<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exclusive: MapQuest Plays Catch-Up With Launch of Beta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: There is no way you could ever get lost&#8230; &#124; Concepts, Ideas, Thoughts &#38; Bullsh!t</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-2061348</link>
		<dc:creator>There is no way you could ever get lost&#8230; &#124; Concepts, Ideas, Thoughts &#38; Bullsh!t</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 10:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-2061348</guid>
		<description>[...] Exclusive: MapQuest Plays Catch-Up With Launch of Beta [via Zemanta] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Exclusive: MapQuest Plays Catch-Up With Launch of Beta [via Zemanta] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MapQuest reveals new beta map site &#124; Bullroarer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1796450</link>
		<dc:creator>MapQuest reveals new beta map site &#124; Bullroarer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 05:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1796450</guid>
		<description>[...] information on the new beta are available at Mapquest blog entry and TechCrunch.    Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] information on the new beta are available at Mapquest blog entry and TechCrunch.    Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresh Mexican Food Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1712802</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh Mexican Food Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2007 20:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1712802</guid>
		<description>Let's see. 

(*) Mapquest offers me the ability to avoid any particular maneuver of my directions, just by clicking "Avoid" against a maneuver. This isn't easy in Google Maps if not impossible. For example, see - http://snipurl.com/1sxdo

(*) "Avoid Toll" option, very important especially for people in toll happy states like NJ. Mapquest had this for ages; they removed it for a while and now it is back for almost a year. Google, Yahoo, MS doesn't offer this feature. See - http://snipurl.com/1sxdf

(*) "Avoid Highways" was available in Mapquest for ages. (http://snipurl.com/1sxdd); took a while for Google to have that feature. 

So, fanboys need to learn to give credit when and where it is due, instead of simply saying "MQ sucks".

FYI, Map24.com has better features than Mapquest and Google Maps.

That's all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see. </p>
<p>(*) Mapquest offers me the ability to avoid any particular maneuver of my directions, just by clicking &#8220;Avoid&#8221; against a maneuver. This isn&#8217;t easy in Google Maps if not impossible. For example, see - <a href="http://snipurl.com/1sxdo" rel="nofollow">http://snipurl.com/1sxdo</a></p>
<p>(*) &#8220;Avoid Toll&#8221; option, very important especially for people in toll happy states like NJ. Mapquest had this for ages; they removed it for a while and now it is back for almost a year. Google, Yahoo, MS doesn&#8217;t offer this feature. See - <a href="http://snipurl.com/1sxdf" rel="nofollow">http://snipurl.com/1sxdf</a></p>
<p>(*) &#8220;Avoid Highways&#8221; was available in Mapquest for ages. (http://snipurl.com/1sxdd); took a while for Google to have that feature. </p>
<p>So, fanboys need to learn to give credit when and where it is due, instead of simply saying &#8220;MQ sucks&#8221;.</p>
<p>FYI, Map24.com has better features than Mapquest and Google Maps.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live Search Maps Getting Better</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1709827</link>
		<dc:creator>Live Search Maps Getting Better</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Oct 2007 19:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1709827</guid>
		<description>[...] post), I love all the competition going on in online mapping between Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, and even MapQuest. The latest in the feature race  comes from Microsoft&#8217;s Live Search Maps. In addition to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post), I love all the competition going on in online mapping between Google, Microsoft, Yahoo, and even MapQuest. The latest in the feature race  comes from Microsoft&#8217;s Live Search Maps. In addition to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1681248</link>
		<dc:creator>Liam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 03:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1681248</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the info Claire, this so called "soft launch" is awesome! i can't wait to see what is to come on this site, it's much better than Mapquest's effort - less advertising!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the info Claire, this so called &#8220;soft launch&#8221; is awesome! i can&#8217;t wait to see what is to come on this site, it&#8217;s much better than Mapquest&#8217;s effort - less advertising!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dougie FRESH</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1677192</link>
		<dc:creator>Dougie FRESH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 02:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1677192</guid>
		<description>It really is amazing. Iif we're all pretty much in agreement that even the new Beta SUCKS versus gMaps, how they hell does MQ have such a large margin in user base?

