<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NowPublic Gets $10.6 Million For Crowd Sourced News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 22:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: marijuana or cannabis addiction treatment</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1554700</link>
		<dc:creator>marijuana or cannabis addiction treatment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 21:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1554700</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;marijuanaor cannabis addiction treatment...&lt;/strong&gt;

Marijuana or cannabis addiction treatment can be found here....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>marijuanaor cannabis addiction treatment&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Marijuana or cannabis addiction treatment can be found here&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big bucks for CJ network &#171; NextNews</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1551842</link>
		<dc:creator>Big bucks for CJ network &#171; NextNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 04:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1551842</guid>
		<description>[...] August 11th, 2007 &#183; No Comments   NowPublic Gets $10.6 Million For Crowd Sourced News [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] August 11th, 2007 &middot; No Comments   NowPublic Gets $10.6 Million For Crowd Sourced News [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Tolles</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1527558</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tolles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1527558</guid>
		<description>I think this is great news for the field.  Can't speak for the stats, but I'm happy to see that these guys got some funding.

For folks commenting on Topix -- the portion of Topix which constitutes original, fresh content are the original comments within our forum system -- while we aggregate news from 50k sources, we get over half of our traffic on the commentary, half of which is not from articles but is indeed original, mainly local, output from the communities we serve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is great news for the field.  Can&#8217;t speak for the stats, but I&#8217;m happy to see that these guys got some funding.</p>
<p>For folks commenting on Topix &#8212; the portion of Topix which constitutes original, fresh content are the original comments within our forum system &#8212; while we aggregate news from 50k sources, we get over half of our traffic on the commentary, half of which is not from articles but is indeed original, mainly local, output from the communities we serve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaveO</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1526479</link>
		<dc:creator>DaveO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 17:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1526479</guid>
		<description>Great news for a group of quality folks.  Now Public are working hard to be a firstsource for original content and not just another crosspost/re-aggregating location designed to leverage earnest users' content.

I am a NP user (uncleweed) usually posting news on hockey and cannabis. After posting a photo of a murder scene i came across, the editor "Actual News Guy" gave me a personal call to get the backstory and gauge my ability to mentally process the scene.  They also served as a great place to make content public which i didn't want to post on my own site - and they were more able to deflect police reaction than i was.   

Anyhow Vancouver is indeed home to a very happening tech scene of companies brewing a strong community ethic.  Entrepreneurs want to start a business here *and* stay here because of this community vibe - plus VanBC being an all around brilliant place to live (despite the local past time of complaining about everything).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news for a group of quality folks.  Now Public are working hard to be a firstsource for original content and not just another crosspost/re-aggregating location designed to leverage earnest users&#8217; content.</p>
<p>I am a NP user (uncleweed) usually posting news on hockey and cannabis. After posting a photo of a murder scene i came across, the editor &#8220;Actual News Guy&#8221; gave me a personal call to get the backstory and gauge my ability to mentally process the scene.  They also served as a great place to make content public which i didn&#8217;t want to post on my own site - and they were more able to deflect police reaction than i was.   </p>
<p>Anyhow Vancouver is indeed home to a very happening tech scene of companies brewing a strong community ethic.  Entrepreneurs want to start a business here *and* stay here because of this community vibe - plus VanBC being an all around brilliant place to live (despite the local past time of complaining about everything).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Church Hilling</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1526376</link>
		<dc:creator>Church Hilling</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 16:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1526376</guid>
		<description>Good article... Much better than Duncan....

$10 million dollar Vancouver-based company. Not bad... It's much hard to get VC in Vancouver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article&#8230; Much better than Duncan&#8230;.</p>
<p>$10 million dollar Vancouver-based company. Not bad&#8230; It&#8217;s much hard to get VC in Vancouver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymouse</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1526345</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 15:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1526345</guid>
		<description>Wasn't this really their Series B? They took 1.7M or something from Brightspark last year.

