<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook: Opening Up, But on Its Own Terms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: FBS Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Data Portability Ain&#8217;t Just A Real Estate Problem</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1752374</link>
		<dc:creator>FBS Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Data Portability Ain&#8217;t Just A Real Estate Problem</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 20:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1752374</guid>
		<description>[...] complaints being made about social network silos.  Who wants to enter their data more than once?  How can I get my data out once the data is in the silo?  What is the silo going to do with the data once they have it?  So, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] complaints being made about social network silos.  Who wants to enter their data more than once?  How can I get my data out once the data is in the silo?  What is the silo going to do with the data once they have it?  So, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Updates From Sam Jones &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook Needs to Open Up for Real</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1687273</link>
		<dc:creator>Updates From Sam Jones &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook Needs to Open Up for Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 17:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1687273</guid>
		<description>[...] it turns out that&#8217;s not going to work because first I find this TechCrunch article which points out a problem with my approach and the Facebook terms  put the final nail in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it turns out that&#8217;s not going to work because first I find this TechCrunch article which points out a problem with my approach and the Facebook terms  put the final nail in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Told ya so&#8230; Facebook adds users.setStatus() API method &#124; Technologist For Hire</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1655621</link>
		<dc:creator>Told ya so&#8230; Facebook adds users.setStatus() API method &#124; Technologist For Hire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1655621</guid>
		<description>[...] it appears that one month after Facebook asked me, and others, to remove my little cURL &#8216;hack&#8217; for updating your Facebook Status, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it appears that one month after Facebook asked me, and others, to remove my little cURL &#8216;hack&#8217; for updating your Facebook Status, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: musc@&#62; $daniele.rant &#124; Out-Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook implemented a user.setStatus API!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1654946</link>
		<dc:creator>musc@&#62; $daniele.rant &#124; Out-Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook implemented a user.setStatus API!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 05:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1654946</guid>
		<description>[...] has taken a while, some struggles, but now they finally recognized the need for federated status, and implemented a user.setStatus [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has taken a while, some struggles, but now they finally recognized the need for federated status, and implemented a user.setStatus [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Flickinger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1654098</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Flickinger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1654098</guid>
		<description>Facebook has added a users.setStatus() API method, more here: http://www.nexdot.net/blog/2007/10/01/told-ya-so-facebook-adds-userssetstatus-api-method/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facebook has added a users.setStatus() API method, more here: <a href="http://www.nexdot.net/blog/2007/10/01/told-ya-so-facebook-adds-userssetstatus-api-method/" rel="nofollow">http://www.nexdot.net/blog/200.....pi-method/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kerri</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1642284</link>
		<dc:creator>kerri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 23:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1642284</guid>
		<description>I think they should close facebook down cause its only trouble</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should close facebook down cause its only trouble</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pcal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1607046</link>
		<dc:creator>pcal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 05:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1607046</guid>
		<description>I once heard about this place where you could build any app you wanted to and you didn't have to worry about any of this stuff.  No one could tell you what you could and couldn't do.  If the app was valuable, people would come use it, simple as that.

I forget, I think maybe it was called...um..."The Internet" or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once heard about this place where you could build any app you wanted to and you didn&#8217;t have to worry about any of this stuff.  No one could tell you what you could and couldn&#8217;t do.  If the app was valuable, people would come use it, simple as that.</p>
<p>I forget, I think maybe it was called&#8230;um&#8230;&#8221;The Internet&#8221; or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Charles Morin</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1606814</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Charles Morin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 01:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1606814</guid>
		<description>Stupid me. I thought when Facebook opened up, I was gonna be able to write my own terms for their API.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stupid me. I thought when Facebook opened up, I was gonna be able to write my own terms for their API.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Catto</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1606375</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Catto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 17:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1606375</guid>
		<description>There is only one effective way to respond to this - organise a boycott of FaceBook.com.

People should boycott FaceBook by deleting their profiles and pledging never to use their service again.

We, the users, need to establish the balance of power firmly in our favour so that no online organisation EVER acts in an undemocratic dictatorial manner.

