Comments on: Who Spams Digg the Most http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/ Startup and Technology News Sat, 11 Oct 2008 02:17:21 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Mihalcea Romeo http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1687730 Mihalcea Romeo Sat, 20 Oct 2007 22:33:51 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1687730 A shitty title placed just to catch the eye. Too bad our huge work and marketing strategies can be so easily interpreted as "SPAM". A shitty title placed just to catch the eye. Too bad our huge work and marketing strategies can be so easily interpreted as “SPAM”.

]]> By: Sudar http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1660050 Sudar Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:43:31 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1660050 This guy has writeen a bot to analyse the sites that have been on digg's front page and you can get the list of sites with most diggs from here http://blog.yuvisense.net/2007/10/04/statbot-top-100-sites-on-diggcom-by-nett-diggs/ This guy has writeen a bot to analyse the sites that have been on digg’s front page and you can get the list of sites with most diggs from here http://blog.yuvisense.net/2007.....ett-diggs/

]]> By: Harley Jane http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659896 Harley Jane Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:58:35 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659896 While some of the comments are harsh on TechCrunch, I will admit that you make some good points. However, I see nothing wrong with 'spammers' as you call them, submitting their stuff to digg. Because if they submit GOOD content, it's more likely to be accepted by the digg community, and eventually make the front page. There is also a term for this - it's called LINKBAIT. But I do see a difference between what you call 'spammers' and the *real* spammers that truly spam digg with porn & viagra sites. The 'spammers' that you speak of are just trying to get their blog/site more widely known, and I see nothing wrong with that. While some of the comments are harsh on TechCrunch, I will admit that you make some good points. However, I see nothing wrong with ’spammers’ as you call them, submitting their stuff to digg. Because if they submit GOOD content, it’s more likely to be accepted by the digg community, and eventually make the front page. There is also a term for this - it’s called LINKBAIT.

But I do see a difference between what you call ’spammers’ and the *real* spammers that truly spam digg with porn & viagra sites. The ’spammers’ that you speak of are just trying to get their blog/site more widely known, and I see nothing wrong with that.

]]> By: Hammer http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659872 Hammer Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:26:58 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659872 They are not spammers, u retard, they are sources, contributors, originators. They are not spammers, u retard, they are sources, contributors, originators.

]]> By: Wayne Smallman http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659821 Wayne Smallman Fri, 05 Oct 2007 11:27:49 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659821 "Have you thought that maybe Engadget, Gizmodo, CNN, BBC and other sites get into the Digg front page because people actually like their stories?" I think Louise nailed it. These guys aren't exactly BlogSpot + PLM + AdSense, are they? “Have you thought that maybe Engadget, Gizmodo, CNN, BBC and other sites get into the Digg front page because people actually like their stories?”

I think Louise nailed it. These guys aren’t exactly BlogSpot + PLM + AdSense, are they?

]]> By: David Mackey http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659458 David Mackey Fri, 05 Oct 2007 04:33:54 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659458 Erick - good recommendations for refinements, I like them. Would be very interesting to have these refined statistics. Erick - good recommendations for refinements, I like them. Would be very interesting to have these refined statistics.

]]> By: Jay White http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659252 Jay White Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:57:46 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659252 The list is inaccurate because the author chose what to search for. If he/she didn't know a site existed, he didn't search for it or subsequently list it. If this was an accurate report, my site would have been #49 or #50 with a rating of 7200 or so. Oddly, we'd be within striking distance of TechCrunch which is laughable. For the record, I am not going as far as Ralph but most of these site are legit and not spammers. Jay The list is inaccurate because the author chose what to search for. If he/she didn’t know a site existed, he didn’t search for it or subsequently list it.

If this was an accurate report, my site would have been #49 or #50 with a rating of 7200 or so. Oddly, we’d be within striking distance of TechCrunch which is laughable.

For the record, I am not going as far as Ralph but most of these site are legit and not spammers.

Jay

]]> By: Shams http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659202 Shams Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:14:38 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659202 Ralph I didn't get your site. Will you please tell it. Ralph I didn’t get your site. Will you please tell it.

