<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The FCC Needs To Listen To Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 17:20:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Free the Airwaves, Free Puna and Free the Whales &#124; Brent.fm • a technology mixdown</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2487455</link>
		<dc:creator>Free the Airwaves, Free Puna and Free the Whales &#124; Brent.fm • a technology mixdown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2487455</guid>
		<description>[...] The FCC Needs To Listen To Google by Michael Arrington on July 22, 2007    Also from UnwiredView.com:       [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The FCC Needs To Listen To Google by Michael Arrington on July 22, 2007    Also from UnwiredView.com:       [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google&#8217;s End Run Around the Wireless Carriers</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2481829</link>
		<dc:creator>Google&#8217;s End Run Around the Wireless Carriers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2481829</guid>
		<description>[...] to get as many people online as possible with as many devices as possible. Hence the gPhone, its pressure on the FCC, and Larry Page&#8217;s bristling in support of open white spaces. The opening of white spaces in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to get as many people online as possible with as many devices as possible. Hence the gPhone, its pressure on the FCC, and Larry Page&#8217;s bristling in support of open white spaces. The opening of white spaces in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spectrum Bridge Launches Marketplace For &#8220;Fallow&#8221; Wireless Spectrum</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2459415</link>
		<dc:creator>Spectrum Bridge Launches Marketplace For &#8220;Fallow&#8221; Wireless Spectrum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 13:52:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2459415</guid>
		<description>[...] the last big FCC wireless spectrum auctions, one of the rules Google proposed addressed this problem: Open services: Third parties (resellers) should be able to acquire wireless [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the last big FCC wireless spectrum auctions, one of the rules Google proposed addressed this problem: Open services: Third parties (resellers) should be able to acquire wireless [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WinExtra - The 700Mhz spectrum, Google and TechCrunch has a point &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2456683</link>
		<dc:creator>WinExtra - The 700Mhz spectrum, Google and TechCrunch has a point &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 05:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2456683</guid>
		<description>[...] 49th parallel where I live but I do find myself agreeing with Michael Arrington at TechCrunch as he weighs in on the matter Google isn&#8217;t always not evil, but in this case they are going to bat for all of us against [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 49th parallel where I live but I do find myself agreeing with Michael Arrington at TechCrunch as he weighs in on the matter Google isn&#8217;t always not evil, but in this case they are going to bat for all of us against [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The OPLIN 4cast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OPLIN 4cast #65</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2431385</link>
		<dc:creator>The OPLIN 4cast &#187; Blog Archive &#187; OPLIN 4cast #65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 18:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2431385</guid>
		<description>[...] The FCC Needs To Listen To Google (TechCrunch) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The FCC Needs To Listen To Google (TechCrunch) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: L&#8217;Obama pensiero sulla tecnologia - Vittorio Pasteris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2368256</link>
		<dc:creator>L&#8217;Obama pensiero sulla tecnologia - Vittorio Pasteris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 06:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2368256</guid>
		<description>[...] He doesn’t feel the FCC went far enough in promoting competition with the upcoming 700MHz spectrum auctions. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] He doesn’t feel the FCC went far enough in promoting competition with the upcoming 700MHz spectrum auctions. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terbaik.Net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Breaking: FCC Confirms that Big Winner in Spectrum Auction is Verizon. So Why Is Google Smiling?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2049584</link>
		<dc:creator>Terbaik.Net &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Breaking: FCC Confirms that Big Winner in Spectrum Auction is Verizon. So Why Is Google Smiling?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 05:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2049584</guid>
		<description>[...] real winner here is Google precisely because it lost. Google committed to bidding the minimum $4.6 billion that would trigger open device and open application rules that it had lobbied for, but nobody [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] real winner here is Google precisely because it lost. Google committed to bidding the minimum $4.6 billion that would trigger open device and open application rules that it had lobbied for, but nobody [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breaking: FCC Confirms that Big Winner in Spectrum Auction is Verizon. So Why Is Google Smiling?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2046881</link>
		<dc:creator>Breaking: FCC Confirms that Big Winner in Spectrum Auction is Verizon. So Why Is Google Smiling?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 21:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-2046881</guid>
		<description>[...] real winner here is Google precisely because it lost. Google committed to bidding the minimum $4.6 billion that would trigger open device and open application rules that it had lobbied for, but nobody [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] real winner here is Google precisely because it lost. Google committed to bidding the minimum $4.6 billion that would trigger open device and open application rules that it had lobbied for, but nobody [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Can Google Still Claim To Be David To Microsoft&#8217;s Goliath? No.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1966708</link>
		<dc:creator>Can Google Still Claim To Be David To Microsoft&#8217;s Goliath? No.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 21:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1966708</guid>
		<description>[...] it comes to Google standing up to the FCC and the incumbent wireless carriers to make our life better, I&#8217;m behind them 100%. But when [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it comes to Google standing up to the FCC and the incumbent wireless carriers to make our life better, I&#8217;m behind them 100%. But when [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Super Panel At Davos: The Future Of Mobile Technology</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1945469</link>
