http://www.tech...demand-service/

Still, this ‘product’ is: not well executed, infringes on YouTube’s TOS, not strictly legal, and really just not that interesting.

We have a bit of an issue here, the publisher is also writer and editor of a publication. Which naturally only leads to conflict of interest. Would MA always use “brilliant” about a company that is directly competing with something he is involved with and has a brilliant solution?

I think if MA wants to maintain credibility in long run, he might need to pull our of the entire editorial process. I know he has hired a CEO, but she is only to run the day to day things, and he is still the publisher and the editor.

http://www.getmiro.com/

P.S. “FIQL” is a brilliant name, puts the marketing “geniuses” at Clown Co. to shame.

Also with Kanute. You can disagree by not buying, not supporting, but not by just making your own rules and rationalizing it. If you think another revenue model would make more sense for music, find an artist that works that way and sit alone in a room with your bad music and sense of self-satisfaction.

I’m starting to be truly amazed at how outright cheap people are. There are plenty of ways to test an album before buying, and paying $10-$15 for something I generally spend at least 10 hours listening to is DIRT cheap.

fiqul = fickle

or

fiqul = feacal

You agree not to use the Website, including the YouTube Embeddable Player for any commercial use, without the prior written authorization of YouTube. Prohibited commercial uses include any of the following actions taken without YouTube’s express approval:

sale of access to the Website or its related services (such as the Embeddable Player) on another website;

use of the Website or its related services (such as the Embeddable Player), for the primary purpose of gaining advertising or subscription revenue;

the sale of advertising, on the YouTube website or any third-party website, targeted to the content of specific User Submissions or YouTube content;

and any use of the Website or its related services (such as the Embeddable player) that YouTube finds, in its sole discretion, to use YouTube’s resources or User Submissions with the effect of competing with or displacing the market for YouTube, YouTube content, or its User Submissions. (For more information about prohibited commercial uses, see our FAQ.)