<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technorati CEO: Techmeme is &#8220;a great little site.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: free verizon ringtones download free phone ringtones verizon free motorola ringtones verizon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1778611</link>
		<dc:creator>free verizon ringtones download free phone ringtones verizon free motorola ringtones verizon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 04:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1778611</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;download ringtones download metro pcs ringtones...&lt;/strong&gt;

If she sprint ringtones cingular free phone real ringtones...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>download ringtones download metro pcs ringtones&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>If she sprint ringtones cingular free phone real ringtones&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a reader</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1675071</link>
		<dc:creator>a reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 17:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1675071</guid>
		<description>I read TechCrunch because of its timely reporting of interesting Web 2.0 and other new startups/technologies.  I do not come here to read TC writers harshly bashing other companies they don’t like.

TC became wildly popular and influential not because of the opinionate bashing of other companies.  It became popular because of its timely and mostly unbiased reporting.  Frankly speaking, we all have our own brains and don’t really need your thinking/judging for us.  Forget that little secret of success may quickly turn people off and lead to demise of the beloved blog/news site.  Please consider this friendly advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read TechCrunch because of its timely reporting of interesting Web 2.0 and other new startups/technologies.  I do not come here to read TC writers harshly bashing other companies they don’t like.</p>
<p>TC became wildly popular and influential not because of the opinionate bashing of other companies.  It became popular because of its timely and mostly unbiased reporting.  Frankly speaking, we all have our own brains and don’t really need your thinking/judging for us.  Forget that little secret of success may quickly turn people off and lead to demise of the beloved blog/news site.  Please consider this friendly advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1664843</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1664843</guid>
		<description>Oh wait, now I see why the author is so vehement. Look at the #1 source of news for Techmeme:
http://www.techmeme.com/lb

None other than TechCrunch!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wait, now I see why the author is so vehement. Look at the #1 source of news for Techmeme:<br />
<a href="http://www.techmeme.com/lb" rel="nofollow">http://www.techmeme.com/lb</a></p>
<p>None other than TechCrunch!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1664832</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1664832</guid>
		<description>I understand that being loud-mouthed and opinionated is what gets you noticed in the blogosphere, but this author is ridiculous. I've only been here once and I won't come back. Maybe next time you can try taking a serious tone to the conversation and stating your opinions reasonably - instead of sounding like a drunken fanboi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand that being loud-mouthed and opinionated is what gets you noticed in the blogosphere, but this author is ridiculous. I&#8217;ve only been here once and I won&#8217;t come back. Maybe next time you can try taking a serious tone to the conversation and stating your opinions reasonably - instead of sounding like a drunken fanboi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Artemi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1663662</link>
		<dc:creator>Artemi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 22:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1663662</guid>
		<description>Its great to see the massive discussion develop in the comments about such opinion pieces.  Perhaps Technorati should be looking at that.  Often comments are at least as valuable as the post itself.  Would be nice if it was possible to structure them, and sort of show results of a reader poll, eg "87% of readers agree with Mike's opinion on this".

Technorati is a great company, I believe they've stayed focused and executed well, the site is a pleasure to use.  The trouble is that their sharp focus on blog search put them in direct competition with Google.  And now that the new WordPress release (2.3) has switched from Technorati to Google (for tracking backlinks) they must really be in a tough situation.

Admittedly beating Google in the blog search game is very tough.  As a vertical search engine, Technorati must focus on what makes blog seach different from normal search.  The timeline, authority, spam, discussions / comments, personalisation, and cluster results by opinions (at least positive / negative) and topics.  When I search for "web 2.0" on Technorati I don't just want the latest blog posts featuring the keyword.  I want a timeline of popularity, people and sources that are authorities on the subject, popular opinions and how they change over time.  I want a geographic view of where it's happening and where it began.  I want to know the topics that are correlated, companies and people that are often cited.  I want to see famous quotes on the subject.  I want to track certain subjects over time and discussions on specific posts.