		<dc:creator>Super Panel At Davos: The Future Of Mobile Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1945469</guid>
		<description>[...] FCC Chairman Kevin Martin defended their recent decision to partly open up the mobile market, but reject many of the key rules requested by Google. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] FCC Chairman Kevin Martin defended their recent decision to partly open up the mobile market, but reject many of the key rules requested by Google. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; 億万長者たちにもFrontline Wirelessのデッドプール入りは阻止できず</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1913774</link>
		<dc:creator>TechCrunch Japanese アーカイブ &#187; 億万長者たちにもFrontline Wirelessのデッドプール入りは阻止できず</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 21:46:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1913774</guid>
		<description>[...] 富豪として知られるJohn DoerrやRam Shriram、Netscape前CEO Jim Barksdale、それにFCC（連邦通信委員会）の前委員長Reed Hundtなどが支援するNew York Timesによると、同社は、これから予定されている無線通信帯域の競売入札に必要な前金$128M（1.28億ドル）を用意出来なかったためだ。この無線帯域オークションが形をなすのに同社は（Googleと共に）大きく影響した。涙があふれそうだが、Frontlineはこれでデッドプール入りとする（日本語）。 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 富豪として知られるJohn DoerrやRam Shriram、Netscape前CEO Jim Barksdale、それにFCC（連邦通信委員会）の前委員長Reed Hundtなどが支援するNew York Timesによると、同社は、これから予定されている無線通信帯域の競売入札に必要な前金$128M（1.28億ドル）を用意出来なかったためだ。この無線帯域オークションが形をなすのに同社は（Googleと共に）大きく影響した。涙があふれそうだが、Frontlineはこれでデッドプール入りとする（日本語）。 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google To Announce Wireless Spectrum Bid Friday teasered @ Feed UP !!</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1803971</link>
		<dc:creator>Google To Announce Wireless Spectrum Bid Friday teasered @ Feed UP !!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 22:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1803971</guid>
		<description>[...] first expressed interesting in bidding in July, when it sent a letter to the FCC demanding that the new bandwidth have four requirements: open [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] first expressed interesting in bidding in July, when it sent a letter to the FCC demanding that the new bandwidth have four requirements: open [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Candidatos questionados sobre Novas Tecnologias &#171; Eleições Americanas de 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1694746</link>
		<dc:creator>Candidatos questionados sobre Novas Tecnologias &#171; Eleições Americanas de 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1694746</guid>
		<description>[...] -         the role of government in protecting personal privacy online; -         Mobile spectrum allocations and ground rules; -         How should the U.S. engage with China: technology, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] -         the role of government in protecting personal privacy online; -         Mobile spectrum allocations and ground rules; -         How should the U.S. engage with China: technology, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upcoming Podcast With Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney - We Need Your Help</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1690156</link>
		<dc:creator>Upcoming Podcast With Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney - We Need Your Help</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1690156</guid>
		<description>[...] Mobile spectrum allocations and ground rules [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mobile spectrum allocations and ground rules [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Upcoming Podcast With Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney - We Need Your Help</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1690157</link>
		<dc:creator>Upcoming Podcast With Presidential Candidate Mitt Romney - We Need Your Help</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 02:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1690157</guid>
		<description>[...] Mobile spectrum allocations and ground rules [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Mobile spectrum allocations and ground rules [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Personal &#8220;Keep Me Up To Date On The Top News&#8221; blog &#187; Comment on The FCC Needs To Listen To Google by Doerr Wants To &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1686168</link>
		<dc:creator>My Personal &#8220;Keep Me Up To Date On The Top News&#8221; blog &#187; Comment on The FCC Needs To Listen To Google by Doerr Wants To &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1686168</guid>
		<description>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptalso a key player in helping to shape the auction’s rules. Doerr explains why this fight is so important: This is the last auction. It is the last opportunity in our lifetime (for the United States). […] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptalso a key player in helping to shape the auction’s rules. Doerr explains why this fight is so important: This is the last auction. It is the last opportunity in our lifetime (for the United States). […] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: My Ghillie &#187; Comment on The FCC Needs To Listen To Google by Doerr Wants To &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1686165</link>
		<dc:creator>My Ghillie &#187; Comment on The FCC Needs To Listen To Google by Doerr Wants To &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 02:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1686165</guid>
		<description>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptalso a key player in helping to shape the auction’s rules. Doerr explains why this fight is so important: This is the last auction. It is the last opportunity in our lifetime (for the United States). […] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Check it out! While looking through the blogosphere we stumbled on an interesting post today.Here&#8217;s a quick excerptalso a key player in helping to shape the auction’s rules. Doerr explains why this fight is so important: This is the last auction. It is the last opportunity in our lifetime (for the United States). […] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doerr Wants To Take Down The Telcos (And Save The Planet)</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1686092</link>
		<dc:creator>Doerr Wants To Take Down The Telcos (And Save The Planet)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Oct 2007 01:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1686092</guid>
		<description>[...] also a key player in helping to shape the auction&#8217;s rules. Doerr explains why this fight is so important: This is the last auction. It is the last opportunity in our lifetime (for the United States). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also a key player in helping to shape the auction&#8217;s rules. Doerr explains why this fight is so important: This is the last auction. It is the last opportunity in our lifetime (for the United States). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NevilleG</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1565515</link>
		<dc:creator>NevilleG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 19:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1565515</guid>
		<description>Googles Ad supported Video phone

