<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Study: Top 50k blogs had $500 million in 2006 Revenue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Times Archive &#183; New AT&#38; T&#8217;s Lobbying Operation Takes Shape</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1687183</link>
		<dc:creator>Times Archive &#183; New AT&#38; T&#8217;s Lobbying Operation Takes Shape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 16:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1687183</guid>
		<description>[...] bloggers have been quite skeptical of this figure and their research methodology, including TechCrunch, Just Make Money Online, and various other blogs, though the main response seems to have been [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bloggers have been quite skeptical of this figure and their research methodology, including TechCrunch, Just Make Money Online, and various other blogs, though the main response seems to have been [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Оборотът на първите 50 хиляди блога</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1595817</link>
		<dc:creator>Оборотът на първите 50 хиляди блога</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1595817</guid>
		<description>[...] TechCrunch разпространи данни за едно много интересно, макар и спорно изследване - какъв е оборотът на първите 50 000 блога за 2006г. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] TechCrunch разпространи данни за едно много интересно, макар и спорно изследване - какъв е оборотът на първите 50 000 блога за 2006г. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Chitika Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top 5! Chitika Blog Post Winners</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1579998</link>
		<dc:creator>The Chitika Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top 5! Chitika Blog Post Winners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Aug 2007 03:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1579998</guid>
		<description>[...] ever study estimating the revenue in the blogosphere. This study may have grabbed the interest of Tech Crunch but was it enough to sway everyone? The good news is this study was the first of many others that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ever study estimating the revenue in the blogosphere. This study may have grabbed the interest of Tech Crunch but was it enough to sway everyone? The good news is this study was the first of many others that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: srinath</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1564000</link>
		<dc:creator>srinath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2007 13:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1564000</guid>
		<description>i hope to join</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hope to join</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nico Nemil &#124; Web Developer &#124; Web Designer &#124; Graphics Artist &#187; 50k blogs equals $500mil Revenue</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1541246</link>
		<dc:creator>Nico Nemil &#124; Web Developer &#124; Web Designer &#124; Graphics Artist &#187; 50k blogs equals $500mil Revenue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 22:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1541246</guid>
		<description>[...] blogs equals $500mil Revenue  Top 50k blogs had $500 million in 2006 Revenue: TechCrunch has an interesting link to a study performed by a couple University of Texas Ph.D [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blogs equals $500mil Revenue  Top 50k blogs had $500 million in 2006 Revenue: TechCrunch has an interesting link to a study performed by a couple University of Texas Ph.D [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog about music</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1540365</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog about music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2007 11:44:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1540365</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blog about music...&lt;/strong&gt;

Blog about music...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blog about music&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Blog about music&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bubble 2.0 &#171; Leaving my &#8220;logs&#8221; on the web.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1538949</link>
		<dc:creator>Bubble 2.0 &#171; Leaving my &#8220;logs&#8221; on the web.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 18:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1538949</guid>
		<description>[...] Mike Arrington pointed out in this post, the trend is already pretty well demonstrated&#8211; revenue generation based on content is even [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mike Arrington pointed out in this post, the trend is already pretty well demonstrated&#8211; revenue generation based on content is even [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Chan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1534958</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Chan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 21:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1534958</guid>
		<description>Headlines like this spawn a whole "internet gold rush".  Seems like the top blogs are Blogs who blog about blogging.

How's this for an estimate income than Chitika's study... some kind of Inverse Power Law:

Blog income = $1 Billion / Alexa Rank</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Headlines like this spawn a whole &#8220;internet gold rush&#8221;.  Seems like the top blogs are Blogs who blog about blogging.</p>
<p>How&#8217;s this for an estimate income than Chitika&#8217;s study&#8230; some kind of Inverse Power Law:</p>
<p>Blog income = $1 Billion / Alexa Rank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Review Boss</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1534535</link>
		<dc:creator>Review Boss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1534535</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Loudlaunch.com-Launch loudly, pay badly!...&lt;/strong&gt;

This is a story of a website which promises pay for posts written by bloggers and just ditch them later! In the world of internet and bloggs, it is a cheap and unhealthy forum where no bloggers should approach.
......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Loudlaunch.com-Launch loudly, pay badly!&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This is a story of a website which promises pay for posts written by bloggers and just ditch them later! In the world of internet and bloggs, it is a cheap and unhealthy forum where no bloggers should approach.<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonix Konios</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1533366</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonix Konios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 00:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1533366</guid>
		<description>i think this can be possible. none of the real big blog earners reveal is true earnings, that's a fact. if we think that 500M ($500.000.000 ) for 50k (50.000) blogs is 10k ($10.000) per blog and per year!!! Which means $10.000 / 12 months  = $833 per month .
This numbers for me are low, i think some big blogs itself, make more than 100k monthly. Just see the case of techcrunch.com itself, each ad spot is 10k mont, it has 8 spots, which means at least 80k per month.

