<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mr. Murdoch, Take Down This (Other) Wall!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Progress Report on the Open Mesh - July '08</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-2407534</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Progress Report on the Open Mesh - July '08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-2407534</guid>
		<description>[...] Two-way APIs are appearing which present a level playing field - an inter-connected environment which Open Data can be easily shared and user&#8217;s profile data, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Two-way APIs are appearing which present a level playing field - an inter-connected environment which Open Data can be easily shared and user&#8217;s profile data, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Woudenberg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Waarom zouden web 2.0 diensten jouw data portable maken?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-2032969</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Woudenberg &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Waarom zouden web 2.0 diensten jouw data portable maken?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 21:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-2032969</guid>
		<description>[...] en functionaliteit naar binnen toe loodsen. Maar wellicht dat er - zoals Marc Canter dat noemt - 2-way API&#8217;s komen. Oftewel vrijelijk overdraagbare content van de ene dienst naar de [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] en functionaliteit naar binnen toe loodsen. Maar wellicht dat er - zoals Marc Canter dat noemt - 2-way API&#8217;s komen. Oftewel vrijelijk overdraagbare content van de ene dienst naar de [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrice Albertus - Blog et Actualités &#187; Widget marketing and new medias</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1741072</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrice Albertus - Blog et Actualités &#187; Widget marketing and new medias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 02:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1741072</guid>
		<description>[...]  Ruppet Murdoch, media magnat invest into MySpace, and Microsoft get the partnership with to defy Facebook with bringing MySpace community more widgetizable for users, another market for your next campaigns ! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  Ruppet Murdoch, media magnat invest into MySpace, and Microsoft get the partnership with to defy Facebook with bringing MySpace community more widgetizable for users, another market for your next campaigns ! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrice Albertus - Blog et Actualités &#187; Le &#8220;widget marketing&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1725300</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrice Albertus - Blog et Actualités &#187; Le &#8220;widget marketing&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 00:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1725300</guid>
		<description>[...] Ruppet Murdoch le magnat des médias investit dans le web avec MySpace pour défier Facebook avec une orientation plus widgetisable du portail, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ruppet Murdoch le magnat des médias investit dans le web avec MySpace pour défier Facebook avec une orientation plus widgetisable du portail, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: émergenceweb : blogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alliance Microsoft-Facebook : Google répond avec MySpace et l&#8217;Open Social Initiative !</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1719192</link>
		<dc:creator>émergenceweb : blogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Alliance Microsoft-Facebook : Google répond avec MySpace et l&#8217;Open Social Initiative !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 21:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1719192</guid>
		<description>[...] dans le même modèle soit «One Way API», pour Application Programming Interface. Arrington avait pertinemment relevé les objections de la salle, dont celles de Mark Canter, sur le modèle «propriétaire» des [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dans le même modèle soit «One Way API», pour Application Programming Interface. Arrington avait pertinemment relevé les objections de la salle, dont celles de Mark Canter, sur le modèle «propriétaire» des [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s Response to Facebook: &#8220;Maka-Maka&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1709341</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s Response to Facebook: &#8220;Maka-Maka&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1709341</guid>
		<description>[...] lock developers into Google’s own platform. One way it will do that from the start is by creating two-way APIs so that any app created for Google can be taken to other Websites. (Whether this will extend to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] lock developers into Google’s own platform. One way it will do that from the start is by creating two-way APIs so that any app created for Google can be taken to other Websites. (Whether this will extend to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Ward</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1693256</link>
		<dc:creator>John Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 08:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1693256</guid>
		<description>Just out of curiosity, why aren't federated identity, profile, and address books part of this discussion?  Once these are in place, the functional APIs fall into place.

I don't understand why there isn't a movement to pressure the big SNs and search providers to adopt the Liberty Alliance Project standards.  There are two federation specs, and a number of products that work together.

Right now, implementation cost might be prohibitive for small startups, but it won't be long before these solutions are more or less turnkey.  If the big SNs go their own way (as suggested here), we'll end up with proprietary APIs and a legacy that will take years to undo.

