<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fake Steve Jobs Was A Blog Hater</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:33:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nadia</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-2694196</link>
		<dc:creator>Nadia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-2694196</guid>
		<description>All the factors told are very realistic. Wonderful discussion, nice information.


&lt;a href=&quot;www.jobz.pk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;jobs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All the factors told are very realistic. Wonderful discussion, nice information.</p>
<p><a href="www.jobz.pk" rel="nofollow">jobs</a><a></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-2694024</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-2694024</guid>
		<description>Hi 

This is a wonderful opinion. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone

scott

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fulltimeparttimejobs.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;full time part time jobs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi </p>
<p>This is a wonderful opinion. The things mentioned are unanimous and needs to be appreciated by everyone</p>
<p>scott</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fulltimeparttimejobs.com" rel="nofollow">full time part time jobs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robinson</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-2692466</link>
		<dc:creator>robinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 07:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-2692466</guid>
		<description>hi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Qaisera</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-2627461</link>
		<dc:creator>Qaisera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 04:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-2627461</guid>
		<description>Nice post.  This post is provide very good steve jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post.  This post is provide very good steve jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jobs in Pakistan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-2614467</link>
		<dc:creator>Jobs in Pakistan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 05:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-2614467</guid>
		<description>Your post give important knowledge to blogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your post give important knowledge to blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: émergenceweb : blogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daniel Lyons, IBM et Steve Jobs&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1608956</link>
		<dc:creator>émergenceweb : blogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Daniel Lyons, IBM et Steve Jobs&#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2007 14:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1608956</guid>
		<description>[...] magazine Forbes. TechCrunch s&#8217;est fait récemment un plaisir de le souligner tout en allant soulever un peu de poussière en-dessous du tapis de Lyons. Ils ont ainsi mis en lumière un article de Lyons, paru dans Forbes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] magazine Forbes. TechCrunch s&#8217;est fait récemment un plaisir de le souligner tout en allant soulever un peu de poussière en-dessous du tapis de Lyons. Ils ont ainsi mis en lumière un article de Lyons, paru dans Forbes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Dan Lyons</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1604156</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Dan Lyons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2007 02:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1604156</guid>
		<description>Lyons is not only a hypocrite, but he also *stole* the bulk of his little writing devices (use of &quot;tard&quot; in compound words, &quot;pet names&quot;) from the hated &quot;freetards&quot;, who he went after in a piece called Revenge of the Nerds a few years ago. Apologists should attempt to wade through Lyons&#039; Floating Point blog.

Not to mention that Dan continues to attack his competitors from behind the Forbes backed FSJ mask. Witness his recent withering attack on tiny news site silicon alley insider. The man is a remorseless hypocrite, and his blog is a safe place from which to carry on his petty personal vendettas.

Google for &quot;Dan Lyons+Linux&quot; and feel the love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lyons is not only a hypocrite, but he also *stole* the bulk of his little writing devices (use of &#8220;tard&#8221; in compound words, &#8220;pet names&#8221;) from the hated &#8220;freetards&#8221;, who he went after in a piece called Revenge of the Nerds a few years ago. Apologists should attempt to wade through Lyons&#8217; Floating Point blog.</p>
<p>Not to mention that Dan continues to attack his competitors from behind the Forbes backed FSJ mask. Witness his recent withering attack on tiny news site silicon alley insider. The man is a remorseless hypocrite, and his blog is a safe place from which to carry on his petty personal vendettas.</p>
<p>Google for &#8220;Dan Lyons+Linux&#8221; and feel the love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rollo</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1593287</link>
		<dc:creator>Rollo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 23:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1593287</guid>
		<description>Content aside (come on, just for a moment), Duncan writes well. Some of us read for the quality of the writing. Style is important: just ask Steve Jobs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Content aside (come on, just for a moment), Duncan writes well. Some of us read for the quality of the writing. Style is important: just ask Steve Jobs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1592604</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 17:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1592604</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see how this is ironic, hypocritical etc.

The whole point of FSJ is making fun of not only tech insiders but also bloggers.  Because it happened to be funny and attracted a huge following doesn&#039;t make what he said in that article any less true.  I&#039;m sure he feels the same.  

And I don&#039;t think the editor of Forbes needs &#039;fame&#039; or a &#039;book deal&#039;.  The book is just supplying a demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see how this is ironic, hypocritical etc.</p>
<p>The whole point of FSJ is making fun of not only tech insiders but also bloggers.  Because it happened to be funny and attracted a huge following doesn&#8217;t make what he said in that article any less true.  I&#8217;m sure he feels the same.  </p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t think the editor of Forbes needs &#8216;fame&#8217; or a &#8216;book deal&#8217;.  The book is just supplying a demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1592489</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1592489</guid>
		<description>Long time reader (~1yr) first time commenter:

Duncan has become the guy everyone likes to bag. It is as of it is part of the &quot;things to do list&quot;:
milk? Check
took the trash out? check
dishes? check
bash duncan? check
k, done

I agree this is overdue, as far as Lyons is concerned, and that he is proving/proved this with FSJ. 

Please engage duncan on the facts of the posts not some bs, without supporting arguments.

