<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft May Invest in Facebook At $10 Billion Valuation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 07:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Facebook Takes the Microsoft Money And Runs.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-2014151</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook Takes the Microsoft Money And Runs.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2008 02:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-2014151</guid>
		<description>[...] billion. So that comes out to less than a 2 percent stake for Microsoft, which is much smaller than 5 percent stake that was bandied about earlier. (Update: During the conference call, Facebook left open the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] billion. So that comes out to less than a 2 percent stake for Microsoft, which is much smaller than 5 percent stake that was bandied about earlier. (Update: During the conference call, Facebook left open the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Windows Vista News</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1698714</link>
		<dc:creator>Windows Vista News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 09:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1698714</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Comment on Microsoft May Invest in Facebook At $10 Billion ......&lt;/strong&gt;

Did you see this post at www.techcrunch.com...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Comment on Microsoft May Invest in Facebook At $10 Billion &#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Did you see this post at <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com.." rel="nofollow">http://www.techcrunch.com..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook名花有主&#8230; &#124; 我blog故我在</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1698600</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook名花有主&#8230; &#124; 我blog故我在</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 08:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1698600</guid>
		<description>[...] billion. So that comes out to less than a 2 percent stake for Microsoft, which is much smaller than 5 percent stake that was bandied about earlier. (Update: During the conference call, Facebook left open the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] billion. So that comes out to less than a 2 percent stake for Microsoft, which is much smaller than 5 percent stake that was bandied about earlier. (Update: During the conference call, Facebook left open the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parakey: Did Investors Get Left Out In The Cold?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1680436</link>
		<dc:creator>Parakey: Did Investors Get Left Out In The Cold?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1680436</guid>
		<description>[...] if the sellers got Facebook stock in return for their Parakey shares, it would likely be worth a fortune down the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] if the sellers got Facebook stock in return for their Parakey shares, it would likely be worth a fortune down the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Networks are like Celebrities &#124; DotNeil.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1672242</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Networks are like Celebrities &#124; DotNeil.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 15:54:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1672242</guid>
		<description>[...] the back of this attention. Facebook may never generate the levels of revenue that would justify a $15 billion valuation. Achtung - that really doesn&#8217;t matter right [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the back of this attention. Facebook may never generate the levels of revenue that would justify a $15 billion valuation. Achtung - that really doesn&#8217;t matter right [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1646855</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1646855</guid>
		<description>Smart move mr Microsoft,

I'd say they're only scruple would be that FaceBook is entirely PHP + MySQL driven, but who cares.

When you have that much cash lying around does guilt even get close to surfacing.

Well done Microsoft!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Smart move mr Microsoft,</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say they&#8217;re only scruple would be that FaceBook is entirely PHP + MySQL driven, but who cares.</p>
<p>When you have that much cash lying around does guilt even get close to surfacing.</p>
<p>Well done Microsoft!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devthink</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1646346</link>
		<dc:creator>Devthink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 03:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1646346</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft Excel 2007 has a multiplication error&#8230;...&lt;/strong&gt;

The first thing I thought when I heard this story (on Slashdot) was this must be why Microsoft is buying into Facebook at a $10 billion valuation (here, here, here, and here). The next thing that came over me was&#8230; ha ha a math error in Excel! The...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Microsoft Excel 2007 has a multiplication error&#8230;&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The first thing I thought when I heard this story (on Slashdot) was this must be why Microsoft is buying into Facebook at a $10 billion valuation (here, here, here, and here). The next thing that came over me was&#8230; ha ha a math error in Excel! The&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Dalka - Creating Revenue and Retention - Chicago GSB MBA</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1645091</link>
		<dc:creator>David Dalka - Creating Revenue and Retention - Chicago GSB MBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:07:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1645091</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Lisa Barone Points Out a Privacy Concern in Facebook...&lt;/strong&gt;

Lisa put together a really thoughtful post that outlines some interesting issues that those concerned with privacy should take a few moments to read.
Perhaps those people wishing to take the valuation of Facebook to the mooon might want to pause and th...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Lisa Barone Points Out a Privacy Concern in Facebook&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Lisa put together a really thoughtful post that outlines some interesting issues that those concerned with privacy should take a few moments to read.<br />
Perhaps those people wishing to take the valuation of Facebook to the mooon might want to pause and th&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Litsky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1645077</link>
		<dc:creator>David Litsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1645077</guid>
		<description>What don't you see? Facebook is to the web what Windows was to the PC. Four months ago everyone here was criticizing FB for not taking a $1Bln+ offer, now they are valued at 10x that amount by a company with no debt and a boatload of cash. I wonder how much cash Google has? 

