September 27, 2007

Microsoft Announces Upgrades to Live Search, Including “Blended Search”

Mark Hendrickson

17 comments »

Microsoft has announced a set of what it claims are “significant advancements in core technology and consumer experience” for its search engine, Live Search.

Among these advancements: improved results relevance, faster load times, UI enhancements, a search index four times larger than before, and special results pages for queries related to entertainment, shopping, health, and local areas. These special pages will attempt to provide comprehensive overviews of the topic at hand using images, prices, reviews, ratings, and maps in addition to regular results. VP Satya Nadella has labeled the idea behind these pages “blended search”, a term which is highly reminiscent of Google’s “universal search”.

Microsoft is also announcing improvements to each of its search verticals. Live Search Video will be enhanced with a motion preview feature that allows users to watch previews instantly by putting their cursor over video thumbnails. Live Search Entertainment will sport an “xRank” feature that ranks celebrities according to how popular they are online.

The Live Search team over at Microsoft says these improvements form the biggest upgrade to Live Search since the search engine debuted in January 2005. We’ll have to wait to see how impressive these improvements actually are, as they are currently being rolled out (no solid timeline has been provided).

Microsoft is currently in 3rd place among the search engine giants with 11.3% of the market. Google dominates with 56.5% and Yahoo trails the leader with 23.3%. Ask and AOL are picking up the scraps with 4.5% each.

It’s nice to see Microsoft doing more to gain ground on Google than simply making Tafiti, its experimental search interface based on Live Search, even more spiffy.

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. 100iso.it: Google vs. Resto del Mondo

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Ritu

    Is Microsoft Live Search and Tafiti the same thing? Personally, I think Ask.com will come out as a winner, well yeah not soon but in a couple of years. They have made some major changes to their site and I see them as one of the search engines that are trying hard to get their share of the market.

    Also about Microsoft live search, “blended search” and google’s search “universal search” is it a copy with just a different name from Microsoft just like the “sidebar” in Vista that is similar to Apple’s “widgets” wondering

  2. EmpireOfLight

    Thanks, I’ll stick to google…is any of this at all relevant?

  3. Textbook Case

    ‘Blended Search’ also sounds vaguely reminiscent of Amazon ECS ‘Blended Search’.

  4. Web

    The bottom line is the relevancy of the Organic Algos-

    and Live just is not that relevant by today’s standards.

    It SERPS are about as relevant as Google was in 2000.

    But - in their favor - the Video, Images and News Links are just as relevant as Google’s. However, MSN has a casual search user base, and it is questionable whether the majority even use any of those vertical search alternatives

    BTW: one link on the post is pointing to the wrong URL

  5. Mark Hendrickson

    #4 - Mark: Good catch, thanks.

  6. Ryan Merket

    Cool AJAX, drag n drop, etc. But it doesn’t differentiate enough from Google from me to switch. Need something ground breaking.

  7. Lipo Network

    Cool but I don’t see results like that when I use it (the blended results). I just get text.

    Isn’t http://www.live.com sufficient?

    I turn to MS for all my web searching needs, and then to Goog if I can’t find them at MS first.

  8. Ash

    Nice coverage Mark. Thanks,

    http://www.Congoo.com- Congoo Vertical News Communities

  9. Andy

    “a search index four times larger than before”

    When was the last time Google advertised the size of their search index? Does it even matter anymore?

  10. Mark Alan Effinger

    I’ll have to play with this a bit.

    We are launching a Universal/3D Search marketing platform next Monday, and I’m curious if MSN results ‘respond’ in the same way as Google and Ask.com in terms of blended results.

    So far Ask.com is doing the best job of organizing the results. Very pretty and navigable, though the Ajaxiness of it is a bit funky in the beginning.

    Nice call, and thanks for keeping us “on the edge”.

    Mark Alan Effinger
    http://www.RichContent.tv

  11. sneaky snake

    Sneaky Microsoft have Natural language search…

  12. Ray Burt

    “what it claims” — your bias shouldn’t be so obvious, eh? You don’t use this phrase with other comapny announcements…

  13. David Mackey

    Hmmm…Interesting, that blended search sounds a bit like Mahalo.

  14. Jorge

    Wow. It’s as accurate as Google used to be…before the splogs and AdSpam sites took over Google’s index.
    If only it didn’t have such a terrible interface…

  15. Omadsense

    I think people have the wrong idea - it’s not about MSN being good enough to dump google and switch over - but that it is on the road to competing more effectivly.
    Competition works to the benefit of all.
    Plus I’ve noticed that I am getting more traffic coming from MSN so, isn’t it really about getting more traffic - be it google, msn or both……

  16. Andy Gongea

    Nice work. Rumble in the search engine jungle. I like live.com - good and powerful and most of all - CLEAN

    Jorge I do not know what is you problem with the interface but I think that the visual line in live.com is very good. Anyway with Ask.com and Live.com boosting the features the search engine is getting very interesting.