<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Googlers Get Kinky On Wikipedia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:24:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: מניפולציות בויקפדיה-לשקר אין רגליים אבל יש IP חשיפת התנהגות גולשים ישראלים בויקפדיה העולמית &#124; SMO- על שיווק באינטרנט וברשתות חברתיות</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-2664508</link>
		<dc:creator>מניפולציות בויקפדיה-לשקר אין רגליים אבל יש IP חשיפת התנהגות גולשים ישראלים בויקפדיה העולמית &#124; SMO- על שיווק באינטרנט וברשתות חברתיות</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-2664508</guid>
		<description>[...] מאוד אם לכתוב את הפוסט הזה, אבל אחרי שראיתי שאפילו Techcrunch לא יכלו להתאפק, ומכיוון שאנחנו מתיימרים להביא לקוראים [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] מאוד אם לכתוב את הפוסט הזה, אבל אחרי שראיתי שאפילו Techcrunch לא יכלו להתאפק, ומכיוון שאנחנו מתיימרים להביא לקוראים [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arny</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1615583</link>
		<dc:creator>Arny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 13:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1615583</guid>
		<description>‘more clearer’ - 100%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>‘more clearer’ &#8211; 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DKameleon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1607613</link>
		<dc:creator>DKameleon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2007 16:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1607613</guid>
		<description>And another way: just infected PC in office network with proxy :)
Didn&#039;t noticed this opinion above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And another way: just infected PC in office network with proxy <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Didn&#8217;t noticed this opinion above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Mowery</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1597313</link>
		<dc:creator>James Mowery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 04:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1597313</guid>
		<description>Interesting read, just not from TechCrunch.  Please stick to Tech related content.  Thanks :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting read, just not from TechCrunch.  Please stick to Tech related content.  Thanks <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claude Gelinas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1597096</link>
		<dc:creator>Claude Gelinas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 03:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1597096</guid>
		<description>I fail to see how this will ever come to be highly problematic for anyone.

Of course, it&#039;s a fun read ; )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see how this will ever come to be highly problematic for anyone.</p>
<p>Of course, it&#8217;s a fun read ; )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1596803</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 00:20:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1596803</guid>
		<description>Extra! Extra! Google employs real people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Extra! Extra! Google employs real people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1596672</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 23:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1596672</guid>
		<description>Do you people think the staff writers of TC( Arrington included)  actually care about your opinions on the quality of what&#039;s presented here? I know several start-ups that contacted TC only to be told they only cover companies funded by the thieves in the Valley. It&#039;s all about Alexa numbers( which Arrington says he doesn&#039;t trust (wink). Eyes equate to expensive ad rates. We&#039;re now seeing cheap tabloid journalism. Everyone has a price. Mike has his and he is looking for the offer. Any takers?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you people think the staff writers of TC( Arrington included)  actually care about your opinions on the quality of what&#8217;s presented here? I know several start-ups that contacted TC only to be told they only cover companies funded by the thieves in the Valley. It&#8217;s all about Alexa numbers( which Arrington says he doesn&#8217;t trust (wink). Eyes equate to expensive ad rates. We&#8217;re now seeing cheap tabloid journalism. Everyone has a price. Mike has his and he is looking for the offer. Any takers?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johhny KNox villa</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1596606</link>
		<dc:creator>Johhny KNox villa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1596606</guid>
		<description>microsoft loves editing it&#039;s own products:

http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=207.46.0.0-207.46.255.255&amp;ip2=&amp;ip3=&amp;ip4=

also you can use asterisks* when doing a whois lookup on whois.arin.net or on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arin.net/whois/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;web form&lt;/a&gt;.