http://bootstrapeconomist.org/2007/05/27/facebook-will-save-microsoft-and-the-washington-post/

http://bootstrapeconomist.org/2007/05/29/facebook-makes-an-excellent-banking-medium/

http://bootstrapeconomist.org/2007/05/31/the-new-corporate-intranet/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What don&#8217;t you see? Facebook is to the web what Windows was to the PC. Four months ago everyone here was criticizing FB for not taking a $1Bln+ offer, now they are valued at 10x that amount by a company with no debt and a boatload of cash. I wonder how much cash Google has? </p>
<p><a href="http://bootstrapeconomist.org/2007/05/27/facebook-will-save-microsoft-and-the-washington-post/" rel="nofollow">http://bootstrapeconomist.org/.....gton-post/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://bootstrapeconomist.org/2007/05/29/facebook-makes-an-excellent-banking-medium/" rel="nofollow">http://bootstrapeconomist.org/.....ng-medium/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://bootstrapeconomist.org/2007/05/31/the-new-corporate-intranet/" rel="nofollow">http://bootstrapeconomist.org/.....-intranet/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yuval</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644848</link>
		<dc:creator>Yuval</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644848</guid>
		<description>As time goes by Google becomes better positioned to win the battle of Internet dominance with MS. It's about values. Facebook's Zuckerberg is young, he grew up in a world where MS is an aggressive and hostile brand, and Google is the Great Enabler. People like him will reject deals with MS and favor Google on general principle.

Young people are the people who come up with disruptive innovations. Their thinking is more flexible because they grew up in a fast-changing world. Google just needs to wait for them to show up and offer them partnerships. Brand-wise, Google is God. I would say to a large extent this is justified. This is the information revolution, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As time goes by Google becomes better positioned to win the battle of Internet dominance with MS. It&#8217;s about values. Facebook&#8217;s Zuckerberg is young, he grew up in a world where MS is an aggressive and hostile brand, and Google is the Great Enabler. People like him will reject deals with MS and favor Google on general principle.</p>
<p>Young people are the people who come up with disruptive innovations. Their thinking is more flexible because they grew up in a fast-changing world. Google just needs to wait for them to show up and offer them partnerships. Brand-wise, Google is God. I would say to a large extent this is justified. This is the information revolution, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave mcclure</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644765</link>
		<dc:creator>dave mcclure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644765</guid>
		<description>hmm.  Facebook for $10B?  

think i'll just buy Fake Dave McClure for a dollar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm.  Facebook for $10B?  </p>
<p>think i&#8217;ll just buy Fake Dave McClure for a dollar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander van Elsas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644752</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander van Elsas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 08:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644752</guid>
		<description>I think this is a very risky investment. While Google spreads its advertisement revenues on-line accross many different platforms, Microsoft will have to monetize their investment in Facebook by creating more advertisement pressure on Facebook members. I think this might backfire in the end. They can try, but the value ibeing used now (10 Bln) is way to high. For more see:
http://vanelsas.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/high-risk-investment-microsoft-wants-a-piece-of-facebook/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a very risky investment. While Google spreads its advertisement revenues on-line accross many different platforms, Microsoft will have to monetize their investment in Facebook by creating more advertisement pressure on Facebook members. I think this might backfire in the end. They can try, but the value ibeing used now (10 Bln) is way to high. For more see:<br />
<a href="http://vanelsas.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/high-risk-investment-microsoft-wants-a-piece-of-facebook/" rel="nofollow">http://vanelsas.wordpress.com/.....-facebook/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moses</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644623</link>
		<dc:creator>Moses</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 06:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644623</guid>
		<description>I'm willing to bet that Facebook will ultimately elect to sell the stake to financial investors rather than either Microsoft or Google, because selling a stake to either: (1) reduces Facebook's ability to get the best deal on its next ad sales contract, and (2) restricts the shareholders' exit options. For a full analysis, see my blog, &lt;a href="http://moseskagan.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;moseskagan.com&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m willing to bet that Facebook will ultimately elect to sell the stake to financial investors rather than either Microsoft or Google, because selling a stake to either: (1) reduces Facebook&#8217;s ability to get the best deal on its next ad sales contract, and (2) restricts the shareholders&#8217; exit options. For a full analysis, see my blog, <a href="http://moseskagan.com" rel="nofollow" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview ('/outbound/moseskagan.com');">moseskagan.com</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644588</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644588</guid>
		<description>#70
There are multiple entities who want to invest at that price, not just Microsoft.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#70<br />
There are multiple entities who want to invest at that price, not just Microsoft.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Dave McClure</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644573</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Dave McClure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644573</guid>
		<description>Hell, I'd buy Facebook for a tril, at least.  Zuck, I'll be around. 

