<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GotVoice Adds Talking Bears and Speech-To-Text Transcription</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 10:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: J.B. Malik</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1612518</link>
		<dc:creator>J.B. Malik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 13:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1612518</guid>
		<description>Hello, all. I use Callwave and RingCentral (both, each for a different business) and I have had no problems - ever - with each. I've used RingCentral for about a year now (for a non-Internet business), and I have used callwave for probably 2 years now to manage my incoming cell phone calls.

You can read my reviews of both RingCentral and Callwave here: www.small-business-phone.com

With all due respect, I don't think Callwave is a useless application at all, yet their speech-to-text app (as, I believe ALL such apps) needs some maturing.

The good thing about Callwave is that you're not relying on them to provide you with an actual phone number (the service uses your own cell phone number). So should Callwave ever go away, all a user has to do is the quick 'deprogramming' of the service.

The reason I chose RingCentral for my other business (in which you have to rely on them being around for a long time, because they do provide you with a phone number) is that I believe of ALL the Virtual PBX companies (RingCentral, GotVmail, etc), RingCentral is among the one to three that will be around for a long time.

-J.B. Malik
Small-Business-Phone.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, all. I use Callwave and RingCentral (both, each for a different business) and I have had no problems - ever - with each. I&#8217;ve used RingCentral for about a year now (for a non-Internet business), and I have used callwave for probably 2 years now to manage my incoming cell phone calls.</p>
<p>You can read my reviews of both RingCentral and Callwave here: <a href="http://www.small-business-phone.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.small-business-phone.com</a></p>
<p>With all due respect, I don&#8217;t think Callwave is a useless application at all, yet their speech-to-text app (as, I believe ALL such apps) needs some maturing.</p>
<p>The good thing about Callwave is that you&#8217;re not relying on them to provide you with an actual phone number (the service uses your own cell phone number). So should Callwave ever go away, all a user has to do is the quick &#8216;deprogramming&#8217; of the service.</p>
<p>The reason I chose RingCentral for my other business (in which you have to rely on them being around for a long time, because they do provide you with a phone number) is that I believe of ALL the Virtual PBX companies (RingCentral, GotVmail, etc), RingCentral is among the one to three that will be around for a long time.</p>
<p>-J.B. Malik<br />
Small-Business-Phone.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1611213</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 02:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1611213</guid>
		<description>Phil@Callwave- I'm sure everyone reading these posts can appreciate your candor. But, there is no need to punk out anybody. The market will eventually pick the winner. Fact of the matter is this new offering as well as yours (CallWave) is cute and nothing more. It's not like you have developed a killer application, and yes I can't believe GotVoice got funded in the first place. Please don't take this the wrong way, but Callwave has been a disaster as a public company with little vision, innovation and direction from the executive leadership team (though I see you now have a new CEO). If I was Callwave I would be more concerned with a company such as Ringcentral or Kall8  putting you out of business. As a matter of fact may be you guys should acquire an established Virtual PBX company to help ramp your revenues so your stock price starts to exceed your book value.

Disclosure - I DO NOT work at any of the companies mentioned, but I did stay at Holiday Express last night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="mailto:Phil@Callwave-">Phil@Callwave-</a> I&#8217;m sure everyone reading these posts can appreciate your candor. But, there is no need to punk out anybody. The market will eventually pick the winner. Fact of the matter is this new offering as well as yours (CallWave) is cute and nothing more. It&#8217;s not like you have developed a killer application, and yes I can&#8217;t believe GotVoice got funded in the first place. Please don&#8217;t take this the wrong way, but Callwave has been a disaster as a public company with little vision, innovation and direction from the executive leadership team (though I see you now have a new CEO). If I was Callwave I would be more concerned with a company such as Ringcentral or Kall8  putting you out of business. As a matter of fact may be you guys should acquire an established Virtual PBX company to help ramp your revenues so your stock price starts to exceed your book value.</p>
<p>Disclosure - I DO NOT work at any of the companies mentioned, but I did stay at Holiday Express last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil @ CallWave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610831</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil @ CallWave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 19:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610831</guid>
		<description>The avatar feature is quite interesting and I'm glad to see GotVoice entering the speech-to-text transcription business. Competition is always healthy for further enhancements in technology. Due to the inability of most software to analyze and understand the nuances of multiple vocal patterns, there is still room for improvement in each company. Even those listed above, including GotVoice, Simulscribe,  and CallWave, cannot claim to have a perfect answer to the problem. Most, including Simulscribe and Gotvoice, use a combination of software analysis and human transcription to deliver a quality user experience.

