<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Favorit a Digg killer?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 14:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: fav.or.it l\'incrocio tra Digg e CoComments</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1996565</link>
		<dc:creator>fav.or.it l\'incrocio tra Digg e CoComments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1996565</guid>
		<description>[...] fav.or.it&#160; &#232; un incrocio tra un aggregatore ed una comunit&#224; che si presenta molto bene ed ha avuto molti pareri favorevoli da varie autorit&#224; come TechCrunch. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fav.or.it&nbsp; &egrave; un incrocio tra un aggregatore ed una comunit&agrave; che si presenta molto bene ed ha avuto molti pareri favorevoli da varie autorit&agrave; come TechCrunch. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Library clips :: Knowledge network filter and sources :: December :: 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1836279</link>
		<dc:creator>Library clips :: Knowledge network filter and sources :: December :: 2007</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1836279</guid>
		<description>[...] network version of a post from within the social network, this is a feature of social RSS Reader fav.or.it (not quite sure if it&#8217;s an actual social [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] network version of a post from within the social network, this is a feature of social RSS Reader fav.or.it (not quite sure if it&#8217;s an actual social [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1664561</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 11:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1664561</guid>
		<description>Actually, I met the CEO of the company and he explained his product in a totally different way. The way he explained the product bears little to no relation to Digg...Here is what he said:
He used the concept of his father who is a fan and officianado of air guns. His dad contributes to a number of message boards and bloggs on the subject but has to manually visit each of those to do that. He also finds it time consuming to visit all those sources because he doesnt know what RSS feeds are or how they work. 
Using fav.or.it he can find all the best feeds and subscribe to them simply by doing a category search. Then from that interface he can simple read and comment to all those sources from one location. 
For the mainstream user this is an incredible product. I have no idea what this has to do with Digg or why you would even compare the two. For all the tech geniuses out there.....Joe public still doesn't even know what an RSS feed is or how to use it. Fav.or.it does a very elegant job of solving that challenge and giving them easy access to the treaure trove of data on the net. 
Oh, yes and it "learns" based upon your viewing habits which bloggs and feeds are more important to you and ranks them accordingly. 
Unlike all the cynics on here who have never built anything of any commercial value and seem to know so much, I wish the lads luck. It takes guts to be an entrepreneur and they have taken the plunge and built what seems like a very useful interface.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I met the CEO of the company and he explained his product in a totally different way. The way he explained the product bears little to no relation to Digg&#8230;Here is what he said:<br />
He used the concept of his father who is a fan and officianado of air guns. His dad contributes to a number of message boards and bloggs on the subject but has to manually visit each of those to do that. He also finds it time consuming to visit all those sources because he doesnt know what RSS feeds are or how they work.<br />
Using fav.or.it he can find all the best feeds and subscribe to them simply by doing a category search. Then from that interface he can simple read and comment to all those sources from one location.<br />
For the mainstream user this is an incredible product. I have no idea what this has to do with Digg or why you would even compare the two. For all the tech geniuses out there&#8230;..Joe public still doesn&#8217;t even know what an RSS feed is or how to use it. Fav.or.it does a very elegant job of solving that challenge and giving them easy access to the treaure trove of data on the net.<br />
Oh, yes and it &#8220;learns&#8221; based upon your viewing habits which bloggs and feeds are more important to you and ranks them accordingly.<br />
Unlike all the cynics on here who have never built anything of any commercial value and seem to know so much, I wish the lads luck. It takes guts to be an entrepreneur and they have taken the plunge and built what seems like a very useful interface.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gaming</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655696</link>
		<dc:creator>gaming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 19:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655696</guid>
		<description>"Because it will track what people actually read, Favorit will be a far more accurate reflection of what is popular online than Digg, which everyone knows is increasingly subject to gaming."

IF the gaming users write some greasemonkey script to disable the timer reporting, they will not have a chance.  You can't ever rely on client-side code for things like controlling users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Because it will track what people actually read, Favorit will be a far more accurate reflection of what is popular online than Digg, which everyone knows is increasingly subject to gaming.&#8221;</p>
<p>IF the gaming users write some greasemonkey script to disable the timer reporting, they will not have a chance.  You can&#8217;t ever rely on client-side code for things like controlling users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655641</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655641</guid>
		<description>I'm actually not a fan of the "track what's popular by how long I view it".  I agree with Nate (#17).

Using his example.  Say you get to the end of a 3 page Wired article only to find out the title was misleading, the conclusion was just dumb, and the article sucked as a whole.  Because you've spent 10 minutes reading it, it goes up in popularity though the majority of the population could very well think it's dumb.  

