<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yahoo Podcasts Joins The Deadpool</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:40:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Podango Fails But Podcasting Is Strong : Awakened Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-2578446</link>
		<dc:creator>Podango Fails But Podcasting Is Strong : Awakened Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 20:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-2578446</guid>
		<description>[...] via their Wordcast service and failed. Yahoo! tried the directory format with Yahoo! Podcasts and failed. PodTech tried to build a network of advertising supported content and failed. Evan Williams of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via their Wordcast service and failed. Yahoo! tried the directory format with Yahoo! Podcasts and failed. PodTech tried to build a network of advertising supported content and failed. Evan Williams of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiederholungstäter &#171; Das Frage-Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1784379</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiederholungstäter &#171; Das Frage-Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 17:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1784379</guid>
		<description>[...] YouTube killed the Podcast-Star? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] YouTube killed the Podcast-Star? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stitchr Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1649715</link>
		<dc:creator>Stitchr Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 01:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1649715</guid>
		<description>I think that this is a sign that in order for on-demand audio to enjoy widespread adoption, providers/distributors/etc need to understand the subtle and not-so-subtle differences in the way people consume audio on-the-go. Too many square pegs solutions for video were squeezed into the round hole of audio because of the YouTube and related video gold fever.

However, there is a large number of people that need a personalized audio solution beyond FM and satellite radio, and some solution is going to trickle up and fill the gap. 

At www.stitchr.com , we&#039;re working on it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that this is a sign that in order for on-demand audio to enjoy widespread adoption, providers/distributors/etc need to understand the subtle and not-so-subtle differences in the way people consume audio on-the-go. Too many square pegs solutions for video were squeezed into the round hole of audio because of the YouTube and related video gold fever.</p>
<p>However, there is a large number of people that need a personalized audio solution beyond FM and satellite radio, and some solution is going to trickle up and fill the gap. </p>
<p>At <a href="http://www.stitchr.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.stitchr.com'>http://www.stitchr.com</a> , we&#8217;re working on it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1649086</link>
		<dc:creator>michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1649086</guid>
		<description>This is precisely why I don&#039;t use ANY Yahoo products. Why get comfortable when they&#039;re just going to close up shop later on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is precisely why I don&#8217;t use ANY Yahoo products. Why get comfortable when they&#8217;re just going to close up shop later on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Modern Worker</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1649080</link>
		<dc:creator>Modern Worker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1649080</guid>
		<description>Classic Yahoo behavior...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Classic Yahoo behavior&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoopie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1649047</link>
		<dc:creator>whoopie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 16:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1649047</guid>
		<description>these closures usually have nothing to do with &quot;focusing on the core business&quot; because my guess is that yahoo had no one assigned to maintaining the site in any case, either technical or bd-wise. 

by time yahoo actually turns off a site you can be sure it was in a headcount-coma for probably a year prior, yahoo photos being the exception and even more galling in that they poured money into upgrading it shortly before killing it in favor of flickr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these closures usually have nothing to do with &#8220;focusing on the core business&#8221; because my guess is that yahoo had no one assigned to maintaining the site in any case, either technical or bd-wise. </p>
<p>by time yahoo actually turns off a site you can be sure it was in a headcount-coma for probably a year prior, yahoo photos being the exception and even more galling in that they poured money into upgrading it shortly before killing it in favor of flickr</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648932</link>
		<dc:creator>Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648932</guid>
		<description>Excellent comments, bmof. 

When you say that publishers won&#039;t let other people monetize with advertising, are you referring to use of a non-commercial license like the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent comments, bmof. </p>
<p>When you say that publishers won&#8217;t let other people monetize with advertising, are you referring to use of a non-commercial license like the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmof</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648865</link>
		<dc:creator>bmof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648865</guid>
		<description>Oh, and one more thing. Most of the web-based aggregators depend on an advertising model. Most publishers won&#039;t let other people monetize their content in that fashion - either through display around the web-viewed content, or worse, as pre-roll/post-roll on that content. A business model based on making money off other people&#039;s podcasts and video podcasts is going to be a very tough road to follow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and one more thing. Most of the web-based aggregators depend on an advertising model. Most publishers won&#8217;t let other people monetize their content in that fashion &#8211; either through display around the web-viewed content, or worse, as pre-roll/post-roll on that content. A business model based on making money off other people&#8217;s podcasts and video podcasts is going to be a very tough road to follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bmof</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648861</link>
		<dc:creator>bmof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648861</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s got nothing to do with audio vs. video podcasts. It&#039;s got everything to do with iTunes being the 800 lb gorilla, and working super-slick with the No. 1 podcast-consumption tool on the planet: the iPod. My company pushes out millions of podcasts episodes a month, and close to 90% of them are consumed through iTunes. 

