Comments on: Joost Coming To The Browser? http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/ Startup and Technology News Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:41:42 -0800 hourly 1 By: Joost planea una versión web « Mantero.net http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-2608868 Joost planea una versión web « Mantero.net Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:14:00 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-2608868 [...] una noticia de hace unos días en Techcrunch, titulada Joost Coming To The Browser?, la cual pese a que la había leido y marcado con la dorada estrella en Google Reader, se me [...] [...] una noticia de hace unos días en Techcrunch, titulada Joost Coming To The Browser?, la cual pese a que la había leido y marcado con la dorada estrella en Google Reader, se me [...]

]]> By: Horse Racing Ratings http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-2570133 Horse Racing Ratings Wed, 17 Dec 2008 20:14:01 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-2570133 <strong>Horse Racing Ratings...</strong> Don\'t bet in extreme Going conditions unless you are backing a horse proven on extreme going conditions.... Horse Racing Ratings…

Don\’t bet in extreme Going conditions unless you are backing a horse proven on extreme going conditions….

]]> By: Joost beta client 1.1.8 just released : JoostTeam http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-2414421 Joost beta client 1.1.8 just released : JoostTeam Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:02:55 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-2414421 [...] Joost Coming To The Browser? [...] [...] Joost Coming To The Browser? [...]

]]> By: Joost beta client 1.1.8 just released : JoostTeam http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-2414420 Joost beta client 1.1.8 just released : JoostTeam Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:02:55 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-2414420 [...] Joost Coming To The Browser? [...] [...] Joost Coming To The Browser? [...]

]]> By: .::.Crea tus Blogs.::. » Blog Archive » Y si Joost tuviera un interfaz para navegadores… http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-2317567 .::.Crea tus Blogs.::. » Blog Archive » Y si Joost tuviera un interfaz para navegadores… Thu, 22 May 2008 04:40:05 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-2317567 [...] El rumor lo lanza Techcrunch y lo recoge JoostTeam.com. En la última conferencia de turno, el reportero pregunta con ingenuidad y obtiene una respuesta cogida por los pelos: ni afirma ni desmiente, pero estamos en ello. Joost sería accesible a través del navegador cuando puedan dar el nivel de calidad por el que son conocidos. [...] [...] El rumor lo lanza Techcrunch y lo recoge JoostTeam.com. En la última conferencia de turno, el reportero pregunta con ingenuidad y obtiene una respuesta cogida por los pelos: ni afirma ni desmiente, pero estamos en ello. Joost sería accesible a través del navegador cuando puedan dar el nivel de calidad por el que son conocidos. [...]

]]> By: ｊｊｊｊｊｊｊｊｊｊ ¦ wp http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1950258 ｊｊｊｊｊｊｊｊｊｊ ¦ wp Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:13:24 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1950258 [...] [原文へ] « hhhh [...] [...] [原文へ] « hhhh [...]

]]> By: TechCrunch en français » BitTorrent diffuse des films en streaming mais pas grand chose à voir pour l'instant http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1851480 TechCrunch en français » BitTorrent diffuse des films en streaming mais pas grand chose à voir pour l'instant Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:17:04 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1851480 [...] est-il temps pour Joost de s’adapter à ce mode [...] [...] est-il temps pour Joost de s’adapter à ce mode [...]

]]> By: TechCrunch en français » BitTorrent diffuse des films en streaming mais pas grand chose à voir pour l'instant http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1851479 TechCrunch en français » BitTorrent diffuse des films en streaming mais pas grand chose à voir pour l'instant Tue, 18 Dec 2007 08:17:04 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1851479 [...] est-il temps pour Joost de s’adapter à ce mode [...] [...] est-il temps pour Joost de s’adapter à ce mode [...]

]]> By: Seven reasons why SaaS is not main street in SMB « a la 360 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1713123 Seven reasons why SaaS is not main street in SMB « a la 360 Tue, 30 Oct 2007 23:32:01 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1713123 [...] week (all thanks to good old techcrunch) reveals that the industry is focused on photo editing, Internet TV, and web 2.0 mashups for your car. Even applications that are more business-oriented, like [...] [...] week (all thanks to good old techcrunch) reveals that the industry is focused on photo editing, Internet TV, and web 2.0 mashups for your car. Even applications that are more business-oriented, like [...]

