<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Domain Industry Intrigue; Oversee.net Gets Hosed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:38:04 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: blackatreyu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-2680825</link>
		<dc:creator>blackatreyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 05:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-2680825</guid>
		<description>----------------------------------------------------------------------
SnapNames.com - Scam Company &amp; Shady Registrar Partners - Protondomains &amp; Media Web Plus
 
ICANN has to do something about Snapnames and their Shady Registrar Partners - Protondomains &amp; Media Web Plus, and what they get away with.
  
For several months we&#039;ve had to contend with registrars that includes Directnic, Intercosmos, DirectI, Snapnames, Protondomains, and now Media Web Plus.
 
Back in July, My company asked DirectNIC/Intercosmos (through emails and faxes) to release a specific inactive and parked domain name to the public because of our trademark. They did so by expiring and deleting the domain (Thank you Intercosmos!) and we waited patiently for over thirty days to purchase the name when it became available.
 
Snapnames grabbed it first through their domain drop and snatch service and then auctioned it off to THEIR shady registry partner and SUBSIDIARY - PROTONDOMAINS.  According to Whois:
 
&quot;Domain Name: *.COM
Registrar: PROTONDOMAINS.COM LLC
Whois Server: whois.protondomains.com
Referral URL: http://www.protondomains.com
Name Server: NS1.SEDOPARKING.COM
Name Server: NS2.SEDOPARKING.COM
Status: ok
Updated Date: 20-dec-2008
Creation Date: 10-dec-2008
Expiration Date: 10-dec-2009&quot;
 
So first it was under the name of DirectI, a company in India. We called them, and they informed us that they weren&#039;t the owners, and then we contacted Oversee and they said that the domain name was being managed by Snapnames under its subsidiary:  Prontodomains.
 
We then made numerous attempts to reach Protondomains.  The Whois information was incorrect, so we made a formal complaint with ICANN about their phony Whois information. The recently restored accurate information to the whois, so hopefully we&#039;ve led to helping to prevent them from misleading the public in the future.
 
We made attempts to contact KJEL HOLMBERG over at Snapnames, but he hasn&#039;t replied since December of 2008 (It&#039;s now approaching April 2009), only to our surprise that Protondomains might share an office with the folk at Snapnames.
 
Recently, the name was sold to or registered by MEDIA WEB PLUS, cybersquatters in the search optimization business.  We did reach out to them and they have asked us for $5000 for the name and then to f*ck off when we refused to pay.  We forwarded their request as well as our response to legal@moniker.com. I spoke to a couple of folk at Moniker, as they were the only ones answering their phones and they were wondering why Snapnames hadn&#039;t responded to our voicemail messages and emails.
 
Next We learned that the same domain name is on the Moniker marketplace being sold for $1600 as of 1:38PM EST. Dec. 22nd, 2008.  We were confused and so we contacted their customer support line and Moniker explained that Media Web Plus is most likely involved in a practice that is in likelihood violating their terms and agreement as customers of theirs.  The domain name also appears on the SEDO marketplace for an unknown bid amount.
 
All we want is our name.  Media Web Plus along with SEOSEO and OnlineDomains.mobi are also the owners and administrators of websites that would tarnish our brand name, and for what, so they can make a quick buck?
 
We have rights to THIS domain through our business registration in the State of New York and we hold a USPTO trademark and relevant pseudo-mark registration for THIS name, and have engaged in commerce under THIS name, and we were also issued a Tax ID by the IRS number under THIS name and will be filing for our company 2008 tax returns under THIS name.
 
On March 26, 2009, Media Web Plus informed us that the name will be sold through SEDO.  That means they&#039;ve had literally no traffic on the name and have been attempting to sell it for their outrageous sum since December 22, 2008!!!
 
This was our response (sent the same day):
 
&quot;As I mentioned on my previous email, we have a trademark for the name, so anyone who, to their misfortune purchases the name, we will inform them of our rights over the name and what they do from there to get there money back is up to them.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s even fair for them to be buying into a domain dispute and then delivered cease and desist letters by our lawyers.  As long as they want to engage in any activity involving the United States, they&#039;ll be confronted by the USPTO as using our name illegally.  Who wants that?  Is that worth $5000?
 
There&#039;s a reason why it has taken you so long to sell the name.  No one wants it and would have to be reckless to buy it if they did their research.  We are cool with buying the name for a $100 and that&#039;s it - quick &amp; easy.  We already have money set aside for the legal fees and arbitration fees to pursue this issue from start to finish.
 