]]> By: Ralph Finklestein http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659193 Ralph Finklestein Fri, 05 Oct 2007 00:06:03 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1659193 @Michael Arrington To answer your question - I'm (one of) the blogs listed that simply doesn't want anything to do with TechCrunch. I'm one of the ones that puts out actual content, that people actually get use out of. I'm one of the sites that's sometimes popular on digg because it provides practical, helpful information. And is the title of the post, "Who Spams Digg the Most", in any way related to what YOU say "its main point" (that apparently some of us are "missing") is? No. So why give it that title? Because it's the type of sensationalist SHIT that makes it to the top of whatever-circle-jerk-site is popular today. By giving it the title Who Spams Digg The Most, what whatshisface flat out said is that if you're on that list, you spam digg the most. That's not how all of us are recognized. Do you get it now? A lot of bloggers are popular in spite of not having you "mention us" on your almighty house of self-jerkoffery, or by "spamming" digg. Some of us just concentrate on content, rather than make big bold and stupid statements, spam, or praise your self-important ass. @Michael Arrington

To answer your question - I’m (one of) the blogs listed that simply doesn’t want anything to do with TechCrunch. I’m one of the ones that puts out actual content, that people actually get use out of. I’m one of the sites that’s sometimes popular on digg because it provides practical, helpful information.

And is the title of the post, “Who Spams Digg the Most”, in any way related to what YOU say “its main point” (that apparently some of us are “missing”) is? No. So why give it that title? Because it’s the type of sensationalist SHIT that makes it to the top of whatever-circle-jerk-site is popular today. By giving it the title Who Spams Digg The Most, what whatshisface flat out said is that if you’re on that list, you spam digg the most. That’s not how all of us are recognized.

Do you get it now? A lot of bloggers are popular in spite of not having you “mention us” on your almighty house of self-jerkoffery, or by “spamming” digg. Some of us just concentrate on content, rather than make big bold and stupid statements, spam, or praise your self-important ass.

]]> By: gabbu http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658975 gabbu Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:20:43 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658975 this guy simply writes poor stuff.i dont expect anything from erik this guy simply writes poor stuff.i dont expect anything from erik

]]> By: CenterNetworks http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658974 CenterNetworks Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:20:05 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658974 <strong>TechMeme Leaderboard Movers 'n Shakers and a Blogging Thought...</strong> This week marked the launch of the newest egoboard, the Techmeme Leaderboard. I thought it might be fun to look at the movers and shakers in the first four days since launch. The chart is below. From what I can put together, the big winners so far are ... TechMeme Leaderboard Movers ‘n Shakers and a Blogging Thought…

This week marked the launch of the newest egoboard, the Techmeme Leaderboard. I thought it might be fun to look at the movers and shakers in the first four days since launch. The chart is below. From what I can put together, the big winners so far are …

]]> By: Roy http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658971 Roy Thu, 04 Oct 2007 21:14:59 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658971 wait... XKCD out diggs facebook? Maybe there is hope for our species yet! wait… XKCD out diggs facebook?

Maybe there is hope for our species yet!

]]> By: Alistair http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658902 Alistair Thu, 04 Oct 2007 20:06:10 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658902 Look at the dugg analyzer (digg api data) for a list of hosts ordered by the number of front page stories. Click on the ‘Top Hosts’ tab for the top 10. http://demo.qliktech.com/qlikview/AJAX/digg/default.htm :) Look at the dugg analyzer (digg api data) for a list of hosts ordered by the number of front page stories. Click on the ‘Top Hosts’ tab for the top 10.

http://demo.qliktech.com/qlikv.....efault.htm

:)

]]> By: Ed http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658885 Ed Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:51:55 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658885 Michael - Perhaps Erick should have made that more clear, instead of having that first paragraph seem like a complaint that Techcrunch itself isn't viewed as #1 in some places. Michael - Perhaps Erick should have made that more clear, instead of having that first paragraph seem like a complaint that Techcrunch itself isn’t viewed as #1 in some places.

