<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nirvanix Launches To Compete With Amazon S3 Storage Service</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 21:32:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2594352</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 04:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-2594352</guid>
		<description>why doesnt techcrunch want to continue to cover the nirvanix debacle?

http://thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/011309_Nirvanix_Names_Jim_Zierick_CEO

hopefully jim zierick plans on firing all the crooks that were there!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why doesnt techcrunch want to continue to cover the nirvanix debacle?</p>
<p><a href="http://thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/011309_Nirvanix_Names_Jim_Zierick_CEO" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://thewhir.com/web-hosting-news/011309_Nirvanix_Names_Jim_Zierick_CEO'>http://thewhir....Jim_Zierick_CEO</a></p>
<p>hopefully jim zierick plans on firing all the crooks that were there!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ex nirvanix</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2559436</link>
		<dc:creator>ex nirvanix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 08:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-2559436</guid>
		<description>two weeks ago nirvanix laid off 15 of 41 employees including the firing of their ceo patrick harr.  a new interim ceo jim zierick will be publicly announced in a couple weeks.

if you were a friend of patricks you were paid way too much and put in a position three grades higher than you previously ever had.  now of course youre being laid off but with 3 months severance.  if you were a highly paid engineer you got 1 months severance.  or if you made less than 75k per year and the money really matters you got 2 weeks severance.  thanks.  what a bunch of assholes.  stay classy nirvanix.

harr consistently lied to us, the board, customers and on sales calls but still couldnt make any sales - probably one of many reasons they finally decided to fire him.  revenue is still virtually non existant.

the company has about 6 months left before they are out of money.  but i think the vcs just may be stupid enough to put more money into this sinking ship.

and yes nirvanix recently discovered that as many as 8000 customer files are corrupt.  this is the THIRD major data loss at nirvanix.  we had not met our own sla a single week i worked there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>two weeks ago nirvanix laid off 15 of 41 employees including the firing of their ceo patrick harr.  a new interim ceo jim zierick will be publicly announced in a couple weeks.</p>
<p>if you were a friend of patricks you were paid way too much and put in a position three grades higher than you previously ever had.  now of course youre being laid off but with 3 months severance.  if you were a highly paid engineer you got 1 months severance.  or if you made less than 75k per year and the money really matters you got 2 weeks severance.  thanks.  what a bunch of assholes.  stay classy nirvanix.</p>
<p>harr consistently lied to us, the board, customers and on sales calls but still couldnt make any sales &#8211; probably one of many reasons they finally decided to fire him.  revenue is still virtually non existant.</p>
<p>the company has about 6 months left before they are out of money.  but i think the vcs just may be stupid enough to put more money into this sinking ship.</p>
<p>and yes nirvanix recently discovered that as many as 8000 customer files are corrupt.  this is the THIRD major data loss at nirvanix.  we had not met our own sla a single week i worked there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel Takes Stake In Amazon S3 Competitor Nirvanix</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-2301584</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel Takes Stake In Amazon S3 Competitor Nirvanix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-2301584</guid>
		<description>[...] Nirvanix&#8217;s selling points are a claim that its service is easier to integrate than S3 and they offer a service level agreement that guarantees 99.9% uptime (see our previous coverage here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nirvanix&#8217;s selling points are a claim that its service is easier to integrate than S3 and they offer a service level agreement that guarantees 99.9% uptime (see our previous coverage here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Intel Takes Stake In Amazon S3 Competitor Nirvanix &#8212; hometown.at</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1865729</link>
		<dc:creator>Intel Takes Stake In Amazon S3 Competitor Nirvanix &#8212; hometown.at</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 04:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1865729</guid>
		<description>[...] Nirvanix&#8217;s selling points are a claim that its service is easier to integrate than S3 and they offer a service level agreement that guarantees 99.9% uptime (see our previous coverage here.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nirvanix&#8217;s selling points are a claim that its service is easier to integrate than S3 and they offer a service level agreement that guarantees 99.9% uptime (see our previous coverage here.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On-demand host goes up against Amazon S3</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1656658</link>
		<dc:creator>On-demand host goes up against Amazon S3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Oct 2007 11:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1656658</guid>
		<description>[...] our recent coverage of Nirvanix, a U.S. based S3 competitor as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our recent coverage of Nirvanix, a U.S. based S3 competitor as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1615023</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1615023</guid>
		<description>The original articles on newsvine are published elsewhere, &lt;a href=&quot;http://nirvanix.nfshost.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://nirvanix.nfshost.com/&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The original articles on newsvine are published elsewhere, <a href="http://nirvanix.nfshost.com/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://nirvanix.nfshost.com/'>http://nirvanix.nfshost.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1612269</link>
		<dc:creator>JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 11:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1612269</guid>
		<description>There as an interesting article on newsvine 
For reasons not clear yet it has been removed. The author mentioned earlier
that he was pressed to open up comments for mediamax to react. They didn&#039;t react so why removal of this article. Do they want to avoid any more publicity, is there more to tell?
Fortunately there are &lt;a href=&quot;http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:VEnddZvHE6IJ:bassett.newsvine.com/_news/2007/09/06/944429-nirvanix-amazon-s3-killer-or-crap-in-sheeps-clothing+review+nirvanix+mediamax&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=8&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;copies &lt;/a&gt; to be found on the net
Another interesting &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1058042/startup_nirvanix_to_offer_digital_file_storage/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article &lt;/a&gt; can be found on the san diego tribune online