]]> By: motus http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1690703 motus Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:34:01 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1690703 Joost is already dead, thanks to the lack of net neutrality and ISPs cutting off 'heavy users' it doesn't help that the content sucks about as much as the software, can't forget the ads either. Joost is already dead, thanks to the lack of net neutrality and ISPs cutting off ‘heavy users’

it doesn’t help that the content sucks about as much as the software, can’t forget the ads either.

]]> By: El Honathan http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1690571 El Honathan Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:39:01 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1690571 Joost is dead.... we all know it. Too many good video alternatives out there. Who wants to watch c-rated TV shows on a p2p application sucking up CPU and bandwidth. Wait a new browser based application... a bit late maybe? Joost is dead…. we all know it. Too many good video alternatives out there. Who wants to watch c-rated TV shows on a p2p application sucking up CPU and bandwidth. Wait a new browser based application… a bit late maybe?

]]> By: killer application http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1689071 killer application Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:08:58 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1689071 try them, really different try them, really different

]]> By: killer application http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1689068 killer application Sun, 21 Oct 2007 11:07:05 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1689068 21 richard In fact, technology is important, at least as content, that is why all media titans are waiting for the right time and perfect solution on web TV. But before Joost, if you tried rawflow, TVkoo, PPstream, PPlive, Kazzar, octshape, you will not say their technology are all same as what those media giants need. 21 richard
In fact, technology is important, at least as content, that is why all media titans are waiting for the right time and perfect solution on web TV. But before Joost, if you tried rawflow, TVkoo, PPstream, PPlive, Kazzar, octshape, you will not say their technology are all same as what those media giants need.

]]> By: iptv is now http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1687578 iptv is now Sat, 20 Oct 2007 21:03:27 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1687578 Seems like Mike Volpi had to say that since he was on stage at a Web 2.0 conference and also the recent pressure he must have felt of Techcrunch stating that the clock is ticking for Joost - with the new flash player support for H.264 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/the-clock-is-ticking-for-joost/ Adobe will be entering the game with their own flash video player that does all the things that Joost does http://labs.adobe.com/wiki/index.php/Media_Player Chime.tv is another excellent solution that has been around for quite some time. There is also browser based Joost clone http://www.paulyanez.com/labs/joost/ that's been online since July and an updated version http://www.paulyanez.com/labs/joostbeta1/ that emerged just a few weeks after the beta was released. The one common thing betweeen these are the use of flash as the technology. Joost has invested over a year in XUL. Let's hope Joost is serious in wanting to make a browser based version. It might make more sense to just buy a solution instead of trying to getting into the web development arena since so far they've been building a client based application. Seems like Mike Volpi had to say that since he was on stage at a Web 2.0 conference and also the recent pressure he must have felt of Techcrunch stating that the clock is ticking for Joost – with the new flash player support for H.264 http://www.tech...king-for-joost/

Adobe will be entering the game with their own flash video player that does all the things that Joost does http://labs.ado...hp/Media_Player

Chime.tv is another excellent solution that has been around for quite some time.

There is also browser based Joost clone http://www.paul...com/labs/joost/ that’s been online since July and an updated version http://www.paul...abs/joostbeta1/ that emerged just a few weeks after the beta was released.

The one common thing betweeen these are the use of flash as the technology. Joost has invested over a year in XUL.
Let’s hope Joost is serious in wanting to make a browser based version. It might make more sense to just buy a solution instead of trying to getting into the web development arena since so far they’ve been building a client based application.

]]> By: MacEwan http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1687341 MacEwan Sat, 20 Oct 2007 18:36:55 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1687341 After months of promising the Linux crowd a beta client was just around the corner how are we to believe in a promised browser based version? Are you hiring the engineering talent that brought us the currently available Miro? After months of promising the Linux crowd a beta client was just around the corner how are we to believe in a promised browser based version? Are you hiring the engineering talent that brought us the currently available Miro?