It's a tough problem, sure.  But that's what will make Technorati stand out from Google blog search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its great to see the massive discussion develop in the comments about such opinion pieces.  Perhaps Technorati should be looking at that.  Often comments are at least as valuable as the post itself.  Would be nice if it was possible to structure them, and sort of show results of a reader poll, eg &#8220;87% of readers agree with Mike&#8217;s opinion on this&#8221;.</p>
<p>Technorati is a great company, I believe they&#8217;ve stayed focused and executed well, the site is a pleasure to use.  The trouble is that their sharp focus on blog search put them in direct competition with Google.  And now that the new WordPress release (2.3) has switched from Technorati to Google (for tracking backlinks) they must really be in a tough situation.</p>
<p>Admittedly beating Google in the blog search game is very tough.  As a vertical search engine, Technorati must focus on what makes blog seach different from normal search.  The timeline, authority, spam, discussions / comments, personalisation, and cluster results by opinions (at least positive / negative) and topics.  When I search for &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; on Technorati I don&#8217;t just want the latest blog posts featuring the keyword.  I want a timeline of popularity, people and sources that are authorities on the subject, popular opinions and how they change over time.  I want a geographic view of where it&#8217;s happening and where it began.  I want to know the topics that are correlated, companies and people that are often cited.  I want to see famous quotes on the subject.  I want to track certain subjects over time and discussions on specific posts.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tough problem, sure.  But that&#8217;s what will make Technorati stand out from Google blog search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1663412</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1663412</guid>
		<description>Technorati is still pretty widely used and has some potential...though I agree it has been flagging recently.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technorati is still pretty widely used and has some potential&#8230;though I agree it has been flagging recently.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saptarshi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662736</link>
		<dc:creator>Saptarshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 06:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662736</guid>
		<description>I think technocrati is better, more fun to use and slicker compared to techmeme. But hopefully, Richard Jalichandra doesn't get over confident and loose it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think technocrati is better, more fun to use and slicker compared to techmeme. But hopefully, Richard Jalichandra doesn&#8217;t get over confident and loose it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662143</link>
		<dc:creator>justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662143</guid>
		<description>Darnel: Famous words from a Mikey wannabe.  Good journalism requires research, validation and objectivity for crafting interesting stories about breaking news.  Other than your mom or some lonely dorks, who really gives a %$#@ about reading a blog used as a soapbox for spewing personal and biased opinions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darnel: Famous words from a Mikey wannabe.  Good journalism requires research, validation and objectivity for crafting interesting stories about breaking news.  Other than your mom or some lonely dorks, who really gives a %$#@ about reading a blog used as a soapbox for spewing personal and biased opinions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darnell Clayton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662132</link>
		<dc:creator>Darnell Clayton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 23:24:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662132</guid>
		<description>Objectivity? What is that, the viewpoint of a robot?

If you are alive, you have an opinion. If you have an opinion, then you are biased.

Hence the reason why blogs and editorials are popular, and the media is fading in their vain attempts at being "objective."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Objectivity? What is that, the viewpoint of a robot?</p>
<p>If you are alive, you have an opinion. If you have an opinion, then you are biased.</p>
<p>Hence the reason why blogs and editorials are popular, and the media is fading in their vain attempts at being &#8220;objective.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: max</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662072</link>
		<dc:creator>max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662072</guid>
		<description>MA: you should avoid condescendingly criticizing the new CEO's "media training" when you obviously lack any journalistic training yourself.  You might want to find some better "intern"s to do your research.  If i didn't know better i'd say you have CEO envy.

EVERYONE ON TECHCRUNCH: it should be obvious by now that MA has a vendetta against Technorati, and you are right to question if he is being given incentives by Techmeme and other rivals.  MA actually misquotes data, or purposely uses old data to slam Technorati, which is still, objectively in terms of data quality and quantity (though not speed), better than Google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MA: you should avoid condescendingly criticizing the new CEO&#8217;s &#8220;media training&#8221; when you obviously lack any journalistic training yourself.  You might want to find some better &#8220;intern&#8221;s to do your research.  If i didn&#8217;t know better i&#8217;d say you have CEO envy.</p>
<p>EVERYONE ON TECHCRUNCH: it should be obvious by now that MA has a vendetta against Technorati, and you are right to question if he is being given incentives by Techmeme and other rivals.  MA actually misquotes data, or purposely uses old data to slam Technorati, which is still, objectively in terms of data quality and quantity (though not speed), better than Google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662043</link>
		<dc:creator>patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662043</guid>
		<description>@ jackamo, most of the engineers i know in telecom and internet call sites properties. it's just sort of the term. or, platforms.

it just sort of comes out of my mouth without thinking because of this, when I say it. it's probably the same here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ jackamo, most of the engineers i know in telecom and internet call sites properties. it&#8217;s just sort of the term. or, platforms.</p>
<p>it just sort of comes out of my mouth without thinking because of this, when I say it. it&#8217;s probably the same here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackamo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662040</link>
		<dc:creator>jackamo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662040</guid>
		<description>those sound like yahoo sound bites.  does anyone else cringe when they hear sites referred to as "properties"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>those sound like yahoo sound bites.  does anyone else cringe when they hear sites referred to as &#8220;properties&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662019</link>
		<dc:creator>patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662019</guid>
		<description>@ sputnick, taking VC is not an intelligent expansion plan and shouldn't - emphasize "shouldn't" - be taken unless you need it. Entrepreneurship 101. VC sounds sexy, it sounds so fantastic - it's not. You should only raise if you have to - Techmeme is actually pretty solid if it hasn't needed to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ sputnick, taking VC is not an intelligent expansion plan and shouldn&#8217;t - emphasize &#8220;shouldn&#8217;t&#8221; - be taken unless you need it. Entrepreneurship 101. VC sounds sexy, it sounds so fantastic - it&#8217;s not. You should only raise if you have to - Techmeme is actually pretty solid if it hasn&#8217;t needed to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662016</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662016</guid>
		<description>Mike:

