<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AT&amp;T Signs Napster Mobile Deal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:51:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zenhere &#187; Comment on AT&#38;T Signs Napster Mobile Deal by Bruce Warila</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1696705</link>
		<dc:creator>zenhere &#187; Comment on AT&#38;T Signs Napster Mobile Deal by Bruce Warila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 16:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1696705</guid>
		<description>[...] here for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: methodshop</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1696336</link>
		<dc:creator>methodshop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:11:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1696336</guid>
		<description>Two things strike me as odd about this deal:

   1. It&#039;s kind of weird that AT&amp;T didn&#039;t try to integrate any music system on their phones with iTunes. They already have a pretty solid relationship with Apple. In the US, AT&amp;T is the only approved mobile carrier for the iPhone.

   2. When it comes to music, are people really ready to leave their iPods behind and just use their phones? Maybe if you have an iPhone, otherwise, probably not. The media player built into my brand new BlackBerry Curve sucks so bad that I just bought an iPod Touch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things strike me as odd about this deal:</p>
<p>   1. It&#8217;s kind of weird that AT&amp;T didn&#8217;t try to integrate any music system on their phones with iTunes. They already have a pretty solid relationship with Apple. In the US, AT&amp;T is the only approved mobile carrier for the iPhone.</p>
<p>   2. When it comes to music, are people really ready to leave their iPods behind and just use their phones? Maybe if you have an iPhone, otherwise, probably not. The media player built into my brand new BlackBerry Curve sucks so bad that I just bought an iPod Touch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajan Tawate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1694574</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajan Tawate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 20:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1694574</guid>
		<description>The apple deal has truly helped att in jumping onto the web 2.0 bandwagon.  Looks like they are getting to speed now.

http://www.meetingflex.com
Custom Social Networks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The apple deal has truly helped att in jumping onto the web 2.0 bandwagon.  Looks like they are getting to speed now.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.meetingflex.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.meetingflex.com'>http://www.meetingflex.com</a><br />
Custom Social Networks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moss</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1694505</link>
		<dc:creator>Moss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 19:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1694505</guid>
		<description>What a year for AT&amp;T. First they had the BellSouth deal, then they partner with Apple for the iPhone, now this Napster deal. Is it any wonder that they put up quarter numbers like they did today? Year in, year out, AT&amp;T is one of the best run companies in the world, period http://www.newsvisual.com/newsvisual/2007/10/corporate-exper.html . This interactive map of their Board provides a glimpse of the awesome corporate experience of the people running the company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a year for AT&amp;T. First they had the BellSouth deal, then they partner with Apple for the iPhone, now this Napster deal. Is it any wonder that they put up quarter numbers like they did today? Year in, year out, AT&amp;T is one of the best run companies in the world, period <a href="http://www.newsvisual.com/newsvisual/2007/10/corporate-exper.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.newsvisual.com/newsvisual/2007/10/corporate-exper.html'>http://www.news...rate-exper.html</a> . This interactive map of their Board provides a glimpse of the awesome corporate experience of the people running the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AT&#38;T signs up for Napster Mobile - NovaScene</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1691919</link>
		<dc:creator>AT&#38;T signs up for Napster Mobile - NovaScene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1691919</guid>
		<description>[...] to make money as a legitimate online music distributor. Now a stroke of good luck comes as AT&amp;T has signed up to offer Napster Mobile to its 63 million customers. AT&amp;T customers will be able to browse and preview 5 million songs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to make money as a legitimate online music distributor. Now a stroke of good luck comes as AT&#38;T has signed up to offer Napster Mobile to its 63 million customers. AT&#38;T customers will be able to browse and preview 5 million songs [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ATT web 1.0</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1691762</link>
		<dc:creator>ATT web 1.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1691762</guid>
		<description>Welcome ATT, dragging us kicking and screaming into the web 1.0 world of the 1990&#039;s.

Next ATT will introduce a chat like messenger service that allows instant communication. Speculation insdicates they will charge .50$ per message for their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.netpaths.net/blog/iphone-revolutionary-device/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;revolutionary device&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome ATT, dragging us kicking and screaming into the web 1.0 world of the 1990&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Next ATT will introduce a chat like messenger service that allows instant communication. Speculation insdicates they will charge .50$ per message for their <a href="http://www.netpaths.net/blog/iphone-revolutionary-device/" rel="nofollow">revolutionary device</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1691090</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1691090</guid>
		<description>This is like one of those moves that nobody finds reasonable I think!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is like one of those moves that nobody finds reasonable I think!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rajan Tawate</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1691070</link>
		<dc:creator>Rajan Tawate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1691070</guid>
		<description>ATT got a good feel of the online music selling industry by riding on top of the IPhone..   Now they would like to dump apple and be on their own... pretty logical..

http://www.meetingflex.com
Custom Social Networks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ATT got a good feel of the online music selling industry by riding on top of the IPhone..   Now they would like to dump apple and be on their own&#8230; pretty logical..</p>
<p><a href="http://www.meetingflex.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.meetingflex.com'>http://www.meetingflex.com</a><br />
Custom Social Networks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1691044</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1691044</guid>
		<description>Does this cause a conflict of interest (i.e. ATT already in bed with Apple and iTunes)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does this cause a conflict of interest (i.e. ATT already in bed with Apple and iTunes)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveballme</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1691036</link>
		<dc:creator>steveballme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:08:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1691036</guid>
		<description>Thieves and thieves!
http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thieves and thieves!<br />
<a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com'>http://fakestev...er.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Warila</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1690985</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Warila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1690985</guid>
		<description>Oops that&#039;s Unsprung not Unstrung!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops that&#8217;s Unsprung not Unstrung!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Warila</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1690981</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Warila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 13:28:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1690981</guid>
		<description>$7.49 a month for 5 songs!  

Someone will say 18 months from now when this partnership dies that it generated $2.4 million in revenue, but it never lived up to expectations.  Not bad for a bit of deal negotiation, lawyer time, programmer time, paper and ink?

$1.50 per song - (ATT cut + Napster cut + digital distributor cut + record label cut + manager cut) = artist payout.  Someone has to make money.

I like Universal&#039;s Total Music plan better.  Check out Unstrung Artists for a review on this plan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$7.49 a month for 5 songs!  </p>
<p>Someone will say 18 months from now when this partnership dies that it generated $2.4 million in revenue, but it never lived up to expectations.  Not bad for a bit of deal negotiation, lawyer time, programmer time, paper and ink?</p>
<p>$1.50 per song &#8211; (ATT cut + Napster cut + digital distributor cut + record label cut + manager cut) = artist payout.  Someone has to make money.</p>
<p>I like Universal&#8217;s Total Music plan better.  Check out Unstrung Artists for a review on this plan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: online market research report</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1690757</link>
		<dc:creator>online market research report</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 11:17:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1690757</guid>
		<description>not surprise to see this - but mobile to pod is still not successful business model as this is an expansive option for school going / young / vibrant target audience :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not surprise to see this &#8211; but mobile to pod is still not successful business model as this is an expansive option for school going / young / vibrant target audience <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kanute</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/comment-page-1/#comment-1690545</link>
		<dc:creator>Kanute</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/21/att-signs-napster-mobile-deal/#comment-1690545</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s rather unfortunate that Napster  ends up this way, for me they are just a scapegoat. I this move put a little bit of order in this unhealthy company then I&#039;m glad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s rather unfortunate that Napster  ends up this way, for me they are just a scapegoat. I this move put a little bit of order in this unhealthy company then I&#8217;m glad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
