<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breast Isn&#8217;t Best On Facebook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cracked Nipple Cream</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-2035833</link>
		<dc:creator>Cracked Nipple Cream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 16:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-2035833</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Cracked Nipple Cream...&lt;/strong&gt;

Some mothers have difficulties when feeding their baby.  Sometimes the nipple can become sore and cracked.  In this condition breastfeeding can be extremely painful and a quick and fast remedy is needed.  Cracked Nipple Cream is one of these remedies....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Cracked Nipple Cream&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Some mothers have difficulties when feeding their baby.  Sometimes the nipple can become sore and cracked.  In this condition breastfeeding can be extremely painful and a quick and fast remedy is needed.  Cracked Nipple Cream is one of these remedies&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zac Echola</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1622684</link>
		<dc:creator>Zac Echola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Sep 2007 06:16:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1622684</guid>
		<description>Many of you people are idiots and apparently unable to read beyond this post. Or think critically.

The photos were posted in a support group for breastfeeding. Of course posting photos of women breastfeeding is going to make sense in a Facebook group about breastfeeding.

Just like posting sexualized photos of women in the Facebook group "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa sex sex sex boobs boobs boobs tits and ass we are horny teenagers" makes sense in the context of the group.

Facebook is wrong on so many levels here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many of you people are idiots and apparently unable to read beyond this post. Or think critically.</p>
<p>The photos were posted in a support group for breastfeeding. Of course posting photos of women breastfeeding is going to make sense in a Facebook group about breastfeeding.</p>
<p>Just like posting sexualized photos of women in the Facebook group &#8220;aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa sex sex sex boobs boobs boobs tits and ass we are horny teenagers&#8221; makes sense in the context of the group.</p>
<p>Facebook is wrong on so many levels here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacqueline</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1618617</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacqueline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 15:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1618617</guid>
		<description>What a lot of you don't seem to understand is that many of the photos which were taken down didn't show the breast AT ALL. To many people, it would have simply looked like a mother holding her baby who was facing her chest. (OMG THAT'S SO WRONG!)
So I find a picture of myself with my baby and post it and that's obscene? Sorry, what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a lot of you don&#8217;t seem to understand is that many of the photos which were taken down didn&#8217;t show the breast AT ALL. To many people, it would have simply looked like a mother holding her baby who was facing her chest. (OMG THAT&#8217;S SO WRONG!)<br />
So I find a picture of myself with my baby and post it and that&#8217;s obscene? Sorry, what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smokering</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1616772</link>
		<dc:creator>Smokering</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1616772</guid>
		<description>To the 'why would anyone want to see a pic of a kid breastfeeding' posters:  Well, newborns breastfeed a LOT.  Breastfeeding a new baby can be literally a fulltime--8 hours plus a day--job.  Given that people usually post pics of their babies to show friends and family what their lives are like, doesn't it make sense to represent what their baby does for 8 hours a day?  Photos of the baby sleeping get kinda old if that's all you show.  Babies tend to look adorable breastfeeding, and it's often the few times they have their eyes open during the newborn stage.  One might ask: Who wants to see a picture of your 12-year-old eating?  Answer: someone who cares about your family.  For the same reason, an absent grandparent/friend/family member is likely to want to see your newborn eating--because it's an important part of his life!

I don't buy that lactivists post pics of themselves breastfeeding simply in order to normalise it.  That may be one reason for a select few, but in general women post breastfeeding pics for the same reason they post any other baby pic--this is what my baby did today, isn't she cute, look how fast she's growing.  The exact same reasons a mother might post pics of her baby being bottlefed!

