<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Site Rankings (September, 2007)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 05:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Imeem Gobbles Up A Young Startup, Anywhere.FM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-2302436</link>
		<dc:creator>Imeem Gobbles Up A Young Startup, Anywhere.FM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 01:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-2302436</guid>
		<description>[...] monthly uniques and 65,000 new registered users each day according to their own stats. Comscore ranked them the top growing social site last September. If ad supported music is going to succeed, Imeem is the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] monthly uniques and 65,000 new registered users each day according to their own stats. Comscore ranked them the top growing social site last September. If ad supported music is going to succeed, Imeem is the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES GROW YEAR OVER YEAR &#124; Kriitika Imkamol</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-2301394</link>
		<dc:creator>SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES GROW YEAR OVER YEAR &#124; Kriitika Imkamol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-2301394</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/" rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007.....mber-2007/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Classmates IPO Tries to Cash In On Social Networking Craze</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-2048419</link>
		<dc:creator>Classmates IPO Tries to Cash In On Social Networking Craze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 18:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-2048419</guid>
		<description>[...] (which raised $25 million last April). While Facebook&#8217;s U.S. visitors grew 129 percent in September to 31 million (according to comScore), Classmate.com&#8217;s shrank 12 percent to 13 million. (Even [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (which raised $25 million last April). While Facebook&#8217;s U.S. visitors grew 129 percent in September to 31 million (according to comScore), Classmate.com&#8217;s shrank 12 percent to 13 million. (Even [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MyWord or FacePress? &#171; one cool site</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-2026423</link>
		<dc:creator>MyWord or FacePress? &#171; one cool site</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 00:25:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-2026423</guid>
		<description>[...] Social Networking Sites Growth Rates  - A look at growth rates of social networking sites. The rules aren&#8217;t what you think here, so anything under 100 percent growth year over year is actually BAD. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Social Networking Sites Growth Rates  - A look at growth rates of social networking sites. The rules aren&#8217;t what you think here, so anything under 100 percent growth year over year is actually BAD. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imeem Adds EMI To Its Stable</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-2014174</link>
		<dc:creator>Imeem Adds EMI To Its Stable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 02:35:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-2014174</guid>
		<description>[...] a few bumps in the road, imeem seems to be hitting its stride. Comscore shows it as one of the fastest growing social sites, with 3.2 unique U.S. visitors in September—although that&#8217;s down from a peak [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a few bumps in the road, imeem seems to be hitting its stride. Comscore shows it as one of the fastest growing social sites, with 3.2 unique U.S. visitors in September—although that&#8217;s down from a peak [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNET Sells Webshots For $45 Million; Other News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-2014172</link>
		<dc:creator>CNET Sells Webshots For $45 Million; Other News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 02:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-2014172</guid>
		<description>[...] be growing pretty fast, though. The site attracted 7.2 million visitors in the U.S. in September, up 25 percent from last year.And just a year ago it was considered a key part of CNET&#8217;s strategy to become [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] be growing pretty fast, though. The site attracted 7.2 million visitors in the U.S. in September, up 25 percent from last year.And just a year ago it was considered a key part of CNET&#8217;s strategy to become [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DigitalBlab &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Strategy: How to Market Music on imeem</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1989265</link>
		<dc:creator>DigitalBlab &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Strategy: How to Market Music on imeem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 03:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1989265</guid>
		<description>[...] declared imeem the fastest-growing social network of the past year, after the site posted a monster 1600% swell in unique visitors from September [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] declared imeem the fastest-growing social network of the past year, after the site posted a monster 1600% swell in unique visitors from September [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Advertising Kill DRM? - Michael Myers: CRUCES &#124; Internet, Marketing Service, Marketing Services, Market Online, Marketing, Market Research, Internet Marketing, Online Advertising, Internet Marketing Service, Internet Marketing Services, Internet Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1782007</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Advertising Kill DRM? - Michael Myers: CRUCES &#124; Internet, Marketing Service, Marketing Services, Market Online, Marketing, Market Research, Internet Marketing, Online Advertising, Internet Marketing Service, Internet Marketing Services, Internet Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 22:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1782007</guid>
		<description>[...] they would create a strategic partnership with someone like imeem which is currently one of the fastest growing social networks focused on music. Rcrd Lbl does have a social aspect in that a blog is there [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] they would create a strategic partnership with someone like imeem which is currently one of the fastest growing social networks focused on music. Rcrd Lbl does have a social aspect in that a blog is there [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1712205</link>
		<dc:creator>Joris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 16:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1712205</guid>
		<description>Superb info!! 

I am working on my scripture, its all about social networling sites and this was just the info i was looking for!! Thanx

I'm making this scripture for my interm ship company 

http://www.whoozz.com

The goal of my reseach is getting whoozz.com in this website list!