What is clear at this moment? The problems at mediamax are still not solved. See also mediamaxusers.blogspot for this. I don&#039;t see a reason why they cannot come out with their story. Nirvanix is live so why the incomplete information?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There as an interesting article on newsvine<br />
For reasons not clear yet it has been removed. The author mentioned earlier<br />
that he was pressed to open up comments for mediamax to react. They didn&#8217;t react so why removal of this article. Do they want to avoid any more publicity, is there more to tell?<br />
Fortunately there are <a href="http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:VEnddZvHE6IJ:bassett.newsvine.com/_news/2007/09/06/944429-nirvanix-amazon-s3-killer-or-crap-in-sheeps-clothing+review+nirvanix+mediamax&amp;hl=en&amp;ct=clnk&amp;cd=8" rel="nofollow">copies </a> to be found on the net<br />
Another interesting <a href="http://www.redorbit.com/news/technology/1058042/startup_nirvanix_to_offer_digital_file_storage/index.html" rel="nofollow">article </a> can be found on the san diego tribune online</p>
<p>What is clear at this moment? The problems at mediamax are still not solved. See also mediamaxusers.blogspot for this. I don&#8217;t see a reason why they cannot come out with their story. Nirvanix is live so why the incomplete information?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogwi.se</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1607682</link>
		<dc:creator>blogwi.se</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 17:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1607682</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Nirvanix - A new storage delivery competitor for Amazon&#8217;s S3...&lt;/strong&gt;


Nirvanix has opened its doors today - it&#8217;s basically the same thing Amazon S3&#8217;s does, similiar pricing, but way more importantly - they have a SLA, which Amazon hasn&#8217;t delivered so far.
It also features a SOAP &amp; REST-based API, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Nirvanix &#8211; A new storage delivery competitor for Amazon&#8217;s S3&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Nirvanix has opened its doors today &#8211; it&#8217;s basically the same thing Amazon S3&#8217;s does, similiar pricing, but way more importantly &#8211; they have a SLA, which Amazon hasn&#8217;t delivered so far.<br />
It also features a SOAP &#38; REST-based API, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1604731</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 05:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1604731</guid>
		<description>Hi.

Streamload is MediaMax.   Steve was president, then they brought in Harr.  During this time, they were working behind the scenes to create Nirvanix.  Steve during this time was MediaMax&#039;s CTO.

When Nirvanix finally got funding, Harr stepped down to take over the &quot;new&quot;  company and Steve became president again.  

Sources report that Harr is not the only staff to go from MediaMax to Nirvanix, but I cannot get either side to confirm this.   If I were Nirvanix, I wouldn&#039;t want to be associated with MediaMax, either.