http://www.twitter.com/fakedave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hell, I&#8217;d buy Facebook for a tril, at least.  Zuck, I&#8217;ll be around. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.twitter.com/fakedave" rel="nofollow">http://www.twitter.com/fakedave</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bulls*^$</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644565</link>
		<dc:creator>bulls*^$</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 05:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644565</guid>
		<description>jay 

September 24th, 2007 at 7:05 pm 

#55
You are wrong. The investment round is 100% certain, the only question is the final identity of the investors.

JAY - ARE YOU EVEN AWARE OF THE CONVERSATION WE ARE HAVING HERE?  MSFT BUYING A 5% STAKE IN FB.  WAKE UP - NOT A REAL INVESTMENT DEAL BEING PONDERED - WHY WOULD WE NEED FINAL IDENTITIES IF "EVERYONE KNOWS IT IS MSFT"

TRUST ME MSFT IS NOT MAKING SUCH AN INVESTMENT! PERIOD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jay </p>
<p>September 24th, 2007 at 7:05 pm </p>
<p>#55<br />
You are wrong. The investment round is 100% certain, the only question is the final identity of the investors.</p>
<p>JAY - ARE YOU EVEN AWARE OF THE CONVERSATION WE ARE HAVING HERE?  MSFT BUYING A 5% STAKE IN FB.  WAKE UP - NOT A REAL INVESTMENT DEAL BEING PONDERED - WHY WOULD WE NEED FINAL IDENTITIES IF &#8220;EVERYONE KNOWS IT IS MSFT&#8221;</p>
<p>TRUST ME MSFT IS NOT MAKING SUCH AN INVESTMENT! PERIOD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644552</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644552</guid>
		<description>You people are not capable of seeing the BIG plan, you'll never understand.
FB is a threat to our future "cloud" plans and must be "enhanced".
Yeah, that's how we put it.

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people are not capable of seeing the BIG plan, you&#8217;ll never understand.<br />
FB is a threat to our future &#8220;cloud&#8221; plans and must be &#8220;enhanced&#8221;.<br />
Yeah, that&#8217;s how we put it.</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644484</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:04:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644484</guid>
		<description>I love how everyone posts their opinions like they are facts.  As if any of us have a clue of how this will work out and what a "steal" is or not.  Google was offered $3B in 2002 by Yahoo.  They refused when they had roughly $250M in revenue(see Wired 'Yahoo blew it' article).  Not to mention the fact that it was 2002.  Now google is worth $160B+.  But on the opposite hand, you have the overpriced AOL purchase.  You never know...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love how everyone posts their opinions like they are facts.  As if any of us have a clue of how this will work out and what a &#8220;steal&#8221; is or not.  Google was offered $3B in 2002 by Yahoo.  They refused when they had roughly $250M in revenue(see Wired &#8216;Yahoo blew it&#8217; article).  Not to mention the fact that it was 2002.  Now google is worth $160B+.  But on the opposite hand, you have the overpriced AOL purchase.  You never know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresh Prince Of Bell-Air</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644482</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh Prince Of Bell-Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 04:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644482</guid>
		<description>#66 this is a somewhat circular logic- will MSFT pay money upfront to later recover it via ads? It would take them 5 years to do so, by that time the fad will be over.

The thing is, for MSFT this amount is indeed not critical- it's like another Eolas' patent settlement. 

The real "looser" in this is Zuck, since he will probably end up with his share in 500m (after this the company will likely become unsellable), instead of potentially unloading it for 1B+.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#66 this is a somewhat circular logic- will MSFT pay money upfront to later recover it via ads? It would take them 5 years to do so, by that time the fad will be over.</p>
<p>The thing is, for MSFT this amount is indeed not critical- it&#8217;s like another Eolas&#8217; patent settlement. </p>
<p>The real &#8220;looser&#8221; in this is Zuck, since he will probably end up with his share in 500m (after this the company will likely become unsellable), instead of potentially unloading it for 1B+.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tcruncher2</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644463</link>
		<dc:creator>Tcruncher2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644463</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that this valuation is not necessary all that stupid and that Microsoft knows what it is doing. REMEMBER, Microsoft is looking after the ad serving on Facebook and therefore has a huge amount of metrics on the ad serving potential.