As for Facebook, I recognise it's 'allowed' to make as many ridiculous rules as it likes... voluntary joining, etc.  That doesn't alter the fact that the rule is stupid.  Breastfeeding is not obscene.  Breasts are not sexual in a breastfeeding context; they are the best way to give optimal nutrition, heightened immunity and easily-absorbed vitamins to your child.  Get over it, people!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To the &#8216;why would anyone want to see a pic of a kid breastfeeding&#8217; posters:  Well, newborns breastfeed a LOT.  Breastfeeding a new baby can be literally a fulltime&#8211;8 hours plus a day&#8211;job.  Given that people usually post pics of their babies to show friends and family what their lives are like, doesn&#8217;t it make sense to represent what their baby does for 8 hours a day?  Photos of the baby sleeping get kinda old if that&#8217;s all you show.  Babies tend to look adorable breastfeeding, and it&#8217;s often the few times they have their eyes open during the newborn stage.  One might ask: Who wants to see a picture of your 12-year-old eating?  Answer: someone who cares about your family.  For the same reason, an absent grandparent/friend/family member is likely to want to see your newborn eating&#8211;because it&#8217;s an important part of his life!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t buy that lactivists post pics of themselves breastfeeding simply in order to normalise it.  That may be one reason for a select few, but in general women post breastfeeding pics for the same reason they post any other baby pic&#8211;this is what my baby did today, isn&#8217;t she cute, look how fast she&#8217;s growing.  The exact same reasons a mother might post pics of her baby being bottlefed!</p>
<p>As for Facebook, I recognise it&#8217;s &#8216;allowed&#8217; to make as many ridiculous rules as it likes&#8230; voluntary joining, etc.  That doesn&#8217;t alter the fact that the rule is stupid.  Breastfeeding is not obscene.  Breasts are not sexual in a breastfeeding context; they are the best way to give optimal nutrition, heightened immunity and easily-absorbed vitamins to your child.  Get over it, people!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zaddeo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1613519</link>
		<dc:creator>zaddeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 19:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1613519</guid>
		<description>FACEBOOK IS FULL OF PORN. just type in breast, F---, or anything else.  Why would lactivists want their breast feeding instructions posted here????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FACEBOOK IS FULL OF PORN. just type in breast, F&#8212;, or anything else.  Why would lactivists want their breast feeding instructions posted here????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laurel Papworth</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1608235</link>
		<dc:creator>Laurel Papworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 03:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1608235</guid>
		<description>The issue is around two foci and the lack of tools to manage them: identity and core values. Identity says we don't know if the group is genuinely women breastfeeding or men with a nipple fetish or kids stuffing around a la National Geographic fotos being passed around. We don't know if the "beautiful baby/child foto" groups online are genuinely doting parents or paedophiles sharing pictures. No nudity goes a long way to removing this issue. And brings us to core values. While californians might love posting up still shots from Californication, artwork by Jeff Koons, breastfeeding by mothers in the name of entertainment, art and education, social networks online do not share those forward thinking values. I mean the members, not the hosts.  And if you want to protect your members, institute a 'no nudity, no exception policy'. It's not prudity, it's recognition of the limitations of technology and protection. 
I am also reluctant to believe that out of 30 million global members, 8000 of whom are in breastfeeding groups of which there are around 150, this member Karen was picked on for no reason. If a moderator wants to get power-trippy, there's plenty of people in the bondage (BDSM) groups to send nasty emails to. The email said something about "Additionally, we do not allow users to send threatening, obscene, and harassing messages. Unsolicited messages will also not be tolerated. " Is there something we don't know? This situation has nothing to do with beastfeeding and everything to do with establishing appropriate guidelines and managing behaviour in online communities. By the way, some paedophile parties have legal standing in some countries. If you allow breastfeeding women or nudist beach parties, or whatever to push a political agenda, are you going to allow paedophiles too? Can you say no, because one fits your core values (or you don't care either way) but not the other?  Only a fool would open that door. No nudity, no exceptions. (Glad they took that banner ad down. :))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The issue is around two foci and the lack of tools to manage them: identity and core values. Identity says we don&#8217;t know if the group is genuinely women breastfeeding or men with a nipple fetish or kids stuffing around a la National Geographic fotos being passed around. We don&#8217;t know if the &#8220;beautiful baby/child foto&#8221; groups online are genuinely doting parents or paedophiles sharing pictures. No nudity goes a long way to removing this issue. And brings us to core values. While californians might love posting up still shots from Californication, artwork by Jeff Koons, breastfeeding by mothers in the name of entertainment, art and education, social networks online do not share those forward thinking values. I mean the members, not the hosts.  And if you want to protect your members, institute a &#8216;no nudity, no exception policy&#8217;. It&#8217;s not prudity, it&#8217;s recognition of the limitations of technology and protection.<br />
I am also reluctant to believe that out of 30 million global members, 8000 of whom are in breastfeeding groups of which there are around 150, this member Karen was picked on for no reason. If a moderator wants to get power-trippy, there&#8217;s plenty of people in the bondage (BDSM) groups to send nasty emails to. The email said something about &#8220;Additionally, we do not allow users to send threatening, obscene, and harassing messages. Unsolicited messages will also not be tolerated. &#8221; Is there something we don&#8217;t know? This situation has nothing to do with beastfeeding and everything to do with establishing appropriate guidelines and managing behaviour in online communities. By the way, some paedophile parties have legal standing in some countries. If you allow breastfeeding women or nudist beach parties, or whatever to push a political agenda, are you going to allow paedophiles too? Can you say no, because one fits your core values (or you don&#8217;t care either way) but not the other?  Only a fool would open that door. No nudity, no exceptions. (Glad they took that banner ad down. :))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bapakeghozan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1608151</link>
		<dc:creator>bapakeghozan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 02:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1608151</guid>
		<description>ooooh my God.