As for you saying that the issues with MediaMax are separate, on the official MediaMax blog post &lt;a href=&quot;http://mediamaxblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/hi-mediamax-michael-arrington-at.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;HERE&lt;/a&gt;, &quot;Team MediaMax&quot; says that:

&lt;i&gt;&lt;blockquote&gt;In regards to MediaMax&#039;s problems mentioned in the TechCrunch article, this was only partially related to the spin-out process.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;/i&gt;

This is their admission that, yes, our &quot;spin out&quot; of Nirvanix was &quot;partially&quot; to blame for all the hell they&#039;ve put their users through over the past year.   They admit this, and they&#039;ve admitted the shared staff, etc.

Again, these statements aren&#039;t in debate - they come directly from official MediaMax and Nirvanix press releases, blogs, and interviews.

I encourage anyone who doesn&#039;t believe me - do a little surfing, read the words directly from their mouths.    They certainly refuse to come right out and say what the &quot;affiliation&quot; is between the 2 companies, but their combined statements tell the story.  And they DO confess they are &quot;affiliated&quot; - just not saying in what way.   

For crying out loud - their offices are less than a block away from each other (600 B St vs 525 B St, San Diego.)   Check the facts, people.   Do your own research - you&#039;ll find the truth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.</p>
<p>Streamload is MediaMax.   Steve was president, then they brought in Harr.  During this time, they were working behind the scenes to create Nirvanix.  Steve during this time was MediaMax&#8217;s CTO.</p>
<p>When Nirvanix finally got funding, Harr stepped down to take over the &#8220;new&#8221;  company and Steve became president again.  </p>
<p>Sources report that Harr is not the only staff to go from MediaMax to Nirvanix, but I cannot get either side to confirm this.   If I were Nirvanix, I wouldn&#8217;t want to be associated with MediaMax, either.</p>
<p>As for you saying that the issues with MediaMax are separate, on the official MediaMax blog post <a href="http://mediamaxblog.blogspot.com/2007/08/hi-mediamax-michael-arrington-at.html" rel="nofollow">HERE</a>, &#8220;Team MediaMax&#8221; says that:</p>
<p><i><br />
<blockquote>In regards to MediaMax&#8217;s problems mentioned in the TechCrunch article, this was only partially related to the spin-out process.</p></blockquote>
<p></i></p>
<p>This is their admission that, yes, our &#8220;spin out&#8221; of Nirvanix was &#8220;partially&#8221; to blame for all the hell they&#8217;ve put their users through over the past year.   They admit this, and they&#8217;ve admitted the shared staff, etc.</p>
<p>Again, these statements aren&#8217;t in debate &#8211; they come directly from official MediaMax and Nirvanix press releases, blogs, and interviews.</p>
<p>I encourage anyone who doesn&#8217;t believe me &#8211; do a little surfing, read the words directly from their mouths.    They certainly refuse to come right out and say what the &#8220;affiliation&#8221; is between the 2 companies, but their combined statements tell the story.  And they DO confess they are &#8220;affiliated&#8221; &#8211; just not saying in what way.   </p>
<p>For crying out loud &#8211; their offices are less than a block away from each other (600 B St vs 525 B St, San Diego.)   Check the facts, people.   Do your own research &#8211; you&#8217;ll find the truth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1604472</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 04:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1604472</guid>
		<description>Actually, in Steve Iverson&#039;s own words this is not the case.  Steve was the former CEO of Streamload.  Patrick Harr came in and took over as CEO of Streamload (for a period of 2 months) at which time Mediamax was then spun out of Streamload and Steve Iverson became CEO of Mediamax.  Patrick then went on to found Nirvanix - which is a new company with new technology and new service.  Mediamax is not nor have they been using the Nirvanix service.  The issues with Mediamax are totally and completely separate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, in Steve Iverson&#8217;s own words this is not the case.  Steve was the former CEO of Streamload.  Patrick Harr came in and took over as CEO of Streamload (for a period of 2 months) at which time Mediamax was then spun out of Streamload and Steve Iverson became CEO of Mediamax.  Patrick then went on to found Nirvanix &#8211; which is a new company with new technology and new service.  Mediamax is not nor have they been using the Nirvanix service.  The issues with Mediamax are totally and completely separate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1603400</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 21:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1603400</guid>
		<description>Hi, Mike.