It must just be that the techies, the same ones that read TechCrunch, were blown away by the gMaps launch - whereas the average user never knew it even happened. Hence they stick with the name they know, MapQuest. But that is not a sustainable advantage...

Poor people, MQ has sucked for years - a perfect example of a company resting on it's laurels: "Oh we DO maps! We're the one! Our interface is PERFECT!" While it just takes another company to ask - "How can this be done better..."

Too little, too late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really is amazing. Iif we&#8217;re all pretty much in agreement that even the new Beta SUCKS versus gMaps, how they hell does MQ have such a large margin in user base?</p>
<p>It must just be that the techies, the same ones that read TechCrunch, were blown away by the gMaps launch - whereas the average user never knew it even happened. Hence they stick with the name they know, MapQuest. But that is not a sustainable advantage&#8230;</p>
<p>Poor people, MQ has sucked for years - a perfect example of a company resting on it&#8217;s laurels: &#8220;Oh we DO maps! We&#8217;re the one! Our interface is PERFECT!&#8221; While it just takes another company to ask - &#8220;How can this be done better&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Too little, too late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claire</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1675794</link>
		<dc:creator>Claire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 04:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1675794</guid>
		<description>A smiliar story is playing out in Austraila. http://www.whereis.com is the current market leading mapping website (though Google is gaining). 
They've just launched a very soft beta which you can see at http://beta.whereis.com. This is also their first drop with plans to increase functionality over the coming months, before turning the old site off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A smiliar story is playing out in Austraila. <a href="http://www.whereis.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.whereis.com</a> is the current market leading mapping website (though Google is gaining).<br />
They&#8217;ve just launched a very soft beta which you can see at <a href="http://beta.whereis.com" rel="nofollow">http://beta.whereis.com</a>. This is also their first drop with plans to increase functionality over the coming months, before turning the old site off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1675253</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1675253</guid>
		<description>I forgot to disclose that I used to work on AOL's local products, though not directly on MapQuest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to disclose that I used to work on AOL&#8217;s local products, though not directly on MapQuest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1675251</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 20:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1675251</guid>
		<description>MapQuest has a very loyal user base and people go there without thinking about it -- the same advantage that Google has in search over newcomers, MapQuest has in mapping.

The current beta shows very little that's new and certainly nothing that's innovative compared with the competition. 

I did an in-depth comparison of MapQuest to Google and Yahoo's offerings:
http://redesign.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/a-new-mapquest-beta-with-not-much-new/

Given that MapQuest is a bare bones mapping site and does the job (even if it's not pretty) for most people, it's biggest threat in the U.S. is really sat nav systems. The prices have been plummeting, with many portable nav systems available under $200. I bet by Christmas you'll see a few units at $99.

When your car can provide the basics, that's when the tools that Google and Yahoo offer will make a real difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MapQuest has a very loyal user base and people go there without thinking about it &#8212; the same advantage that Google has in search over newcomers, MapQuest has in mapping.</p>
<p>The current beta shows very little that&#8217;s new and certainly nothing that&#8217;s innovative compared with the competition. </p>
<p>I did an in-depth comparison of MapQuest to Google and Yahoo&#8217;s offerings:<br />
<a href="http://redesign.wordpress.com/2007/10/14/a-new-mapquest-beta-with-not-much-new/" rel="nofollow">http://redesign.wordpress.com/.....-much-new/</a></p>
<p>Given that MapQuest is a bare bones mapping site and does the job (even if it&#8217;s not pretty) for most people, it&#8217;s biggest threat in the U.S. is really sat nav systems. The prices have been plummeting, with many portable nav systems available under $200. I bet by Christmas you&#8217;ll see a few units at $99.</p>
<p>When your car can provide the basics, that&#8217;s when the tools that Google and Yahoo offer will make a real difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scoot</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1674413</link>
		<dc:creator>Scoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 04:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1674413</guid>
		<description>I like mapquest, I hope they don't mess up here and try to get too fancy and slow everything down. I live in a rural area and mapquest works the best out here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like mapquest, I hope they don&#8217;t mess up here and try to get too fancy and slow everything down. I live in a rural area and mapquest works the best out here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePlaz</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1674073</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePlaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 21:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1674073</guid>
		<description>Well at least the old site dosn't make you refresh the entire page when you want to pan up or down - at least that is AJAX.

