arrington, October 2007, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007.....ion-offer/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The shocking badness of Wordpress.com (and what they should do about it) &#171; Jay by Jay Fresh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-2396826</link>
		<dc:creator>The shocking badness of Wordpress.com (and what they should do about it) &#171; Jay by Jay Fresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 19:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-2396826</guid>
		<description>[...] noticed:] Automattic, the company behind WordPress.com, turned down a $200m acquisition offer in in the last fortnight. And the traffic is going through the roof. Somebody loves them.      This [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] noticed:] Automattic, the company behind WordPress.com, turned down a $200m acquisition offer in in the last fortnight. And the traffic is going through the roof. Somebody loves them.      This [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: where&#8217;s the catch &#171; Bheemboy&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-2304419</link>
		<dc:creator>where&#8217;s the catch &#171; Bheemboy&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 20:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-2304419</guid>
		<description>[...] about $1.1 million in angel funding. and $ 29.5 million in round B. and before that turns down a $200 million buy-out bid. founder Matt is talking [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] about $1.1 million in angel funding. and $ 29.5 million in round B. and before that turns down a $200 million buy-out bid. founder Matt is talking [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Automattic Founders To Take Big Money Off The Table</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-2017216</link>
		<dc:creator>Automattic Founders To Take Big Money Off The Table</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-2017216</guid>
		<description>[...] It didn&#8217;t make a lot of sense when we heard that Automattic, the company that created the Wordpress.com blogging platform and oversees the Wordpress.org open source project, turned down a $200 million buyout offer. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It didn&#8217;t make a lot of sense when we heard that Automattic, the company that created the Wordpress.com blogging platform and oversees the Wordpress.org open source project, turned down a $200 million buyout offer. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress stockt auf: 3 GB Speicher und 30 Millionen Dollar Kapital &#171; c/o operative</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1936592</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress stockt auf: 3 GB Speicher und 30 Millionen Dollar Kapital &#171; c/o operative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 01:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1936592</guid>
		<description>[...] und bbPress fließen. So beeindruckend sich die Summe von knapp 30 Millionen Dollar ausnimmt, laut Techcrunch sollen Mullenweg und Co. letztes Jahr ein 200 Millionen Dollar Übernahme Angebot abgelehnt haben. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] und bbPress fließen. So beeindruckend sich die Summe von knapp 30 Millionen Dollar ausnimmt, laut Techcrunch sollen Mullenweg und Co. letztes Jahr ein 200 Millionen Dollar Übernahme Angebot abgelehnt haben. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dario Salvelli&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A tutto Wordpress!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1936288</link>
		<dc:creator>Dario Salvelli&#8217;s Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; A tutto Wordpress!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 18:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1936288</guid>
		<description>[...] degli eventi e di come si è sviluppato negli anni Wordpress che rifiutò qualche tempo fa un&#8217;offerta di acquisizione di 200 milioni di dollari. A questo punto sarebbe ancora più interessante sentirlo parlare all&#8217;I WordCamp di [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] degli eventi e di come si è sviluppato negli anni Wordpress che rifiutò qualche tempo fa un&#8217;offerta di acquisizione di 200 milioni di dollari. A questo punto sarebbe ancora più interessante sentirlo parlare all&#8217;I WordCamp di [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresh faces, fresh ideas, the future : AccMan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1935628</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh faces, fresh ideas, the future : AccMan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1935628</guid>
		<description>[...] Last year it is rumoured to have turned down an offer of $200 million [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last year it is rumoured to have turned down an offer of $200 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: De Grote Jaarlijkse DNZM-Verzamelpost - Doe Niet Zo Moeilijk!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1890503</link>
		<dc:creator>De Grote Jaarlijkse DNZM-Verzamelpost - Doe Niet Zo Moeilijk!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 17:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1890503</guid>
		<description>[...] Neem een SixApart, dat in 2005 LiveJournal kocht en dat kortgeleden weer van de hand deed. Neem Automattic, dat naast het bestieren van WordPress.com en blogspamfilter Akismet, Gravatar heeft overgenomen, en waarover de geruchten gaan dat ze onlangs een overnamebod van 200 miljoen dollar hebben afgeslagen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Neem een SixApart, dat in 2005 LiveJournal kocht en dat kortgeleden weer van de hand deed. Neem Automattic, dat naast het bestieren van WordPress.com en blogspamfilter Akismet, Gravatar heeft overgenomen, en waarover de geruchten gaan dat ze onlangs een overnamebod van 200 miljoen dollar hebben afgeslagen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Automattic Rumors, Lorelle Provides WordPress.com News &#124; PHP Podcasts</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1849277</link>
		<dc:creator>Automattic Rumors, Lorelle Provides WordPress.com News &#124; PHP Podcasts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 16:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1849277</guid>
		<description>[...] down $200M, receives additional fundingRumors abound surrounding Automattic, Inc. including their turning down US$200 million in acquisition money, the founders receiving US$50 million and Matt Mullenweg&#8217;s peculiar jazz-themed home [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] down $200M, receives additional fundingRumors abound surrounding Automattic, Inc. including their turning down US$200 million in acquisition money, the founders receiving US$50 million and Matt Mullenweg&#8217;s peculiar jazz-themed home [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stanton Champion &#187; Movable Type Now Free - Now What for Six Apart?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1839462</link>
		<dc:creator>Stanton Champion &#187; Movable Type Now Free - Now What for Six Apart?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 06:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1839462</guid>
		<description>[...] all using WordPress as a platform. Automattic just took a $50 million funding round and apparently turned down a $200 million buyout offer not long [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] all using WordPress as a platform. Automattic just took a $50 million funding round and apparently turned down a $200 million buyout offer not long [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diseño Web</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1756489</link>
		<dc:creator>Diseño Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1756489</guid>
		<description>Opportunities come and go. Its very difficult the born of a new WP competitor, so they guys can say: no thanks.