It has the same president.  It has, by some accounts, 50% of the same staff.  It was STARTED by MediaMax, for crying out loud.  

Steve Iverson even ADMITS these facts.   They aren&#039;t in dispute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Mike.</p>
<p>It has the same president.  It has, by some accounts, 50% of the same staff.  It was STARTED by MediaMax, for crying out loud.  </p>
<p>Steve Iverson even ADMITS these facts.   They aren&#8217;t in dispute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1602982</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 18:33:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1602982</guid>
		<description>Nick, do your homework.  Nirvanix IS a completely separate company.  Contact them yourself and find out the real story rather than posting false statements.  http://www.nirvanix.com/contact.aspx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, do your homework.  Nirvanix IS a completely separate company.  Contact them yourself and find out the real story rather than posting false statements.  <a href="http://www.nirvanix.com/contact.aspx" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.nirvanix.com/contact.aspx'>http://www.nirv...om/contact.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1600409</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 01:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1600409</guid>
		<description>Remember, Nirvanix = MediaMax.  It is a spin-off of the same company, and even has the same president.

Do some research, investigate the HELL MediaMax has put it&#039;s users through for the past year, and then decide if you want to truth them with your data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember, Nirvanix = MediaMax.  It is a spin-off of the same company, and even has the same president.</p>
<p>Do some research, investigate the HELL MediaMax has put it&#8217;s users through for the past year, and then decide if you want to truth them with your data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srini</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1600194</link>
		<dc:creator>Srini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 23:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1600194</guid>
		<description>With luck, this will convince amazon to finally add some oft-requested features to s3.

One feature people have been asking for since S3&#039;s inception: moving/renaming/copying files in S3 without having to download and re-upload.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With luck, this will convince amazon to finally add some oft-requested features to s3.</p>
<p>One feature people have been asking for since S3&#8217;s inception: moving/renaming/copying files in S3 without having to download and re-upload.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aj</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1600114</link>
		<dc:creator>Aj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 22:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1600114</guid>
		<description>Scott,

I work for Nirvanix and we don&#039;t charge for PUTS/GETS or other requests. Our pricing is $0.18 per GB/month (based on daily average) and $0.18 per GB bandwidth (up/down). Some of our advantages over S3 are:

- Media clustered file system available for file system calls – move, copy, rename, delete, etc
- Advanced media services – large file support up to 256GB, transcoding, image manipulation, etc
- Parent/child account mgmt

You can sign up for a trial account (no cc required) at: http://www.nirvanix.com/gettingStarted.aspx. 

Aj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott,</p>
<p>I work for Nirvanix and we don&#8217;t charge for PUTS/GETS or other requests. Our pricing is $0.18 per GB/month (based on daily average) and $0.18 per GB bandwidth (up/down). Some of our advantages over S3 are:</p>
<p>- Media clustered file system available for file system calls – move, copy, rename, delete, etc<br />
- Advanced media services – large file support up to 256GB, transcoding, image manipulation, etc<br />
- Parent/child account mgmt</p>
<p>You can sign up for a trial account (no cc required) at: <a href="http://www.nirvanix.com/gettingStarted.aspx" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.nirvanix.com/gettingStarted.aspx'>http://www.nirv...ingStarted.aspx</a>. </p>
<p>Aj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Alden</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1599884</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Alden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 20:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1599884</guid>
		<description>I use S3 in a production level to serve images (about 1.5TB per month) for my site http://www.boardgamegeek.com

One thing I don&#039;t see is the cost for GET requests.