I learn a whole lot here from posts and comments, even when the original post is less than stellar. Constructive criticism has meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Long time reader (~1yr) first time commenter:</p>
<p>Duncan has become the guy everyone likes to bag. It is as of it is part of the &#8220;things to do list&#8221;:<br />
milk? Check<br />
took the trash out? check<br />
dishes? check<br />
bash duncan? check<br />
k, done</p>
<p>I agree this is overdue, as far as Lyons is concerned, and that he is proving/proved this with FSJ. </p>
<p>Please engage duncan on the facts of the posts not some bs, without supporting arguments.</p>
<p>I learn a whole lot here from posts and comments, even when the original post is less than stellar. Constructive criticism has meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1592460</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 16:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1592460</guid>
		<description>Duncan

I think it is obvious I struck a nerve. Can everyone be wrong and you be 100% wcorrect. I also thought you were above name calling. When someone gets the best of you, is that all you can offer?

There are several people who find your &#039; opinions&#039; to be offensive or way out in left field. You do like to have people read your post don&#039;t you? If you want to continue having some sort of impact, just remember when keep score, readers always win. Dom 1 Duncan 0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan</p>
<p>I think it is obvious I struck a nerve. Can everyone be wrong and you be 100% wcorrect. I also thought you were above name calling. When someone gets the best of you, is that all you can offer?</p>
<p>There are several people who find your &#8216; opinions&#8217; to be offensive or way out in left field. You do like to have people read your post don&#8217;t you? If you want to continue having some sort of impact, just remember when keep score, readers always win. Dom 1 Duncan 0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1592362</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1592362</guid>
		<description>Zemode:

OMG....Mike is the worst in taking criticism and frequently deletes posts that he does not like, calling them &quot;spam&quot;  Mike has also said time and time again that he writes what he likes and does not care what people think. His posts covering justintv&#039;s fiasco with EMT personnel and his attack on Sprint are examples that this blog&#039;s purpose is often to provide a soapbox for Mike.  Kind of sounds like Daniel&#039;s article in Forbes could have been written about this blog! 

Mike has great connections and understands the technology space very well.  I just wish he would keep his ego in check and understand that techcrunch is no longer his personal blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zemode:</p>
<p>OMG&#8230;.Mike is the worst in taking criticism and frequently deletes posts that he does not like, calling them &#8220;spam&#8221;  Mike has also said time and time again that he writes what he likes and does not care what people think. His posts covering justintv&#8217;s fiasco with EMT personnel and his attack on Sprint are examples that this blog&#8217;s purpose is often to provide a soapbox for Mike.  Kind of sounds like Daniel&#8217;s article in Forbes could have been written about this blog! </p>
<p>Mike has great connections and understands the technology space very well.  I just wish he would keep his ego in check and understand that techcrunch is no longer his personal blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fake Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1592204</link>
		<dc:creator>Fake Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 15:01:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1592204</guid>
		<description>I hope my past writings attacking various foodstuffs are never revealed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope my past writings attacking various foodstuffs are never revealed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1592187</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 14:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1592187</guid>
		<description>It looks like the blogging glory might have changed his mind or what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks like the blogging glory might have changed his mind or what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: geg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1592064</link>
		<dc:creator>geg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1592064</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found the the ad hominem vitriol and downright demonization of people who think poorly of blogs (particularly Andrew Keen) is really amusing/pathetic. I see it on boing boing too. 

This sort of bullying approach has always been the poorest way to make a point; it&#039;s more useful as a tool to help polarize people of two opposing opinions. 

tldr: grow up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found the the ad hominem vitriol and downright demonization of people who think poorly of blogs (particularly Andrew Keen) is really amusing/pathetic. I see it on boing boing too. </p>
<p>This sort of bullying approach has always been the poorest way to make a point; it&#8217;s more useful as a tool to help polarize people of two opposing opinions. </p>
<p>tldr: grow up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Blister</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1592035</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Blister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:48:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1592035</guid>
		<description>...I for one agree with Mr. Lyons.  Blogs sometimes create news be referencing each other until it MUST be true!  Even mainstream media can get caught up in this hype.  The key for dealing with this new &quot;news&quot; medium is having a way to sort out the b.s.