With you see on latch on Mr. facebook?

very bad condition

keep breastfeeding

warm regards,
bapakeghozan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ooooh my God.</p>
<p>With you see on latch on Mr. facebook?</p>
<p>very bad condition</p>
<p>keep breastfeeding</p>
<p>warm regards,<br />
bapakeghozan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breastfeeding Mummy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1608116</link>
		<dc:creator>Breastfeeding Mummy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 01:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1608116</guid>
		<description>I have 2 girls - a 2 1/2 yo and an almost 4 month old.  I breastfed my first and am currently breastfeeding my second.  I have no problem with women breastfeeding in public - after all, I do it myself - but I do have a problem when some of them feel that they need to expose their whole breast or chest while they are doing it.  There are obviously people who feel uncomfortable with the breastfeeding in public issue and really, there's no hassle with just throwing a cloth nappy/diaper or a wrap over one's shoulder while feeding baby.  Feeding in public can be done discretely (with or without the wrap) and I think that we can all be sensitive to other people's feelings and opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have 2 girls - a 2 1/2 yo and an almost 4 month old.  I breastfed my first and am currently breastfeeding my second.  I have no problem with women breastfeeding in public - after all, I do it myself - but I do have a problem when some of them feel that they need to expose their whole breast or chest while they are doing it.  There are obviously people who feel uncomfortable with the breastfeeding in public issue and really, there&#8217;s no hassle with just throwing a cloth nappy/diaper or a wrap over one&#8217;s shoulder while feeding baby.  Feeding in public can be done discretely (with or without the wrap) and I think that we can all be sensitive to other people&#8217;s feelings and opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enzo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1607667</link>
		<dc:creator>Enzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1607667</guid>
		<description>And the lactivists attack Facebook: 
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=1171030&#38;id=829140105&#38;op=1&#38;view=all&#38;subj=2517126532&#38;aid=-1&#38;oid=2517126532</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the lactivists attack Facebook:<br />
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=1171030&amp;id=829140105&amp;op=1&amp;view=all&amp;subj=2517126532&amp;aid=-1&amp;oid=2517126532" rel="nofollow">http://www.facebook.com/photo......2517126532</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alfonso Jiménez</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1607318</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfonso Jiménez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 10:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1607318</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;La teta de Facebook...&lt;/strong&gt;

Hace unos días saltó una disputa entre lactivistas y la política interna de Facebook, a causa de la eliminación de fotografías donde aparecían bebés mamando de sus madres. Facebook ha eliminado por completo todas las fotografías de usuarias dan...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>La teta de Facebook&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Hace unos días saltó una disputa entre lactivistas y la política interna de Facebook, a causa de la eliminación de fotografías donde aparecían bebés mamando de sus madres. Facebook ha eliminado por completo todas las fotografías de usuarias dan&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ImageBlox : Free Image Hosting</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1607138</link>
		<dc:creator>ImageBlox : Free Image Hosting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 07:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1607138</guid>
		<description>Vow amazing .. maximum no of posts possible on this topic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vow amazing .. maximum no of posts possible on this topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1606920</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 03:27:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1606920</guid>
		<description>ummmmm gooood!