I don't really see much of a difference to having it all on 1 page.  I just care for the AJAX panning and zooming</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well at least the old site dosn&#8217;t make you refresh the entire page when you want to pan up or down - at least that is AJAX.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really see much of a difference to having it all on 1 page.  I just care for the AJAX panning and zooming</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673979</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 20:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673979</guid>
		<description>It is slow as molasses, which is a kiss of death for a mainstream consumer need like mapping.  I also think that they got it wrong, if the goal is mainstream users:  It is neither a leader in ease of use nor good at exposing the new functionality in a well-executed manner.  Also, the tabs on the top suck as an idea.

I think they will do nothing to stop the Google Maps not-so-gradual erosion of their market share.  Won't take long, with Google Maps growing at 26% annually!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is slow as molasses, which is a kiss of death for a mainstream consumer need like mapping.  I also think that they got it wrong, if the goal is mainstream users:  It is neither a leader in ease of use nor good at exposing the new functionality in a well-executed manner.  Also, the tabs on the top suck as an idea.</p>
<p>I think they will do nothing to stop the Google Maps not-so-gradual erosion of their market share.  Won&#8217;t take long, with Google Maps growing at 26% annually!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673938</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 19:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673938</guid>
		<description>New beta has been available for awhile.  I don't much care for it. UI is overcomplicated and feels heavy, and the maps visually are too noisy for me to look at.

For maps, I usually bounce between Yahoo and Google. I find Google's interface easier to use, while Yahoo's tends to provide more useful information(i.e., I can see neighborhoods in major cities).  Also odd is that I find Yahoo maps to visually have less noise the more I zoom out (say, city or state level), whereas Google's seems imminently more readable at the street level.

There are only 2 other things I like more about Yahoo, which is the zoom feature is much more useful then Google's, and I occasionally benefit from the user reviews and local information Yahoo is able to provide, which seems more helpful than Google's occasional aggregate reviews.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New beta has been available for awhile.  I don&#8217;t much care for it. UI is overcomplicated and feels heavy, and the maps visually are too noisy for me to look at.</p>
<p>For maps, I usually bounce between Yahoo and Google. I find Google&#8217;s interface easier to use, while Yahoo&#8217;s tends to provide more useful information(i.e., I can see neighborhoods in major cities).  Also odd is that I find Yahoo maps to visually have less noise the more I zoom out (say, city or state level), whereas Google&#8217;s seems imminently more readable at the street level.</p>
<p>There are only 2 other things I like more about Yahoo, which is the zoom feature is much more useful then Google&#8217;s, and I occasionally benefit from the user reviews and local information Yahoo is able to provide, which seems more helpful than Google&#8217;s occasional aggregate reviews.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673769</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 16:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673769</guid>
		<description>I thought they were playing catch up with Web 2.0 by adding "Beta" to their logo LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought they were playing catch up with Web 2.0 by adding &#8220;Beta&#8221; to their logo LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Tsai</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673633</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Tsai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673633</guid>
		<description>Mapquest still sucks even the Beta version is.
I can't believe it's over Google Maps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mapquest still sucks even the Beta version is.<br />
I can&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s over Google Maps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoopie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673242</link>
		<dc:creator>whoopie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 06:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673242</guid>
		<description>who are the idiots? the people using mapquest or valley types who can't grasp that over in flyover country people treat websites the same way you treat a stapler. they pick it up, they use it, they put it down. there is nothing more frustrating for johnny startup than an audience that doesn't even care if his site is better.