At the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Opportunities come and go. Its very difficult the born of a new WP competitor, so they guys can say: no thanks.</p>
<p>At the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are you committed to WordPress? Then how do you feel about Automattic?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1756204</link>
		<dc:creator>Are you committed to WordPress? Then how do you feel about Automattic?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1756204</guid>
		<description>[...] Automattic founders will make a bunch of money from the investors in the company, in response to the turned down $200m buyout offer. Good for Matt &#38; Co. of course, I won&#8217;t begrudge anyone making money out of good [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Automattic founders will make a bunch of money from the investors in the company, in response to the turned down $200m buyout offer. Good for Matt &#38; Co. of course, I won&#8217;t begrudge anyone making money out of good [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuku</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1741756</link>
		<dc:creator>kuku</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 06:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1741756</guid>
		<description>i glad to hear that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i glad to hear that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EC</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1739239</link>
		<dc:creator>EC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1739239</guid>
		<description>hello!
say hello to my homepage
http://affiliate-tyoushoshinnsha.livedoor.biz/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello!<br />
say hello to my homepage<br />
<a href="http://affiliate-tyoushoshinnsha.livedoor.biz/" rel="nofollow">http://affiliate-tyoushoshinnsha.livedoor.biz/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1734928</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 07:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1734928</guid>
		<description>Wow what a stupid move. When the bubble bursts and that $200 million+ offer doesn't comes back again Matt might be regretting this move. $200 million for an open source software package is nuts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow what a stupid move. When the bubble bursts and that $200 million+ offer doesn&#8217;t comes back again Matt might be regretting this move. $200 million for an open source software package is nuts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Fresh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1732802</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Fresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1732802</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The shocking badness of Wordpress.com (and what they should do about&#160;it)...&lt;/strong&gt;