Amazon charges 0.01 per 10,000 GET and all other requests and it&#039;s not insignificant if you are using them as for distribution (like me).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use S3 in a production level to serve images (about 1.5TB per month) for my site <a href="http://www.boardgamegeek.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.boardgamegeek.com'>http://www.boardgamegeek.com</a></p>
<p>One thing I don&#8217;t see is the cost for GET requests.</p>
<p>Amazon charges 0.01 per 10,000 GET and all other requests and it&#8217;s not insignificant if you are using them as for distribution (like me).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Huen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1597616</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Huen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 06:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1597616</guid>
		<description>An SLA is only as good as the company behind it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An SLA is only as good as the company behind it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: whoopie</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1597580</link>
		<dc:creator>whoopie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 06:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1597580</guid>
		<description>well the original point of not caring about SLAs is correct. no company, particularly a startup, can make an SLA prediction with no history to back it up. at the very least, no company should be even talking uptime until they have been live for a year. wheee - my service has been up for ten minutes....100% uptime!

chances are amazon has higher actual uptimes and response times. only an idiot would take the nirvanix SLA to have any meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well the original point of not caring about SLAs is correct. no company, particularly a startup, can make an SLA prediction with no history to back it up. at the very least, no company should be even talking uptime until they have been live for a year. wheee &#8211; my service has been up for ten minutes&#8230;.100% uptime!</p>
<p>chances are amazon has higher actual uptimes and response times. only an idiot would take the nirvanix SLA to have any meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1596993</link>
		<dc:creator>steve ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 02:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1596993</guid>
		<description>MS has a better plan, right now I don&#039;t know what it is but it is better.

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MS has a better plan, right now I don&#8217;t know what it is but it is better.</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com'>http://fakestev...er.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1596762</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1596762</guid>
		<description>smcnally

I know of one: http://www.coutorture.com

They use it to deal with high volume periods (fashion week and the like.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>smcnally</p>
<p>I know of one: <a href="http://www.coutorture.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.coutorture.com'>http://www.coutorture.com</a></p>
<p>They use it to deal with high volume periods (fashion week and the like.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smcnally</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1596598</link>
		<dc:creator>smcnally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1596598</guid>
		<description>elasticdrive looks seriously good.

s3 and nirvanix look good for several apps we have underway now.

are there case studies - informal or otherwise - even user anecdotes re the hows and wheres people are putting this to use beyond &#039;simple&#039; backup and storage? anyone using these for production web apps on any scale?

thanks -


S</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>elasticdrive looks seriously good.</p>
<p>s3 and nirvanix look good for several apps we have underway now.</p>
<p>are there case studies &#8211; informal or otherwise &#8211; even user anecdotes re the hows and wheres people are putting this to use beyond &#8217;simple&#8217; backup and storage? anyone using these for production web apps on any scale?</p>
<p>thanks -</p>
<p>S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reuven Cohen, CEO, Enomaly Inc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1596354</link>
		<dc:creator>Reuven Cohen, CEO, Enomaly Inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 21:06:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1596354</guid>
		<description>Great  Question,

Jungle disk is basically a file transfer application similar to that of an FTP., it&#039;s currently limited to Amazon&#039;s S3 service. 

ElasticDrive enables actual formating of multiple geographically disperse storage resources to act like a local hard drive. ElasticDrive supports most modern filesystems including EXT3, XFS, JFS, ZFS etc as well as the ability to provide blocklevel snapshots for infinite rollback/versioning. This is handy in a lot of enterprise contexts where a native file system is easier to use then trying to re-architect your app to fit the confines of a web service call.

Also, files can be written to several remote locations simultaneously (S3, Nirvanix and your own storage).  