Since its becoming more obvious that Facebook is going to overtake Myspace as the "preferred" social network in the next 12 - 24 months, and since Google have a $1 Billion Deal with Myspace - taking 5% in the company could also mean that they have a more persuasive argument over who CONTINUES to serve ads. 

So in my thinking its a strategical move. Microsoft know that by injecting that amount of cash, they are only further promoting their ad serving technology - so its actually a core advertising business investment to an audience of possibly 100+ million in the next 24 months.

I also think that valuing Facebook at that sort of money also indicates there is no way they will be bought out ? i.e. who could afford them ?

:D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that this valuation is not necessary all that stupid and that Microsoft knows what it is doing. REMEMBER, Microsoft is looking after the ad serving on Facebook and therefore has a huge amount of metrics on the ad serving potential.</p>
<p>Since its becoming more obvious that Facebook is going to overtake Myspace as the &#8220;preferred&#8221; social network in the next 12 - 24 months, and since Google have a $1 Billion Deal with Myspace - taking 5% in the company could also mean that they have a more persuasive argument over who CONTINUES to serve ads. </p>
<p>So in my thinking its a strategical move. Microsoft know that by injecting that amount of cash, they are only further promoting their ad serving technology - so its actually a core advertising business investment to an audience of possibly 100+ million in the next 24 months.</p>
<p>I also think that valuing Facebook at that sort of money also indicates there is no way they will be bought out ? i.e. who could afford them ?</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Christner</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644447</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Christner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 03:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644447</guid>
		<description>Can anyone do math?  $300-500MM for a 5% stake implies a valuation between $15B and $25B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone do math?  $300-500MM for a 5% stake implies a valuation between $15B and $25B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fresh Prince Of Bell-Air</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644430</link>
		<dc:creator>Fresh Prince Of Bell-Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644430</guid>
		<description>#62 jay

I agree that Peter should not sell, since this is still probably insignificant for him compared to his Clarium operations.

Zuck should sell however- chances are he will not have enough time to unload FB in an IPO before the "market correction" - look at the oil price. 

Google is not stupid, Yutube is indeed a steal, but FB is a flashmob-like fad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#62 jay</p>
<p>I agree that Peter should not sell, since this is still probably insignificant for him compared to his Clarium operations.</p>
<p>Zuck should sell however- chances are he will not have enough time to unload FB in an IPO before the &#8220;market correction&#8221; - look at the oil price. </p>
<p>Google is not stupid, Yutube is indeed a steal, but FB is a flashmob-like fad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tecnoinformes.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644425</link>
		<dc:creator>Tecnoinformes.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644425</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Microsoft podría comprar parte de la red social FaceBook...&lt;/strong&gt;


FaceBook podr&#237;a valer mas de 15 billones de d&#243;lares&#160;
Segun el Wall Street Journal, Microsoft habr&#237;a hecho una oferta por el 5% de una de las redes sociales de mas rapido crecimiento, FaceBook, la cantidad que Microsoft estar&#38;...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Microsoft podría comprar parte de la red social FaceBook&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>FaceBook podr&iacute;a valer mas de 15 billones de d&oacute;lares&nbsp;<br />
Segun el Wall Street Journal, Microsoft habr&iacute;a hecho una oferta por el 5% de una de las redes sociales de mas rapido crecimiento, FaceBook, la cantidad que Microsoft estar&amp;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emre Sokullu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644412</link>
		<dc:creator>Emre Sokullu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644412</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Facebook $10B too much? No&#8230; too low!...&lt;/strong&gt;

The blogosphere is once again shaken up by the valuation speculated over Facebook. The consensus is Microsoft&#8217;s $10 B is too high. But just like I spoke over a videocast at Buram Buram Silikon months ago, I think the valuation should be even high...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Facebook $10B too much? No&#8230; too low!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>The blogosphere is once again shaken up by the valuation speculated over Facebook. The consensus is Microsoft&#8217;s $10 B is too high. But just like I spoke over a videocast at Buram Buram Silikon months ago, I think the valuation should be even high&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644409</link>
		<dc:creator>AP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 02:38:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/24/microsoft-may-invest-in-facebook-at-10-billion-valuation/#comment-1644409</guid>
		<description>If you sign up Facebook and Myspace. You will end up get telemarketing calls almost everyday. Only lucky people never sign up Facebook and Myspace is good thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you sign up Facebook and Myspace. You will end up get telemarketing calls almost everyday. Only lucky people never sign up Facebook and Myspace is good thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.101 seconds -->