Yahoo, Google, AOL, Microsoft, Facebook, and MySpace would be perfect identity providers.  Somehow, it just feels like what's good for us is good for them too.  Perhaps that's what the smart guys at Google are thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just out of curiosity, why aren&#8217;t federated identity, profile, and address books part of this discussion?  Once these are in place, the functional APIs fall into place.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand why there isn&#8217;t a movement to pressure the big SNs and search providers to adopt the Liberty Alliance Project standards.  There are two federation specs, and a number of products that work together.</p>
<p>Right now, implementation cost might be prohibitive for small startups, but it won&#8217;t be long before these solutions are more or less turnkey.  If the big SNs go their own way (as suggested here), we&#8217;ll end up with proprietary APIs and a legacy that will take years to undo.</p>
<p>Yahoo, Google, AOL, Microsoft, Facebook, and MySpace would be perfect identity providers.  Somehow, it just feels like what&#8217;s good for us is good for them too.  Perhaps that&#8217;s what the smart guys at Google are thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Startupbin - Platform wars are upon us</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1691763</link>
		<dc:creator>Startupbin - Platform wars are upon us</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 20:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1691763</guid>
		<description>[...] their services. I believe the winners are not the social networks themselves, who will be forced to open their users&#8217; social graphs, and thus their competitive advantage, but now smaller widget-like services that tap into the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] their services. I believe the winners are not the social networks themselves, who will be forced to open their users&#8217; social graphs, and thus their competitive advantage, but now smaller widget-like services that tap into the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1689521</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 16:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1689521</guid>
		<description>I wrote about this last month:

http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/09/mr-zuckerberg-tear-down-this-wall/

Thanks to Google launching their platform, they are going to force many of the social networks to open up.  It's not going to happen immediately but I could see it happening in 12 months potentially.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote about this last month:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.allfacebook.com/2007/09/mr-zuckerberg-tear-down-this-wall/" rel="nofollow">http://www.allfacebook.com/200.....this-wall/</a></p>
<p>Thanks to Google launching their platform, they are going to force many of the social networks to open up.  It&#8217;s not going to happen immediately but I could see it happening in 12 months potentially.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anders Fredriksson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1688894</link>
		<dc:creator>Anders Fredriksson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 09:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1688894</guid>
		<description>I'm all for the fully open 2-way APIs.

If your service is good enough, you'll be able to monetize it anyways.

//Anders, CEO at Tablefinder.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for the fully open 2-way APIs.</p>
<p>If your service is good enough, you&#8217;ll be able to monetize it anyways.</p>
<p>//Anders, CEO at Tablefinder.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Asking the right questions at the right time</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1687998</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc&#8217;s Voice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Asking the right questions at the right time</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1687998</guid>
		<description>[...] Eric Shonfeld has nice things to say about me asking questions and here&#8217;s a video of me asking the question (after :25 of Battelle interviewing Zuckerberg. I suspect the DeWolfe interview (and my subsequent question) will be posted soon - as well. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eric Shonfeld has nice things to say about me asking questions and here&#8217;s a video of me asking the question (after :25 of Battelle interviewing Zuckerberg. I suspect the DeWolfe interview (and my subsequent question) will be posted soon - as well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: manfmnantucket</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1687459</link>
		<dc:creator>manfmnantucket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 19:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1687459</guid>
		<description>where can you sign up to get info on the myspace API when it's released?

I haven't found any resources other than these blog mentions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where can you sign up to get info on the myspace API when it&#8217;s released?</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t found any resources other than these blog mentions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1687342</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1687342</guid>
		<description>very interesting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very interesting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Mah</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1687284</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Mah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1687284</guid>
		<description>Please, Myspace, &lt;b&gt;GIVE US TWO WAY API&lt;/b&gt; and I might just develop for your platform :)

Yet again, I can see where they're coming from.  Twitter and Twine are smaller startups and have less to lose, whereas MySpace has a lot of advertising money at stake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please, Myspace, <b>GIVE US TWO WAY API</b> and I might just develop for your platform <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Yet again, I can see where they&#8217;re coming from.  Twitter and Twine are smaller startups and have less to lose, whereas MySpace has a lot of advertising money at stake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1687278</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1687278</guid>
		<description>Facebook already has a 2-way API. Everything you can do with an embedded Facebook application you can also do with a completely external web application. It's well documented on developer.facebook.com, and has been implemented already for both external web sites and even external desktop applications.