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ummmmm gooood!</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIKE</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1606595</link>
		<dc:creator>MIKE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 21:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1606595</guid>
		<description>Fact is none of the kids over at Facebook are old enough to be parents and don't understand how beautiful and vital breastfeeding is for babies.

As they all become rich and can afford to settle down and have families of their own the realities of this act will hit them.

I do appreciate their stance on adult oriented crap but this sounds like they just don't understand the subject.

Nice post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fact is none of the kids over at Facebook are old enough to be parents and don&#8217;t understand how beautiful and vital breastfeeding is for babies.</p>
<p>As they all become rich and can afford to settle down and have families of their own the realities of this act will hit them.</p>
<p>I do appreciate their stance on adult oriented crap but this sounds like they just don&#8217;t understand the subject.</p>
<p>Nice post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mommy Blawger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1606593</link>
		<dc:creator>The Mommy Blawger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 21:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1606593</guid>
		<description>"What about complaining about people dying because of war, because of unsafe job place, because of accidents, because of pollution?"

According to UNICEF, if infants worldwide were fed only mother's milk for their first six months, at least 1.3 million lives a year would be saved. Babies in the US who are breastfed are far less likely to die or be injured from ANY CAUSE, including disease, accident, and abuse. Not to mention that a woman's chances of getting breast cancer and other reproductive cancers are greatly reduced when she breastfeeds. That's a lot of people NOT dying because lactivists are passionate about this issue and trying to re-normalize breastfeeding in our culture.

It's not about your right not to be offended. It's not even about a woman's right to breastfeed. It's about a baby's right to receive biologically appropriate nutrition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What about complaining about people dying because of war, because of unsafe job place, because of accidents, because of pollution?&#8221;</p>
<p>According to UNICEF, if infants worldwide were fed only mother&#8217;s milk for their first six months, at least 1.3 million lives a year would be saved. Babies in the US who are breastfed are far less likely to die or be injured from ANY CAUSE, including disease, accident, and abuse. Not to mention that a woman&#8217;s chances of getting breast cancer and other reproductive cancers are greatly reduced when she breastfeeds. That&#8217;s a lot of people NOT dying because lactivists are passionate about this issue and trying to re-normalize breastfeeding in our culture.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not about your right not to be offended. It&#8217;s not even about a woman&#8217;s right to breastfeed. It&#8217;s about a baby&#8217;s right to receive biologically appropriate nutrition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andray</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1606530</link>
		<dc:creator>Andray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 20:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1606530</guid>
		<description>Join the discussion on Skinship:
http://skinship.typepad.com/skinship/2007/09/photos-of-babie.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Join the discussion on Skinship:<br />
<a href="http://skinship.typepad.com/skinship/2007/09/photos-of-babie.html" rel="nofollow">http://skinship.typepad.com/sk.....babie.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andray</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1606529</link>
		<dc:creator>Andray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 20:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1606529</guid>
		<description>Our society is degrading at an unprecedented pace: we don't mind watching naked women and men appearing in all media promoting all kinds of products, and we tolerate violence as a genre, but we do mind watching babies eat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our society is degrading at an unprecedented pace: we don&#8217;t mind watching naked women and men appearing in all media promoting all kinds of products, and we tolerate violence as a genre, but we do mind watching babies eat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Huge Facebook Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1606194</link>
		<dc:creator>A Huge Facebook Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1606194</guid>
		<description>War still going, people still dying. That doesn't matter a jot Olivier. Breastfeeding is more topical for us than unknown Iraqees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>War still going, people still dying. That doesn&#8217;t matter a jot Olivier. Breastfeeding is more topical for us than unknown Iraqees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605658</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 11:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605658</guid>
		<description>ENOUGH !. can you do a Digg like bury on this idiot story?