]]> By: Matt http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1687258 Matt Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:42:56 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1687258 I tested Joost - and was dissapointed. Infact it is so borring, sucks big time! Deleted it less than 30min after i installed it. Content sucks - it is not even close to being TV like - more YouTube like. It just has videos or prerecorded content, no live tv, live sports... and no porn or hot naked babes or any other interesting content. They were promissing so much and delivered so little! So far the best TV website out there is http://www.chooseandwatch.com/ . It is nothing like Joost. It aggregates streaming video channels from around the web, from a mixture of mainstream TV channels to more amateur, independent networks. It claims to have 435 channels. From a content selection standpoint C&W beats Joost hands down. It even offers adult content area – nice :) Looks like Joost has all the media attention and everyone blogs about it only because of its famous founders - not to mention they probably pay to be on digg so often. I tested Joost – and was dissapointed. Infact it is so borring, sucks big time! Deleted it less than 30min after i installed it. Content sucks – it is not even close to being TV like – more YouTube like. It just has videos or prerecorded content, no live tv, live sports… and no porn or hot naked babes or any other interesting content. They were promissing so much and delivered so little!

So far the best TV website out there is http://www.chooseandwatch.com/ . It is nothing like Joost. It aggregates streaming video channels from around the web, from a mixture of mainstream TV channels to more amateur, independent networks. It claims to have 435 channels. From a content selection standpoint C&W beats Joost hands down. It even offers adult content area – nice :)

Looks like Joost has all the media attention and everyone blogs about it only because of its famous founders – not to mention they probably pay to be on digg so often.

]]> By: Darnell Clayton http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1687135 Darnell Clayton Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:20:44 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1687135 Joost is awesome! My only beef is the P2P software that either makes your computer function in slow-mo, or crashes whenever you play certain shows. With many other television networks (like CBS, SciFi Channel, etc.) allowing users to watch shows through their favorite browser, Joost would be wise to consider following suit. If not, I will have no reason to keep it on my machine. Joost is awesome!

My only beef is the P2P software that either makes your computer function in slow-mo, or crashes whenever you play certain shows.

With many other television networks (like CBS, SciFi Channel, etc.) allowing users to watch shows through their favorite browser, Joost would be wise to consider following suit.

If not, I will have no reason to keep it on my machine.

]]> By: Richard http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1687116 Richard Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:08:41 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1687116 Joost still seem to think that internet TV is a technology problem rather than a content problem - that is why they will never succeed. Joost still seem to think that internet TV is a technology problem rather than a content problem – that is why they will never succeed.

]]> By: Prank Videos http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1687076 Prank Videos Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:40:53 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1687076 I'd rather stick with the application. Joost video playback is really amazing. I’d rather stick with the application. Joost video playback is really amazing.

]]> By: Holga http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1687056 Holga Sat, 20 Oct 2007 15:24:57 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1687056 Too late for them, they had their chance and they messed it up. Browser based version would probably use java or require an additional Joost plugin which is just encroaching the point of stupidity. Let's see the Joost Alternatives that are browser based: http://www.freetube.us.tc http://www.paulyanez.com/swfs/j_prototype.swf Too late for them, they had their chance and they messed it up. Browser based version would probably use java or require an additional Joost plugin which is just encroaching the point of stupidity.

Let’s see the Joost Alternatives that are browser based:
http://www.freetube.us.tc
http://www.paul...j_prototype.swf

]]> By: David http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1686698 David Sat, 20 Oct 2007 10:46:09 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1686698 I think Joost needs to be browser based to make an impact...whilst I have been using it since it was the Venice Project, and now watch virtually all of my tv legally over the web (unfortunately I have to watch Studio 60 on the traditional TV), Joost has never managed to become a major tv source for me because I don't come across it as part of my usual browsing activities and it is not constantly updated like the iPlayer I think Joost needs to be browser based to make an impact…whilst I have been using it since it was the Venice Project, and now watch virtually all of my tv legally over the web (unfortunately I have to watch Studio 60 on the traditional TV), Joost has never managed to become a major tv source for me because I don’t come across it as part of my usual browsing activities and it is not constantly updated like the iPlayer