Also checkout &lt;a href=&quot;http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=213.130.112.64-95&amp;ip2=213.130.102.152-159&amp;ip3=84.11.113.0-95&amp;ip4=213.130.100.32-39&amp;ip5=195.39.166.240-253&amp;ip6=213.130.118.40-47&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;al jazeera&#039;s edits&lt;/a&gt;

Here&#039;s my schools edits, &lt;a href=&quot;http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=129.81.0.0-129.81.255.255&amp;ip2=&amp;ip3=&amp;ip4=&amp;nolimit=1&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;tulane&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>microsoft loves editing it&#8217;s own products:</p>
<p><a href="http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=207.46.0.0-207.46.255.255&amp;ip2=&amp;ip3=&amp;ip4=" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=207.46.0.0-207.46.255.255&amp;ip2=&amp;ip3=&amp;ip4='>http://wikiscan...p;ip3=&amp;ip4=</a></p>
<p>also you can use asterisks* when doing a whois lookup on whois.arin.net or on the <a href="http://www.arin.net/whois/" rel="nofollow">web form</a>.</p>
<p>Also checkout <a href="http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=213.130.112.64-95&amp;ip2=213.130.102.152-159&amp;ip3=84.11.113.0-95&amp;ip4=213.130.100.32-39&amp;ip5=195.39.166.240-253&amp;ip6=213.130.118.40-47" rel="nofollow">al jazeera&#8217;s edits</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my schools edits, <a href="http://wikiscanner.virgil.gr/f.php?ip1=129.81.0.0-129.81.255.255&amp;ip2=&amp;ip3=&amp;ip4=&amp;nolimit=1" rel="nofollow">tulane</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johhny KNox villa</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1596537</link>
		<dc:creator>Johhny KNox villa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 22:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1596537</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Grammar quibble: “Users of Google registered IP addresses contributed to Wikipedia entries including…”

You should hyphenate “Google-registered” to avoid confusion in this sentence. Otherwise the first 6 words can be read with an entirely different meaning. It’s awkward.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Just wait til google lights up the world with all of it&#039;s dark fiber. Will those be Google.com or google.net hostnames?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Grammar quibble: “Users of Google registered IP addresses contributed to Wikipedia entries including…”</p>
<p>You should hyphenate “Google-registered” to avoid confusion in this sentence. Otherwise the first 6 words can be read with an entirely different meaning. It’s awkward.</p></blockquote>
<p>Just wait til google lights up the world with all of it&#8217;s dark fiber. Will those be Google.com or google.net hostnames?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Snider</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1596297</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Snider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 20:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1596297</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got to say that I agree with Shawn (comment #34) on this one. The initial idea and research was solid, but when it didn&#039;t turn out the way you&#039;d suspected, the story should have been shelved, not turned into a gossip piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got to say that I agree with Shawn (comment #34) on this one. The initial idea and research was solid, but when it didn&#8217;t turn out the way you&#8217;d suspected, the story should have been shelved, not turned into a gossip piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kula bácsi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1596046</link>
		<dc:creator>Kula bácsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 19:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1596046</guid>
		<description>Googlers are faggots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googlers are faggots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Word Hugger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595939</link>
		<dc:creator>Word Hugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 18:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595939</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if this post was techcrunch worthy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if this post was techcrunch worthy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Irish</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595750</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Irish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595750</guid>
		<description>Try writing real posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try writing real posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595585</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 16:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595585</guid>
		<description>This is the only TechCrunch post that actually made me angry.   I think Duncan genrally does good work and I&#039;ve considered defending him when others have ciriticized in the past, but this kind of pandering is horrible.   I&#039;ll still read TechCrunch because it&#039;s still worth it, but please, don&#039;t go down this path.  I&#039;m speaking to the whole editorial staff at Tech Crunch, since it is not just Duncan&#039;s responsibility.  The original research was  valid (Google possibly whitewashing their Wikipedia entries) but when that didn&#039;t pan out, the story should have died.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the only TechCrunch post that actually made me angry.   I think Duncan genrally does good work and I&#8217;ve considered defending him when others have ciriticized in the past, but this kind of pandering is horrible.   I&#8217;ll still read TechCrunch because it&#8217;s still worth it, but please, don&#8217;t go down this path.  I&#8217;m speaking to the whole editorial staff at Tech Crunch, since it is not just Duncan&#8217;s responsibility.  The original research was  valid (Google possibly whitewashing their Wikipedia entries) but when that didn&#8217;t pan out, the story should have died.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dev</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595466</link>
		<dc:creator>Dev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595466</guid>
		<description>Good find Nick Denton.. oh no.. I am not reading Valleywag.