I mean it's an interesting take but maybe the combinaition of how long someone spends on the page, along with votes, and comments would be a better way to rank stories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m actually not a fan of the &#8220;track what&#8217;s popular by how long I view it&#8221;.  I agree with Nate (#17).</p>
<p>Using his example.  Say you get to the end of a 3 page Wired article only to find out the title was misleading, the conclusion was just dumb, and the article sucked as a whole.  Because you&#8217;ve spent 10 minutes reading it, it goes up in popularity though the majority of the population could very well think it&#8217;s dumb.  </p>
<p>I mean it&#8217;s an interesting take but maybe the combinaition of how long someone spends on the page, along with votes, and comments would be a better way to rank stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: techmine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655365</link>
		<dc:creator>techmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655365</guid>
		<description>More than a Digg killer, the site looks a nice feed reader with LIVE commenting. I don't think Digg is ever considered as a feed reader (I would say, it is a headlines reader plus crap comments). TIme will tell, in what way favorit will compete with Digg. I hope it does. Digg needs a killer. Please. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than a Digg killer, the site looks a nice feed reader with LIVE commenting. I don&#8217;t think Digg is ever considered as a feed reader (I would say, it is a headlines reader plus crap comments). TIme will tell, in what way favorit will compete with Digg. I hope it does. Digg needs a killer. Please. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gosh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655363</link>
		<dc:creator>Gosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655363</guid>
		<description>I wonder what Arrington would have written about this site.  I think it would have been at least one paragraph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what Arrington would have written about this site.  I think it would have been at least one paragraph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magnus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655359</link>
		<dc:creator>Magnus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655359</guid>
		<description>Why is the name in Swedish? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the name in Swedish? <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: share.websitemagazine.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655350</link>
		<dc:creator>share.websitemagazine.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 14:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655350</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is Favorit a Digg killer?...&lt;/strong&gt;

Favorit brings together blog reading and replying into one simple web application. Its innovative web interface is designed to allow users to let users read any kind of RSS feed, cut-up, mashed-up with other feeds or “sliced” in any kind of way....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Favorit a Digg killer?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Favorit brings together blog reading and replying into one simple web application. Its innovative web interface is designed to allow users to let users read any kind of RSS feed, cut-up, mashed-up with other feeds or “sliced” in any kind of way&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655330</link>
		<dc:creator>Beas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655330</guid>
		<description>If you want a Digg killer  you need a Digg-style community. Thats Diggs main asset.In addition,  I dont see much relationship between Digg and this startup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want a Digg killer  you need a Digg-style community. Thats Diggs main asset.In addition,  I dont see much relationship between Digg and this startup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: julia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655328</link>
		<dc:creator>julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655328</guid>
		<description>Why are you comparing it to Digg? It's a more advanced rss reader. Google RSS and bloglines are the direct rivals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are you comparing it to Digg? It&#8217;s a more advanced rss reader. Google RSS and bloglines are the direct rivals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate Weiner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655324</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate Weiner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 13:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655324</guid>
		<description>Initially, I think it sounds like a great concept.

However, I don't think simply ranking items by the time spent on a page is very effective.  Consider the difference between a page with a cool photo, and a 3 page article on Wired.  The photo only takes 10 seconds to look at and the Wired article would take about 10 minutes.  On digg they'd share the same level of popularity, but on here you would see the blog post absolutely crushing the photo.

So it wouldn't necessarily rank popularity, but just how long it takes for you to view the content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Initially, I think it sounds like a great concept.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t think simply ranking items by the time spent on a page is very effective.  Consider the difference between a page with a cool photo, and a 3 page article on Wired.  The photo only takes 10 seconds to look at and the Wired article would take about 10 minutes.  On digg they&#8217;d share the same level of popularity, but on here you would see the blog post absolutely crushing the photo.</p>
<p>So it wouldn&#8217;t necessarily rank popularity, but just how long it takes for you to view the content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: God</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655158</link>
		<dc:creator>God</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 10:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655158</guid>
		<description>Nothing about this site makes any sense on any level.

Who is the target market?
Who will leave digg for it?

Digg is about people promoting their own sites under the guise of news and 12 yr olds commenting.

This will kill digg, No, this will not gain any traction, will not make any adsense money and will be toast in a few months.

The only people who will make money are the people who arrange the VC money train to fund this loser.

