<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pownce Offers New Features, Still No API</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:04:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tecnologia &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Pownce ofrece cinco nuevas funcionalidades</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1835037</link>
		<dc:creator>Tecnologia &#187; Blog Archiv &#187; Pownce ofrece cinco nuevas funcionalidades</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 06:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1835037</guid>
		<description>[...] &#124; TechCrunch Enlace &#124; Más información en su blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] | TechCrunch Enlace | Más información en su blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1592065</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1592065</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’d argue the majority of users prefer a desktop app;&quot;

Let&#039;s hear your argument, because one of the major aspects of what why &quot;web 2.0&quot; is so innovative is that sites are beginning to support the functionality of desktop apps through a browser.   I for one, would not want to install a desktop app... Why clutter up my start menu when I don&#039;t have to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’d argue the majority of users prefer a desktop app;&#8221;</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s hear your argument, because one of the major aspects of what why &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; is so innovative is that sites are beginning to support the functionality of desktop apps through a browser.   I for one, would not want to install a desktop app&#8230; Why clutter up my start menu when I don&#8217;t have to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john freeman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1590432</link>
		<dc:creator>john freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1590432</guid>
		<description>pownce definitely needs an API.  Funny how you mention pownce in this article but not newcomer yappd who released their api last week.  Must be because of kevin rose....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pownce definitely needs an API.  Funny how you mention pownce in this article but not newcomer yappd who released their api last week.  Must be because of kevin rose&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1590429</link>
		<dc:creator>jc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 23:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1590429</guid>
		<description>&gt;&gt;I’d argue the majority of users prefer a desktop app; certainly the variety and popularity of Twitter apps would support that notion. Believe it or not, not everyone wants to connect to a microblogging platform via a webpage&gt;&gt;

This is the most logical comment I have seen on the subject. Most web 2.0 heads do not know what a compiler is . Good article and good call, arrington needs to get you to write more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;&gt;I’d argue the majority of users prefer a desktop app; certainly the variety and popularity of Twitter apps would support that notion. Believe it or not, not everyone wants to connect to a microblogging platform via a webpage&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>This is the most logical comment I have seen on the subject. Most web 2.0 heads do not know what a compiler is . Good article and good call, arrington needs to get you to write more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Word Hugger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1589846</link>
		<dc:creator>Word Hugger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 19:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1589846</guid>
		<description>Allan: Yet from they made thousands of startups inside their website rich, and had TONS of press releases about it.  I wouldn&#039;t call that crappy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allan: Yet from they made thousands of startups inside their website rich, and had TONS of press releases about it.  I wouldn&#8217;t call that crappy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan Drake</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1589642</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 18:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1589642</guid>
		<description>DONT put in an API. look how crappy it made facebook</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DONT put in an API. look how crappy it made facebook</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1589603</link>
		<dc:creator>spell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1589603</guid>
		<description>They need to learn to spell first, before offering new features.

Pownce is not very useful and the fad will go away in few months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need to learn to spell first, before offering new features.</p>
<p>Pownce is not very useful and the fad will go away in few months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seth E</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1589517</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1589517</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also still invite-only. While it still may be quite easy to get on, I still find it to be a turn-off and haven&#039;t bothered to sign-up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also still invite-only. While it still may be quite easy to get on, I still find it to be a turn-off and haven&#8217;t bothered to sign-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Ballmer</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1589516</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Ballmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 17:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1589516</guid>
		<description>Forget this crap!
We are about to release MS Geikra!

http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Forget this crap!<br />
We are about to release MS Geikra!</p>
<p><a href="http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://fakesteveballmer.blogspot.com'>http://fakestev...er.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luis Suarez</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1589445</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Suarez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1589445</guid>
		<description>I think another good title for this weblog post would be something like &quot;Pownce Offers New Features, Still No Proper RSS Feeds&quot;. Despite the fact that Pownce keeps adding more and more new features some of the very basics from any Web 2.0 application are just missing: RSS / Atom feeds. 

