<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CAMfess: Because Jerry Springer Isn&#8217;t Enough</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 20:09:59 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: name required</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1532014</link>
		<dc:creator>name required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 04:04:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1532014</guid>
		<description>is it just me or does it seem there are a lot more TC posts per article than there used to be? anyone have an opinion on why? 

i actually like this duncan fella. the more he posts, the more the readers want to just bash him. i actually read the posts for his articles nowadays just to see people tee off on him. i say thank you duncan for doing your part to make TC fun to read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>is it just me or does it seem there are a lot more TC posts per article than there used to be? anyone have an opinion on why? </p>
<p>i actually like this duncan fella. the more he posts, the more the readers want to just bash him. i actually read the posts for his articles nowadays just to see people tee off on him. i say thank you duncan for doing your part to make TC fun to read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531998</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 03:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531998</guid>
		<description>“the world’s first website that allows users to confess secrets through video blogs.”

Yes, very true... Confessions, as we know, are wildly popular yet illegal on all the other video sites. 

(look how low res and cheap the logos and nav bar are</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“the world’s first website that allows users to confess secrets through video blogs.”</p>
<p>Yes, very true&#8230; Confessions, as we know, are wildly popular yet illegal on all the other video sites. </p>
<p>(look how low res and cheap the logos and nav bar are</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531611</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531611</guid>
		<description>“the patent-pending Camfess Anonymizer(TM)”, which allows users to automatically disguise their voice or face on a submitted video (see video below for an example).

What?  How about using a freaking mask if you want to hide your face?

Having a website where you can find confessions may be appealing.  But, what&#039;s makes Springer or a show like Cheaters interesting is the unexpected stuff.  We like to someone shocked by some news or being caught in the act, or to be surprised ourselves by someone&#039;s actions (the stabbing of the Cheaters host).  Here, despite the confessions, you won&#039;t be shocked by much.  

Given that, I&#039;m going to create a website where people will confess to others something awful they did and/or tape people cheating on somebody.  Can a VC show me some love and hand over the cash for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“the patent-pending Camfess Anonymizer(TM)”, which allows users to automatically disguise their voice or face on a submitted video (see video below for an example).</p>
<p>What?  How about using a freaking mask if you want to hide your face?</p>
<p>Having a website where you can find confessions may be appealing.  But, what&#8217;s makes Springer or a show like Cheaters interesting is the unexpected stuff.  We like to someone shocked by some news or being caught in the act, or to be surprised ourselves by someone&#8217;s actions (the stabbing of the Cheaters host).  Here, despite the confessions, you won&#8217;t be shocked by much.  </p>
<p>Given that, I&#8217;m going to create a website where people will confess to others something awful they did and/or tape people cheating on somebody.  Can a VC show me some love and hand over the cash for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531543</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531543</guid>
		<description>Anatoly:

here here!! But you have to admit that that site blows!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anatoly:</p>
<p>here here!! But you have to admit that that site blows!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531540</link>
		<dc:creator>Al</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 20:01:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531540</guid>
		<description>And how much funding did they get I wonder? Duncan, if you are running out of things to cover just take a look at our startup, at least we provide a service and already have great traction. URL in the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And how much funding did they get I wonder? Duncan, if you are running out of things to cover just take a look at our startup, at least we provide a service and already have great traction. URL in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yez</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531532</link>
		<dc:creator>Yez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531532</guid>
		<description>I confess I&#039;m intrigued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I confess I&#8217;m intrigued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531519</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531519</guid>
		<description>I blame the spell checker, it did have a c to start with! But thanks for pointing it out. 

Alaska
as I&#039;ve said numerous times before, damned if I do, damned if I don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I blame the spell checker, it did have a c to start with! But thanks for pointing it out. </p>
<p>Alaska<br />
as I&#8217;ve said numerous times before, damned if I do, damned if I don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anatoly</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531516</link>
		<dc:creator>Anatoly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531516</guid>
		<description>My first camfession: 

Those who can, try and build companies. Yes, mayb companies with poor business models, etc., but at least they try.

Those who cant, come and post comments on how lame these startups are. And how lame techcrunch is for mentioning them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first camfession: </p>
<p>Those who can, try and build companies. Yes, mayb companies with poor business models, etc., but at least they try.</p>
<p>Those who cant, come and post comments on how lame these startups are. And how lame techcrunch is for mentioning them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nerd Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531497</link>
		<dc:creator>Nerd Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 19:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531497</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with YouTube?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with YouTube?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dominic</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531474</link>
		<dc:creator>Dominic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531474</guid>
		<description>I think the site is lame. I am not a big fan of Duncan either, however, if you are looking for literary excellence, this is not the place to find it. Try your local library.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the site is lame. I am not a big fan of Duncan either, however, if you are looking for literary excellence, this is not the place to find it. Try your local library.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: na</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531462</link>
		<dc:creator>na</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531462</guid>
		<description>Cite, not site. Proof yet again that spell-check is no match against basic English and re-reading before publishing.