Do what you have to do in the name of business and commerce.  Best of luck to you and I hope you guys are successful in your accomplishing your wishes and hopes.  We will still always be {inserted domain name}, and doing good by that name for all our world&#039;s kids.&quot;
 
We want our name and won&#039;t stop fighting until a transfer is made.WE sent ALL our supporting documents to the above parties, and we will not send them again. We wanted to avoid an arbitration process (it&#039;s expensive), but it may come to that. However, we will make sure that any customer, ICANN and anyone who has to deal with SNAPNAMES, PROTONDOMAINS, and MEDIA WEB PLUS will find this board posting, and be fearless in the pursuit of their dreams.
 
Fight them!!!
 
 
Anyone wishing to contact me about resolving this matter or have any questions or tips, please do so (to avoid spam) through this site&#039;s messaging process. We will get back to you as soon as we can.

---------------------------------------
Email addresses of those mentioned in this posting.  Contact them if you face similar issues  Good luck future business owners and social entrepreneurs, and thank you ICANN for establishing new policies against those who are a part of why our US economy is bad.  We need more oversight and regulations.  This issue has made me an advocate for them.  Here are the email addresses you won&#039;t find as available on the web:
 
Also try:
 
Attn: Legal (Moniker)
1600 Southwest 4th Avenue, Suite 400
Portland, Oregon, 97201
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you have trouble with MEDIA WEB PLUS, their public whois information (made public) is:
 
Registration Service Provided By: MANAGE.SNAPNAMES.COM
Contact: +1.5034595739
Website: http://Manage.SnapNames.com

