<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Blogs On Google Reader</title>
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/</link>
	<description>Startup and Tech News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 06:11:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ganar dinero ruleta</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-2266391</link>
		<dc:creator>ganar dinero ruleta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 07:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-2266391</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ganar dinero ruleta...&lt;/strong&gt;

In that case ganancias casinos internet casino descarga gratis...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ganar dinero ruleta&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In that case ganancias casinos internet casino descarga gratis&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: poker pc gratis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-2245140</link>
		<dc:creator>poker pc gratis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-2245140</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;quick and easy cash advance...&lt;/strong&gt;

Quite juego portales internet torneo poker gratis...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>quick and easy cash advance&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Quite juego portales internet torneo poker gratis&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: juegos de poker online gratis juego de poker online gratis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-2238362</link>
		<dc:creator>juegos de poker online gratis juego de poker online gratis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 17:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-2238362</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;poker zum online spielen...&lt;/strong&gt;

In other words bonus de casino juegos interactivos paginas internet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>poker zum online spielen&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>In other words bonus de casino juegos interactivos paginas internet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slot machine online spielen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-2154883</link>
		<dc:creator>slot machine online spielen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 07:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-2154883</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;slots com...&lt;/strong&gt;

As it is usually payday loan 1000 casino virtuale...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>slots com&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As it is usually payday loan 1000 casino virtuale&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: no fax no credit check cash advance check cash advance</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-2154208</link>
		<dc:creator>no fax no credit check cash advance check cash advance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 05:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-2154208</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;video poker strategie...&lt;/strong&gt;

As the roulette tipps cash loan payday till...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>video poker strategie&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As the roulette tipps cash loan payday till&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashok</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1726008</link>
		<dc:creator>ashok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 07:43:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1726008</guid>
		<description>Visit
http://easy-money-4u.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visit<br />
<a href="http://easy-money-4u.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://easy-money-4u.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ashok</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1726007</link>
		<dc:creator>ashok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Nov 2007 07:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1726007</guid>
		<description>Nice post</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mattbucher</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1718771</link>
		<dc:creator>mattbucher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 18:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1718771</guid>
		<description>Why was Kottke never featured on this list? kottke.org has over 80,000 subscribers on Google Reader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why was Kottke never featured on this list? kottke.org has over 80,000 subscribers on Google Reader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webdesign</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1714852</link>
		<dc:creator>Webdesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1714852</guid>
		<description>Hey look this site

http://www.ooyes.net

Best Regards :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey look this site</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ooyes.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.ooyes.net</a></p>
<p>Best Regards <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1699096</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:36:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1699096</guid>
		<description>http://freeitunessongs.blogspot.com has 100,000+ Search for itunes and you'll find it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://freeitunessongs.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://freeitunessongs.blogspot.com</a> has 100,000+ Search for itunes and you&#8217;ll find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tips on your Google Reader subscriber numbers &#124; MT-Soft Website Development</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1691999</link>
		<dc:creator>Tips on your Google Reader subscriber numbers &#124; MT-Soft Website Development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 22:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1691999</guid>
		<description>[...] subscriber numbers for a blog when you search to add a new feed. It didn&#8217;t take long for different folks to start collecting subscriber numbers for different blogs. I haven&#8217;t asked the Reader [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] subscriber numbers for a blog when you search to add a new feed. It didn&#8217;t take long for different folks to start collecting subscriber numbers for different blogs. I haven&#8217;t asked the Reader [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1689542</link>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1689542</guid>
		<description>http://ilovetypography.com has 2000+</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://ilovetypography.com" rel="nofollow">http://ilovetypography.com</a> has 2000+</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 博采志 &#187; Google Reader 的统计功能</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1682034</link>
		<dc:creator>博采志 &#187; Google Reader 的统计功能</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:14:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1682034</guid>
		<description>[...] weekend Google Reader released its stats, and I see the exact same problem: all the “top” feeds are actually the default feeds. In fact, many of the most popular feeds don’t actually exist. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] weekend Google Reader released its stats, and I see the exact same problem: all the “top” feeds are actually the default feeds. In fact, many of the most popular feeds don’t actually exist. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Reader Subscribers &#171; Ian Skerrett</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1681888</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Reader Subscribers &#171; Ian Skerrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1681888</guid>
		<description>[...] I was pleasantly surprised to see the Eclipse Foundation news at 10,330. If you compare it to a list of top blogs, that puts the Foundation news feed in the top 40; not [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I was pleasantly surprised to see the Eclipse Foundation news at 10,330. If you compare it to a list of top blogs, that puts the Foundation news feed in the top 40; not [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Skerrett</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1681887</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Skerrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:56:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1681887</guid>
		<description>I might as well add the feed from the Eclipse Foundation.  It comes in at 10,330.