]]> By: MichaelDotNet http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658884 MichaelDotNet Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:51:06 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658884 Well, to be fair, the headline of the article is "Who Spams Digg the Most" implying that all those on the list are the worst offenders. A better headline would be "A Digg Leaderboard, useful?" or some such. Well, to be fair, the headline of the article is “Who Spams Digg the Most” implying that all those on the list are the worst offenders. A better headline would be “A Digg Leaderboard, useful?” or some such.

]]> By: Michael Arrington http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658870 Michael Arrington Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:40:49 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658870 Ralph - which blog are you? Seems odd that you'd take offense when you were not called out personally. The main point of this post, which people are missing, is that it would be cool to have a Digg leaderboard similar to the techmeme leaderboard. Ralph - which blog are you? Seems odd that you’d take offense when you were not called out personally.

The main point of this post, which people are missing, is that it would be cool to have a Digg leaderboard similar to the techmeme leaderboard.

]]> By: MichaelDotNet http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658867 MichaelDotNet Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:40:20 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658867 Yuvi did exactly what you're asking for Erick: http://blog.yuvisense.net/2007/10/04/statbot-top-100-sites-on-diggcom-by-nett-diggs/ Blogspot.com actually ends up on top :) Yuvi did exactly what you’re asking for Erick: http://blog.yuvisense.net/2007.....ett-diggs/

Blogspot.com actually ends up on top :)

]]> By: Ryan Mickle http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658822 Ryan Mickle Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:03:55 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658822 By saying, "Guess which one we think is better?" I think that we are incorrectly assuming that the audiences are comparable, while I wouldn't necessarily expect the gamer-in-the-basement-of-his-mom's-house-with-Red-Bull-cans-everywhere stereotype to be a close fit for the typical TC reader. By saying, “Guess which one we think is better?” I think that we are incorrectly assuming that the audiences are comparable, while I wouldn’t necessarily expect the gamer-in-the-basement-of-his-mom’s-house-with-Red-Bull-cans-everywhere stereotype to be a close fit for the typical TC reader.

]]> By: Scott http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658767 Scott Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:31:43 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658767 digg is not limited to tech news like Techmeme is. digg is not limited to tech news like Techmeme is.

]]> By: magnusdopus http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658733 magnusdopus Thu, 04 Oct 2007 18:06:45 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658733 I think the <a>Ron Paul spam</a> is sufficiently contained. Its down to 1x a day and they are generally decent stories. The list seems inaccurate as the NYTimes.com is nowhere to be found. I think the Ron Paul spam is sufficiently contained. Its down to 1x a day and they are generally decent stories. The list seems inaccurate as the NYTimes.com is nowhere to be found.

]]> By: Ralph Finklestein http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658723 Ralph Finklestein Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:55:19 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658723 As one of the folks in that digg list, I resent you suggesting that I'm spamming digg. Of course you like the stupid leaderboard more, you're on top of it. When it's revealed that you've paid or sponsored or sucked your way into getting damn near every techcrunch article on techmeme, what happens then? Why is it that any list you're not on top of must have flaws? The only reason you get the readers that you do is for SOME reason people in tech seem to think that talking to you is the best way to promote their product/service. When these people finally smarten up, your feed count will go from 600k to 60. As one of the folks in that digg list, I resent you suggesting that I’m spamming digg. Of course you like the stupid leaderboard more, you’re on top of it. When it’s revealed that you’ve paid or sponsored or sucked your way into getting damn near every techcrunch article on techmeme, what happens then? Why is it that any list you’re not on top of must have flaws? The only reason you get the readers that you do is for SOME reason people in tech seem to think that talking to you is the best way to promote their product/service. When these people finally smarten up, your feed count will go from 600k to 60.