Domain Name

Registrant:
Media Web Plus
nidal elkadri
125 marcel chaput
gatineau
qc,j9a 3b3
CA
Tel. +1.8197761113
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kjel P. Holmberg
SnapNames, Business Development Manager
115 NW 1st Ave, 3rd Floor
Portland, Oregon 97209
503.219.9990 ext. 236</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-<br />
SnapNames.com &#8211; Scam Company &amp; Shady Registrar Partners &#8211; Protondomains &amp; Media Web Plus</p>
<p>ICANN has to do something about Snapnames and their Shady Registrar Partners &#8211; Protondomains &amp; Media Web Plus, and what they get away with.</p>
<p>For several months we&#8217;ve had to contend with registrars that includes Directnic, Intercosmos, DirectI, Snapnames, Protondomains, and now Media Web Plus.</p>
<p>Back in July, My company asked DirectNIC/Intercosmos (through emails and faxes) to release a specific inactive and parked domain name to the public because of our trademark. They did so by expiring and deleting the domain (Thank you Intercosmos!) and we waited patiently for over thirty days to purchase the name when it became available.</p>
<p>Snapnames grabbed it first through their domain drop and snatch service and then auctioned it off to THEIR shady registry partner and SUBSIDIARY &#8211; PROTONDOMAINS.  According to Whois:</p>
<p>&#8220;Domain Name: *.COM<br />
Registrar: PROTONDOMAINS.COM LLC<br />
Whois Server: whois.protondomains.com<br />
Referral URL: <a href="http://www.protondomains.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.protondomains.com'>http://www.protondomains.com</a><br />
Name Server: NS1.SEDOPARKING.COM<br />
Name Server: NS2.SEDOPARKING.COM<br />
Status: ok<br />
Updated Date: 20-dec-2008<br />
Creation Date: 10-dec-2008<br />
Expiration Date: 10-dec-2009&#8243;</p>
<p>So first it was under the name of DirectI, a company in India. We called them, and they informed us that they weren&#8217;t the owners, and then we contacted Oversee and they said that the domain name was being managed by Snapnames under its subsidiary:  Prontodomains.</p>
<p>We then made numerous attempts to reach Protondomains.  The Whois information was incorrect, so we made a formal complaint with ICANN about their phony Whois information. The recently restored accurate information to the whois, so hopefully we&#8217;ve led to helping to prevent them from misleading the public in the future.</p>
<p>We made attempts to contact KJEL HOLMBERG over at Snapnames, but he hasn&#8217;t replied since December of 2008 (It&#8217;s now approaching April 2009), only to our surprise that Protondomains might share an office with the folk at Snapnames.</p>
<p>Recently, the name was sold to or registered by MEDIA WEB PLUS, cybersquatters in the search optimization business.  We did reach out to them and they have asked us for $5000 for the name and then to f*ck off when we refused to pay.  We forwarded their request as well as our response to <a href="mailto:legal@moniker.com">legal@moniker.com</a>. I spoke to a couple of folk at Moniker, as they were the only ones answering their phones and they were wondering why Snapnames hadn&#8217;t responded to our voicemail messages and emails.</p>
<p>Next We learned that the same domain name is on the Moniker marketplace being sold for $1600 as of 1:38PM EST. Dec. 22nd, 2008.  We were confused and so we contacted their customer support line and Moniker explained that Media Web Plus is most likely involved in a practice that is in likelihood violating their terms and agreement as customers of theirs.  The domain name also appears on the SEDO marketplace for an unknown bid amount.</p>
<p>All we want is our name.  Media Web Plus along with SEOSEO and OnlineDomains.mobi are also the owners and administrators of websites that would tarnish our brand name, and for what, so they can make a quick buck?</p>
<p>We have rights to THIS domain through our business registration in the State of New York and we hold a USPTO trademark and relevant pseudo-mark registration for THIS name, and have engaged in commerce under THIS name, and we were also issued a Tax ID by the IRS number under THIS name and will be filing for our company 2008 tax returns under THIS name.</p>
<p>On March 26, 2009, Media Web Plus informed us that the name will be sold through SEDO.  That means they&#8217;ve had literally no traffic on the name and have been attempting to sell it for their outrageous sum since December 22, 2008!!!</p>
<p>This was our response (sent the same day):</p>
<p>&#8220;As I mentioned on my previous email, we have a trademark for the name, so anyone who, to their misfortune purchases the name, we will inform them of our rights over the name and what they do from there to get there money back is up to them.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s even fair for them to be buying into a domain dispute and then delivered cease and desist letters by our lawyers.  As long as they want to engage in any activity involving the United States, they&#8217;ll be confronted by the USPTO as using our name illegally.  Who wants that?  Is that worth $5000?</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a reason why it has taken you so long to sell the name.  No one wants it and would have to be reckless to buy it if they did their research.  We are cool with buying the name for a $100 and that&#8217;s it &#8211; quick &amp; easy.  We already have money set aside for the legal fees and arbitration fees to pursue this issue from start to finish.</p>
<p>Do what you have to do in the name of business and commerce.  Best of luck to you and I hope you guys are successful in your accomplishing your wishes and hopes.  We will still always be {inserted domain name}, and doing good by that name for all our world&#8217;s kids.&#8221;</p>
<p>We want our name and won&#8217;t stop fighting until a transfer is made.WE sent ALL our supporting documents to the above parties, and we will not send them again. We wanted to avoid an arbitration process (it&#8217;s expensive), but it may come to that. However, we will make sure that any customer, ICANN and anyone who has to deal with SNAPNAMES, PROTONDOMAINS, and MEDIA WEB PLUS will find this board posting, and be fearless in the pursuit of their dreams.</p>
<p>Fight them!!!</p>
<p>Anyone wishing to contact me about resolving this matter or have any questions or tips, please do so (to avoid spam) through this site&#8217;s messaging process. We will get back to you as soon as we can.</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Email addresses of those mentioned in this posting.  Contact them if you face similar issues  Good luck future business owners and social entrepreneurs, and thank you ICANN for establishing new policies against those who are a part of why our US economy is bad.  We need more oversight and regulations.  This issue has made me an advocate for them.  Here are the email addresses you won&#8217;t find as available on the web:</p>
<p>Also try:</p>
<p>Attn: Legal (Moniker)<br />
1600 Southwest 4th Avenue, Suite 400<br />
Portland, Oregon, 97201<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;<br />
If you have trouble with MEDIA WEB PLUS, their public whois information (made public) is:</p>
<p>Registration Service Provided By: MANAGE.SNAPNAMES.COM<br />
Contact: +1.5034595739<br />
Website: <a href="http://Manage.SnapNames.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://Manage.SnapNames.com'>http://Manage.SnapNames.com</a></p>
<p>Domain Name</p>
<p>Registrant:<br />
Media Web Plus<br />
nidal elkadri<br />
125 marcel chaput<br />
gatineau<br />
qc,j9a 3b3<br />
CA<br />
Tel. +1.8197761113<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Kjel P. Holmberg<br />
SnapNames, Business Development Manager<br />
115 NW 1st Ave, 3rd Floor<br />
Portland, Oregon 97209<br />
503.219.9990 ext. 236</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: led</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-2493705</link>
		<dc:creator>led</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 09:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-2493705</guid>
		<description>well, the domain speculators have always led the domain market, and they are actually the ones who are giving a major heat to the domain process. Without them, the domain industry would be nothing but a regsitrar-led bazar which is bad for everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, the domain speculators have always led the domain market, and they are actually the ones who are giving a major heat to the domain process. Without them, the domain industry would be nothing but a regsitrar-led bazar which is bad for everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate Reviews Training And Tips</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-2453934</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate Reviews Training And Tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-2453934</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Affiliate Reviews Training And Tips...&lt;/strong&gt;