Assuming you knew that, perhaps what you're calling for is not a 2-way API (as that already exists) but for more functions to be added to the existing API: ability to view wall messages, the news-feed, etc. Currently you can't do this with internal or external Facebook applications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook already has a 2-way API. Everything you can do with an embedded Facebook application you can also do with a completely external web application. It&#8217;s well documented on developer.facebook.com, and has been implemented already for both external web sites and even external desktop applications.</p>
<p>Assuming you knew that, perhaps what you&#8217;re calling for is not a 2-way API (as that already exists) but for more functions to be added to the existing API: ability to view wall messages, the news-feed, etc. Currently you can&#8217;t do this with internal or external Facebook applications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1687081</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1687081</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or does this sound like the exact same debate a few years ago between cell phone providers? You can't do xyz because blah blah blah ;-)

The more things change, the more they remain the same... I figure in a few years, when social network sites die off, this will happen but until then, there is too much a profit motive invested in keeping the status-quo.

Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or does this sound like the exact same debate a few years ago between cell phone providers? You can&#8217;t do xyz because blah blah blah <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The more things change, the more they remain the same&#8230; I figure in a few years, when social network sites die off, this will happen but until then, there is too much a profit motive invested in keeping the status-quo.</p>
<p>Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685886</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685886</guid>
		<description>So what was Murdoch's response to the question !?

I can't see why being the first to provide a '2-way' api would be of great benefit to MySpace.   Ultimately, they will probably have to do this if other big players (ie: FB) do it, but right now I can't see much incentive for them.

Also '2-way api' is vague.   I believe Marc Canter is interested in portability or de-centralization of the graph of social connections.    Achieving something like this requires a good deal of standardization among networks.   MySpace allowing you to simply extract a list of your friends isn't going to add a lot of value to anything if those friends details have no significance outside the MySpace platform.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what was Murdoch&#8217;s response to the question !?</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see why being the first to provide a &#8216;2-way&#8217; api would be of great benefit to MySpace.   Ultimately, they will probably have to do this if other big players (ie: FB) do it, but right now I can&#8217;t see much incentive for them.</p>
<p>Also &#8216;2-way api&#8217; is vague.   I believe Marc Canter is interested in portability or de-centralization of the graph of social connections.    Achieving something like this requires a good deal of standardization among networks.   MySpace allowing you to simply extract a list of your friends isn&#8217;t going to add a lot of value to anything if those friends details have no significance outside the MySpace platform.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel Noriega</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685773</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Noriega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 22:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685773</guid>
		<description>Does Mr. Murdoch even know how to imbed Youtube vids on myspace? Look at him sitting there looking like he invented the WWW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Mr. Murdoch even know how to imbed Youtube vids on myspace? Look at him sitting there looking like he invented the <a href="http://WWW" rel="nofollow">http://WWW</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Blume</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685718</link>
		<dc:creator>David Blume</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685718</guid>
		<description>Joel has wanted to be able take down the other wall since 2000.

http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000052.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joel has wanted to be able take down the other wall since 2000.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog0000000052.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.joelonsoftware.com/.....00052.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Teare</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685708</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Teare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685708</guid>
		<description>That (a 2 way API) is exactly what we have at edgeio. It enables inbound and outbound data (hence edge IO). I have to disagree that this approach threatens a business model. Infact I would strongly suggest the opposite. By enabling advertisers and other publishers to come inside whilst allowing data to be taken outside the entitry at the center increases its reach into a publisher network and so extends "the social graph" beyond its borders. Money follows traffic and links and so in theend this is a big win for all 3 parties (inbound partners; outbound partners and the middle).