BS post mate.. leave this to Valleywag and do what TC does best.. will ya!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good find Nick Denton.. oh no.. I am not reading Valleywag.</p>
<p>BS post mate.. leave this to Valleywag and do what TC does best.. will ya!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grammar Zorro</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595425</link>
		<dc:creator>Grammar Zorro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:24:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595425</guid>
		<description>Grammar quibble:  &quot;Users of Google registered IP addresses contributed to Wikipedia entries including...&quot;

You should hyphenate &quot;Google-registered&quot; to avoid confusion in this sentence. Otherwise the first 6 words can be read with an entirely different meaning. It&#039;s awkward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grammar quibble:  &#8220;Users of Google registered IP addresses contributed to Wikipedia entries including&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>You should hyphenate &#8220;Google-registered&#8221; to avoid confusion in this sentence. Otherwise the first 6 words can be read with an entirely different meaning. It&#8217;s awkward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Jacobson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595412</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Jacobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 15:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595412</guid>
		<description>Oh those Google folk! They&#039;re a fun bunch. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh those Google folk! They&#8217;re a fun bunch. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoli Erdos</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595323</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoli Erdos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595323</guid>
		<description>&quot;no evidence that they have been editing the pages of Google competitors, the story I had initially looked to research.&quot;

Duncan, that would have been a good point to decide this would nor make it to a post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;no evidence that they have been editing the pages of Google competitors, the story I had initially looked to research.&#8221;</p>
<p>Duncan, that would have been a good point to decide this would nor make it to a post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595221</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 14:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595221</guid>
		<description>Horrible entry......Why waste our time with this garbage?

Are we going to start seeing pictures of Britney and Lohan on techcrunch tomorrow?

Come on now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horrible entry&#8230;&#8230;Why waste our time with this garbage?</p>
<p>Are we going to start seeing pictures of Britney and Lohan on techcrunch tomorrow?</p>
<p>Come on now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Way to Go Mike P</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595163</link>
		<dc:creator>Way to Go Mike P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595163</guid>
		<description>@27 - MikeP

I sure agreed 100% with you on the quality of TC.. LOoooOK at the the amount of advertisements that is sitting on the right column, page loading is getting slower and slower. I guess their &quot;CEO&quot; figured out a way to increase revenue to justify her &quot;fee&quot;. I personally do not think that there are no startups out there that they can write about, it&#039;s become this high and mighty game, where startups need to chase TC editors and get their attention to have TC writers to even be bothered with them. I&#039;m sure the are tons of entrepreneurs writing to them and were getting their door slammed in the face, because they think they&#039;re TC and they are high and mighty. They seldom write about no-name startups. 

I&#039;m sure TC writers have done something right.. don&#039;t you. They&#039;re great when they wrote about inviteshare and then bought inviteshare - wow awesome. But then again there needs to be more rights then wrongs at this point of the game since they &quot;think&quot; that they&#039;re the almighty reviewer and trend spotter of the web2.0 

My advice to other entrepreneurs, stop emailing them, try Allen at www.centernetworks.com. He is one genuine guy who is passionate about startups and discovering startups.  Check out Allen&#039;s last few blog posts, they&#039;re all about startup demo reviews, entrepreneurs&#039; interviews about how to get it done. He even has a FREE, yes FREE, startup tips ebook: http://www.centernetworks.com/centernetworks-startup-tips-month-ebook