Nice Content Very Usseful...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Affiliate Reviews Training And Tips&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nice Content Very Usseful&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Network Solutions Using Questionable Tactic to Sell More Domain Names</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-2381848</link>
		<dc:creator>Network Solutions Using Questionable Tactic to Sell More Domain Names</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 16:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-2381848</guid>
		<description>[...] last covered Network Solutions in October [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] last covered Network Solutions in October [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Speaker City &#187; links for 2007-10-07</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-2007483</link>
		<dc:creator>Speaker City &#187; links for 2007-10-07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 21:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-2007483</guid>
		<description>[...] Domain Industry Intrigue; Oversee.net Gets Hosed (tags: namejet webcli) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Domain Industry Intrigue; Oversee.net Gets Hosed (tags: namejet webcli) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oversee.net Gets a $150 Million Injection of Private Equity</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1926666</link>
		<dc:creator>Oversee.net Gets a $150 Million Injection of Private Equity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 18:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1926666</guid>
		<description>[...] Oak Hlll Capital Partners. Oversee has been on a buying spree lately, snapping up domain auctioneer SnapNames for $35 million last October and domain registrar Moniker for $65 million a couple weeks [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Oak Hlll Capital Partners. Oversee has been on a buying spree lately, snapping up domain auctioneer SnapNames for $35 million last October and domain registrar Moniker for $65 million a couple weeks [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anything sounds powerful</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1727705</link>
		<dc:creator>anything sounds powerful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 07:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1727705</guid>
		<description>hi can you sugget few names which are suitable for manufacturing industry

thanks&amp;regards

ravi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi can you sugget few names which are suitable for manufacturing industry</p>
<p>thanks&amp;regards</p>
<p>ravi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: successclick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1706549</link>
		<dc:creator>successclick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 13:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1706549</guid>
		<description>Michael who?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael who?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1688368</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 03:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1688368</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t take this whole purported drama at face value at all.  Knowing some of the guys at Snap/Oversee, to think they didn&#039;t see this as a potential risk and not have two or three contingency plans for growth (see Snap Live Auctions news release) is a little bit ... well .. just being a bit drama queen don&#039;t you think?  I&#039;d like to see someone else who can build an immensely profitable  $250m business with $0 outside funding tell me they&#039;ve never had a minor setback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t take this whole purported drama at face value at all.  Knowing some of the guys at Snap/Oversee, to think they didn&#8217;t see this as a potential risk and not have two or three contingency plans for growth (see Snap Live Auctions news release) is a little bit &#8230; well .. just being a bit drama queen don&#8217;t you think?  I&#8217;d like to see someone else who can build an immensely profitable  $250m business with $0 outside funding tell me they&#8217;ve never had a minor setback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisco</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1664134</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 05:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1664134</guid>
		<description>@ #1: Take a stream of income, grow it at a 25%+ CAGR and sell at a nice multiple to the income statement...  that is a definition of wealth creation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ #1: Take a stream of income, grow it at a 25%+ CAGR and sell at a nice multiple to the income statement&#8230;  that is a definition of wealth creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill T.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1663998</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill T.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 03:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1663998</guid>
		<description>agreed with kyle. &quot;hosed&quot; seems to be a bit overstated....ive heard that oversee.net is on pace to do 250mm this year. snapnames 35mm may hurt a bit, but this company still seems like the best kept secret out there i&#039;ve heard of....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agreed with kyle. &#8220;hosed&#8221; seems to be a bit overstated&#8230;.ive heard that oversee.net is on pace to do 250mm this year. snapnames 35mm may hurt a bit, but this company still seems like the best kept secret out there i&#8217;ve heard of&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Mackey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1663407</link>
		<dc:creator>David Mackey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1663407</guid>
		<description>Ouch, that&#039;s really gonna hurt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch, that&#8217;s really gonna hurt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: itechcrunch.cn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1663241</link>
		<dc:creator>itechcrunch.cn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1663241</guid>
		<description>i went to namejet,i found it a domain exchange site.i found 0012530.com,020china.com.i think it is used for china.but i think nobody would buy it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i went to namejet,i found it a domain exchange site.i found 0012530.com,020china.com.i think it is used for china.but i think nobody would buy it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1663231</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 15:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1663231</guid>
		<description>Interesting post... I wouldn&#039;t label oversee.net as getting hosed.They are in a sweet spot and executing right. Funny how they have grown to a 150m rev company from their own pockets. Yet, demand needs to rais 300m+ to open eyeballs. Snapnames is just a start to what oversee has to come. They have a brilliant management team, and will be the leader in this market</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post&#8230; I wouldn&#8217;t label oversee.net as getting hosed.They are in a sweet spot and executing right. Funny how they have grown to a 150m rev company from their own pockets. Yet, demand needs to rais 300m+ to open eyeballs. Snapnames is just a start to what oversee has to come. They have a brilliant management team, and will be the leader in this market</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AV</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1663035</link>
		<dc:creator>AV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 11:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1663035</guid>
		<description>Obviously none of you know how much DomainSponsor makes per *DAY* from their parking business.  Hint: take your house price and maybe triple it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously none of you know how much DomainSponsor makes per *DAY* from their parking business.  Hint: take your house price and maybe triple it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin Wauters</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1662956</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Wauters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 10:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1662956</guid>
		<description>Oversee.net also just pulled the plug out of the company SwapNames (with a &#039;w&#039; instead of an &#039;n&#039;) by suing them over trademark infringement. What were they so afraid of?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oversee.net also just pulled the plug out of the company SwapNames (with a &#8216;w&#8217; instead of an &#8216;n&#8217;) by suing them over trademark infringement. What were they so afraid of?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1662902</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 09:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1662902</guid>
		<description>They may have cost me a dime or two when compared to some reality where the domains I have wanted were available or when I was spared the time moderating the comments from the likes of Alex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They may have cost me a dime or two when compared to some reality where the domains I have wanted were available or when I was spared the time moderating the comments from the likes of Alex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1662882</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 09:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1662882</guid>
		<description>#16