Lets hope whoozz.com will be in top 10 if they follow my advise!! LOL

thanx for the info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superb info!! </p>
<p>I am working on my scripture, its all about social networling sites and this was just the info i was looking for!! Thanx</p>
<p>I&#8217;m making this scripture for my interm ship company </p>
<p><a href="http://www.whoozz.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.whoozz.com</a></p>
<p>The goal of my reseach is getting whoozz.com in this website list!</p>
<p>Lets hope whoozz.com will be in top 10 if they follow my advise!! LOL</p>
<p>thanx for the info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Myers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1710225</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Myers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 23:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1710225</guid>
		<description>Erick - Do you have any stats on mobile social networks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick - Do you have any stats on mobile social networks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Horoscop</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1702624</link>
		<dc:creator>Horoscop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 18:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1702624</guid>
		<description>Wow.. thanks for these ranking's info :) 
@29 aniketh   : it's really strange :-&#124;
@Don't forget Orkut was buy by Google</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.. thanks for these ranking&#8217;s info <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
@29 aniketh   : it&#8217;s really strange <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':-|' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
@Don&#8217;t forget Orkut was buy by Google</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Web 2.0 briefing &#124; Connected Internet</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1702314</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Web 2.0 briefing &#124; Connected Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 16:04:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1702314</guid>
		<description>[...] social network, followed by Facebook. What surprised me a bit this week, is that according to a comScore research, the fastest growing social network website in the US is not Facebook but Social playlist website [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] social network, followed by Facebook. What surprised me a bit this week, is that according to a comScore research, the fastest growing social network website in the US is not Facebook but Social playlist website [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1701281</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 06:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1701281</guid>
		<description>The thing about Six Apart and ComScore is it only captures traffic that they host. And I believe it probably doesn't capture pages such as comment pages?  But I'm just guessing on that one.
Don't forget they also have MoveableType that they don't host. That number isn't anywhere reflected in ComScore and from what I know that's a huge portion of their business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about Six Apart and ComScore is it only captures traffic that they host. And I believe it probably doesn&#8217;t capture pages such as comment pages?  But I&#8217;m just guessing on that one.<br />
Don&#8217;t forget they also have MoveableType that they don&#8217;t host. That number isn&#8217;t anywhere reflected in ComScore and from what I know that&#8217;s a huge portion of their business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Strackany</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1699980</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Strackany</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 20:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1699980</guid>
		<description>I think below a certain traffic threshold, growth % can vary widely &#38; doesn't matter as much. It's like penny stocks. 

Otherwise I could launch a site tomorrow and grow its traffic by 1,000% in a month (from 1 user to 1,000 users) with some link &#38; ad buys. 

I noticed that imeem is at (almost) the bottom of the list in terms of traffic, so that big growth % could be partly explained by an initial growth spike or marketing push.

And while imeem is up a lot over the year, they're down by at least 30% over the past three months (per compete.com). So is it possible that they're already a fading star?

Lastly, I agree that the focus &#38; takeaway should be more on the larger properties -- 20-30% changes when you're pulling in millions of visitors is a big shift.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think below a certain traffic threshold, growth % can vary widely &amp; doesn&#8217;t matter as much. It&#8217;s like penny stocks. </p>
<p>Otherwise I could launch a site tomorrow and grow its traffic by 1,000% in a month (from 1 user to 1,000 users) with some link &amp; ad buys. </p>
<p>I noticed that imeem is at (almost) the bottom of the list in terms of traffic, so that big growth % could be partly explained by an initial growth spike or marketing push.</p>
<p>And while imeem is up a lot over the year, they&#8217;re down by at least 30% over the past three months (per compete.com). So is it possible that they&#8217;re already a fading star?</p>
<p>Lastly, I agree that the focus &amp; takeaway should be more on the larger properties &#8212; 20-30% changes when you&#8217;re pulling in millions of visitors is a big shift.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProHipHop</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1699674</link>
		<dc:creator>ProHipHop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 17:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1699674</guid>
		<description>I'm seeing a lot of bands and publicists using Imeem but I don't know how big such sources are for growth.

In terms of music marketing, MySpace and YouTube are the biggest sites and Imeem probably comes in third, just at a much smaller scale.

Facebook and most everybody else of any size has little to no presence in that space.  Niche networks do, however, and we're seeing more such networks and related 2.0 services focused on music marketing.

A lot of the Facebook news has come from the second wave of members, the business community.  Some folks have been watching where the former college kid Facebook members have been moving.  It would also be interesting to keep an eye on where the bands go as new networks develop because music is a strong driver in this space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m seeing a lot of bands and publicists using Imeem but I don&#8217;t know how big such sources are for growth.</p>
<p>In terms of music marketing, MySpace and YouTube are the biggest sites and Imeem probably comes in third, just at a much smaller scale.</p>
<p>Facebook and most everybody else of any size has little to no presence in that space.  Niche networks do, however, and we&#8217;re seeing more such networks and related 2.0 services focused on music marketing.</p>
<p>A lot of the Facebook news has come from the second wave of members, the business community.  Some folks have been watching where the former college kid Facebook members have been moving.  It would also be interesting to keep an eye on where the bands go as new networks develop because music is a strong driver in this space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jalex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1699300</link>
		<dc:creator>jalex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 15:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1699300</guid>
		<description>know what? this post of yours made me sign up to imeem and facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>know what? this post of yours made me sign up to imeem and facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1699249</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 14:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1699249</guid>
		<description>Good info! Helps show the trend so you know where to be.
Grace and Peace,
Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good info! Helps show the trend so you know where to be.<br />
Grace and Peace,<br />
Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amit N</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1698407</link>
		<dc:creator>Amit N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1698407</guid>
		<description>This is a really cool report, I did not knew about the site that featured on #1 on the report. I was thinking the Digg will be on #1. But this really comes as a surprise to see that many social sites coming up fast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really cool report, I did not knew about the site that featured on #1 on the report. I was thinking the Digg will be on #1. But this really comes as a surprise to see that many social sites coming up fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John McHammond</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1698306</link>
		<dc:creator>John McHammond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1698306</guid>
		<description>Is it just me, or are there too many companies with meaningless names (IMEEM?) fighting for my online social time?