Furthermore, by parody-blogging, Mr. Lyons isn&#039;t exactly embracing the blogging world: he&#039;s making fun of it, while cashing in at the same time.  Genius...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;I for one agree with Mr. Lyons.  Blogs sometimes create news be referencing each other until it MUST be true!  Even mainstream media can get caught up in this hype.  The key for dealing with this new &#8220;news&#8221; medium is having a way to sort out the b.s.</p>
<p>Furthermore, by parody-blogging, Mr. Lyons isn&#8217;t exactly embracing the blogging world: he&#8217;s making fun of it, while cashing in at the same time.  Genius&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1592000</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1592000</guid>
		<description>Ok, last one:
http://www.dashes.com/anil/2007/08/fake-steve-jobs-and-the-triumph-of-blogs.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, last one:<br />
<a href="http://www.dashes.com/anil/2007/08/fake-steve-jobs-and-the-triumph-of-blogs.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.dashes.com/anil/2007/08/fake-steve-jobs-and-the-triumph-of-blogs.html'>http://www.dash...h-of-blogs.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1591992</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:29:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1591992</guid>
		<description>One more:
http://technically.us/code/archive/2007/8#item-772</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more:<br />
<a href="http://technically.us/code/archive/2007/8#item-772" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://technically.us/code/archive/2007/8#item-772'>http://technica...2007/8#item-772</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1591983</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 13:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1591983</guid>
		<description>I agree with #10.  Duncan, I&#039;ve never attacked your posts, but this is old news.  This is something you should have written up when the news came out about who Fake Steve Jobs was.  If you look at the comments when he was outed, there are some comments discussing his point of view on blogs:
http://snipurl.com/sjcomment
http://snipurl.com/sjcomment2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with #10.  Duncan, I&#8217;ve never attacked your posts, but this is old news.  This is something you should have written up when the news came out about who Fake Steve Jobs was.  If you look at the comments when he was outed, there are some comments discussing his point of view on blogs:<br />
<a href="http://snipurl.com/sjcomment" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://snipurl.com/sjcomment'>http://snipurl.com/sjcomment</a><br />
<a href="http://snipurl.com/sjcomment2" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://snipurl.com/sjcomment2'>http://snipurl.com/sjcomment2</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clyde Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1591820</link>
		<dc:creator>Clyde Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 12:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1591820</guid>
		<description>Ah, the land of hate!

I hadn&#039;t heard about this and maybe it undermines Fake blogs and maybe it doesn&#039;t but I don&#039;t care.  I just love watching the journalists capitulate.

Every human may not eventually have a blog but every journalist certainly will.

Why?  Cause management will mandate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, the land of hate!</p>
<p>I hadn&#8217;t heard about this and maybe it undermines Fake blogs and maybe it doesn&#8217;t but I don&#8217;t care.  I just love watching the journalists capitulate.</p>
<p>Every human may not eventually have a blog but every journalist certainly will.</p>
<p>Why?  Cause management will mandate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: therry</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1591772</link>
		<dc:creator>therry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 11:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1591772</guid>
		<description>Your note has a bitter tone that stats me wondering if any &quot;fight&quot; involved you and FSJ, Duncan ?

As for me I&#039;m amazed at how FSJ was right in the quoted articles, his description of blogs *is* still accurate and good.
Duncan, may be you just lack taking a look outside of the tech world for a broader view of how much blog can be bad or armful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your note has a bitter tone that stats me wondering if any &#8220;fight&#8221; involved you and FSJ, Duncan ?</p>
<p>As for me I&#8217;m amazed at how FSJ was right in the quoted articles, his description of blogs *is* still accurate and good.<br />
Duncan, may be you just lack taking a look outside of the tech world for a broader view of how much blog can be bad or armful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris R.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1591721</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris R.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 11:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1591721</guid>
		<description>Fake Steve is biased and extremely unfair. I would venture to say he should be working at a tabloid, and not Forbes Magazine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fake Steve is biased and extremely unfair. I would venture to say he should be working at a tabloid, and not Forbes Magazine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1591422</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1591422</guid>
		<description>Raj
Fair call, but to be fair it was a long weekend in the US...literally next to nothing happened over 3 days, so as much as it wasn&#039;t a post I&#039;d run on a normal day, I thought it was interesting enough for a long weekend. If I&#039;m wrong so be it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Raj<br />
Fair call, but to be fair it was a long weekend in the US&#8230;literally next to nothing happened over 3 days, so as much as it wasn&#8217;t a post I&#8217;d run on a normal day, I thought it was interesting enough for a long weekend. If I&#8217;m wrong so be it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1591420</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1591420</guid>
		<description>Duncan,

You write well. But the thing is, most of your posts (probably 80%) is not what the techcrunch crowd is keen on. Except if you were hired to change techcrunch&#039;s writing style. If this does change, the rss feed will drop in the next 6 months. 

On the flip side, why dont you start a blog where you will be writing your Gossip and sensational posts. I am sure there is a market out there for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan,</p>
<p>You write well. But the thing is, most of your posts (probably 80%) is not what the techcrunch crowd is keen on. Except if you were hired to change techcrunch&#8217;s writing style. If this does change, the rss feed will drop in the next 6 months. </p>
<p>On the flip side, why dont you start a blog where you will be writing your Gossip and sensational posts. I am sure there is a market out there for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raj</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/comment-page-1/#comment-1591351</link>
		<dc:creator>Raj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 09:06:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/03/fake-steve-jobs-was-a-blog-hater/#comment-1591351</guid>
		<description>Duncan,
Expectations from techcrunch are high and one feels disappointed to see not very exciting posts.

I suggest to add categories like:Breaking News,Gossips,Analysis of Existing Stuff etc so that expectations are set properly and posts reach only the intended audience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan,<br />
Expectations from techcrunch are high and one feels disappointed to see not very exciting posts.</p>
<p>I suggest to add categories like:Breaking News,Gossips,Analysis of Existing Stuff etc so that expectations are set properly and posts reach only the intended audience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