Also &quot;the world’s first website that allows users to confess secrets through video blogs.&quot; has got to be one hell of a joke from the copywriter. Nearly any video sharing site on the web (ala YouTube or Vimeo) &quot;allows users to confess secrets through video blogs&quot; the point, as always, is who cares to watch them? People can post ego-porn to their own sites as well, that doesn&#039;t make the service, or the providing of such service any more worthwhile or notable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cite, not site. Proof yet again that spell-check is no match against basic English and re-reading before publishing.</p>
<p>Also &#8220;the world’s first website that allows users to confess secrets through video blogs.&#8221; has got to be one hell of a joke from the copywriter. Nearly any video sharing site on the web (ala YouTube or Vimeo) &#8220;allows users to confess secrets through video blogs&#8221; the point, as always, is who cares to watch them? People can post ego-porn to their own sites as well, that doesn&#8217;t make the service, or the providing of such service any more worthwhile or notable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531461</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531461</guid>
		<description>Duncan, sorry to point out your typos in public, but the word you want is &#039;cite&#039; not &#039;site&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, sorry to point out your typos in public, but the word you want is &#8216;cite&#8217; not &#8217;site&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531454</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531454</guid>
		<description>CamFess is straight up dumb - who cares - how about something a little more interesting - like a Julia Allison profile!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CamFess is straight up dumb &#8211; who cares &#8211; how about something a little more interesting &#8211; like a Julia Allison profile!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alaska Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531447</link>
		<dc:creator>Alaska Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531447</guid>
		<description>TechCrunch really needs to hire copyeditors. What do those &quot;interns&quot; do anyway? There&#039;s no school, tell them to proof read all these posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TechCrunch really needs to hire copyeditors. What do those &#8220;interns&#8221; do anyway? There&#8217;s no school, tell them to proof read all these posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531440</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531440</guid>
		<description>Typo!  Please exchange &quot;cite&quot; for &quot;site&quot; in the following sentence:

&quot;This is where is becomes perhaps more amusing, because the folks at CAMfess ___site___ religion as a marketing angle&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typo!  Please exchange &#8220;cite&#8221; for &#8220;site&#8221; in the following sentence:</p>
<p>&#8220;This is where is becomes perhaps more amusing, because the folks at CAMfess ___site___ religion as a marketing angle&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alaska Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531427</link>
		<dc:creator>Alaska Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531427</guid>
		<description>@Duncan,

For the sake of journalistic responsibility I went through the TC9 sponsor list and looked through TC archives to match up what company was profiled and 8 out of the 25 don&#039;t have any mentions.

I also considered, also for the sake of journalistic responsibility, that there can be a perceived sense of conflict of interest but considering that that in the past others have always done the dirty work (Nicky G posting all those &quot;Thank the Sponsors&quot; posts) surely it wouldn&#039;t be a big deal if you wrote the posts. Because again, if they paid money to exhibit at the party they surely can be profiled. 

But hey I&#039;ll confess, not through this crappy site though, that I have another reason for wanting to see posts about the companies at TC9: some of them were really godawful lame. My top three lamest: Dial Directions, collegewiki.com, and Jaman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Duncan,</p>
<p>For the sake of journalistic responsibility I went through the TC9 sponsor list and looked through TC archives to match up what company was profiled and 8 out of the 25 don&#8217;t have any mentions.</p>
<p>I also considered, also for the sake of journalistic responsibility, that there can be a perceived sense of conflict of interest but considering that that in the past others have always done the dirty work (Nicky G posting all those &#8220;Thank the Sponsors&#8221; posts) surely it wouldn&#8217;t be a big deal if you wrote the posts. Because again, if they paid money to exhibit at the party they surely can be profiled. </p>
<p>But hey I&#8217;ll confess, not through this crappy site though, that I have another reason for wanting to see posts about the companies at TC9: some of them were really godawful lame. My top three lamest: Dial Directions, collegewiki.com, and Jaman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the buxr widget</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531422</link>
		<dc:creator>the buxr widget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531422</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t appeal to me. Guess I&#039;m getting too old!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t appeal to me. Guess I&#8217;m getting too old!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Riley</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531415</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531415</guid>
		<description>Alaska
many of them have already been run, and if we only ran sponsor posts..well suffice to say the barbs would be worse still than those you&#039;re writing at this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alaska<br />
many of them have already been run, and if we only ran sponsor posts..well suffice to say the barbs would be worse still than those you&#8217;re writing at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KindAndThoughtful</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531394</link>
		<dc:creator>KindAndThoughtful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531394</guid>
		<description>&quot;Confess yourself to heaven, repent what&#039;s past, avoid what is to come... And do not spread the compost on the weeds to make them ranker.&quot;