Every time I hear about some new site that will "revolutionize" some aspect of my online life, I want to puke. 

Not only do I not have the time anymore to invest into these time wasting sites, either do my friends, who power their very growth. Everyonce in awhile, a friend will get lured by some marketer, to "join the new revolution" of one of these social/viral/ sites. This inevitably ends up in an address book import, an un-authorized spamming of our entire group of friends, with a request to "join sally and MILLIONS of other hipsters" on anothercrapsitewithnorealvalue.com.

Well, I'm not doing it anymore, and either are a surprising number of my friends. I want my real life back. 

...

[/rant]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me, or are there too many companies with meaningless names (IMEEM?) fighting for my online social time?</p>
<p>Every time I hear about some new site that will &#8220;revolutionize&#8221; some aspect of my online life, I want to puke. </p>
<p>Not only do I not have the time anymore to invest into these time wasting sites, either do my friends, who power their very growth. Everyonce in awhile, a friend will get lured by some marketer, to &#8220;join the new revolution&#8221; of one of these social/viral/ sites. This inevitably ends up in an address book import, an un-authorized spamming of our entire group of friends, with a request to &#8220;join sally and MILLIONS of other hipsters&#8221; on anothercrapsitewithnorealvalue.com.</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m not doing it anymore, and either are a surprising number of my friends. I want my real life back. </p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>[/rant]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aniketh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1698249</link>
		<dc:creator>aniketh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 05:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1698249</guid>
		<description>Its surprising to see that Orkut had only 503,000 visitors in the US, considering the demographics given out by Orkut (http://www.orkut.com/MembersAll.aspx) stating that the US is no 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its surprising to see that Orkut had only 503,000 visitors in the US, considering the demographics given out by Orkut (http://www.orkut.com/MembersAll.aspx) stating that the US is no 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top Myspace Users</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1697384</link>
		<dc:creator>Top Myspace Users</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 23:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1697384</guid>
		<description>go see whos most popular on myspace 

http://topmyspacer.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go see whos most popular on myspace </p>
<p><a href="http://topmyspacer.com" rel="nofollow">http://topmyspacer.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1697263</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1697263</guid>
		<description>Buzznet.com*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buzznet.com*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1697259</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 22:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1697259</guid>
		<description>As a clarification, Freewebs is actually 6 years old.

In 2006, it had 4,452 Unique Visitors in the US, giving 48% YoY growth.

The reason that this doesn't come up in the second comScore list above is due to another MediaMetrix annoyance: switching the classification of a site.

In 2006 Freewebs was counted as [M] (Media?), while today it is classified as [P] (Property?). Unfortunately, MM makes no effort to join the historical data with the current, reclassified site. 

This is also the case for Wordpress (392% growth) and (337% growth).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a clarification, Freewebs is actually 6 years old.</p>
<p>In 2006, it had 4,452 Unique Visitors in the US, giving 48% YoY growth.</p>
<p>The reason that this doesn&#8217;t come up in the second comScore list above is due to another MediaMetrix annoyance: switching the classification of a site.</p>
<p>In 2006 Freewebs was counted as [M] (Media?), while today it is classified as [P] (Property?). Unfortunately, MM makes no effort to join the historical data with the current, reclassified site. </p>
<p>This is also the case for Wordpress (392% growth) and (337% growth).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geek And Poke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1697212</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek And Poke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1697212</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Triumph Of The "Social"...&lt;/strong&gt;

Sorry for this lame joke.But after reading TechCrunchs social site ranking I just could not resist....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Triumph Of The &#8220;Social&#8221;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Sorry for this lame joke.But after reading TechCrunchs social site ranking I just could not resist&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erick Schonfeld</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1697094</link>
		<dc:creator>Erick Schonfeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 20:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/24/social-site-rankings-september-2007/#comment-1697094</guid>
		<description>@10, it's the trend (up or down) that counts, and 600K is just the number of people who subscribe to the TC feed.

@16, yes this is just U.S. data.  Global numbers would turn up another set of sites.  My guess is that Friendster would do better on a global list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@10, it&#8217;s the trend (up or down) that counts, and 600K is just the number of people who subscribe to the TC feed.</p>
<p>@16, yes this is just U.S. data.  Global numbers would turn up another set of sites.  My guess is that Friendster would do better on a global list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.092 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