Geez</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ENOUGH !. can you do a Digg like bury on this idiot story?</p>
<p>Geez</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605541</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 11:12:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605541</guid>
		<description>Chris!! Wow - thanks for your comment! Obviously you are one of those rare people who actually think about things that make them uncomfortable before they react and I appreciate that a lot.
I am also kind of uncomfortable with breastfeeding in public... but since having a baby who doesn't tolerate formula well, I have had to learn to deal with it.
I HATE doing it in public because of the looks I get (and I just don't like exposing my boobs in public either!) but sometimes there is just no choice - it's cruel (and inconsiderate) to let a hungry baby scream, and most moms don't have the luxury of staying at home all day even if we did want to (which most probably don't).
It makes me feel a lot better about it being around people who understand this... hopefully as we evolve, more people will think of it the way you do.
It's really kind of silly to make such a big deal about it. If more people actually put some thought into why it bugs them, we'd stop feeling so uncomfortable about such a natural thing.
thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris!! Wow - thanks for your comment! Obviously you are one of those rare people who actually think about things that make them uncomfortable before they react and I appreciate that a lot.<br />
I am also kind of uncomfortable with breastfeeding in public&#8230; but since having a baby who doesn&#8217;t tolerate formula well, I have had to learn to deal with it.<br />
I HATE doing it in public because of the looks I get (and I just don&#8217;t like exposing my boobs in public either!) but sometimes there is just no choice - it&#8217;s cruel (and inconsiderate) to let a hungry baby scream, and most moms don&#8217;t have the luxury of staying at home all day even if we did want to (which most probably don&#8217;t).<br />
It makes me feel a lot better about it being around people who understand this&#8230; hopefully as we evolve, more people will think of it the way you do.<br />
It&#8217;s really kind of silly to make such a big deal about it. If more people actually put some thought into why it bugs them, we&#8217;d stop feeling so uncomfortable about such a natural thing.<br />
thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wings On Some Wheels</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605521</link>
		<dc:creator>Wings On Some Wheels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 11:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605521</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Tits Up...&lt;/strong&gt;

It looks like an argument has broken out between Facebook and breast feeding activists over pictures of breast feeding&#160;babies uploaded to Facebook.
Facebook has taken down pictures of users breast feeding, and has even gone as far as banning users...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Tits Up&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>It looks like an argument has broken out between Facebook and breast feeding activists over pictures of breast feeding&nbsp;babies uploaded to Facebook.<br />
Facebook has taken down pictures of users breast feeding, and has even gone as far as banning users&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: raqqash</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605451</link>
		<dc:creator>raqqash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 10:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605451</guid>
		<description>Oh my, prudishness conquers the world. This world is really going mad. Especially when on tv and the net is just full and choking of tits and asses and legs exposed for commercial purpose, and what? People complains about breast feeding. What about complaing about people dying because of war, because of unsafe job place, because of accidents, because of pollution?
No of course that would be too uncomfortable. Sex issues are so much more fashionable.

Oh well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh my, prudishness conquers the world. This world is really going mad. Especially when on tv and the net is just full and choking of tits and asses and legs exposed for commercial purpose, and what? People complains about breast feeding. What about complaing about people dying because of war, because of unsafe job place, because of accidents, because of pollution?<br />
No of course that would be too uncomfortable. Sex issues are so much more fashionable.</p>
<p>Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605309</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 09:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605309</guid>
		<description>I'm all for breastfeeding, all my kids were breast fed.  But, why the pictures? Is there a need for pictures?  Please don't tell me they're instructional, I don't buy that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for breastfeeding, all my kids were breast fed.  But, why the pictures? Is there a need for pictures?  Please don&#8217;t tell me they&#8217;re instructional, I don&#8217;t buy that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605108</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 08:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605108</guid>
		<description>Total agreement with Ruthe.  

It's quite simple why these women are being "in your face" about breastfeeding.

There are women who would like to feed their babies in public.  These women believe they should be free to nurture their baby as they go about their daily lives (heaven forfend!).  When they attempt to do so, they get bad experiences from people who are intolerant of that activity.   Instead of shutting themselves and their infants in restrooms, or resorting to baby formula, they decide to do something about it by joining the public discourse.  They get vocal. 

All of these slippery-slope faux arguments about "men in fur suits" or "OMG! This is like allowing public masturbation!" are specious. The majority of cultures in the majority of human history tolerated public breastfeeding. A whole generation of Americans were raised with the incorrect 'medical' knowledge that breastfeeding was unhealthy and improper.  

