<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL Is Gussying Itself Up for an Advertising IPO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 17:50:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Q dub</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-2591802</link>
		<dc:creator>Q dub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 22:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-2591802</guid>
		<description>IAC-like is dead on.  Yes the AOL brand is dying in the consumer&#039;s eyes, that&#039;s exactly why they are de-emphasizing it in favor of major vertical blogs/portals own brands (e.g. fine properties such as Engadget and TMZ).  But to ad-buyers, AOL is still a pretty powerful source of good inventory.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IAC-like is dead on.  Yes the AOL brand is dying in the consumer&#8217;s eyes, that&#8217;s exactly why they are de-emphasizing it in favor of major vertical blogs/portals own brands (e.g. fine properties such as Engadget and TMZ).  But to ad-buyers, AOL is still a pretty powerful source of good inventory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL Sees Strong Growth In Sites After Year Long Revamping</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-2222957</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL Sees Strong Growth In Sites After Year Long Revamping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-2222957</guid>
		<description>[...] AOL is monetizing all of this content through Platform-A, which recently became the top U.S. advertising network by reach. In March 170,537 U.S. Internet users (91% of the total audience) visited a site represented by Platform-A. Yahoo and Google, by contrast, reached just 85% and 81%, respectively. More on AOL&#8217;s advertising plans here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AOL is monetizing all of this content through Platform-A, which recently became the top U.S. advertising network by reach. In March 170,537 U.S. Internet users (91% of the total audience) visited a site represented by Platform-A. Yahoo and Google, by contrast, reached just 85% and 81%, respectively. More on AOL&#8217;s advertising plans here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL: Upto 30 New Sites By The End Of 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-2015300</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL: Upto 30 New Sites By The End Of 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 03:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-2015300</guid>
		<description>[...] has asked twice when AOL is going to be spun of in what he calls an &#8220;advertising IPO.&#8221; The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has asked twice when AOL is going to be spun of in what he calls an &#8220;advertising IPO.&#8221; The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amid Yahoo Turmoil, AOL Makes An Acquisition</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-2004911</link>
		<dc:creator>Amid Yahoo Turmoil, AOL Makes An Acquisition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 09:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-2004911</guid>
		<description>[...] Goowy&#8217;s technology into both user-facing AOL products (to widgetize them) as well as their Platform A advertising network. Expect Platform A to launch significant new advertising products in the widget [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Goowy&#8217;s technology into both user-facing AOL products (to widgetize them) as well as their Platform A advertising network. Expect Platform A to launch significant new advertising products in the widget [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL To Split Off Dying Access Subscription Business. When&#8217;s That Advertising IPO?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1978835</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL To Split Off Dying Access Subscription Business. When&#8217;s That Advertising IPO?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1978835</guid>
		<description>[...] Bewkes mentioned that the split up would &#8220;increase AOL&#8217;s strategic options.&#8221; That is code for a sale or IPO, or both. Time Warner should sell off the access business to a private equity shop and go full-steam ahead with its IPO plans for Platform A. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bewkes mentioned that the split up would &#8220;increase AOL&#8217;s strategic options.&#8221; That is code for a sale or IPO, or both. Time Warner should sell off the access business to a private equity shop and go full-steam ahead with its IPO plans for Platform A. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AOL To Split Off Dying Access Subscription Business. When&#8217;s That Advertising IPO?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1978834</link>
		<dc:creator>AOL To Split Off Dying Access Subscription Business. When&#8217;s That Advertising IPO?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1978834</guid>
		<description>[...] Bewkes mentioned that the split up would &#8220;increase AOL&#8217;s strategic options.&#8221; That is code for a sale or IPO, or both. Time Warner should sell off the access business to a private equity shop and go full-steam ahead with its IPO plans for Platform A. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bewkes mentioned that the split up would &#8220;increase AOL&#8217;s strategic options.&#8221; That is code for a sale or IPO, or both. Time Warner should sell off the access business to a private equity shop and go full-steam ahead with its IPO plans for Platform A. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: la stratégie texas holdem</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1960933</link>
		<dc:creator>la stratégie texas holdem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 07:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1960933</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;klingeltöne herunterladen...&lt;/strong&gt;