100 million websites and only 100 are really useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing about this site makes any sense on any level.</p>
<p>Who is the target market?<br />
Who will leave digg for it?</p>
<p>Digg is about people promoting their own sites under the guise of news and 12 yr olds commenting.</p>
<p>This will kill digg, No, this will not gain any traction, will not make any adsense money and will be toast in a few months.</p>
<p>The only people who will make money are the people who arrange the VC money train to fund this loser.</p>
<p>100 million websites and only 100 are really useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655049</link>
		<dc:creator>Dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 08:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655049</guid>
		<description>Is blah blah a digg killer?
is this and that.. an iPod killer?

sensationalise just about anything!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is blah blah a digg killer?<br />
is this and that.. an iPod killer?</p>
<p>sensationalise just about anything!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rune W. Ecklon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655035</link>
		<dc:creator>Rune W. Ecklon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 07:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1655035</guid>
		<description>#11: Why use british spelling over american? English has become a world language and people may use it as they see fit.

English has always been a language in transformation and still so. Just deal with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#11: Why use british spelling over american? English has become a world language and people may use it as they see fit.</p>
<p>English has always been a language in transformation and still so. Just deal with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654901</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 04:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654901</guid>
		<description>So is fav.or.it biting the in-development FeedSlice's terminology for slices?  I think so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So is fav.or.it biting the in-development FeedSlice&#8217;s terminology for slices?  I think so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654892</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 04:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654892</guid>
		<description>I think its going to be a great idea, I even signed up to see what happens.  I can say that it is going to take some time to climb but when it does... Well only time will tell.  But it will be good to write about over at tsotd.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its going to be a great idea, I even signed up to see what happens.  I can say that it is going to take some time to climb but when it does&#8230; Well only time will tell.  But it will be good to write about over at tsotd.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the rooster</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654885</link>
		<dc:creator>the rooster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 04:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654885</guid>
		<description>what an ultra stuipid brand name... the could have at least tried to spel it rite!

favourite has a U in it... and an E at the end... the UK folks could have at least got the U part rite - stupid umerican speling!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what an ultra stuipid brand name&#8230; the could have at least tried to spel it rite!</p>
<p>favourite has a U in it&#8230; and an E at the end&#8230; the UK folks could have at least got the U part rite - stupid umerican speling!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jhon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654866</link>
		<dc:creator>Jhon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 04:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654866</guid>
		<description>Looks like another "Me too, nothing (new) to see here".
See you on the DeadPool in 6 months...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like another &#8220;Me too, nothing (new) to see here&#8221;.<br />
See you on the DeadPool in 6 months&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: barefootmeg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654851</link>
		<dc:creator>barefootmeg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654851</guid>
		<description>I like the idea that it tracks how long I'm on a post.  If I glance at a post and can tell right away that it's not something I'm interested in and move on, then that should count as less eyeball time than when I not only read a post from beginning to end but then end up linking to it from other relevant locations.  

I look forward to checking that aspect out.  Unfortunately, I think the last thing we need online is yet another blogging location.  *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea that it tracks how long I&#8217;m on a post.  If I glance at a post and can tell right away that it&#8217;s not something I&#8217;m interested in and move on, then that should count as less eyeball time than when I not only read a post from beginning to end but then end up linking to it from other relevant locations.  </p>
<p>I look forward to checking that aspect out.  Unfortunately, I think the last thing we need online is yet another blogging location.  *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveBallmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654849</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveBallmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654849</guid>
		<description>Digg was obsolete one week after it initially launched. Made obsolete by MSN Ultra Weblinker Service link server!
http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digg was obsolete one week after it initially launched. Made obsolete by MSN Ultra Weblinker Service link server!<br />
<a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phenom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654801</link>
		<dc:creator>phenom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 03:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654801</guid>
		<description>I don't see it as a digg killer....rather I can think of creating applications using their API</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see it as a digg killer&#8230;.rather I can think of creating applications using their API</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denis González</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654768</link>
		<dc:creator>Denis González</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654768</guid>
		<description>Well, the problem is to create a wide community as digg. I don't see it as a 'dig killer'</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the problem is to create a wide community as digg. I don&#8217;t see it as a &#8216;dig killer&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654761</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654761</guid>
		<description>Too bad - there needs to be a Digg killer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad - there needs to be a Digg killer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654754</link>
		<dc:creator>James Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 02:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/10/01/is-favorit-a-digg-killer/#comment-1654754</guid>
		<description>As I &lt;a href="http://www.mentallyretired.com/2007/09/26/you-are-not-building-a-youtube-killer/" rel="nofollow"&gt;point out here&lt;/a&gt;, no... it won't be...

Site does look cool though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I <a href="http://www.mentallyretired.com/2007/09/26/you-are-not-building-a-youtube-killer/" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/www.mentallyretired.com');">point out here</a>, no&#8230; it won&#8217;t be&#8230;</p>
<p>Site does look cool though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.090 seconds -->
