Free: Pack Of MySpace Branded Playing Cards »
IAC Up, Ask Down In Second Quarter
by Duncan Riley on July 31, 2007

iac.jpgA strong second quarter by IAC saw a 78% increase in profits, mostly driven by assets sales and reduced costs.

The positive headline results did not flow through to the struggling 4th ranked search engine Ask.com, which saw a decline in revenues. The second quarter decline comes despite a $100 million Crispin, Porter + Bogusky advertising campaign that should be resulting in increased traffic and revenue to the site.

The exact amount of the decline was not disclosed.

Advertisement

Comments rss icon

  • Ducan

    Why so biased when it comes to Ask and their advertising?

  • What is IAC and how is it related to Ask.com?

  • IAC owns several major properties, ask.com being one of them. they also own bustedtees and collegehumor.

  • The big deal about Ask.com is that IAC is Barry Diller’s company. They own ticketmaster, city search, match.com, lendingtree.com, and HSN. WHile most of their properties seem to be real leaders Ask.com just doesn’t seem to have the mojo that google and yahoo do.

  • Why would the advertising campaign result in increased traffic and revenue? Its one of the worst advertising campaigns in history!!

  • The Crispin, Porter + Bogusky advertising campaign for ask has to be one of the worst campaigns in history….the billboards failed to generate the controversy it intended to, the commercials on tv was confusing in terms of message. I mean, if you had never heard of ask, how does having kato kaitlin as the centerpiece of the commercial make ask appealing at all?
    If they wanted to get a d-list celebrity, at least get someone who had some credentials…maybe a former child star? Just look at the resurgence of vh1 thanks to all those reality shows starring former tv stars.

  • Sung

    Are you sure about that? Do you work for the agency or Ask? Do you know the campaign goals. You may have thought it was awful, but Ask had some wins on this one, especially there Sponsorship of Ask A Ninja.

  • > The second quarter decline comes despite a
    > $100 million Crispin, Porter + Bogusky advertising campaign

    That post was supposed to read “comes *because* of a $100 million…”, right?

    The Algorithm isn’t popular.

  • JM obviously works for Crispin, Porter + Bogusky. Let’s face it…the ads may not have been the only reason Ask seeing an uptick in revenue, but they certainly didn’t help. A partnership with Ask a Ninja is meaningless if there’s no money behind it.

  • “The Algorithm isn’t popular” – exactly.

    JM – what type of goals do you think they were successful with?

    1) Building buzz / awareness – nope
    2) Casting Ask in a positive light to consumers – nope
    3) Casting Ask in a positive light to customers (search engine marketers) – nope
    4) Driving traffic to the site – nope
    5) Increasing search market share – nope

    Spending $100 million with Google would have given them results that were likely 10 times more effective and actually increased their market share.

  • I agree with you, Sung. Their “Algorithm” campaign seems like a disaster. It’s too geeky for the general public, yet most geeks don’t like it.

  • Duncan, you are an idiot. Read the release and the info and you’ll see that IAC was dragged down by Ticketmaster and HSN not Ask.

  • So, do geeks like Ask.com? Is the product worthy? Or is it a bad product, that tried to use advertising to make a difference. Sometimes no matter how brilliant or horrible your advertising is — or how MUCH you advertise — it just doesn’t make up for a product that isn’t good or has something new to offer. Google has just become a synomyn for online search — how do you beat that?

    What would all you smartypants have done to solve Ask.com’s problem?

  • IAC would be HUGE if it had SwitchPlanet.com in its portfolio. :)

    Dump Ask.com and move us right in its place!

  • Sniffer
    I didn’t say IAC was dragged down by Ask, I noted that Ask declined. Not sure how much more clearer I could be.

  • Should have never changed it’s name. That alone changed the user base.

  • Hello there

    sorry Duncan but I really don’t get it. Are you talking about this company: http://tinyurl.com/3dwug8 ? If so, I don’t really see any positive signal there… The other way round… Barry Diller said, “We are not satisfied with these results – whether driven by market conditions or our own hand – and are taking every appropriate action to have the back half of the year reflect a demarcation point to a 2008 more reflective of our ambition.”

    /best

    Paolo

Leave Comment

Commenting Options

Enter your personal information to the left, or sign in with your Facebook account by clicking the button below.

Alternatively, you can create an avatar that will appear whenever you leave a comment on a Gravatar-enabled blog.

Trackback URL
bugbugbug