For transparency's sake, I think it's only fair to announce that I'm a product manager at CallWave. At CallWave, we prefer to be upfront with our user's when posting to forums and blogs, to avoid looking like a satisfied customer who happens to really like a product. Unlike a few posters above, namely DSB, we pride ourselves on being upfront about our reactive promotion.

The same word for word response was given by DSB on a very similar post today for GotVoice.  http://www.startupreporter.com/?p=235

I see nothing wrong with touting the benefits of a product when given the chance, nor do I see anything wrong with addressing misgivings about a product's downsides, but I do believe there is something wrong with not addressing yourself as an agent of the company you are representing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The avatar feature is quite interesting and I&#8217;m glad to see GotVoice entering the speech-to-text transcription business. Competition is always healthy for further enhancements in technology. Due to the inability of most software to analyze and understand the nuances of multiple vocal patterns, there is still room for improvement in each company. Even those listed above, including GotVoice, Simulscribe,  and CallWave, cannot claim to have a perfect answer to the problem. Most, including Simulscribe and Gotvoice, use a combination of software analysis and human transcription to deliver a quality user experience.</p>
<p>For transparency&#8217;s sake, I think it&#8217;s only fair to announce that I&#8217;m a product manager at CallWave. At CallWave, we prefer to be upfront with our user&#8217;s when posting to forums and blogs, to avoid looking like a satisfied customer who happens to really like a product. Unlike a few posters above, namely DSB, we pride ourselves on being upfront about our reactive promotion.</p>
<p>The same word for word response was given by DSB on a very similar post today for GotVoice.  <a href="http://www.startupreporter.com/?p=235" rel="nofollow">http://www.startupreporter.com/?p=235</a></p>
<p>I see nothing wrong with touting the benefits of a product when given the chance, nor do I see anything wrong with addressing misgivings about a product&#8217;s downsides, but I do believe there is something wrong with not addressing yourself as an agent of the company you are representing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Wilsch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610665</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Wilsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610665</guid>
		<description>Seems kind of expensive for disabled people, whom I'd could see using this (a friend's father who had a stroke for example and has a hard time typing).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems kind of expensive for disabled people, whom I&#8217;d could see using this (a friend&#8217;s father who had a stroke for example and has a hard time typing).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610651</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610651</guid>
		<description>#5 said ...."There’s something to be said about listening to the voice of your customers, investors and business associates that could never be replaced by a text solution".

Nobody will argue with you here. But, you being a CEO, you're probably tied up in meetings all day. and since you can't answer your cell phone while seating  in those meetings then the text version makes sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>#5 said &#8230;.&#8221;There’s something to be said about listening to the voice of your customers, investors and business associates that could never be replaced by a text solution&#8221;.</p>
<p>Nobody will argue with you here. But, you being a CEO, you&#8217;re probably tied up in meetings all day. and since you can&#8217;t answer your cell phone while seating  in those meetings then the text version makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shaival</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610593</link>
		<dc:creator>Shaival</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 16:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610593</guid>
		<description>Visual Voicemail has numerous applications, as well as personalization features.  Hats off to Curt, Bruce and team at GotVoice.  