--</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Confess yourself to heaven, repent what&#8217;s past, avoid what is to come&#8230; And do not spread the compost on the weeds to make them ranker.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alaska Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531393</link>
		<dc:creator>Alaska Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531393</guid>
		<description>Another point:

Why are lame stuff like this being featured? What about you write up a profile for some of the companies that had a booth at Techcrunch9 or at least an update? Stuff like profil.es, collegewiki.com, real time matrix? That&#039;s at least 5 post material right there! If they&#039;re good enough to sling you some cash for a booth they must be worth writing about right?

Actually on a second thought, after having talked to most of them it&#039;s probably a good idea you don&#039;t, cause most of them were just stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another point:</p>
<p>Why are lame stuff like this being featured? What about you write up a profile for some of the companies that had a booth at Techcrunch9 or at least an update? Stuff like profil.es, collegewiki.com, real time matrix? That&#8217;s at least 5 post material right there! If they&#8217;re good enough to sling you some cash for a booth they must be worth writing about right?</p>
<p>Actually on a second thought, after having talked to most of them it&#8217;s probably a good idea you don&#8217;t, cause most of them were just stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: biz.inc</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531375</link>
		<dc:creator>biz.inc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531375</guid>
		<description>...Teeesst-iii-ffFyy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Teeesst-iii-ffFyy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alaska Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531373</link>
		<dc:creator>Alaska Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531373</guid>
		<description>This is a great idea!

NOT.

This is lame. Confessions are meant to be anonymous and given a degree of barriers to ensure it is. Grouphug.us is all text. PostSecret had an artsy self expression angle. Even a boring ol&#039; confessional booth HAS SCREENS because YOU&#039;RE NOT SUPPOSE TO SEE EACH OTHER. It loses its soul like this. Let&#039;s paste wacky stuff on people&#039;s faces and change their voice, that&#039;ll definitely makes this entertaining! No, it just makes this sad and cartoonish. Jerry Springer had scores of producers and writers on staff, if kids want to be creative, they have YouTube.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great idea!</p>
<p>NOT.</p>
<p>This is lame. Confessions are meant to be anonymous and given a degree of barriers to ensure it is. Grouphug.us is all text. PostSecret had an artsy self expression angle. Even a boring ol&#8217; confessional booth HAS SCREENS because YOU&#8217;RE NOT SUPPOSE TO SEE EACH OTHER. It loses its soul like this. Let&#8217;s paste wacky stuff on people&#8217;s faces and change their voice, that&#8217;ll definitely makes this entertaining! No, it just makes this sad and cartoonish. Jerry Springer had scores of producers and writers on staff, if kids want to be creative, they have YouTube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karthik</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531372</link>
		<dc:creator>karthik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531372</guid>
		<description>if it becomes even a tad famous it should be only a matter of time before  some one comes up with a crack that decrypts the voice encryption or watever...........the day that happens camfess goes straight down the gutter

bottomline: u must be a dim wit to think that you can post  your voice to be anonymous through some encryption</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it becomes even a tad famous it should be only a matter of time before  some one comes up with a crack that decrypts the voice encryption or watever&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..the day that happens camfess goes straight down the gutter</p>
<p>bottomline: u must be a dim wit to think that you can post  your voice to be anonymous through some encryption</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Keys</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531371</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Keys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531371</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m not sure whether to be amused or disturbed by CAMfess. It’s like a poor man’s Post Secret with a touch of Jerry Springer. In the age of reality television, an age where voyeurism has reached a height never seen before, there will undoubtedly be a place in the market for CAMfess&quot;.

Very well said. With the ability to disguise...Jerry Springer may even be child&#039;s play...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m not sure whether to be amused or disturbed by CAMfess. It’s like a poor man’s Post Secret with a touch of Jerry Springer. In the age of reality television, an age where voyeurism has reached a height never seen before, there will undoubtedly be a place in the market for CAMfess&#8221;.</p>
<p>Very well said. With the ability to disguise&#8230;Jerry Springer may even be child&#8217;s play&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeM</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/comment-page-1/#comment-1531369</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 17:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/08/01/camfess-because-jerry-springer-isnt-enough/#comment-1531369</guid>
		<description>Huh??? Patent for disguising their voice or face on a submitted video ? 

Am I being sued if I mimic Homer Simpson voice on a submitted video ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Huh??? Patent for disguising their voice or face on a submitted video ? </p>
<p>Am I being sued if I mimic Homer Simpson voice on a submitted video ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