Open is best, Canter is right. And if that is right, it will happen! Only question is who will jump first. :-)

Keith Teare
ceo/co-founder/edgeio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That (a 2 way API) is exactly what we have at edgeio. It enables inbound and outbound data (hence edge IO). I have to disagree that this approach threatens a business model. Infact I would strongly suggest the opposite. By enabling advertisers and other publishers to come inside whilst allowing data to be taken outside the entitry at the center increases its reach into a publisher network and so extends &#8220;the social graph&#8221; beyond its borders. Money follows traffic and links and so in theend this is a big win for all 3 parties (inbound partners; outbound partners and the middle).</p>
<p>Open is best, Canter is right. And if that is right, it will happen! Only question is who will jump first. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Keith Teare<br />
ceo/co-founder/edgeio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manuel Noriega</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685675</link>
		<dc:creator>Manuel Noriega</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:50:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685675</guid>
		<description>Linux = very open = 2 dozen distros
Windows = blackhole = 0 

who's making $$

remember, anyone can clone these sites.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linux = very open = 2 dozen distros<br />
Windows = blackhole = 0 </p>
<p>who&#8217;s making $$</p>
<p>remember, anyone can clone these sites.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685649</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685649</guid>
		<description>In Response to Ryan Merket's msg...

For some apps, clearly it doesn't make sense to develop on the 'other side of the wall'. For other apps, it clearly does. No, the widgets like 'top friends' and 'where i've been' don't necessarily make sense out of facebook's 4 walls.

However, even taking a look at my company it would sense to add 'social graph' functionality to it without having to build within the FB platform. When people visit SkiReport.com, how cool would it be when they visited a resort to say '25 of your friends have skied here before, they've said this about it.' 

Yes, i can create ski area pages within the FB platform... but it doesn't belong there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Response to Ryan Merket&#8217;s msg&#8230;</p>
<p>For some apps, clearly it doesn&#8217;t make sense to develop on the &#8216;other side of the wall&#8217;. For other apps, it clearly does. No, the widgets like &#8216;top friends&#8217; and &#8216;where i&#8217;ve been&#8217; don&#8217;t necessarily make sense out of facebook&#8217;s 4 walls.</p>
<p>However, even taking a look at my company it would sense to add &#8217;social graph&#8217; functionality to it without having to build within the FB platform. When people visit SkiReport.com, how cool would it be when they visited a resort to say &#8216;25 of your friends have skied here before, they&#8217;ve said this about it.&#8217; </p>
<p>Yes, i can create ski area pages within the FB platform&#8230; but it doesn&#8217;t belong there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shelley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685647</link>
		<dc:creator>Shelley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685647</guid>
		<description>It always amazes me that in the wide open spaces of the web, companies' strategies for growth are still based on creating artificial barriers, not compelling products. Guess human nature doesn't really change: mine is mine, and yours is mine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It always amazes me that in the wide open spaces of the web, companies&#8217; strategies for growth are still based on creating artificial barriers, not compelling products. Guess human nature doesn&#8217;t really change: mine is mine, and yours is mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dawson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685645</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685645</guid>
		<description>"But creating a two-way API is probably one of the smartest things MySpace can do right now."

It's probably one of the most dumbest thing MySpace can do right now, actually, if it wants to compete with Facekbook and Co that is. One way API, sure! Two way API, would be suicide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;But creating a two-way API is probably one of the smartest things MySpace can do right now.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s probably one of the most dumbest thing MySpace can do right now, actually, if it wants to compete with Facekbook and Co that is. One way API, sure! Two way API, would be suicide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685634</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/mr-murdoch-take-down-this-other-wall/#comment-1685634</guid>
		<description>In response to Ryan Merket's msg.

Users don't necessarily want to go to FaceBook to post to their friends, they would want to post something in the least amount of steps possible.  If they were at a site that contained a widget that allowed them to post to their friends without leaving the current website then that is how they are going to do it.

R.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Ryan Merket&#8217;s msg.</p>
<p>Users don&#8217;t necessarily want to go to FaceBook to post to their friends, they would want to post something in the least amount of steps possible.  If they were at a site that contained a widget that allowed them to post to their friends without leaving the current website then that is how they are going to do it.</p>
<p>R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.095 seconds -->