The fact is that it was once (and still is in most places) proper for women to breastfeed in public.  Now (in America) it is not.  Women are trying to reclaim a freedom that was once theirs.  To do so, they have to be 'in your face' about it.  People become comfortable and acquainted with things they see frequently.  So 'lactivists' post pictures of themselves breastfeeding.

Honestly, I was raised in an environment where public breastfeeding was considered improper.  There's still a part of me that's uncomfortable when I see it.  You know what?  I deal.  Because by suspending my own issues (which I recognize are not 'normal' or 'natural') I contribute--in a small way--to improving our cultural environment. And I approve of people being 'in your face' about it. Because 'in your face' is how you bring new ideas to people and challenge their preconceptions.  'In your face' is how you keep the world young and learning rather than old and calcified. Which is why this thread is relevant to the tech industry--because why are we all here working on technology, if not to challenge ourselves and others to create something new and challenging?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Total agreement with Ruthe.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s quite simple why these women are being &#8220;in your face&#8221; about breastfeeding.</p>
<p>There are women who would like to feed their babies in public.  These women believe they should be free to nurture their baby as they go about their daily lives (heaven forfend!).  When they attempt to do so, they get bad experiences from people who are intolerant of that activity.   Instead of shutting themselves and their infants in restrooms, or resorting to baby formula, they decide to do something about it by joining the public discourse.  They get vocal. </p>
<p>All of these slippery-slope faux arguments about &#8220;men in fur suits&#8221; or &#8220;OMG! This is like allowing public masturbation!&#8221; are specious. The majority of cultures in the majority of human history tolerated public breastfeeding. A whole generation of Americans were raised with the incorrect &#8216;medical&#8217; knowledge that breastfeeding was unhealthy and improper.  </p>
<p>The fact is that it was once (and still is in most places) proper for women to breastfeed in public.  Now (in America) it is not.  Women are trying to reclaim a freedom that was once theirs.  To do so, they have to be &#8216;in your face&#8217; about it.  People become comfortable and acquainted with things they see frequently.  So &#8216;lactivists&#8217; post pictures of themselves breastfeeding.</p>
<p>Honestly, I was raised in an environment where public breastfeeding was considered improper.  There&#8217;s still a part of me that&#8217;s uncomfortable when I see it.  You know what?  I deal.  Because by suspending my own issues (which I recognize are not &#8216;normal&#8217; or &#8216;natural&#8217;) I contribute&#8211;in a small way&#8211;to improving our cultural environment. And I approve of people being &#8216;in your face&#8217; about it. Because &#8216;in your face&#8217; is how you bring new ideas to people and challenge their preconceptions.  &#8216;In your face&#8217; is how you keep the world young and learning rather than old and calcified. Which is why this thread is relevant to the tech industry&#8211;because why are we all here working on technology, if not to challenge ourselves and others to create something new and challenging?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Olivier</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605077</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 08:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605077</guid>
		<description>Geeez, only in america :-) 83 and counting message about breastfeeding and who's wrong who's right ....
Well at least while wasting peoples minds on stupidity, war still going, people still dying but hey ! a freaking piece of boob THAT the deal :-)

Please no offense, it just my 5 cents view from another continent, another culture.

Peace</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geeez, only in america <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> 83 and counting message about breastfeeding and who&#8217;s wrong who&#8217;s right &#8230;.<br />
Well at least while wasting peoples minds on stupidity, war still going, people still dying but hey ! a freaking piece of boob THAT the deal <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Please no offense, it just my 5 cents view from another continent, another culture.</p>
<p>Peace</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605066</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 08:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/07/breast-isnt-best-on-facebook/#comment-1605066</guid>
		<description>I said somewhere suitable. For people with common sense, that would indicate that I was referring to... somewhere suitable. Many family restaurants for example have special changing room type places to handle such needs.

And how is a restroom any less clean than a public restaurant?

But I guess taking other people's considerations into account is far too difficult for the me-first mommies of this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I said somewhere suitable. For people with common sense, that would indicate that I was referring to&#8230; somewhere suitable. Many family restaurants for example have special changing room type places to handle such needs.</p>
<p>And how is a restroom any less clean than a public restaurant?</p>
<p>But I guess taking other people&#8217;s considerations into account is far too difficult for the me-first mommies of this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.128 seconds -->