stay frustrated children. ten years from now, AIM, hotmail, yahoo and mapquest will still likely have millions of users, and more obnoxiously, they will retain most of them with minimal investments to copy innovative features four years late</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who are the idiots? the people using mapquest or valley types who can&#8217;t grasp that over in flyover country people treat websites the same way you treat a stapler. they pick it up, they use it, they put it down. there is nothing more frustrating for johnny startup than an audience that doesn&#8217;t even care if his site is better.</p>
<p>stay frustrated children. ten years from now, AIM, hotmail, yahoo and mapquest will still likely have millions of users, and more obnoxiously, they will retain most of them with minimal investments to copy innovative features four years late</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boomer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673140</link>
		<dc:creator>Boomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 04:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673140</guid>
		<description>I agree, MGZ -- it boggles the mind why anyone still uses the old Mapquest.


Then again, San Francisco's Google Map still has the Central Expressway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, MGZ &#8212; it boggles the mind why anyone still uses the old Mapquest.</p>
<p>Then again, San Francisco&#8217;s Google Map still has the Central Expressway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PXLated</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673114</link>
		<dc:creator>PXLated</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 04:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1673114</guid>
		<description>If I recall correctly it's even worse (sadder) than no changes since 1999. The first real estate site to feature MLS listings (CyberHomes) used it to map properties way back in 96-97. Wasn't called MapQuest but was the same company, same technology. Back then, they were the only thing going. Any site that wanted/needed mapping of any kind (location, proximity, etc) had only one choice, them. They've been milking their contracts ever since. A lot of ecommerce sites contracted with them during the first bubble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I recall correctly it&#8217;s even worse (sadder) than no changes since 1999. The first real estate site to feature MLS listings (CyberHomes) used it to map properties way back in 96-97. Wasn&#8217;t called MapQuest but was the same company, same technology. Back then, they were the only thing going. Any site that wanted/needed mapping of any kind (location, proximity, etc) had only one choice, them. They&#8217;ve been milking their contracts ever since. A lot of ecommerce sites contracted with them during the first bubble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672985</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672985</guid>
		<description>when it comes to maps Google rocks, especially now by integrating youtube on maps.... that is freakin awesome....Google Maps rock

http://vidsonly.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when it comes to maps Google rocks, especially now by integrating youtube on maps&#8230;. that is freakin awesome&#8230;.Google Maps rock</p>
<p><a href="http://vidsonly.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://vidsonly.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672950</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672950</guid>
		<description>What's Mapquest? Seriously, I had never heard of it. Are it's loyal users mostly US or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s Mapquest? Seriously, I had never heard of it. Are it&#8217;s loyal users mostly US or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Fake Meg Whitman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672878</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Fake Meg Whitman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672878</guid>
		<description>What does this have to do with Facebook?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does this have to do with Facebook?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NB</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672868</link>
		<dc:creator>NB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 00:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672868</guid>
		<description>But this does go to show you the difference in between what is considered to be true (Google Maps is #1) versus what the traffic numbers indicate.

Do you all think that GMail is #1 as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this does go to show you the difference in between what is considered to be true (Google Maps is #1) versus what the traffic numbers indicate.</p>
<p>Do you all think that GMail is #1 as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Daddy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672860</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Daddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672860</guid>
		<description>Weak - not even any TRAFFIC on it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weak - not even any TRAFFIC on it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Coonce</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672839</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Coonce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672839</guid>
		<description>Yikes - its still pretty hokey.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes - its still pretty hokey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Support this story on Stirrdup</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672832</link>
		<dc:creator>Support this story on Stirrdup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 23:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/12/exclusive-mapquest-plays-catch-up-with-launch-of-beta/#comment-1672832</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Exclusive: MapQuest Plays Catch-Up With Launch of Beta...&lt;/strong&gt;

This story has been submitted to Stirrdup.  Your support can help it become hot....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Exclusive: MapQuest Plays Catch-Up With Launch of Beta&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This story has been submitted to Stirrdup.  Your support can help it become hot&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.094 seconds -->
