Comments on: Google Reverses Position On Video Refunds; Good For Them http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/ Startup and Technology News Thu, 26 Nov 2009 21:02:38 -0800 hourly 1 By: Adam Ostrow http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1568132 Adam Ostrow Wed, 22 Aug 2007 22:05:46 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1568132 <strong>The Google Spin Zone Reaches New Heights...</strong> It looks like I’m finally not the only person that thinks a $160 billion company might not actually live and die by the moniker “Don’t Be Evil.” Nicholas Carr is dead on with his response to the way YouTube (aka... The Google Spin Zone Reaches New Heights…

It looks like I’m finally not the only person that thinks a $160 billion company might not actually live and die by the moniker “Don’t Be Evil.” Nicholas Carr is dead on with his response to the way YouTube (aka…

]]> By: BikerDan http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1567244 BikerDan Wed, 22 Aug 2007 04:33:28 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1567244 Good. They probably realized that no one would ever use their Checkout, or otherwise trust them with their $ again if they didn't do something to fess up. Good.

They probably realized that no one would ever use their Checkout, or otherwise trust them with their $ again if they didn’t do something to fess up.

]]> By: David Mackey http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1567103 David Mackey Wed, 22 Aug 2007 02:14:41 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1567103 Must agree, very nice job by Google. Must agree, very nice job by Google.

]]> By: Larry Rubin http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566957 Larry Rubin Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:45:49 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566957 Google made me a soothsayer. Too bad no one took me up on the Webvan wager. Snap. Google made me a soothsayer. Too bad no one took me up on the Webvan wager.

Snap.

]]> By: O_O http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566945 O_O Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:30:32 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566945 So now Google gave me OVER DOUBLE my money back and is letting me continue watching the videos for 6 months?!?! This must be part of some evil plot!!!! Does anyone here believe Apple would give everyone double their money back (or even there money back at all) if they discontinued iTMS? Google did more then enough with the original deal giving me more money then I gave them back after I enjoyed their product. After this, it shows Google is one of the few truly reputable companies that cares about its users first, as that is what they're selling to the advertisers, they badly need quality users. So now Google gave me OVER DOUBLE my money back and is letting me continue watching the videos for 6 months?!?! This must be part of some evil plot!!!! Does anyone here believe Apple would give everyone double their money back (or even there money back at all) if they discontinued iTMS? Google did more then enough with the original deal giving me more money then I gave them back after I enjoyed their product. After this, it shows Google is one of the few truly reputable companies that cares about its users first, as that is what they’re selling to the advertisers, they badly need quality users.

]]> By: chall http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566940 chall Tue, 21 Aug 2007 23:19:48 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566940 In the end this is a good decision. It would have been better if they had made the decision earlier rather than wait and see people's reaction. In the end this is a good decision. It would have been better if they had made the decision earlier rather than wait and see people’s reaction.

]]> By: Andrew http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566849 Andrew Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:06:59 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566849 its kind of late for it..any person who heard that news will be hesitant to pay for Google products in the future knowing that they can always pull that kind of stuff its kind of late for it..any person who heard that news will be hesitant to pay for Google products in the future knowing that they can always pull that kind of stuff

]]> By: Greg Spira http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566800 Greg Spira Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:54:02 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566800 I wrote in the comments last week that I had no doubt that Google would reverse their decision. The bad publicity so far outweighed the money involved that there was no way Google was going to stick with an obviously universally unpopular decision. The videos will still eventually stop running - I doubt Google really has any choice in that, since other companies are calling the drm shots - but Google is now doing more financially than what they had to do in the first place. As far as I'm concerned, the real question is who made this incredibly bad decision? The outrage on this was quite foreseeable, and I have to seriously question why anyone who would make a decision like this is in a position to make a decision at Google. I find that most of the criticism aimed at Google is aimed at Google decisions that are perfectly reasonable, though not universally popular. This was very different; the decision was indefensible both ethically and from a business relations point of view. I wrote in the comments last week that I had no doubt that Google would reverse their decision. The bad publicity so far outweighed the money involved that there was no way Google was going to stick with an obviously universally unpopular decision. The videos will still eventually stop running – I doubt Google really has any choice in that, since other companies are calling the drm shots – but Google is now doing more financially than what they had to do in the first place.

As far as I’m concerned, the real question is who made this incredibly bad decision? The outrage on this was quite foreseeable, and I have to seriously question why anyone who would make a decision like this is in a position to make a decision at Google. I find that most of the criticism aimed at Google is aimed at Google decisions that are perfectly reasonable, though not universally popular. This was very different; the decision was indefensible both ethically and from a business relations point of view.

]]> By: Sean http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566798 Sean Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:52:32 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566798 Sometimes it seems like a company announces crappy news just so they can turn around and announce something not as crappy and make it seem good. Sometimes it seems like a company announces crappy news just so they can turn around and announce something not as crappy and make it seem good.