Until someone figures out a better way to get content onto iPods, iTunes will trump all those web directories for true podcasts/video podcasts. Mobile phones might also be a way to beat iTunes - but so far every effort I&#039;ve seen has been pretty lame, and the average consumer doesn&#039;t yet think of the mobile phone as a media device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s got nothing to do with audio vs. video podcasts. It&#8217;s got everything to do with iTunes being the 800 lb gorilla, and working super-slick with the No. 1 podcast-consumption tool on the planet: the iPod. My company pushes out millions of podcasts episodes a month, and close to 90% of them are consumed through iTunes. </p>
<p>Until someone figures out a better way to get content onto iPods, iTunes will trump all those web directories for true podcasts/video podcasts. Mobile phones might also be a way to beat iTunes &#8211; but so far every effort I&#8217;ve seen has been pretty lame, and the average consumer doesn&#8217;t yet think of the mobile phone as a media device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Podcasting News &#187; Fallout From Yahoo&#8217;s Decision To Kill Its Podcast Portal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648828</link>
		<dc:creator>Podcasting News &#187; Fallout From Yahoo&#8217;s Decision To Kill Its Podcast Portal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648828</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch, Duncan Riley suggests that podcasting&#8217;s growth rate is the reason for the closing, saying [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch, Duncan Riley suggests that podcasting&#8217;s growth rate is the reason for the closing, saying [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kosso's braingarden</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648789</link>
		<dc:creator>kosso's braingarden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 12:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648789</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Goodbye Yahoo! Podcasts, we hardly knew&#160;ye!...&lt;/strong&gt;

According to their site, the Yahoo! Podcasts site is due to close at the end of October. It was funny to see the news spread from a post to my Twitter account, on to Marshall over at Read/Write Web, then out to the rest of the blogosphere and TechMeme....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Goodbye Yahoo! Podcasts, we hardly knew&nbsp;ye!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>According to their site, the Yahoo! Podcasts site is due to close at the end of October. It was funny to see the news spread from a post to my Twitter account, on to Marshall over at Read/Write Web, then out to the rest of the blogosphere and TechMeme&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aw</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648539</link>
		<dc:creator>aw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648539</guid>
		<description>Internet Video killed the Podshow Star?  Another round of funding - wow!  I knew something was up when the KMart adverts stopped appearing on the Daily Souce Code.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Internet Video killed the Podshow Star?  Another round of funding &#8211; wow!  I knew something was up when the KMart adverts stopped appearing on the Daily Souce Code.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Sinton</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648396</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Sinton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648396</guid>
		<description>Solution for those who love podcasting AND online video : import all of your audio podcast and video show subscriptions in mefeedia. We support both audio and video, and provide a social media network on top of it to boot - and are completely inter-operable with iTunes, Miro, and many other players.
http://www.mefeedia.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Solution for those who love podcasting AND online video : import all of your audio podcast and video show subscriptions in mefeedia. We support both audio and video, and provide a social media network on top of it to boot &#8211; and are completely inter-operable with iTunes, Miro, and many other players.<br />
<a href="http://www.mefeedia.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.mefeedia.com'>http://www.mefeedia.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhardo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648394</link>
		<dc:creator>rhardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648394</guid>
		<description>Tsk... tsk... tsk... they better catch up....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tsk&#8230; tsk&#8230; tsk&#8230; they better catch up&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mefeedia blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648387</link>
		<dc:creator>Mefeedia blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 06:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648387</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Yahoo! Podcasts shuts down, what is the future of podcasting?...&lt;/strong&gt;