Before that polyphone klingeltöne kostenlos real music klingeltöne...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>klingeltöne herunterladen&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Before that polyphone klingeltöne kostenlos real music klingeltöne&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bad card credit debt uk</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1941655</link>
		<dc:creator>bad card credit debt uk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1941655</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;low fixed interest credit card...&lt;/strong&gt;

Consolidate low fixed interest credit card advance advance america cash...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>low fixed interest credit card&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Consolidate low fixed interest credit card advance advance america cash&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More Ad Network Deals—Specific Media Raises $100 Million, AOL Close to Buying Quigo For $300 Million</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1718427</link>
		<dc:creator>More Ad Network Deals—Specific Media Raises $100 Million, AOL Close to Buying Quigo For $300 Million</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1718427</guid>
		<description>[...] and USAToday.com. This would certainly be in keeping with AOL&#8217;s strategy to build out its Platform-A advertising network, even as it takes steps to allow consumers to opt out of such targeting. Quigo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and USAToday.com. This would certainly be in keeping with AOL&#8217;s strategy to build out its Platform-A advertising network, even as it takes steps to allow consumers to opt out of such targeting. Quigo [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1654288</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 18:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1654288</guid>
		<description>AOL is still in business?? WHO CARES!!!
They are the worst ISP on the planet and anybody still working there is a moron just hanging on for a bonus and a RIF Check.

GOOD RIDDANCE OF THIS TURD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AOL is still in business?? WHO CARES!!!<br />
They are the worst ISP on the planet and anybody still working there is a moron just hanging on for a bonus and a RIF Check.</p>
<p>GOOD RIDDANCE OF THIS TURD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Omadsense</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1650638</link>
		<dc:creator>Omadsense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1650638</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m with dale, distruction is thier motto... sad, they had a bright future once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with dale, distruction is thier motto&#8230; sad, they had a bright future once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Advertising</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1650049</link>
		<dc:creator>Advertising</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 07:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1650049</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I too agree that AOL is the best place for online advertising, you can easily advertise your product here and can get lots of profits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I too agree that AOL is the best place for online advertising, you can easily advertise your product here and can get lots of profits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Name(required)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649836</link>
		<dc:creator>Name(required)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649836</guid>
		<description>google&#039;s 1B already bought themselves 2 years worth of maybe 8% of their revenue, pocket change compared to their market cap, well worth it even at a zero dollar residual value. Losing that chunk of revenue would change the market shares and perception of momentum, 1B is a small price to pay to protect that.

Looks like AOL is going to be more like an IACI sort of shop. Just won&#039;t be very interesting from now on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>google&#8217;s 1B already bought themselves 2 years worth of maybe 8% of their revenue, pocket change compared to their market cap, well worth it even at a zero dollar residual value. Losing that chunk of revenue would change the market shares and perception of momentum, 1B is a small price to pay to protect that.</p>
<p>Looks like AOL is going to be more like an IACI sort of shop. Just won&#8217;t be very interesting from now on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marah Marie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649809</link>
		<dc:creator>Marah Marie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 02:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649809</guid>
		<description>@ Observer:


Consider it explained.

http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/twaol_expanded.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Observer:</p>
<p>Consider it explained.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/twaol_expanded.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/twaol_expanded.html'>http://www.goog...l_expanded.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Observer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649700</link>
		<dc:creator>Observer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649700</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand it. They first acquire all these companies,  to get some of that internet magic that Google has. They then become a portal like Yahoo (when Yahoo was already being handed its head by Google) - hmm, wrong move!

Now, they are going to spin off/IPO all the advertising pieces they acquired - the only valuable pieces of AOL in your analysis - and keep what? Keep the dying businesses they were supposed to be diversifying out of. 