The cool thing about nirvanix, we can target specific geographical regions, so lets say an office in London may have access to the local data center, where an office in China get the Asian data center.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great  Question,</p>
<p>Jungle disk is basically a file transfer application similar to that of an <a href="http://FTP." rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://FTP'>http://FTP</a>., it&#8217;s currently limited to Amazon&#8217;s S3 service. </p>
<p>ElasticDrive enables actual formating of multiple geographically disperse storage resources to act like a local hard drive. ElasticDrive supports most modern filesystems including EXT3, XFS, JFS, ZFS etc as well as the ability to provide blocklevel snapshots for infinite rollback/versioning. This is handy in a lot of enterprise contexts where a native file system is easier to use then trying to re-architect your app to fit the confines of a web service call.</p>
<p>Also, files can be written to several remote locations simultaneously (S3, Nirvanix and your own storage).  </p>
<p>The cool thing about nirvanix, we can target specific geographical regions, so lets say an office in London may have access to the local data center, where an office in China get the Asian data center.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: misconstrued</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1596185</link>
		<dc:creator>misconstrued</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1596185</guid>
		<description>Reuven. You seriously have people paying $2,999 (for unlimited storage) to use your software to connect with these services (e.g. S3)? This doesn&#039;t even include the costs incurred by using the storage services... Why would I use your program and not, say, JungleDisk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reuven. You seriously have people paying $2,999 (for unlimited storage) to use your software to connect with these services (e.g. S3)? This doesn&#8217;t even include the costs incurred by using the storage services&#8230; Why would I use your program and not, say, JungleDisk?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reuven Cohen, CEO, Enomaly Inc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1596146</link>
		<dc:creator>Reuven Cohen, CEO, Enomaly Inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1596146</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve been using Nirvanix as part of our ElasticDrive offering. If you compare the cost of using Nirvanix Vs S3,  Nirvanix&#039;s storage costs are a bit more but the cost saving from S3&#039;s put/list offsets the overall price to the point of making Nirvanix actually about 10-20% cheaper for heavy usage applications such as our Network storage application.  

See http://www.Elasticdrive.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve been using Nirvanix as part of our ElasticDrive offering. If you compare the cost of using Nirvanix Vs S3,  Nirvanix&#8217;s storage costs are a bit more but the cost saving from S3&#8217;s put/list offsets the overall price to the point of making Nirvanix actually about 10-20% cheaper for heavy usage applications such as our Network storage application.  </p>
<p>See <a href="http://www.Elasticdrive.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.Elasticdrive.com'>http://www.Elasticdrive.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cbmeeks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/comment-page-1/#comment-1596143</link>
		<dc:creator>cbmeeks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/05/nirvanix-launches-to-compete-with-amazon-s3-storage-service/#comment-1596143</guid>
		<description>&quot;Nobody cares about SLAs??? That and no support are everyone’s biggest complaints about Amazon S3.

The Nirvanix service looks great! The integrated video transcoding and thumbnail generation is pretty cool too.&quot;


I can only speak from my experiences.  AT&amp;T put on a dog and pony show one time for us trying to get business and they bragged about SLA&#039;s.  &quot;We will pay YOU if you ever have downtime!&quot;  

Sounds great.  However, when we asked &quot;How much will you pay us?  Your hourly rate our ours?&quot;

They got quiet.

See, it&#039;s easy to say you have an SLA.  But if your business averages $5000 per hour in sales and Nirvanix is down for 5 hours, how much would they pay you???  Or, would they just give you a few gigs for free?

So any of you honestly going to jump over because of three little letters?  SLA

SLA?  blah...worthless.
cbmeeks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nobody cares about SLAs??? That and no support are everyone’s biggest complaints about Amazon S3.</p>
<p>The Nirvanix service looks great! The integrated video transcoding and thumbnail generation is pretty cool too.&#8221;</p>
<p>I can only speak from my experiences.  AT&amp;T put on a dog and pony show one time for us trying to get business and they bragged about SLA&#8217;s.  &#8220;We will pay YOU if you ever have downtime!&#8221;  </p>
<p>Sounds great.  However, when we asked &#8220;How much will you pay us?  Your hourly rate our ours?&#8221;</p>
<p>They got quiet.</p>
<p>See, it&#8217;s easy to say you have an SLA.  But if your business averages $5000 per hour in sales and Nirvanix is down for 5 hours, how much would they pay you???  Or, would they just give you a few gigs for free?</p>
<p>So any of you honestly going to jump over because of three little letters?  SLA</p>
<p>SLA?  blah&#8230;worthless.<br />
cbmeeks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