]]> By: Saagar http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566790 Saagar Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:35:52 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566790 The power of user community in the modern blogging world. First Digg acknowledges and now the giant Google itself does.. Is this a sign of Happy Days coming :) The power of user community in the modern blogging world. First Digg acknowledges and now the giant Google itself does.. Is this a sign of Happy Days coming :)

]]> By: Blogger Quoted: Google Reverses Position On Video Refunds; Good For Them http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566769 Blogger Quoted: Google Reverses Position On Video Refunds; Good For Them Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:57:29 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566769 [...] Michael Arrington on Google decision on video refunds@TechCrunch [...] [...] Michael Arrington on Google decision on video refunds@TechCrunch [...]

]]> By: Zoli Erdos http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566766 Zoli Erdos Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:52:47 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566766 I predicted Google would <a href="http://www.zoliblog.com/2007/08/12/google-video-do-i-hear-class-action/" rel="nofollow">revert the original decision within a day:</a> "Because this ignorant move is so ridiculously stupid, will hurt Google’s image so much that I’m sure someone higher up will wake up and revert it before the lawyers have a chance to file papers." Right call, wrong timing. What the hell took Google a week? I predicted Google would revert the original decision within a day:

“Because this ignorant move is so ridiculously stupid, will hurt Google’s image so much that I’m sure someone higher up will wake up and revert it before the lawyers have a chance to file papers.”

Right call, wrong timing. What the hell took Google a week?

]]> By: Michael Rubin, Arment Dietrich http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566755 Michael Rubin, Arment Dietrich Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:42:59 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566755 While I still disagree with the idea that the videos that people legally purchased will no longer be available to play (after six months), I have to give kudos to Google for acknowledging their screwup in an open and transparent manner. Many companies try to hide behind silence or spin their way out of a bad situation instead of owning up and giving the digital equivalent of the "My bad." So add my voice to the chorus of kudos. This should be a case study for any company that finds itself in hot water, especially now in the age of instant (and very far-reaching) conversation. It's a simple three-step process: 1. Apologize 2. Own up (humor helps) 3. Fix the problem Simple. Disclosure: I have no affiliation with Google apart from being addicted to its search engine and a satisfied user of several of its products. ---- Michael E. Rubin Arment Dietrich, Inc. Call me -- 312-787-7249 x212 Tell a friend -- fight destructive spin! http:///www.spinsucks.com See what I’m up to -- http://twitter.com/merubin While I still disagree with the idea that the videos that people legally purchased will no longer be available to play (after six months), I have to give kudos to Google for acknowledging their screwup in an open and transparent manner. Many companies try to hide behind silence or spin their way out of a bad situation instead of owning up and giving the digital equivalent of the “My bad.” So add my voice to the chorus of kudos.

This should be a case study for any company that finds itself in hot water, especially now in the age of instant (and very far-reaching) conversation. It’s a simple three-step process:

1. Apologize

2. Own up (humor helps)

3. Fix the problem

Simple.

Disclosure: I have no affiliation with Google apart from being addicted to its search engine and a satisfied user of several of its products.

—-
Michael E. Rubin
Arment Dietrich, Inc.

Call me — 312-787-7249 x212
Tell a friend — fight destructive spin! http:///www.spinsucks.com
See what I’m up to — http://twitter.com/merubin

]]> By: Slappenstance http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566751 Slappenstance Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:37:06 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566751 Nice. Nice.

]]> By: Yezidi http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566749 Yezidi Tue, 21 Aug 2007 19:36:03 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566749 Good on Google. The pressure from many blogs, including TechCrunch, must have gotten to them. heh Good on Google. The pressure from many blogs, including TechCrunch, must have gotten to them. heh

]]> By: Garth Hall http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566723 Garth Hall Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:59:01 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566723 A good move on Google's part to recant. Goodwill gestures go a long way. They do get a touch arrogant at times but understandably so (how would we sustain life, as we know it, without them?). And you guys are so brave.. Well done, TechCrunch. A good move on Google’s part to recant. Goodwill gestures go a long way. They do get a touch arrogant at times but understandably so (how would we sustain life, as we know it, without them?).

And you guys are so brave.. Well done, TechCrunch.

]]> By: Tim http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566719 Tim Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:57:09 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566719 The power of the blogosphere in action! So they do have a soul. =^) Tim McCormack iRent2u.com - the Online Rental Marketplace The power of the blogosphere in action!

So they do have a soul. =^)

Tim McCormack
iRent2u.com – the Online Rental Marketplace

]]> By: Chris http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/comment-page-1/#comment-1566714 Chris Tue, 21 Aug 2007 18:52:23 +0000 http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/21/google-reverses-position-on-video-refunds-good-for-them/#comment-1566714 They also said that users who've already received Google Checkout credit will get to keep it in addition to getting their full refunds in cash. It's always nice to see a big company actually own up to a mistake and not try to sweep it under the rug... They also said that users who’ve already received Google Checkout credit will get to keep it in addition to getting their full refunds in cash. It’s always nice to see a big company actually own up to a mistake and not try to sweep it under the rug…

]]>