Yes, I do know you have got the Public RSS feed, but that is what I meant with &quot;proper&quot;. A feed for every single type of notifcation you are getting already directly via e-mail, and a universal feed for your own profile. Unless Pownce provides some of that basic functionality, we would just continue to make use of &quot;other&quot; tools, even if they are not as powerful as Pownce could well be. Just my two cents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think another good title for this weblog post would be something like &#8220;Pownce Offers New Features, Still No Proper RSS Feeds&#8221;. Despite the fact that Pownce keeps adding more and more new features some of the very basics from any Web 2.0 application are just missing: RSS / Atom feeds. </p>
<p>Yes, I do know you have got the Public RSS feed, but that is what I meant with &#8220;proper&#8221;. A feed for every single type of notifcation you are getting already directly via e-mail, and a universal feed for your own profile. Unless Pownce provides some of that basic functionality, we would just continue to make use of &#8220;other&#8221; tools, even if they are not as powerful as Pownce could well be. Just my two cents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pownce 发布新功能【附邀请】 - 花儿开了</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1589418</link>
		<dc:creator>Pownce 发布新功能【附邀请】 - 花儿开了</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 16:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1589418</guid>
		<description>[...] Pownce 推出新功能的消息了(1,2,3)。根据其官方 Blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pownce 推出新功能的消息了(1,2,3)。根据其官方 Blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Features for Pownce</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1589249</link>
		<dc:creator>New Features for Pownce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 15:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1589249</guid>
		<description>[...] [via: Pownce Offers New Features, Still No API] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [via: Pownce Offers New Features, Still No API] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big dave</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1588766</link>
		<dc:creator>Big dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1588766</guid>
		<description>Pownce does nothing much, but should have done something that was slightly more important than nothing. yawn.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pownce does nothing much, but should have done something that was slightly more important than nothing. yawn&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raja Agrawal</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1588707</link>
		<dc:creator>Raja Agrawal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 11:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1588707</guid>
		<description>Duncan,

In the previous post, you&#039;ve linked TouchGraph&#039;s logo to its site whereas in this post, the Pownce logo links to the Crunchbase. I, as a regular loyal Techcrunch reader would request you to keep some consistency. Also, while posting about a company, a link to its site would be of great use. 

For example, in the above post, none of the links leads to Pownce.com which is little annoying.

Thanks and keep up the good work,
Raja</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan,</p>
<p>In the previous post, you&#8217;ve linked TouchGraph&#8217;s logo to its site whereas in this post, the Pownce logo links to the Crunchbase. I, as a regular loyal Techcrunch reader would request you to keep some consistency. Also, while posting about a company, a link to its site would be of great use. </p>
<p>For example, in the above post, none of the links leads to Pownce.com which is little annoying.</p>
<p>Thanks and keep up the good work,<br />
Raja</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1588497</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1588497</guid>
		<description>Stefan
Because the Pownce client isn&#039;t up to scratch and I&#039;d argue the majority of users prefer a desktop app; certainly the variety and popularity of Twitter apps would support that notion. Believe it or not, not everyone wants to connect to a microblogging platform via a webpage :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stefan<br />
Because the Pownce client isn&#8217;t up to scratch and I&#8217;d argue the majority of users prefer a desktop app; certainly the variety and popularity of Twitter apps would support that notion. Believe it or not, not everyone wants to connect to a microblogging platform via a webpage <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/comment-page-1/#comment-1588468</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 10:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/pownce-offers-new-features-still-no-api/#comment-1588468</guid>
		<description>Duncan, why do you think is an API _so_ important (especially for pownce)? I think websites itself are a giant API. Tools like iMacros or Kapow make it easy to connect to all of them. This approach is &quot;good enough&quot; for most uses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, why do you think is an API _so_ important (especially for pownce)? I think websites itself are a giant API. Tools like iMacros or Kapow make it easy to connect to all of them. This approach is &#8220;good enough&#8221; for most uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
