<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blinkx AdHoc Lets Publishers Monetize Your Embedded Videos Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mark slater</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1670442</link>
		<dc:creator>mark slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 21:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1670442</guid>
		<description>ok so blinkx valuation is what?

http://www.blinkx.com/investors

and its revenue is what?

http://emea-store.blinkx.com/images/docs/blinkx_aim_admission.pdf

notice anything?

please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok so blinkx valuation is what?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.blinkx.com/investors" rel="nofollow">http://www.blinkx.com/investors</a></p>
<p>and its revenue is what?</p>
<p><a href="http://emea-store.blinkx.com/images/docs/blinkx_aim_admission.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://emea-store.blinkx.com/i.....ission.pdf</a></p>
<p>notice anything?</p>
<p>please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668654</link>
		<dc:creator>steve ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 20:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668654</guid>
		<description>Loser!

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loser!</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668508</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 18:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668508</guid>
		<description>"Yet it seems a curious reality that in online video, apart from all other media, it has become perfectly acceptable to embed and monetize someone else’s content. On the other hand, creators can choose to not allow embeds of their videos."

Seems perfectly acceptable to monetize an embedded widget. What's so curious about the dynamic going on here? The widget/embed is getting something out of the relationship: eyeballs/distribution/audience. You don't get something for nothing Nick. I'd be certain to monetize widgets/embeds too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Yet it seems a curious reality that in online video, apart from all other media, it has become perfectly acceptable to embed and monetize someone else’s content. On the other hand, creators can choose to not allow embeds of their videos.&#8221;</p>
<p>Seems perfectly acceptable to monetize an embedded widget. What&#8217;s so curious about the dynamic going on here? The widget/embed is getting something out of the relationship: eyeballs/distribution/audience. You don&#8217;t get something for nothing Nick. I&#8217;d be certain to monetize widgets/embeds too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jean</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668457</link>
		<dc:creator>jean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668457</guid>
		<description>it's a great tool, really cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a great tool, really cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresh Video</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668392</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh Video</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668392</guid>
		<description>Looks like Blinkx AdHoc is pretty easy to use, and also surprisingly much more targeted than Google Video Ads.  When Google launched their Video Ad Units yesterday, I thought it would have been much more like the Blinkx AdHoc ads, it's too bad it's not.

It will be interesting to see if Blinkx can get enough Advertisers to make it worthwhile for publishers, and if their ad payout is any good.

It would also be nice if they had an API for AdHoc, so that publishers don't have to go to the Blinkx website every time they want to use the Adhoc ads, but instead have the Ad code automatically generated using the API.  

The ability to customize the look and feel of the Ads would also be a huge plus.  
     
See a live version of Blinkx Ad Hoc in action here:  http://www.freshtribe.com/story/ferrari-vs-lamborghini.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Blinkx AdHoc is pretty easy to use, and also surprisingly much more targeted than Google Video Ads.  When Google launched their Video Ad Units yesterday, I thought it would have been much more like the Blinkx AdHoc ads, it&#8217;s too bad it&#8217;s not.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see if Blinkx can get enough Advertisers to make it worthwhile for publishers, and if their ad payout is any good.</p>
<p>It would also be nice if they had an API for AdHoc, so that publishers don&#8217;t have to go to the Blinkx website every time they want to use the Adhoc ads, but instead have the Ad code automatically generated using the API.  </p>
<p>The ability to customize the look and feel of the Ads would also be a huge plus.  </p>
<p>See a live version of Blinkx Ad Hoc in action here:  <a href="http://www.freshtribe.com/story/ferrari-vs-lamborghini.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.freshtribe.com/stor.....ghini.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe T.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668357</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668357</guid>
		<description>Monetize my embedded videos?  

How about a scalable, distributed platform to aggregate my real-time embedded videos and seamlessly leverage eyeballs?

Sounds like 1999 all over again, but this time with video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Monetize my embedded videos?  </p>
<p>How about a scalable, distributed platform to aggregate my real-time embedded videos and seamlessly leverage eyeballs?</p>
<p>Sounds like 1999 all over again, but this time with video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Star Affiliate Marketing Blogs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668330</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Star Affiliate Marketing Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668330</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blinkx AdHoc Widget - Another Way to Monetize Video...&lt;/strong&gt;

	Hot on the heels of the GoogTubeSense Video launch is Blinkx with a slightly different approach to monetizing videos.
So one of the major differences between GoogTubeSense and Blinkx is that Blinkx does a 2 way rev share (you, them) instead of 3 way (...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blinkx AdHoc Widget - Another Way to Monetize Video&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>	Hot on the heels of the GoogTubeSense Video launch is Blinkx with a slightly different approach to monetizing videos.<br />
So one of the major differences between GoogTubeSense and Blinkx is that Blinkx does a 2 way rev share (you, them) instead of 3 way (&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SorenG</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668235</link>
		<dc:creator>SorenG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668235</guid>
		<description>Nice. Opens a whole can of beans, but a creative idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice. Opens a whole can of beans, but a creative idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Cocinero Fiel</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668228</link>
		<dc:creator>El Cocinero Fiel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668228</guid>
		<description>No it is not. It does not work. Not for me, anyway. It says that the launch is today, but...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No it is not. It does not work. Not for me, anyway. It says that the launch is today, but&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668207</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 14:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668207</guid>
		<description>It will fire up some rockets towards the Google video ads for sure</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It will fire up some rockets towards the Google video ads for sure</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Business of Software</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668083</link>
		<dc:creator>The Business of Software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 13:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1668083</guid>
		<description>This looks like a legal minefield.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a legal minefield.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razvan Antonescu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1667966</link>
		<dc:creator>Razvan Antonescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1667966</guid>
		<description>How will Google react on that, especially that they have their video ads launched 2 days ago. I can't believe that someone will launch something like that without taking all this issues into consideration</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How will Google react on that, especially that they have their video ads launched 2 days ago. I can&#8217;t believe that someone will launch something like that without taking all this issues into consideration</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1667911</link>
		<dc:creator>jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 10:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1667911</guid>
		<description>Hi,

Sorry about that!  The new product is at http://www.blinkx.com/adhoc/.

thanks!

Jenny (blinkx)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>Sorry about that!  The new product is at <a href="http://www.blinkx.com/adhoc/" rel="nofollow">http://www.blinkx.com/adhoc/</a>.</p>
<p>thanks!</p>
<p>Jenny (blinkx)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Razvan Antonescu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/09/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1667765</link>
		<dc:creator>Razvan Antonescu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 08:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/10/blinkx-adhoc-lets-publishers-monetize-your-embedded-videos-too/#comment-1667765</guid>
		<description>How about a link to the offering? Is that too hard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about a link to the offering? Is that too hard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.059 seconds -->