Based on this, i think that $500M are low.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think this can be possible. none of the real big blog earners reveal is true earnings, that&#8217;s a fact. if we think that 500M ($500.000.000 ) for 50k (50.000) blogs is 10k ($10.000) per blog and per year!!! Which means $10.000 / 12 months  = $833 per month .<br />
This numbers for me are low, i think some big blogs itself, make more than 100k monthly. Just see the case of techcrunch.com itself, each ad spot is 10k mont, it has 8 spots, which means at least 80k per month.</p>
<p>Based on this, i think that $500M are low.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ultrafox</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532970</link>
		<dc:creator>ultrafox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532970</guid>
		<description>All this hullabaloo for a study purported by Chitika, the laughingstock of the internet.  Consider the source, peeps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All this hullabaloo for a study purported by Chitika, the laughingstock of the internet.  Consider the source, peeps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: share.websitemagazine.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532957</link>
		<dc:creator>share.websitemagazine.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:42:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532957</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Top 50k blogs had $500 million in 2006 Revenue...&lt;/strong&gt;

A new study being published by the University of Texas and Chitika says that the top 50,000 blogs may have generated around $500 million in aggregate 2006 revenue....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top 50k blogs had $500 million in 2006 Revenue&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A new study being published by the University of Texas and Chitika says that the top 50,000 blogs may have generated around $500 million in aggregate 2006 revenue&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anita</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532929</link>
		<dc:creator>Anita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 17:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532929</guid>
		<description>The $500,000,000 is a bogus number.  They just took the Chitika #s and multiplied them by 3.  I don't know any top bloggers who receive 33% of their revenue from Chitika, it's typically more like 5-10%.  If that's the case, total revenue for the top 50K blogs is closer to $1.5B (assuming their methodology is valid, which I contend below that it isn't).

Here's a set of decent assumptions for calculating:
- the top 10 average $2MM per year (e.g. Gizmodo, TechCrunch, BoingBoing, Engadget, etc.)
- the next 40 average $250K per year (all the bloggers I know in this bunch make about that)
- the next 50 average $100K per year
- between 100 and 1000 average $50K per year
- between 1000 and 5000 average $10K per year
- below 5000 average $1K per year (this is generous, since most of these are personal blogs)

Using those averages, the total blogosphere is earning:
top 10 = $20M
11-50 = $10M
51-100 = $5M
101-1,000 = $45M
1,001-5,000 = $40M
5,001-50,000 = $45M
= $165M

Seems far more reasonable to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The $500,000,000 is a bogus number.  They just took the Chitika #s and multiplied them by 3.  I don&#8217;t know any top bloggers who receive 33% of their revenue from Chitika, it&#8217;s typically more like 5-10%.  If that&#8217;s the case, total revenue for the top 50K blogs is closer to $1.5B (assuming their methodology is valid, which I contend below that it isn&#8217;t).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a set of decent assumptions for calculating:<br />
- the top 10 average $2MM per year (e.g. Gizmodo, TechCrunch, BoingBoing, Engadget, etc.)<br />
- the next 40 average $250K per year (all the bloggers I know in this bunch make about that)<br />
- the next 50 average $100K per year<br />
- between 100 and 1000 average $50K per year<br />
- between 1000 and 5000 average $10K per year<br />
- below 5000 average $1K per year (this is generous, since most of these are personal blogs)</p>
<p>Using those averages, the total blogosphere is earning:<br />
top 10 = $20M<br />
11-50 = $10M<br />
51-100 = $5M<br />
101-1,000 = $45M<br />
1,001-5,000 = $40M<br />
5,001-50,000 = $45M<br />
= $165M</p>
<p>Seems far more reasonable to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: China Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532843</link>
		<dc:creator>China Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 16:15:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532843</guid>
		<description>I find it interesting that Mr. Lewis has called out our blog as an example of one that brings in business (and I thank him for the kind words on our content).   Though that is obviously a very important goal of our blog, I have found that it provides so much more than that.  It gives us credibility as China law experts, which, in turn leads to two things.  One, we are constantly getting interviewed by the press.  Two, our clients and potential clients know who we are and where we stand.  This means that those who like us call us and think we fit in with what they are trying to achieve in China will call us and those who don't like us or do not think we are a good fit, go off and call someone else.   In other words, it works as an amazing pre-screening device.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it interesting that Mr. Lewis has called out our blog as an example of one that brings in business (and I thank him for the kind words on our content).   Though that is obviously a very important goal of our blog, I have found that it provides so much more than that.  It gives us credibility as China law experts, which, in turn leads to two things.  One, we are constantly getting interviewed by the press.  Two, our clients and potential clients know who we are and where we stand.  This means that those who like us call us and think we fit in with what they are trying to achieve in China will call us and those who don&#8217;t like us or do not think we are a good fit, go off and call someone else.   In other words, it works as an amazing pre-screening device.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irregular Times: News Unfit for Print</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532769</link>
		<dc:creator>Irregular Times: News Unfit for Print</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 15:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532769</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;If you want the money, work at Burger King....&lt;/strong&gt;