]]> By: Search☸ Engines WEB http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658717 Search☸ Engines WEB Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:50:15 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658717 Some of the bloggers on this list are very ethical - they just have enthusiastic and loyal followers <blockquote>The Top sites by Digg Saturation * 1. YouTube - 551,000 * 2. yahoo.com - 191,000 * 3. Google - 188,000 * 4. Ars Technica - 135,000 * 5. Engadget - 121,000 * 6. BBC - 106,000 * 7. Gizmodo - 104,000 * 8. Wikipedia - 93,100 * 9. wired.com - 89,700 * 10. CNN - 64,900 * 11. Apple - 55,000 * 12. crooksandliars.com - 54,200 * 13. Consumerist - 49,300 * 14. thinkprogress.org - 41,800 * 15. dailymail.co.uk - 38,900 * 16. break.com - 38,600 * 17. msn.com - 36,400 * 18. treehugger.com - 34,600 * 19. Kotaku.com - 33,500 * 20. macrumors.com - 30,900 * 21. Destructoid.com - 28,500 * 22. timesonline.co.uk - 26,700 * 23. Boing Boing - 24,100 * 24. microsoft.com - 21,300 * 25. downloadsquad.com - 21,200 * 26. cracked.com - 20,200 * 27. jalopnik.com - 18,100 * 28. Read Write Web - 17,300 * 29. Huffington Post - 17,100 * 30. littlegreenfootballs.com - 16,900 * 31. lifehack.org - 16,700 * 32. Tuaw.com - 15,500 * 33. myspace.com - 15,500 * 34. Smashing Magazine - 14,800 * 35. dailykos.com - 13,800 * 36. valleywag.com - 13,200 * 37. neatorama.com - 12,600 * 38. zenhabits.net - 11,400 * 39. Giga Om - 10,700 * 40. tmz.com - 10,600 * 41. TechCrunch - 9,760 * 42. FileFront.com - 9,680 * 43. techdirt.com - 8,910 * 44. wikihow.com - 8,760 * 45. CrunchGear - 8,220 * 46. XKCD.com - 7,990 * 47. menshealth.com - 7,890 * 48. facebook.com - 7,830 * 49. Life Hacker - 7,580 * 50. GamerNode.com - 7,330 * 51. michellemalkin.com - 6,440 * 52. WSJ.com - 5,970 * 53. inhabitat.com - 5,460 * 54. ohgizmo.com - 5,380 * 55. Search Engine Land - 4,760 * 56. tumbl.us - 4,560 * 57. Pronet Advertising - 4,500 * 58. Search Engine Journal - 3,560 * 59. Mashable - 3,360 * 60. alistapart.com - 3,230 * 61. Copyblogger - 3,060 * 62. getrichslowly.org - 3,050 * 63. Blogstorm.co.uk - 2,970 * 64. guykawasaki.com - 2,870 * 65. SEOmoz - 2,940 * 66. PickTheBrain.com - 2,880 * 67. simplehelp.net - 2,390 * 68. ririanproject.com2,260 * 69. imagechan.org - 2,110 * 70. ProBlogger - 2,030 * 71. profit42.com - 1,970 * 72. racketboy.com - 1,910 * 73. John Chow - 1,860 * 74. Scobleizer - 1,690 * 75. Marketing Pilgrim - 1,600 * 76. DesignVitality.com - 1,420 * 77. gameriot.com - 1,410 * 78. whenpenguinsattack.com1,370 * 79. Shoemoney - 1,260 * 80. Dailygaming.net - 1,170 * 81. roscripts.com - 1,130 * 82. wowinsider.com - 1,070 * 83. micahville.com - 1,020 * 84. Matt Cutts - 851 </blockquote> Some of the bloggers on this list are very ethical - they just have enthusiastic and loyal followers