And could someone explain how Google&#039;s 5% stake works? What do they get out of it? What is their &quot;exit strategy&quot; for that $1 billion?

Yeah, I hear investment bankers love all this - they get their percentage coming and going - but what&#039;s in it for AOL shareholders? Look at how focused companies operate - Oracle acquires, Google acquires, and they do so for keeps. AOL acquires, and then AOL sells a stake to someone else, and then AOL spins out what it acquired. 

Classic &quot;corporate America&quot;. Thank God I am lucky enough to not work for fucking morons like these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand it. They first acquire all these companies,  to get some of that internet magic that Google has. They then become a portal like Yahoo (when Yahoo was already being handed its head by Google) &#8211; hmm, wrong move!</p>
<p>Now, they are going to spin off/IPO all the advertising pieces they acquired &#8211; the only valuable pieces of AOL in your analysis &#8211; and keep what? Keep the dying businesses they were supposed to be diversifying out of. </p>
<p>And could someone explain how Google&#8217;s 5% stake works? What do they get out of it? What is their &#8220;exit strategy&#8221; for that $1 billion?</p>
<p>Yeah, I hear investment bankers love all this &#8211; they get their percentage coming and going &#8211; but what&#8217;s in it for AOL shareholders? Look at how focused companies operate &#8211; Oracle acquires, Google acquires, and they do so for keeps. AOL acquires, and then AOL sells a stake to someone else, and then AOL spins out what it acquired. </p>
<p>Classic &#8220;corporate America&#8221;. Thank God I am lucky enough to not work for fucking morons like these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: granttool</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649409</link>
		<dc:creator>granttool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649409</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t help but wonder how Google feels about all this. They invested a BILLION dollars in aol a few years ago. And now it appears that the TWX goons have spent most of it acquiring companies that they&#039;ll eventually spin off. Will Google get a piece of the platform A pie or just stuck with withering access and portal businesses.

All this banter by Falco-Grant about portals not being good businesses is just poor excuse-making for their incompetence. Did any ACTUALLY believe some dinosaur from NBC and a midgette could execute a turn-around for AOL? Hind sight is 20 20!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help but wonder how Google feels about all this. They invested a BILLION dollars in aol a few years ago. And now it appears that the TWX goons have spent most of it acquiring companies that they&#8217;ll eventually spin off. Will Google get a piece of the platform A pie or just stuck with withering access and portal businesses.</p>
<p>All this banter by Falco-Grant about portals not being good businesses is just poor excuse-making for their incompetence. Did any ACTUALLY believe some dinosaur from NBC and a midgette could execute a turn-around for AOL? Hind sight is 20 20!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brig Graff</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649341</link>
		<dc:creator>Brig Graff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649341</guid>
		<description>You know, I don&#039;t think that the AOL brand is lacking value. It&#039;s huge....still...even today. Bigger than most of the startups we talk about on TechCrunch all rolled together. I wouldn&#039;t write them off as unable to execute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I don&#8217;t think that the AOL brand is lacking value. It&#8217;s huge&#8230;.still&#8230;even today. Bigger than most of the startups we talk about on TechCrunch all rolled together. I wouldn&#8217;t write them off as unable to execute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nutty geek</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649315</link>
		<dc:creator>nutty geek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649315</guid>
		<description>humm, this might actually work, after the long six years experiment. It has been a dead business with a dead brand, only way to go is to use the cash flow to buy into growth and moving on away from the putrid carcass. Won&#039;t do much for my TWX stocks though, only thing that can help it is next Q&#039;s cable numbers, and I will sell after the conf call no matter what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>humm, this might actually work, after the long six years experiment. It has been a dead business with a dead brand, only way to go is to use the cash flow to buy into growth and moving on away from the putrid carcass. Won&#8217;t do much for my TWX stocks though, only thing that can help it is next Q&#8217;s cable numbers, and I will sell after the conf call no matter what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Migliorisi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649291</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Migliorisi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649291</guid>
		<description>Erick, I cant tell you how nice it is to see a post on TC with so much substance. and content.  It seems that TC, Mashable, and R/WW all seem to pop posts out rather quickly and while they usually have good information, they sometimes lack substantial content and analysis.

Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erick, I cant tell you how nice it is to see a post on TC with so much substance. and content.  It seems that TC, Mashable, and R/WW all seem to pop posts out rather quickly and while they usually have good information, they sometimes lack substantial content and analysis.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jaywood</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649246</link>
		<dc:creator>jaywood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 18:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649246</guid>
		<description>So how would Google&#039;s current 5% stake in AOL be handled? How much of that stake will be in Platform A versus the remaining AOL piece?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So how would Google&#8217;s current 5% stake in AOL be handled? How much of that stake will be in Platform A versus the remaining AOL piece?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649155</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:47:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649155</guid>
		<description>This looks like a good idea.  I&#039;d buy the stock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a good idea.  I&#8217;d buy the stock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Otis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649131</link>
		<dc:creator>Otis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 17:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649131</guid>
		<description>So Mike did you get a lot of this information from AlleyInsider.com? They have been covering these AOL circumstances for the past 3 weeks - corp. intrigue, IPO, layoffs, balance sheet analysis - and all. 

Are you moving from an edit start up focus to industry analysis like alleyinsider?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Mike did you get a lot of this information from AlleyInsider.com? They have been covering these AOL circumstances for the past 3 weeks &#8211; corp. intrigue, IPO, layoffs, balance sheet analysis &#8211; and all. </p>
<p>Are you moving from an edit start up focus to industry analysis like alleyinsider?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649095</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649095</guid>
		<description>Wow, what a lame strategy for a turnaround.  AOL should swallow its pride and just get rid of any services that aren&#039;t working.  The brand has no value, so what&#039;s the point in hanging on?  If they were smart, they&#039;d sell off their dialup customers, re-brand their ad-filled homepage (which I just took a brief look at - and wow, it&#039;s horrible!), and basically become as new a company as they can with the assets that work.

This is what American car companies are beginning to understand, and they don&#039;t seem to have a problem selling off brands that don&#039;t make them money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, what a lame strategy for a turnaround.  AOL should swallow its pride and just get rid of any services that aren&#8217;t working.  The brand has no value, so what&#8217;s the point in hanging on?  If they were smart, they&#8217;d sell off their dialup customers, re-brand their ad-filled homepage (which I just took a brief look at &#8211; and wow, it&#8217;s horrible!), and basically become as new a company as they can with the assets that work.</p>
<p>This is what American car companies are beginning to understand, and they don&#8217;t seem to have a problem selling off brands that don&#8217;t make them money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649089</link>
		<dc:creator>James Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649089</guid>
		<description>BlogReader:  You&#039;re right.  You&#039;re much smarter than people with inside knowledge who work in these industries every day.  AOL should hire you as their CEO.  You&#039;d straighten things out in a heartbeat.

Hope you noticed the sarcasm.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BlogReader:  You&#8217;re right.  You&#8217;re much smarter than people with inside knowledge who work in these industries every day.  AOL should hire you as their CEO.  You&#8217;d straighten things out in a heartbeat.</p>
<p>Hope you noticed the sarcasm.  <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anonymous coward</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/comment-page-1/#comment-1649068</link>
		<dc:creator>anonymous coward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:37:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/27/aol-is-gussying-itself-up-for-an-advertising-ipo/#comment-1649068</guid>
		<description>If AOL closes up their ISP platform, how will college kids get internet access? 

Not that I use it any longer however I made it through (4) years of college using their silly CD&#039;s and continually closing down the accounts prior to the trial period being over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If AOL closes up their ISP platform, how will college kids get internet access? </p>
<p>Not that I use it any longer however I made it through (4) years of college using their silly CD&#8217;s and continually closing down the accounts prior to the trial period being over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