We need to send a message that ANY online web site that seeks our support and participation needs to listen to US, not dictate terms to us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is only one effective way to respond to this - organise a boycott of FaceBook.com.</p>
<p>People should boycott FaceBook by deleting their profiles and pledging never to use their service again.</p>
<p>We, the users, need to establish the balance of power firmly in our favour so that no online organisation EVER acts in an undemocratic dictatorial manner.</p>
<p>We need to send a message that ANY online web site that seeks our support and participation needs to listen to US, not dictate terms to us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two Cent Daily</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1606362</link>
		<dc:creator>Two Cent Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 17:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1606362</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Facebook Ticking Everyone Off...&lt;/strong&gt;

I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one who is frustrated by the closed doors that Facebook hides behind. They will open them a little, but not enough to reduce their page views. This is so frustrating. I would love to use Twitter to update my stat...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Facebook Ticking Everyone Off&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad to see that I&#8217;m not the only one who is frustrated by the closed doors that Facebook hides behind. They will open them a little, but not enough to reduce their page views. This is so frustrating. I would love to use Twitter to update my stat&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Litsky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1602525</link>
		<dc:creator>David Litsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1602525</guid>
		<description>@Bob the Builder

Why does everyone want facebook to be so open? With all the open social networks, isn't there room for one that leaves its doors closed to the outside world? Yes it is one of the biggest, but maybe that's the reason...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bob the Builder</p>
<p>Why does everyone want facebook to be so open? With all the open social networks, isn&#8217;t there room for one that leaves its doors closed to the outside world? Yes it is one of the biggest, but maybe that&#8217;s the reason&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob the Builder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1602424</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob the Builder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1602424</guid>
		<description>Whoops... I knew that wouldn't work... 

Here is a link http://utilitybase.com/paste/4934</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoops&#8230; I knew that wouldn&#8217;t work&#8230; </p>
<p>Here is a link <a href="http://utilitybase.com/paste/4934" rel="nofollow">http://utilitybase.com/paste/4934</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob the Builder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1602414</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob the Builder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 15:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1602414</guid>
		<description>Here is the 36 lines fb doesn't want you to see... this code is definately dangerous to their business....

'.ucfirst($first_name).'/', $page, $form_id);
	curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS,'post_form_id='.$form_id[1].'&#38;status='.urlencode($status).'&#38;update=Update');
	curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, 'http://m.facebook.com/home.php');
curl_exec($ch);
?&#62;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the 36 lines fb doesn&#8217;t want you to see&#8230; this code is definately dangerous to their business&#8230;.</p>
<p>&#8216;.ucfirst($first_name).&#8217;/', $page, $form_id);<br />
	curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_POSTFIELDS,&#8217;post_form_id=&#8217;.$form_id[1].&#8217;&amp;status=&#8217;.urlencode($status).&#8217;&amp;update=Update&#8217;);<br />
	curl_setopt($ch, CURLOPT_URL, &#8216;http://m.facebook.com/home.php&#8217;);<br />
curl_exec($ch);<br />
?&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1602240</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 14:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1602240</guid>
		<description>FaceBook is obsolete!
Look for MS ProfileScroll, coming soon
http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FaceBook is obsolete!<br />
Look for MS ProfileScroll, coming soon<br />
<a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Litsky</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1602194</link>
		<dc:creator>David Litsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 13:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1602194</guid>
		<description>I can't comment on the development aspect of this post, but from a business perspective, they are doing what they can to protect the security of their members. One of the reasons I like facebook is that it is a closed environment where I can connect and re-connect with people that I have met through the years. Outside a few of the social media "rockstars", I know all of my friends from either high school, college, after college, and etc. I have more personal information listed on my facebook profile than I do on other websites, because it is isn't getting mashed up and strewn about the web. 

While I understand that many of you want an open social web, there are a lot of people that want to control what can and cannot be seen by others. I grew up on closed, automotive webforums because privacy is important to me. Also, I believe that not every conversation is meant to be seen because it can upset the balance of the community. Think about the "mods corner" on the old webforums. 

I use twitter, ma.gnolia, viddler, and etc but I also use facebook because it gives me that "closed door".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t comment on the development aspect of this post, but from a business perspective, they are doing what they can to protect the security of their members. One of the reasons I like facebook is that it is a closed environment where I can connect and re-connect with people that I have met through the years. Outside a few of the social media &#8220;rockstars&#8221;, I know all of my friends from either high school, college, after college, and etc. I have more personal information listed on my facebook profile than I do on other websites, because it is isn&#8217;t getting mashed up and strewn about the web. </p>
<p>While I understand that many of you want an open social web, there are a lot of people that want to control what can and cannot be seen by others. I grew up on closed, automotive webforums because privacy is important to me. Also, I believe that not every conversation is meant to be seen because it can upset the balance of the community. Think about the &#8220;mods corner&#8221; on the old webforums. </p>
<p>I use twitter, ma.gnolia, viddler, and etc but I also use facebook because it gives me that &#8220;closed door&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M1ke</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1601606</link>
		<dc:creator>M1ke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 10:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1601606</guid>
		<description>I myself have developed a tool that allows me to update my Facebook status with Twitter, using an XML parser and the cURL code that this article relates to. It's good because I just run a feed aggregator on my server that grabs my Twitter feed and posts to Facebook. I'm tempted to post my script for all to download on my website, maybe get a bit of a Digg effect going to make sure Facebook can't stop it spreading. Thing is, they might still just ban my account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself have developed a tool that allows me to update my Facebook status with Twitter, using an XML parser and the cURL code that this article relates to. It&#8217;s good because I just run a feed aggregator on my server that grabs my Twitter feed and posts to Facebook. I&#8217;m tempted to post my script for all to download on my website, maybe get a bit of a Digg effect going to make sure Facebook can&#8217;t stop it spreading. Thing is, they might still just ban my account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: browse</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1601113</link>
		<dc:creator>browse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 07:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1601113</guid>
		<description>I'm still annoyed that they got rid of the contact exporter.  I finally have a phone that can accept vCards and no way to get them in there.