First Odeo was sold, bought, sold, then bought again. Now Yahoo Podcasts is shutting down. What is the future of audio podcasting? The market is clearly a video game, but is there a need for audio podcasts and can they be monetized? Our answer is a res...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Yahoo! Podcasts shuts down, what is the future of podcasting?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>First Odeo was sold, bought, sold, then bought again. Now Yahoo Podcasts is shutting down. What is the future of audio podcasting? The market is clearly a video game, but is there a need for audio podcasts and can they be monetized? Our answer is a res&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648263</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 04:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648263</guid>
		<description>Rewardless # 6, if closing means Yahoo PodCast means that Yahoo is focusing on its core business then thats good. But I think they are realizing that they don&#039;t have much time for some of these peripheral projects and I would like to see how Google will maintain their ever-growing portfolio.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rewardless # 6, if closing means Yahoo PodCast means that Yahoo is focusing on its core business then thats good. But I think they are realizing that they don&#8217;t have much time for some of these peripheral projects and I would like to see how Google will maintain their ever-growing portfolio.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SteveBallmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648234</link>
		<dc:creator>SteveBallmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648234</guid>
		<description>Truer words were never spoken!

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truer words were never spoken!</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com'>http://fakestev...er.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648211</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 03:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648211</guid>
		<description>Yahoo Podcasts closing has nothing to do with audio vs. video.  It hosted both audio and video podcasts.  The site closing is overdue, honestly; they have done literally nothing with the site since the day it opened.  As long as I can remember, new podcasters would come on to message boards and ask why their show wasn&#039;t listed on Yahoo, or why it was listed two or three times.  A number of podcasters posted to their support message boards in the early days, since it was ostensibly a beta product (though it behaved more like an alpha), but every question, comment and bug report fell on deaf ears.

As a podcaster, I&#039;m happy it closed.  I&#039;m all for the big guys coming in and providing more exposure to podcasting, but if they&#039;re going to put up a site that only works sporadically and then just forget about it, I&#039;d rather it didn&#039;t exist in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo Podcasts closing has nothing to do with audio vs. video.  It hosted both audio and video podcasts.  The site closing is overdue, honestly; they have done literally nothing with the site since the day it opened.  As long as I can remember, new podcasters would come on to message boards and ask why their show wasn&#8217;t listed on Yahoo, or why it was listed two or three times.  A number of podcasters posted to their support message boards in the early days, since it was ostensibly a beta product (though it behaved more like an alpha), but every question, comment and bug report fell on deaf ears.</p>
<p>As a podcaster, I&#8217;m happy it closed.  I&#8217;m all for the big guys coming in and providing more exposure to podcasting, but if they&#8217;re going to put up a site that only works sporadically and then just forget about it, I&#8217;d rather it didn&#8217;t exist in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rewardless</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648193</link>
		<dc:creator>Rewardless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648193</guid>
		<description>Yahoo has shut down three of their properties: WebJay, Yahoo Photos, Yahoo Auctions. Today Yahoo PodCast directory becomes the latest victim. . .

Why? 

Yahoo obviously has the muscle to turn these projects “profitable” at some level, so why not keep them?

Because they have realized they need to FOCUS to save their business. 

Yahoo is taking notes on a hard earned lesson that Google should too take note of: abandoning your core business to pursue opportunities, no matter how closely related, will ultimately damage your core business.

Yahoo has been getting their ass handed to them by Google quarter after quarter in the extremely lucrative search engine arena and it looks like they’re finally waking up and realizing that to be truly competitive they need to refocus their attention on their foundation: being a search directory.

Yahoo over the past several years has become a “Portal”. Becoming a portal in the late days of Bubble 1.0 was something that many large web properties strove to become.

Yahoo has arrived at their goal of becoming a portal. But the problem is that by becoming a portal, Yahoo lost any real value or specialization that made them valuable beyond their brand.

Sure, they do a monster amount of business, but just look at how profitable google has made search. And just look at their stock price to realize the value that the market puts on Google owning an extremely profitable, scalable area of specialization on the web.

A chapter from Al Ries’ classic business book “Focus” teaches us the following lesson:

 “If there were nothing but general surgeons and you were the only brain surgeon, you would have an incredible business and you could charge outrageous prices.“

Hmmm, it seems to me that Google has succeeded in becoming just that! What is somewhat mind boggling, however, is that Google is beginning to segment their brand into completely new and unrelated areas: desktop software (to combat MSFT?!), email, and a dozen other apps. 

Apps like Google Maps, which again are within Google’s core business of helping consumers find things more quickly and efficiently are smart.Desktop software, email, iGoogle, google notebook, Picasa, a potential social network and others are only going to damage Google in the long term by decreasing their most valuable asset - the brand name that is synonymous with SEARCH.