Factual Change:  The speaking avatar platform is powered by Voki, not SitePal.  Both are products of Oddcast in NYC, but Voki is the consumer speaking avatar platform developed for social networks, blogs and communities as a whole.
Check it out at www.voki.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Visual Voicemail has numerous applications, as well as personalization features.  Hats off to Curt, Bruce and team at GotVoice.  </p>
<p>Factual Change:  The speaking avatar platform is powered by Voki, not SitePal.  Both are products of Oddcast in NYC, but Voki is the consumer speaking avatar platform developed for social networks, blogs and communities as a whole.<br />
Check it out at <a href="http://www.voki.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.voki.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DSB</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610466</link>
		<dc:creator>DSB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 14:09:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610466</guid>
		<description>Nothing new here - these guys are way late to market. Voicemail-to-text has been available through SimulScribe for years. SimulScribe has near perfect transcription accuracy for reading mobile, home and work voicemail. SimulScribe is offering a 30 day free trial at: https://apps.simulscribe.com/signup/a/simulscribe30</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing new here - these guys are way late to market. Voicemail-to-text has been available through SimulScribe for years. SimulScribe has near perfect transcription accuracy for reading mobile, home and work voicemail. SimulScribe is offering a 30 day free trial at: <a href="https://apps.simulscribe.com/signup/a/simulscribe30" rel="nofollow">https://apps.simulscribe.com/signup/a/simulscribe30</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Voices.com CEO</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610452</link>
		<dc:creator>Voices.com CEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610452</guid>
		<description>Our corporate phone system simply sends MP3's as file attachments from the phone server.  I prefer hearing the intonation of the person who called me rather than reading a text message.  

There's something to be said about listening to the voice of your customers, investors and business associates that could never be replaced by a text solution.

Furthermore, if the person sending the message wanted me to receive a text message, wouldn't they just send me an email?

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our corporate phone system simply sends MP3&#8217;s as file attachments from the phone server.  I prefer hearing the intonation of the person who called me rather than reading a text message.  </p>
<p>There&#8217;s something to be said about listening to the voice of your customers, investors and business associates that could never be replaced by a text solution.</p>
<p>Furthermore, if the person sending the message wanted me to receive a text message, wouldn&#8217;t they just send me an email?</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AsherSmasher</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610393</link>
		<dc:creator>AsherSmasher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610393</guid>
		<description>Nick, do you know about SimulScribe? They offer voicemail-to-text services. The entire transcription is emailed to you along with the original voicemail audio...which SpinVox and CallWave don't offer. They also have a visual voicemail application that lets you listen to and read voicemail from your handheld, which not even the iPhone offers. SimulScribe is awesome....fab-u-lous!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, do you know about SimulScribe? They offer voicemail-to-text services. The entire transcription is emailed to you along with the original voicemail audio&#8230;which SpinVox and CallWave don&#8217;t offer. They also have a visual voicemail application that lets you listen to and read voicemail from your handheld, which not even the iPhone offers. SimulScribe is awesome&#8230;.fab-u-lous!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610007</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 06:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1610007</guid>
		<description>Heretic - Many of these services offering speech-to-text are actually 3rd party technology sewn together.  GotVoice is a good service but gets expensive if you're getting lots of voicemails - in testing beware of long delays in message notification during peak hours.   

I've been using something similar for abut 9 months that's free called YouMail (http://www.youmail.com) that I also highly recommend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heretic - Many of these services offering speech-to-text are actually 3rd party technology sewn together.  GotVoice is a good service but gets expensive if you&#8217;re getting lots of voicemails - in testing beware of long delays in message notification during peak hours.   </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been using something similar for abut 9 months that&#8217;s free called YouMail (http://www.youmail.com) that I also highly recommend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Electric State</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1609980</link>
		<dc:creator>Electric State</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 05:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1609980</guid>
		<description>Man...I wish transcription as an option could be seamlessly integrated into my iPhone's visual voicemail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man&#8230;I wish transcription as an option could be seamlessly integrated into my iPhone&#8217;s visual voicemail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heretic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1609836</link>
		<dc:creator>Heretic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 03:44:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/10/gotvoice-adds-talking-bears-and-speech-to-text-transcription/#comment-1609836</guid>
		<description>I wonder how they do the speech-to-text.  I'm not aware of any systems, even experimental, that can do a fair job with compressed 8x8.  You laugh at the dancing bear, but this is the killer feature.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how they do the speech-to-text.  I&#8217;m not aware of any systems, even experimental, that can do a fair job with compressed 8&#215;8.  You laugh at the dancing bear, but this is the killer feature.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.065 seconds -->