I host my blog on Wordpress.com. You&#8217;re reading it. It&#8217;s free, so I guess I should be thankful. But it&#8217;s crap.
Maybe it&#8217;s my elevated opinions about how much you should get for free these days, and maybe I am wildly cavalier abo...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The shocking badness of Wordpress.com (and what they should do about&nbsp;it)&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I host my blog on Wordpress.com. You&#8217;re reading it. It&#8217;s free, so I guess I should be thankful. But it&#8217;s crap.<br />
Maybe it&#8217;s my elevated opinions about how much you should get for free these days, and maybe I am wildly cavalier abo&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Rickeds</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1718175</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Rickeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 14:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1718175</guid>
		<description>Every once in a while I am suckered back to the techcrunch site because of an interesting headline, then I remember why I took you out of my RSS reader and can't stand the site.  Why do you publish such crap?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every once in a while I am suckered back to the techcrunch site because of an interesting headline, then I remember why I took you out of my RSS reader and can&#8217;t stand the site.  Why do you publish such crap?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1716418</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 01:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1716418</guid>
		<description>drmike, what you call the "multidatabase code" has been released http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-hackers/2007-May/012893.html
It's called Hyperdb and is open source.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>drmike, what you call the &#8220;multidatabase code&#8221; has been released <a href="http://comox.textdrive.com/pipermail/wp-hackers/2007-May/012893.html" rel="nofollow">http://comox.textdrive.com/pip.....12893.html</a><br />
It&#8217;s called Hyperdb and is open source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drmike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1715504</link>
		<dc:creator>drmike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1715504</guid>
		<description>Lloyd's comment up there needs a disclaimer as he's an employee of Automattic. (And they wonder why folks tell them they need an ethics policy...)

&lt;blockquote&gt;Christian Mohn, I don’t know who suggested to you that code goes from WordPress.com to WordPress on a case by case basic. That just isn’t true.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Um, excuse me but it is true.  A lot of the code used on wp.com is not released as Open Source.  The multidatabase code, the sitewide tag solution, the tag surfer, the recent news code, etc has not been brought oveer to the wordpress/ wpmu code.

&lt;blockquote&gt;All WordPress members benefit from WordPress.com and Automattic’s successes.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

*snort*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lloyd&#8217;s comment up there needs a disclaimer as he&#8217;s an employee of Automattic. (And they wonder why folks tell them they need an ethics policy&#8230;)</p>
<blockquote><p>Christian Mohn, I don’t know who suggested to you that code goes from WordPress.com to WordPress on a case by case basic. That just isn’t true.</p></blockquote>
<p>Um, excuse me but it is true.  A lot of the code used on wp.com is not released as Open Source.  The multidatabase code, the sitewide tag solution, the tag surfer, the recent news code, etc has not been brought oveer to the wordpress/ wpmu code.</p>
<blockquote><p>All WordPress members benefit from WordPress.com and Automattic’s successes.</p></blockquote>
<p>*snort*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: publicidad en internet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1713265</link>
		<dc:creator>publicidad en internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1713265</guid>
		<description>Wordpress is a world wide leader blog platform and the Packt Open Source Content Management System Award confirms that. Its not strange that automattic receives an Acquisition Offer,  automattic worths much more than 200 millions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wordpress is a world wide leader blog platform and the Packt Open Source Content Management System Award confirms that. Its not strange that automattic receives an Acquisition Offer,  automattic worths much more than 200 millions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Mager</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1712889</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Mager</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 21:26:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1712889</guid>
		<description>Good work Matt. Don't sell!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work Matt. Don&#8217;t sell!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Budd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1712552</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Budd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1712552</guid>
		<description>I don't know anything about an acquisition offer.

Our success so far is indeed a great confirmation to a business with open source participation at its core.

Christian Mohn,  I don't know who suggested to you that code goes from WordPress.com to WordPress on a case by case basic. That just isn't true. In fast that would be stupid of us, as it would create maintenance burden and risk code quality.

The business side is all to do with the execution. Anyone with the knowledge, experience, passion and dedication our team has could do the same thing. It is all about the execution, and I'm very happy that I work with the very best.

Could we do it without the WordPress.org community? Who knows, but many members of the team wouldn't be interested in finding out.  Myself and many members of the team wouldn't sleep well if we didn't feel we were living up to our potential in trying to influence the world to move towards free culture.