A study estimates that the top 50,000 blogs generated $50 million in income for their owners.  
Wow!!!!  $50 million!!!  Divided by!!  50,000!  Oh, that averages out to $10,000 a year.
New Headline: Top 50,000 bloggers make less in annual income than b...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>If you want the money, work at Burger King&#8230;.</strong></p>
<p>A study estimates that the top 50,000 blogs generated $50 million in income for their owners.<br />
Wow!!!!  $50 million!!!  Divided by!!  50,000!  Oh, that averages out to $10,000 a year.<br />
New Headline: Top 50,000 bloggers make less in annual income than b&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kurt</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532704</link>
		<dc:creator>kurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 14:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532704</guid>
		<description>What constitues a "Successful" Blog site? Is there a place that actually breaks down the criteria for successful blogs and how this platform and steps that show how this outline can be obtained by someone??

I think that the 50k mean 50,000 blog sites, and the 500,000 is the money...

http://www.tsbo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What constitues a &#8220;Successful&#8221; Blog site? Is there a place that actually breaks down the criteria for successful blogs and how this platform and steps that show how this outline can be obtained by someone??</p>
<p>I think that the 50k mean 50,000 blog sites, and the 500,000 is the money&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tsbo.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tsbo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pankaj</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532339</link>
		<dc:creator>Pankaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 08:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532339</guid>
		<description>The 80/20 comparisin is fallacious, since a majority of the blogs out there are non commercial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 80/20 comparisin is fallacious, since a majority of the blogs out there are non commercial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ozh</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532175</link>
		<dc:creator>Ozh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 06:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1532175</guid>
		<description>Seriously, who is still running Chitika these days ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, who is still running Chitika these days ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: political forum</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531923</link>
		<dc:creator>political forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 02:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531923</guid>
		<description>Technorati is not reliable for showing the most hit blogs?  What is then?


tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technorati is not reliable for showing the most hit blogs?  What is then?</p>
<p>tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debi Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531796</link>
		<dc:creator>Debi Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531796</guid>
		<description>Agreed with all of the questioning on validity of the data.  And the first fallacy is using Technorotty rankings.

Links to my blog from the Huffington Post, Valleywag and even USAToday are not visible on a vanity search.  Does Technorati truly not index these publications?  It's unclear what the proper measure should be for blogs as large traffic isn't as influential as targeted traffic, and no valid measure of influence has, yet, been developed.

Technorati may have had a valid measure in the early days of the blogosphere when it was homogeneous, i.e., 99% tech blogs, but this is no longer true.  One example is that TC has a higher in bound link rating than most mommy blogs, but if you're Disney who would you prefer to engage on an upcoming movie release?  Before you answer, Google the connection between the success of "March of the Penguins" and mommy blogs.

Following Neilsen's attempt at finding different standards for measuring social media, including blogs where the time spent on a site by visitors may inform influence over raw hits, is worthy of attention.

There maybe an element of preserving the old guard, here, with several of the Technorati created A-listers writing about the service recently.  Have you noticed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed with all of the questioning on validity of the data.  And the first fallacy is using Technorotty rankings.</p>
<p>Links to my blog from the Huffington Post, Valleywag and even USAToday are not visible on a vanity search.  Does Technorati truly not index these publications?  It&#8217;s unclear what the proper measure should be for blogs as large traffic isn&#8217;t as influential as targeted traffic, and no valid measure of influence has, yet, been developed.</p>
<p>Technorati may have had a valid measure in the early days of the blogosphere when it was homogeneous, i.e., 99% tech blogs, but this is no longer true.  One example is that TC has a higher in bound link rating than most mommy blogs, but if you&#8217;re Disney who would you prefer to engage on an upcoming movie release?  Before you answer, Google the connection between the success of &#8220;March of the Penguins&#8221; and mommy blogs.</p>
<p>Following Neilsen&#8217;s attempt at finding different standards for measuring social media, including blogs where the time spent on a site by visitors may inform influence over raw hits, is worthy of attention.</p>
<p>There maybe an element of preserving the old guard, here, with several of the Technorati created A-listers writing about the service recently.  Have you noticed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: web site traffic tips</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531785</link>
		<dc:creator>web site traffic tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531785</guid>
		<description>Not sure I'd use Technorati numbers for the top 50k blogs either. Their numbers are heavily influenced by how many other blogs link to you from within a post.