So, you were probably one of those kids who took his ball and went home when you could not be quarterback.  But, then again, you probably were also the kid who would not have been invited in the first place unless you had the ball.

Your readers define your company's value and I am quite confident that you pitch techcrunch as a foremost source of information for a large number of influential readers in the technology world.  Readers that in large part have got to expect objective stories with opinions not stated as fact.

Keep up the biased reporting and disregard for your readers and I and many others will certainly move to a credible source who understands the importance of journalistic integrity. 

Please refrain from your commonly used method of dealing with dissenting opinions by classifying them as SPAM and deleting them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:</p>
<p>So, you were probably one of those kids who took his ball and went home when you could not be quarterback.  But, then again, you probably were also the kid who would not have been invited in the first place unless you had the ball.</p>
<p>Your readers define your company&#8217;s value and I am quite confident that you pitch techcrunch as a foremost source of information for a large number of influential readers in the technology world.  Readers that in large part have got to expect objective stories with opinions not stated as fact.</p>
<p>Keep up the biased reporting and disregard for your readers and I and many others will certainly move to a credible source who understands the importance of journalistic integrity. </p>
<p>Please refrain from your commonly used method of dealing with dissenting opinions by classifying them as SPAM and deleting them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patricia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662015</link>
		<dc:creator>patricia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662015</guid>
		<description>I love Techmeme, and its sister site WeSmirch, and it has nothing to do with Gabe, though I know and like Gabe as well. I just enjoy having a quick look at what everybody's talking about and I do visit both sites daily, sometimes more than once, to what's going on. I also visit Google News. 

I can recall a time where Technorati had the top spot in the market but it didn't fare well thereafter - I think it seemed that they didn't have the ability to cope with or maximize their growth and now they're at the disadvantage. I can recall when it was really common that it came up among publicity clients back in the day. Nobody - and I'm not just saying it - brings it up at all anymore. They talk about Techmeme.

So, if Techmeme is a "nice little site", I wouldn't be surprised if it weren't a "big pain in the ass" for technorati. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Techmeme, and its sister site WeSmirch, and it has nothing to do with Gabe, though I know and like Gabe as well. I just enjoy having a quick look at what everybody&#8217;s talking about and I do visit both sites daily, sometimes more than once, to what&#8217;s going on. I also visit Google News. </p>
<p>I can recall a time where Technorati had the top spot in the market but it didn&#8217;t fare well thereafter - I think it seemed that they didn&#8217;t have the ability to cope with or maximize their growth and now they&#8217;re at the disadvantage. I can recall when it was really common that it came up among publicity clients back in the day. Nobody - and I&#8217;m not just saying it - brings it up at all anymore. They talk about Techmeme.</p>
<p>So, if Techmeme is a &#8220;nice little site&#8221;, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if it weren&#8217;t a &#8220;big pain in the ass&#8221; for technorati. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662011</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 21:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1662011</guid>
		<description>Media Publishing Strategy Loop:

1.  Manufacture controversy to generate interest and readers
2.  Hide behind the blurred line of "opinion" or "reporting"
3.  If criticized, 1st response is to defend, 2nd is to backtrack a little
4.  Smile all the way to the bank
5.  Goto #1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Media Publishing Strategy Loop:</p>
<p>1.  Manufacture controversy to generate interest and readers<br />
2.  Hide behind the blurred line of &#8220;opinion&#8221; or &#8220;reporting&#8221;<br />
3.  If criticized, 1st response is to defend, 2nd is to backtrack a little<br />
4.  Smile all the way to the bank<br />
5.  Goto #1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661826</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661826</guid>
		<description>maybe Richard can sit for your dog and confirm next time you jump Mike.   Something does not sit right with me when you don't verify before the post.  If you have had "media" training then revisit it.  You are not being balanced.  "It's a blog" does not license you to poor research.  I like TechCrunch for the news on tech and insightful opinions not this mike, not this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe Richard can sit for your dog and confirm next time you jump Mike.   Something does not sit right with me when you don&#8217;t verify before the post.  If you have had &#8220;media&#8221; training then revisit it.  You are not being balanced.  &#8220;It&#8217;s a blog&#8221; does not license you to poor research.  I like TechCrunch for the news on tech and insightful opinions not this mike, not this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anand</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661755</link>
		<dc:creator>Anand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 17:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661755</guid>
		<description>Personally, I would have been happy had Richard said that their company's main focus was on to stop their technorati ghost from escaping too often..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I would have been happy had Richard said that their company&#8217;s main focus was on to stop their technorati ghost from escaping too often..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661627</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:26:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661627</guid>
		<description>Mike,