http://www.eclipse.org/home/eclipsenews.rss</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I might as well add the feed from the Eclipse Foundation.  It comes in at 10,330.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eclipse.org/home/eclipsenews.rss" rel="nofollow">http://www.eclipse.org/home/eclipsenews.rss</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1680233</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1680233</guid>
		<description>Started looking through my subscriptions.  Some relatively large ones are
The Superficial: 40,473
Joel On Software: 34,086
Zen Habits: ~22,000 from 4 different feeds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Started looking through my subscriptions.  Some relatively large ones are<br />
The Superficial: 40,473<br />
Joel On Software: 34,086<br />
Zen Habits: ~22,000 from 4 different feeds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Relentless Media &#187; MAKE is #9 on Google Reader and a top 100 blog on PC Magazine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1679708</link>
		<dc:creator>Relentless Media &#187; MAKE is #9 on Google Reader and a top 100 blog on PC Magazine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 08:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1679708</guid>
		<description>[...] saw a list of most subscribed to sites on TechCrunch and was delighted to see our little ole&#8217; MAKE site hit #9 on their top 100 list! Theirs list [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] saw a list of most subscribed to sites on TechCrunch and was delighted to see our little ole&#8217; MAKE site hit #9 on their top 100 list! Theirs list [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kirk gaulden</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1678570</link>
		<dc:creator>kirk gaulden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 19:40:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1678570</guid>
		<description>I"ve been a manger for 6 yrs... if you want money take 10% of your earnings
and place it back into your system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8221;ve been a manger for 6 yrs&#8230; if you want money take 10% of your earnings<br />
and place it back into your system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pkj's blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1677842</link>
		<dc:creator>pkj's blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1677842</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Feed reader count and Long Tail...&lt;/strong&gt;

The big news during the past weekend was the release of google&#8217;s feed reader statistics. Now you can see how many people have subscribed to any feed (through google&#8217;s services like reader, iGoogle, orkut etc) by adding adding the feed in on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Feed reader count and Long Tail&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The big news during the past weekend was the release of google&#8217;s feed reader statistics. Now you can see how many people have subscribed to any feed (through google&#8217;s services like reader, iGoogle, orkut etc) by adding adding the feed in on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wesley Tanaka</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1677832</link>
		<dc:creator>Wesley Tanaka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1677832</guid>
		<description>someone obviously needs to automate this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>someone obviously needs to automate this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Israel LHeureux</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1676896</link>
		<dc:creator>Israel LHeureux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:49:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1676896</guid>
		<description>Over on the google reader blog, Mihai Parparita says 

"Google subscriber counts: These numbers include subscribers across all Google services, including Reader, iGoogle, and Orkut."

"Additionally, we've made changes (some as recently as today) as to how counts are being calculated. "
... and
"Reader's feed search was recently showing stale and incomplete data"

I'm going to parse that to mean that reader had only been showing numbers for reader, and is NOW showing subscriptions from iGoogle + Orkut too.

Whatever the case, they don't have the parsing worked out too well yet. For example, the difference of a capital "Crunch" leads to two different numbers:

http://feeds.feedburner.com/Techcrunch: 169,538
http://feeds.feedburner.com/TechCrunch: 17,782

FB can aggregate the differences (?) and I'd expect GReader to do the same, even if only for the FB special case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over on the google reader blog, Mihai Parparita says </p>
<p>&#8220;Google subscriber counts: These numbers include subscribers across all Google services, including Reader, iGoogle, and Orkut.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Additionally, we&#8217;ve made changes (some as recently as today) as to how counts are being calculated. &#8221;<br />
&#8230; and<br />
&#8220;Reader&#8217;s feed search was recently showing stale and incomplete data&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m going to parse that to mean that reader had only been showing numbers for reader, and is NOW showing subscriptions from iGoogle + Orkut too.</p>
<p>Whatever the case, they don&#8217;t have the parsing worked out too well yet. For example, the difference of a capital &#8220;Crunch&#8221; leads to two different numbers:</p>
<p><a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/Techcrunch:" rel="nofollow">http://feeds.feedburner.com/Techcrunch:</a> 169,538<br />
<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/TechCrunch:" rel="nofollow">http://feeds.feedburner.com/TechCrunch:</a> 17,782</p>
<p>FB can aggregate the differences (?) and I&#8217;d expect GReader to do the same, even if only for the FB special case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1676654</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1676654</guid>
		<description>Interesting, all the numbers jumped substantially up today, probably because it's Monday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, all the numbers jumped substantially up today, probably because it&#8217;s Monday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay White - 53K via Google</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1676641</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay White - 53K via Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1676641</guid>
		<description>Thought I would mention that my blog, Dumb Little Man has a Google Reader count of  53,714 subscribers.   

That's a pretty remarkable portion of my 61K total subscribers as shown by Feedburner.  

Jay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thought I would mention that my blog, Dumb Little Man has a Google Reader count of  53,714 subscribers.   </p>
<p>That&#8217;s a pretty remarkable portion of my 61K total subscribers as shown by Feedburner.  </p>
<p>Jay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Hamm</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1676635</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Hamm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1676635</guid>
		<description>The Simple Dollar (http://www.thesimpledollar.com/) has 7,054 subscribers on Google Reader, split across two feeds.  I believe that this list has a very strong tech slant right off the bat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Simple Dollar (http://www.thesimpledollar.com/) has 7,054 subscribers on Google Reader, split across two feeds.  I believe that this list has a very strong tech slant right off the bat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Reader Stats Still Pretty Useless</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1676629</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Reader Stats Still Pretty Useless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 19:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/14/top-blogs-on-google-reader/#comment-1676629</guid>
		<description>[...] you look at Mike Arrington and Robert Scoble&#8217;s posts where are they are fruitlessly frittering away at trying to track [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] you look at Mike Arrington and Robert Scoble&#8217;s posts where are they are fruitlessly frittering away at trying to track [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1.349 seconds -->