Tell me what TC has given the entrepreneurs so far. Duncan - take a hint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@27 &#8211; MikeP</p>
<p>I sure agreed 100% with you on the quality of TC.. LOoooOK at the the amount of advertisements that is sitting on the right column, page loading is getting slower and slower. I guess their &#8220;CEO&#8221; figured out a way to increase revenue to justify her &#8220;fee&#8221;. I personally do not think that there are no startups out there that they can write about, it&#8217;s become this high and mighty game, where startups need to chase TC editors and get their attention to have TC writers to even be bothered with them. I&#8217;m sure the are tons of entrepreneurs writing to them and were getting their door slammed in the face, because they think they&#8217;re TC and they are high and mighty. They seldom write about no-name startups. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure TC writers have done something right.. don&#8217;t you. They&#8217;re great when they wrote about inviteshare and then bought inviteshare &#8211; wow awesome. But then again there needs to be more rights then wrongs at this point of the game since they &#8220;think&#8221; that they&#8217;re the almighty reviewer and trend spotter of the web2.0 </p>
<p>My advice to other entrepreneurs, stop emailing them, try Allen at <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.centernetworks.com'>http://www.centernetworks.com</a>. He is one genuine guy who is passionate about startups and discovering startups.  Check out Allen&#8217;s last few blog posts, they&#8217;re all about startup demo reviews, entrepreneurs&#8217; interviews about how to get it done. He even has a FREE, yes FREE, startup tips ebook: <a href="http://www.centernetworks.com/centernetworks-startup-tips-month-ebook" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.centernetworks.com/centernetworks-startup-tips-month-ebook'>http://www.cent...ips-month-ebook</a></p>
<p>Tell me what TC has given the entrepreneurs so far. Duncan &#8211; take a hint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trabajadores de Google editan articulos porno en Wikipedia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595155</link>
		<dc:creator>Trabajadores de Google editan articulos porno en Wikipedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595155</guid>
		<description>[...] gay, Masturbación Mútua, Hijo de puta y fetichismo del aumento de pecho segun informa Techcrunch&#8230;    Fuente: http://www.20minutos.es/  Post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] gay, Masturbación Mútua, Hijo de puta y fetichismo del aumento de pecho segun informa Techcrunch&#8230;    Fuente: <a href="http://www.20minutos.es/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.20minutos.es/'>http://www.20minutos.es/</a>  Post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google: Love is in the air...</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595068</link>
		<dc:creator>Google: Love is in the air...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595068</guid>
		<description>[...] [via: Googlers Get Kinky On Wikipedia]    advertising [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via: Googlers Get Kinky On Wikipedia]    advertising [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike P</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595048</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 13:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595048</guid>
		<description>&quot;TechCrunch, founded on June 11, 2005, is a weblog dedicated to obsessively profiling and reviewing new Internet products and companies. In addition to new companies, we will profile existing companies that are making an impact (commercial and/or cultural) on the new web space. TechCrunch is edited by Michael Arrington, who also writes a companion blog, CrunchNotes.&quot;

Though Google as a whole does fit into the &quot;making an impact on the new web space&quot; genre, I don&#039;t see how this article, or a few as of late, fit into the apparent mission of the site. I&#039;d rather see less articles, if there is less news (which I doubt there are LESS startups out there right now). Articles like this seem, to me, to dilute the quality of TechCrunch. This is not a gossip site. This is not a rumor site. This (as I and apparently others have thought) is a site about new sites and technologies that are shaping (*cringe*) Web 2.0. 

Can we get clarification if this is the type of content that will be on the site from this way forward? Or will the direction go back to the &#039;roots&#039; of the site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;TechCrunch, founded on June 11, 2005, is a weblog dedicated to obsessively profiling and reviewing new Internet products and companies. In addition to new companies, we will profile existing companies that are making an impact (commercial and/or cultural) on the new web space. TechCrunch is edited by Michael Arrington, who also writes a companion blog, CrunchNotes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Though Google as a whole does fit into the &#8220;making an impact on the new web space&#8221; genre, I don&#8217;t see how this article, or a few as of late, fit into the apparent mission of the site. I&#8217;d rather see less articles, if there is less news (which I doubt there are LESS startups out there right now). Articles like this seem, to me, to dilute the quality of TechCrunch. This is not a gossip site. This is not a rumor site. This (as I and apparently others have thought) is a site about new sites and technologies that are shaping (*cringe*) Web 2.0. </p>
<p>Can we get clarification if this is the type of content that will be on the site from this way forward? Or will the direction go back to the &#8216;roots&#8217; of the site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monchito</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1595016</link>
		<dc:creator>monchito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1595016</guid>
		<description>lol :) i guess that means that google engineers are people too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  i guess that means that google engineers are people too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grammer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1594995</link>
		<dc:creator>Grammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 12:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/04/googlers-get-kinky-on-wikipedia/#comment-1594995</guid>
		<description>Did you really write &#039;more clearer&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you really write &#8216;more clearer&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