Really. Maybe these smart squatters will just spam your url: http://blog.wajsbrem.com/

:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#16</p>
<p>Really. Maybe these smart squatters will just spam your url: <a href="http://blog.wajsbrem.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://blog.wajsbrem.com/'>http://blog.wajsbrem.com/</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1662857</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2007 08:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1662857</guid>
		<description>No typo or domain squatter has made a dime from me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No typo or domain squatter has made a dime from me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mathew johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1662099</link>
		<dc:creator>mathew johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 22:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1662099</guid>
		<description>Yo, personally, I give Mike Arrington a lot of credit for having a background in domaining. All that back-room Internet marketing stuff is hard. The people that  build big domain/affiliate/ad businesses in their basements with zero capital are super smart, and most startup people couldn&#039;t hack it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yo, personally, I give Mike Arrington a lot of credit for having a background in domaining. All that back-room Internet marketing stuff is hard. The people that  build big domain/affiliate/ad businesses in their basements with zero capital are super smart, and most startup people couldn&#8217;t hack it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1661979</link>
		<dc:creator>bg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 20:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1661979</guid>
		<description>i love it , i hate oversee.net.  They used one of my domains and put ads on them without my knowledge and seeing a cent.    


Karma.   Take that you &amp;&amp;*U(&amp;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i love it , i hate oversee.net.  They used one of my domains and put ads on them without my knowledge and seeing a cent.    </p>
<p>Karma.   Take that you &amp;&amp;*U(&amp;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1661938</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 20:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1661938</guid>
		<description>This article was very interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was very interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1661821</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 18:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1661821</guid>
		<description>My, how the cookie crumbles!

Some of the things that I&#039;ve seen DomainSponsor do in the past made me view them more on the unethical side of the parking spectrum.  It&#039;s interesting to see this take place.  I guess they get a taste of what it&#039;s like when someone does something bad to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My, how the cookie crumbles!</p>
<p>Some of the things that I&#8217;ve seen DomainSponsor do in the past made me view them more on the unethical side of the parking spectrum.  It&#8217;s interesting to see this take place.  I guess they get a taste of what it&#8217;s like when someone does something bad to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sputnick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1661542</link>
		<dc:creator>sputnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1661542</guid>
		<description>Very informative article. Nobody knows the domain squatting business like Mike A.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative article. Nobody knows the domain squatting business like Mike A.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sonome</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/comment-page-1/#comment-1661538</link>
		<dc:creator>Sonome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Oct 2007 15:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/05/domain-industry-intrigue-overseenet-gets-hosed/#comment-1661538</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

Is it possible that you create a separate feed for each of the writers of TechCrunch?

Sonome</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>Is it possible that you create a separate feed for each of the writers of TechCrunch?</p>
<p>Sonome</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