The Top sites by Digg Saturation

* 1. YouTube - 551,000
* 2. yahoo.com - 191,000
* 3. Google - 188,000
* 4. Ars Technica - 135,000
* 5. Engadget - 121,000
* 6. BBC - 106,000
* 7. Gizmodo - 104,000
* 8. Wikipedia - 93,100
* 9. wired.com - 89,700
* 10. CNN - 64,900
* 11. Apple - 55,000
* 12. crooksandliars.com - 54,200
* 13. Consumerist - 49,300
* 14. thinkprogress.org - 41,800
* 15. dailymail.co.uk - 38,900
* 16. break.com - 38,600
* 17. msn.com - 36,400
* 18. treehugger.com - 34,600
* 19. Kotaku.com - 33,500
* 20. macrumors.com - 30,900
* 21. Destructoid.com - 28,500
* 22. timesonline.co.uk - 26,700
* 23. Boing Boing - 24,100
* 24. microsoft.com - 21,300
* 25. downloadsquad.com - 21,200
* 26. cracked.com - 20,200
* 27. jalopnik.com - 18,100
* 28. Read Write Web - 17,300
* 29. Huffington Post - 17,100
* 30. littlegreenfootballs.com - 16,900
* 31. lifehack.org - 16,700
* 32. Tuaw.com - 15,500
* 33. myspace.com - 15,500
* 34. Smashing Magazine - 14,800
* 35. dailykos.com - 13,800
* 36. valleywag.com - 13,200
* 37. neatorama.com - 12,600
* 38. zenhabits.net - 11,400
* 39. Giga Om - 10,700
* 40. tmz.com - 10,600
* 41. TechCrunch - 9,760
* 42. FileFront.com - 9,680
* 43. techdirt.com - 8,910
* 44. wikihow.com - 8,760
* 45. CrunchGear - 8,220
* 46. XKCD.com - 7,990
* 47. menshealth.com - 7,890
* 48. facebook.com - 7,830
* 49. Life Hacker - 7,580
* 50. GamerNode.com - 7,330
* 51. michellemalkin.com - 6,440
* 52. WSJ.com - 5,970
* 53. inhabitat.com - 5,460
* 54. ohgizmo.com - 5,380
* 55. Search Engine Land - 4,760
* 56. tumbl.us - 4,560
* 57. Pronet Advertising - 4,500
* 58. Search Engine Journal - 3,560
* 59. Mashable - 3,360
* 60. alistapart.com - 3,230
* 61. Copyblogger - 3,060
* 62. getrichslowly.org - 3,050
* 63. Blogstorm.co.uk - 2,970
* 64. guykawasaki.com - 2,870
* 65. SEOmoz - 2,940
* 66. PickTheBrain.com - 2,880
* 67. simplehelp.net - 2,390
* 68. ririanproject.com2,260
* 69. imagechan.org - 2,110
* 70. ProBlogger - 2,030
* 71. profit42.com - 1,970
* 72. racketboy.com - 1,910
* 73. John Chow - 1,860
* 74. Scobleizer - 1,690
* 75. Marketing Pilgrim - 1,600
* 76. DesignVitality.com - 1,420
* 77. gameriot.com - 1,410
* 78. whenpenguinsattack.com1,370
* 79. Shoemoney - 1,260
* 80. Dailygaming.net - 1,170
* 81. roscripts.com - 1,130
* 82. wowinsider.com - 1,070
* 83. micahville.com - 1,020
* 84. Matt Cutts - 851

]]> By: Russell Heimlich http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658707 Russell Heimlich Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:43:13 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658707 I believe Ron Paul bots spam digg the most as was most recently revealed -> http://digg.com/software/Ron_Paul_Spam_Digg_Bot_Revealed I believe Ron Paul bots spam digg the most as was most recently revealed -> http://digg.com/software/Ron_P.....t_Revealed

]]> By: Andre Sinosis http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658702 Andre Sinosis Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:40:47 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658702 Nice swipe at Digg's popular sites, TechCrunch. Naturally you only like the leaderboards that rank you highly. I wonder what you'll say about the Techmeme leaderboard in 2 months when you're not #1? Has it occurred to you that the same people don't read and appreciate the two different sites, maybe? Nice swipe at Digg’s popular sites, TechCrunch. Naturally you only like the leaderboards that rank you highly. I wonder what you’ll say about the Techmeme leaderboard in 2 months when you’re not #1? Has it occurred to you that the same people don’t read and appreciate the two different sites, maybe?

]]> By: AC http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658697 AC Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:38:05 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/04/who-spams-digg-the-most/#comment-1658697 Louise, I think the point they're trying to make is not that the top sites are using digg campaigns, but rather once you get deeper into it (perhaps beyond the top 20...if not further back) you'll start seeing the effects of "digg spamming" Louise, I think the point they’re trying to make is not that the top sites are using digg campaigns, but rather once you get deeper into it (perhaps beyond the top 20…if not further back) you’ll start seeing the effects of “digg spamming”

]]>