Go Yahoo!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yahoo has shut down three of their properties: WebJay, Yahoo Photos, Yahoo Auctions. Today Yahoo PodCast directory becomes the latest victim. . .</p>
<p>Why? </p>
<p>Yahoo obviously has the muscle to turn these projects “profitable” at some level, so why not keep them?</p>
<p>Because they have realized they need to FOCUS to save their business. </p>
<p>Yahoo is taking notes on a hard earned lesson that Google should too take note of: abandoning your core business to pursue opportunities, no matter how closely related, will ultimately damage your core business.</p>
<p>Yahoo has been getting their ass handed to them by Google quarter after quarter in the extremely lucrative search engine arena and it looks like they’re finally waking up and realizing that to be truly competitive they need to refocus their attention on their foundation: being a search directory.</p>
<p>Yahoo over the past several years has become a “Portal”. Becoming a portal in the late days of Bubble 1.0 was something that many large web properties strove to become.</p>
<p>Yahoo has arrived at their goal of becoming a portal. But the problem is that by becoming a portal, Yahoo lost any real value or specialization that made them valuable beyond their brand.</p>
<p>Sure, they do a monster amount of business, but just look at how profitable google has made search. And just look at their stock price to realize the value that the market puts on Google owning an extremely profitable, scalable area of specialization on the web.</p>
<p>A chapter from Al Ries’ classic business book “Focus” teaches us the following lesson:</p>
<p> “If there were nothing but general surgeons and you were the only brain surgeon, you would have an incredible business and you could charge outrageous prices.“</p>
<p>Hmmm, it seems to me that Google has succeeded in becoming just that! What is somewhat mind boggling, however, is that Google is beginning to segment their brand into completely new and unrelated areas: desktop software (to combat MSFT?!), email, and a dozen other apps. </p>
<p>Apps like Google Maps, which again are within Google’s core business of helping consumers find things more quickly and efficiently are smart.Desktop software, email, iGoogle, google notebook, Picasa, a potential social network and others are only going to damage Google in the long term by decreasing their most valuable asset &#8211; the brand name that is synonymous with SEARCH.</p>
<p>Go Yahoo!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avinash</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648182</link>
		<dc:creator>Avinash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648182</guid>
		<description>Another closure from Yahoo. Hope things don&#039;t get worser than this for yahoo in the coming days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another closure from Yahoo. Hope things don&#8217;t get worser than this for yahoo in the coming days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648151</link>
		<dc:creator>tomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648151</guid>
		<description>This is a sign of an exec looking show how proactive they are. Nothing more than showing how cost reductions are being made and cutting of the losses is a true mission. Pathetic, nobody know what a podcast is still, and a behemoth like Y! could own the market if they knew what to do. It keeps getting worse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a sign of an exec looking show how proactive they are. Nothing more than showing how cost reductions are being made and cutting of the losses is a true mission. Pathetic, nobody know what a podcast is still, and a behemoth like Y! could own the market if they knew what to do. It keeps getting worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELS</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648149</link>
		<dc:creator>ELS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 02:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648149</guid>
		<description>How on earth could podshow be short of money? 

What on earth could they have spent $23 million on in less than 24 months?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How on earth could podshow be short of money? </p>
<p>What on earth could they have spent $23 million on in less than 24 months?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Thomson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648134</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Thomson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648134</guid>
		<description>Well, I&#039;ve tried to add my podcasts to the directory quite a few times, and the form submitted, but the listings NEVER showed up. Same thing happened to quite a few people I hear. In my mind, its been &quot;dead&quot; for a while now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve tried to add my podcasts to the directory quite a few times, and the form submitted, but the listings NEVER showed up. Same thing happened to quite a few people I hear. In my mind, its been &#8220;dead&#8221; for a while now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clickfire</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/comment-page-1/#comment-1648124</link>
		<dc:creator>Clickfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 01:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/26/yahoo-podcasts-joins-the-deadpool/#comment-1648124</guid>
		<description>I remember this as one of the early directories that helped introduce me to podcasting. I thought it was pretty slick at the time. Sad to see it go but it&#039;s also oddly comforting to see Yahoo not afraid to cut a project that is not profitable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember this as one of the early directories that helped introduce me to podcasting. I thought it was pretty slick at the time. Sad to see it go but it&#8217;s also oddly comforting to see Yahoo not afraid to cut a project that is not profitable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