Either way, I love NowPublic and can't wait to see them grow :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t this really their Series B? They took 1.7M or something from Brightspark last year.</p>
<p>Either way, I love NowPublic and can&#8217;t wait to see them grow <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1526284</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1526284</guid>
		<description>I don't think NowPublic is really in the same category as Digg or Topix.  NowPublic makes no attempt at aggregating news or being a comprehensive source of information.  They do a great job of getting individuals involved in reporting local news events, but I wouldn't call them "another news aggregator" at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think NowPublic is really in the same category as Digg or Topix.  NowPublic makes no attempt at aggregating news or being a comprehensive source of information.  They do a great job of getting individuals involved in reporting local news events, but I wouldn&#8217;t call them &#8220;another news aggregator&#8221; at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Becks</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1526172</link>
		<dc:creator>Becks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1526172</guid>
		<description>ANOTHER news aggregatior. Just what I needed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANOTHER news aggregatior. Just what I needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scriptr</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1526081</link>
		<dc:creator>Scriptr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 12:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1526081</guid>
		<description>What's the difference between a round A, B or C of financing in the 2.0 world?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the difference between a round A, B or C of financing in the 2.0 world?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Evans - NowPublic Raises $10.6M</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525975</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Evans - NowPublic Raises $10.6M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525975</guid>
		<description>[...] company&#8217;s profile should get a huge boost amid news it has raised $10.6-million in private equity from Rho Ventures, Brightspark and GrowthWorks. The deal comes just over a year after NowPublic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] company&#8217;s profile should get a huge boost amid news it has raised $10.6-million in private equity from Rho Ventures, Brightspark and GrowthWorks. The deal comes just over a year after NowPublic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaap</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525952</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 10:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525952</guid>
		<description>I'm not so sure about those members. I myself am a member. I had never heard of it before yesterday evening, and I still have only read one article. The thing is: I received an e-mail from nowpublic, stating that a Flickr photo of mine was used (I use CC licenses, so it's ok) in an article there; I only had to give permission by clicking a link. After having clicked it, I had to register to approve of this. It seemed ok, and the registration procedure was very straightforward (only a couple of data that needed to be filled in on the very same page, needed to click only one more button), so I registered / approved. In other words: they do have an effective way of attracting new 'members', but the degree of activity of a significant portion of those members may not be very high.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not so sure about those members. I myself am a member. I had never heard of it before yesterday evening, and I still have only read one article. The thing is: I received an e-mail from nowpublic, stating that a Flickr photo of mine was used (I use CC licenses, so it&#8217;s ok) in an article there; I only had to give permission by clicking a link. After having clicked it, I had to register to approve of this. It seemed ok, and the registration procedure was very straightforward (only a couple of data that needed to be filled in on the very same page, needed to click only one more button), so I registered / approved. In other words: they do have an effective way of attracting new &#8216;members&#8217;, but the degree of activity of a significant portion of those members may not be very high.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525862</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525862</guid>
		<description>I think it really sums up this definition of web 2.0 : You give the content, they make the money?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it really sums up this definition of web 2.0 : You give the content, they make the money?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: boyboy</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525765</link>
		<dc:creator>boyboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525765</guid>
		<description>It's an interesting concept. Sounds to me like a more evolved version of digg, focusing on real "news" rather than a "top 10 list of the most amazing xxxxxx ever!!!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting concept. Sounds to me like a more evolved version of digg, focusing on real &#8220;news&#8221; rather than a &#8220;top 10 list of the most amazing xxxxxx ever!!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pureweb20.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525763</link>
		<dc:creator>pureweb20.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525763</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NowPublic Gets 10 Million For Crowd Sourced News...&lt;/strong&gt;

Review of the NowPublic.com service along with its recent 10 million dollar funding led by several major investment firms....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NowPublic Gets 10 Million For Crowd Sourced News&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Review of the NowPublic.com service along with its recent 10 million dollar funding led by several major investment firms&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay (living in First Life)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525750</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay (living in First Life)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 06:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525750</guid>
		<description>This should be renamed "outsourced news delivery for major news agencies."  That's a real business model and that's what NowPublic is doing.  This is a much better model than Digg's.  Digg isn't even worth $10.6 MM.  I pity the fool that buys that worthless company since none of its users ever click on any ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This should be renamed &#8220;outsourced news delivery for major news agencies.&#8221;  That&#8217;s a real business model and that&#8217;s what NowPublic is doing.  This is a much better model than Digg&#8217;s.  Digg isn&#8217;t even worth $10.6 MM.  I pity the fool that buys that worthless company since none of its users ever click on any ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525720</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 05:23:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525720</guid>
		<description>didn't a site with the same basic idea get deadpooled a while back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>didn&#8217;t a site with the same basic idea get deadpooled a while back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dorothy Stahlnecker</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525710</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorothy Stahlnecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525710</guid>
		<description>Good information, I'll look forward to future comments. 

Regards, Dorothy at grammology</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good information, I&#8217;ll look forward to future comments. </p>
<p>Regards, Dorothy at grammology</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RBA</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525703</link>
		<dc:creator>RBA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525703</guid>
		<description>Good article, Nick.

I think NowPublic is a lot more about "Crowd sourced news" than some of the other sites mentioned in the article such as Digg or Topix. This is, after all, about people writing and reporting stuff, not about aggregating what's being said somewhere else.

Good for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article, Nick.</p>
<p>I think NowPublic is a lot more about &#8220;Crowd sourced news&#8221; than some of the other sites mentioned in the article such as Digg or Topix. This is, after all, about people writing and reporting stuff, not about aggregating what&#8217;s being said somewhere else.</p>
<p>Good for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zaid</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525674</link>
		<dc:creator>Zaid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 04:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/29/nowpublic-gets-106-million-for-crowd-sourced-news/#comment-1525674</guid>
		<description>Wow. I'll be dreaming of their investor pitch all night.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. I&#8217;ll be dreaming of their investor pitch all night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.075 seconds -->