]]> By: killer application http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1686457 killer application Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:04:59 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1686457 the killer of surrent satalite/cable TV system is existed for 2 years, if you could speack chinese. Many Chinese p2p systems are been popular with millions of users every day. It is a big problem for JOoooost to has millions users on the test, while their Chinese competitors are broadcasting live TV to the world for years. The result is so different on the performance, TVkoo, one of a Chinese system could run 400 channels with 10 server * 100Mbps with one millions users online concurrently. The streaming revolution on cost is coming, with many existing competitors, PPlive, PPstream, TVKoo, Sohu, Rowflow, Octshape, Kazza, feidian, roxbeam, uusee,mysee. As a freshman, Joost are rather good at software interface than performance of usesr, quality and cost. Beside the name of founders, what could made Joost go on? While the day Joost turned to focus on live streaming, it seemed the world will see another war against Chinese product. The streaming revolution on cost is coming, with many existing competitors, PPlive, PPstream, TVKoo, Sohu, Rowflow(britih), Octshape(danmark), Kazza(sweden), feidian, roxbeam, uusee,mysee,mediazone(TVKoo empowered), most from China. As a freshman, Joost are rather good at software interface than performance of usesr, quality and cost. Beside the name of founders, what could be the point to keep Joost go on? the killer of surrent satalite/cable TV system is existed for 2 years, if you could speack chinese. Many Chinese p2p systems are been popular with millions of users every day. It is a big problem for JOoooost to has millions users on the test, while their Chinese competitors are broadcasting live TV to the world for years. The result is so different on the performance, TVkoo, one of a Chinese system could run 400 channels with 10 server * 100Mbps with one millions users online concurrently.

The streaming revolution on cost is coming, with many existing competitors, PPlive, PPstream, TVKoo, Sohu, Rowflow, Octshape, Kazza, feidian, roxbeam, uusee,mysee. As a freshman, Joost are rather good at software interface than performance of usesr, quality and cost. Beside the name of founders, what could made Joost go on?

While the day Joost turned to focus on live streaming, it seemed the world will see another war against Chinese product. The streaming revolution on cost is coming, with many existing competitors, PPlive, PPstream, TVKoo, Sohu, Rowflow(britih), Octshape(danmark), Kazza(sweden), feidian, roxbeam, uusee,mysee,mediazone(TVKoo empowered), most from China. As a freshman, Joost are rather good at software interface than performance of usesr, quality and cost. Beside the name of founders, what could be the point to keep Joost go on?

]]> By: Hashim Warren http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1685946 Hashim Warren Sat, 20 Oct 2007 00:10:52 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1685946 @gilltots it seems some of the comments are coming from people using language translation. All are welcome on techCrunch. @gilltots

it seems some of the comments are coming from people using language translation.

All are welcome on techCrunch.

]]> By: Xavier http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1685912 Xavier Fri, 19 Oct 2007 23:43:03 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1685912 2 typos... : "Joost will have to respond with it’s own browser-based expereince." --> "Joost will have to respond with its own browser-based experience." 2 typos… : “Joost will have to respond with it’s own browser-based expereince.” –> “Joost will have to respond with its own browser-based experience.”

]]> By: Thinker http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1685710 Thinker Fri, 19 Oct 2007 21:21:54 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/19/joost-coming-to-the-browser/#comment-1685710 guys starting a new thing...have so many thoughts..always thought that it was my idea..anyways, penning down all the thoughts not because i am frustrated, but because I am selfish. When i write it I become even more creative. If enough people like it I'll continue else will stop. <a>http://thinkincell.blogspot.com</a> guys starting a new thing…have so many thoughts..always thought that it was my idea..anyways, penning down all the thoughts not because i am frustrated, but because I am selfish. When i write it I become even more creative. If enough people like it I’ll continue else will stop.

http://thinkinc...ll.blogspot.com

]]>