I've been considering using the same mobile Facebook site to build my own vCard exporter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still annoyed that they got rid of the contact exporter.  I finally have a phone that can accept vCards and no way to get them in there.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been considering using the same mobile Facebook site to build my own vCard exporter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Abundo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600798</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Abundo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:22:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600798</guid>
		<description>All social networks are inherently retarded. Even the smartest social network has a bit of retard in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All social networks are inherently retarded. Even the smartest social network has a bit of retard in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600754</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 05:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600754</guid>
		<description>I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one who is frustrated by the closed doors that Facebook hides behind.  They will open them a little, but not enough to reduce their page views.  This is so frustrating.  I would love to use Twitter to update my status, but I can't. 

I even live in the United States, but I can't update from mobile because Facebook allows everyone except T-Mobile to use its mobile services.  Arrrghhh!!

I use Facebook because that's where my friends are, but I can't stand not having some of the comforts that an API should allow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see that I&#8217;m not the only one who is frustrated by the closed doors that Facebook hides behind.  They will open them a little, but not enough to reduce their page views.  This is so frustrating.  I would love to use Twitter to update my status, but I can&#8217;t. </p>
<p>I even live in the United States, but I can&#8217;t update from mobile because Facebook allows everyone except T-Mobile to use its mobile services.  Arrrghhh!!</p>
<p>I use Facebook because that&#8217;s where my friends are, but I can&#8217;t stand not having some of the comforts that an API should allow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600450</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 02:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600450</guid>
		<description>It is pretty clear that FB is just making everyone know what is acceptable.  Perhaps they should hire someone for quality control and not have programmers sending off threats against users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is pretty clear that FB is just making everyone know what is acceptable.  Perhaps they should hire someone for quality control and not have programmers sending off threats against users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: allYourFaces ourbelongToUs</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600433</link>
		<dc:creator>allYourFaces ourbelongToUs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600433</guid>
		<description>get a life.. stop using this  facecrap site and STOP promoting this social network junk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>get a life.. stop using this  facecrap site and STOP promoting this social network junk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600403</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:29:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600403</guid>
		<description>In my opinion, FB has always sucked. CWOT. Beyond that, the reason they are opening up is because of the flattening in their growth. I'm sure they'll begin building lots of subdomains similar to MySpace (their only avenue of monetization). I think it's pretty apparent that user profile pages are for the most part unmonetizable. They don't want you to know that though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion, FB has always sucked. CWOT. Beyond that, the reason they are opening up is because of the flattening in their growth. I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll begin building lots of subdomains similar to MySpace (their only avenue of monetization). I think it&#8217;s pretty apparent that user profile pages are for the most part unmonetizable. They don&#8217;t want you to know that though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600343</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600343</guid>
		<description>Sweet, this got picked up by the NY Times: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/06/closing-the-open-facebook/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sweet, this got picked up by the NY Times: <a href="http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/09/06/closing-the-open-facebook/" rel="nofollow">http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/.....-facebook/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coleman Foley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600212</link>
		<dc:creator>Coleman Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600212</guid>
		<description>facebook should have left him alone</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>facebook should have left him alone</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Davidsson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600146</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Davidsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 22:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/06/facebook-opening-up-but-on-its-own-terms/#comment-1600146</guid>
		<description>I had a similar encounter over a year ago about a Greasemonkey script which I detailed on my blog: http://martindavidsson.blogspot.com/2005/08/facebook-vcards-ii.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a similar encounter over a year ago about a Greasemonkey script which I detailed on my blog: <a href="http://martindavidsson.blogspot.com/2005/08/facebook-vcards-ii.html" rel="nofollow">http://martindavidsson.blogspo.....ds-ii.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.092 seconds -->