If you'd like a quick &#38; easy way to get a link to your blog from a post within 101 different blogs, enter your details here:

http://hitsusa.com/blog/22/blog-promotion-101/

That'll boost you into the top 100k blogs all by itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure I&#8217;d use Technorati numbers for the top 50k blogs either. Their numbers are heavily influenced by how many other blogs link to you from within a post.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;d like a quick &amp; easy way to get a link to your blog from a post within 101 different blogs, enter your details here:</p>
<p><a href="http://hitsusa.com/blog/22/blog-promotion-101/" rel="nofollow">http://hitsusa.com/blog/22/blog-promotion-101/</a></p>
<p>That&#8217;ll boost you into the top 100k blogs all by itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531741</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531741</guid>
		<description>I couldnt agree more with Patrick.  Just image what you can earn if you can position yourself to between 49900~50,000?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldnt agree more with Patrick.  Just image what you can earn if you can position yourself to between 49900~50,000?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Ryall</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531728</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Ryall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531728</guid>
		<description>Greetings all, well what a reaction to a little statement. If the figures are correct or not it still provides an interesting look into the world of blog dollars. 

Of course it is no easy road to earning an online income, but it is not as hard as many make out I believe. I have been self sufficient from the Internet for over 12 months now, and true it has taken some doing but what doesn't take effort in this world.

If you were to pick a business model and open it in the normal world how well would it take off? Starting any business is harder than it used to be just because of the times we live in.

So if any business we plan takes effort a sprinkle of luck and a true dedication  to get it going than it makes sense to put the same dedication into a business that if done right will allow you more time to pursue other money making en-devours.

Just remember the No1 rule; if you work for someone for a living, you do not have time to make money.

Have a B L O G G I N G good day and chin up because there is money in blogging. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greetings all, well what a reaction to a little statement. If the figures are correct or not it still provides an interesting look into the world of blog dollars. </p>
<p>Of course it is no easy road to earning an online income, but it is not as hard as many make out I believe. I have been self sufficient from the Internet for over 12 months now, and true it has taken some doing but what doesn&#8217;t take effort in this world.</p>
<p>If you were to pick a business model and open it in the normal world how well would it take off? Starting any business is harder than it used to be just because of the times we live in.</p>
<p>So if any business we plan takes effort a sprinkle of luck and a true dedication  to get it going than it makes sense to put the same dedication into a business that if done right will allow you more time to pursue other money making en-devours.</p>
<p>Just remember the No1 rule; if you work for someone for a living, you do not have time to make money.</p>
<p>Have a B L O G G I N G good day and chin up because there is money in blogging. <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vlad Balan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531723</link>
		<dc:creator>Vlad Balan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 22:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531723</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Top 50k blogs generated $500 million revenue last year...&lt;/strong&gt;


Here&#8217;s something that could really get you motivated in dedicating more time to blogging. Chitika and the University of Texas conducted a Blog Dollars Study which estimates that the top 50,000 blogs generated $500 million in 2006. This is one of...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Top 50k blogs generated $500 million revenue last year&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s something that could really get you motivated in dedicating more time to blogging. Chitika and the University of Texas conducted a Blog Dollars Study which estimates that the top 50,000 blogs generated $500 million in 2006. This is one of&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Venkat Kolluri</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531436</link>
		<dc:creator>Venkat Kolluri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 18:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/31/new-study-says-top-50k-blogs-had-50-million-in-2006-revenue/#comment-1531436</guid>
		<description>"Again, the data behind the study is very thin, and using Technorati to determine the top 50,000 blogs may not be a perfect indicator either."

Absolutely. This study is our first attempt in this direction and to start off with we used data from our network and public sources like Technorati to take a first stab in estimating the dollars in the blogosphere.  Our goal is to refine and continue this study on a regular basis with richer data sets and publish/share the results. 

We are very much interested in feedback, suggestions, to help us refine/update the study and the methodology: blogdollareport@chitika.com 

Venkat Kolluri
CEO &#124; Chitika, Inc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Again, the data behind the study is very thin, and using Technorati to determine the top 50,000 blogs may not be a perfect indicator either.&#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely. This study is our first attempt in this direction and to start off with we used data from our network and public sources like Technorati to take a first stab in estimating the dollars in the blogosphere.  Our goal is to refine and continue this study on a regular basis with richer data sets and publish/share the results. </p>
<p>We are very much interested in feedback, suggestions, to help us refine/update the study and the methodology: <a href="mailto:blogdollareport@chitika.com">blogdollareport@chitika.com</a> </p>
<p>Venkat Kolluri<br />
CEO | Chitika, Inc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.107 seconds -->