All WordPress members benefit from WordPress.com and Automattic's successes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know anything about an acquisition offer.</p>
<p>Our success so far is indeed a great confirmation to a business with open source participation at its core.</p>
<p>Christian Mohn,  I don&#8217;t know who suggested to you that code goes from WordPress.com to WordPress on a case by case basic. That just isn&#8217;t true. In fast that would be stupid of us, as it would create maintenance burden and risk code quality.</p>
<p>The business side is all to do with the execution. Anyone with the knowledge, experience, passion and dedication our team has could do the same thing. It is all about the execution, and I&#8217;m very happy that I work with the very best.</p>
<p>Could we do it without the WordPress.org community? Who knows, but many members of the team wouldn&#8217;t be interested in finding out.  Myself and many members of the team wouldn&#8217;t sleep well if we didn&#8217;t feel we were living up to our potential in trying to influence the world to move towards free culture.</p>
<p>All WordPress members benefit from WordPress.com and Automattic&#8217;s successes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nikolay Kolev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1712381</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolay Kolev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1712381</guid>
		<description>I don't know why every time there's a talk about WordPress.com, people say "I love WordPress.org" - these are two different things. Most people use WordPress.org source code, not because it's the best open-source blogging platform, but because it has the richest variety of themes and pluggins. But people are talking about forking WordPress not for pure technology reasons, but mostly because they can't live with Matt Mullenweg's attitude and approaches.

I didn't want to bring this up again, but here on this blog a couple of months ago I uncovered some facts about Matt &#38; his gangs' approaches. Namely, an Automattic employee has stolen my username and blog at WordPress and the using information I put in my WordPress.com account, tried to hijack other accounts with other services. Then, being pressed by their own FAQ, Automattic changed their ToS and FAQ overnight and then said to all of us: What are you guys talking about? A few people used web caching services to prove that Automattic changed their legal terms overnight to cover things up.

This is the type of attitude that WordPress.org contributors cannot live with. Not to mention previous tricks Matt used to bring traffic to his own blog and so on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know why every time there&#8217;s a talk about WordPress.com, people say &#8220;I love WordPress.org&#8221; - these are two different things. Most people use WordPress.org source code, not because it&#8217;s the best open-source blogging platform, but because it has the richest variety of themes and pluggins. But people are talking about forking WordPress not for pure technology reasons, but mostly because they can&#8217;t live with Matt Mullenweg&#8217;s attitude and approaches.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t want to bring this up again, but here on this blog a couple of months ago I uncovered some facts about Matt &amp; his gangs&#8217; approaches. Namely, an Automattic employee has stolen my username and blog at WordPress and the using information I put in my WordPress.com account, tried to hijack other accounts with other services. Then, being pressed by their own FAQ, Automattic changed their ToS and FAQ overnight and then said to all of us: What are you guys talking about? A few people used web caching services to prove that Automattic changed their legal terms overnight to cover things up.</p>
<p>This is the type of attitude that WordPress.org contributors cannot live with. Not to mention previous tricks Matt used to bring traffic to his own blog and so on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron R.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1712266</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1712266</guid>
		<description>Don't forget about Yahoo's recent $300M purchase of the open source collaboration solution - Zimbra!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget about Yahoo&#8217;s recent $300M purchase of the open source collaboration solution - Zimbra!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SmoothSpan Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1712095</link>
		<dc:creator>SmoothSpan Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 15:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/29/automattic-spurns-200-million-acquisition-offer/#comment-1712095</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;How Will This Web 2.0 Bubble&#160;Bursts?...&lt;/strong&gt;

The cries that the present Web 2.0 world is a bubble about to burst are becoming increasingly strident.  Emotions are starting to run away, and sometimes it gets a little ugly with the name calling.  We are at that classic point where bubble cryers a...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>How Will This Web 2.0 Bubble&nbsp;Bursts?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The cries that the present Web 2.0 world is a bubble about to burst are becoming increasingly strident.  Emotions are starting to run away, and sometimes it gets a little ugly with the name calling.  We are at that classic point where bubble cryers a&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.096 seconds -->