Techcrunch is a great little site and there are a lot of cool things on here

.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>Techcrunch is a great little site and there are a lot of cool things on here</p>
<p>&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661616</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661616</guid>
		<description>By sign up, I mean when they click on the add blog to "technorati favorites" but have not yet signed up to Technorati. Your blog should be auto-added to their technorati favorites. Right now they have to jump through a billion loops to go back to your blog to click the button after having signed up on Technorati, when all they wanted to do is add a blog on their favorites list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By sign up, I mean when they click on the add blog to &#8220;technorati favorites&#8221; but have not yet signed up to Technorati. Your blog should be auto-added to their technorati favorites. Right now they have to jump through a billion loops to go back to your blog to click the button after having signed up on Technorati, when all they wanted to do is add a blog on their favorites list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661614</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 16:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661614</guid>
		<description>Technorati, are you guys reading????

When a user clicks on your blog to add you as a favorite, and they have not yet signed up. They should be prompted to sign up, BUT,

BUT,

BUTTTTTT,,

Your blog should be auto-added on their favorites list immediately after sign up.
As it is now they have to sign up, then they have to GO BACK TO  YOUR BLOG, and re-press the add to favorites button in order to add the blog.

That is RETARDED. Please fix this, that is a bug in anybody's book.
Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technorati, are you guys reading????</p>
<p>When a user clicks on your blog to add you as a favorite, and they have not yet signed up. They should be prompted to sign up, BUT,</p>
<p>BUT,</p>
<p>BUTTTTTT,,</p>
<p>Your blog should be auto-added on their favorites list immediately after sign up.<br />
As it is now they have to sign up, then they have to GO BACK TO  YOUR BLOG, and re-press the add to favorites button in order to add the blog.</p>
<p>That is RETARDED. Please fix this, that is a bug in anybody&#8217;s book.<br />
Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sputnick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661571</link>
		<dc:creator>sputnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:33:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661571</guid>
		<description>What??? TechMeme has a single employee and has never taken VC? Why not? How come? What gives? What happen? Is the founder a card-carrying liberal or something? I don't get it, please explain, TechCrunch knows this kind of stuff. 

I don't want to have a hugely successful site (like TechMeme) and still be doing all this stuff myself. I want grunts. I want account executives. I want a 36D receptionist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What??? TechMeme has a single employee and has never taken VC? Why not? How come? What gives? What happen? Is the founder a card-carrying liberal or something? I don&#8217;t get it, please explain, TechCrunch knows this kind of stuff. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to have a hugely successful site (like TechMeme) and still be doing all this stuff myself. I want grunts. I want account executives. I want a 36D receptionist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kashif</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661492</link>
		<dc:creator>Kashif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661492</guid>
		<description>Techmeme rocks all the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Techmeme rocks all the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661442</link>
		<dc:creator>TDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661442</guid>
		<description>And please start using a different picture of Richard Jalichandra. Dude looks like he spent too much time baking at a tanning salon with one of those fake yuppie tans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And please start using a different picture of Richard Jalichandra. Dude looks like he spent too much time baking at a tanning salon with one of those fake yuppie tans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TDavid</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661440</link>
		<dc:creator>TDavid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/technorati-ceo-techmeme-is-a-great-little-site/#comment-1661440</guid>
		<description>Mike - I didn't read any "belittling" going on here. I'm with others above who think your bias for a friend is showing here. Techmeme for all its strengths doesn't compete against Technorati -- at least in scope. Technorati is much more broad. Perhaps that is its weakness because it tries to be the google of feeds and consistently fails due to scaling woes mostly.

This takes nothing away from Techmeme, but I think even Gabe would be hardpressed to seriously compare the two services. That's not belittling, that's a fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike - I didn&#8217;t read any &#8220;belittling&#8221; going on here. I&#8217;m with others above who think your bias for a friend is showing here. Techmeme for all its strengths doesn&#8217;t compete against Technorati &#8212; at least in scope. Technorati is much more broad. Perhaps that is its weakness because it tries to be the google of feeds and consistently fails due to scaling woes mostly.</p>
<p>This takes nothing away from Techmeme, but I think even Gabe would be hardpressed to seriously compare the two services. That&#8217;s not belittling, that&#8217;s a fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.105 seconds -->