After reading about Google :
1) Controlling large amounts of the worlds dark-fiber.
http://news.com.com/Google+wants+dark+fiber/2100-1034_3-5537392.html

2) Google said that it's willing to participate in the Federal Communications Commission's upcoming wireless spectrum 700MHz band auction and pay the minimum reserve of $4.6 billion.
http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9747716-7.html
http://digg.com/tech_news/Google_s_battle_for_wireless_spectrum

3) Google hires Andy Rubin, founder of Danger and the " Sidekick"
http://googlewatch.eweek.com/content/google_products/for_google_phone_rumors_press_1_for_more_google_phone_rumors_press_2.html

4) Google &#38; Sprint collaborate on WiMax mobile Internet services.
http://www2.sprint.com/mr/news_dtl.do?id=17560

This all came together in a epiphany I had this weekend. I predict that Google will soon launch a Free Ad supported Video phone some time next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Googles Ad supported Video phone</p>
<p>After reading about Google :<br />
1) Controlling large amounts of the worlds dark-fiber.<br />
<a href="http://news.com.com/Google+wants+dark+fiber/2100-1034_3-5537392.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.com.com/Google+wan.....37392.html</a></p>
<p>2) Google said that it&#8217;s willing to participate in the Federal Communications Commission&#8217;s upcoming wireless spectrum 700MHz band auction and pay the minimum reserve of $4.6 billion.<br />
<a href="http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9747716-7.html" rel="nofollow">http://news.com.com/8301-10784_3-9747716-7.html</a><br />
<a href="http://digg.com/tech_news/Google_s_battle_for_wireless_spectrum" rel="nofollow">http://digg.com/tech_news/Goog.....s_spectrum</a></p>
<p>3) Google hires Andy Rubin, founder of Danger and the &#8221; Sidekick&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://googlewatch.eweek.com/content/google_products/for_google_phone_rumors_press_1_for_more_google_phone_rumors_press_2.html" rel="nofollow">http://googlewatch.eweek.com/c.....ess_2.html</a></p>
<p>4) Google &amp; Sprint collaborate on WiMax mobile Internet services.<br />
<a href="http://www2.sprint.com/mr/news_dtl.do?id=17560" rel="nofollow">http://www2.sprint.com/mr/news_dtl.do?id=17560</a></p>
<p>This all came together in a epiphany I had this weekend. I predict that Google will soon launch a Free Ad supported Video phone some time next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Zimmerman</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1529501</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Zimmerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 00:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1529501</guid>
		<description>The fact is, open source internet, coast-to-coast will be a breath of fresh air. The reason google is wanting to do this, is because there is a HUGE market that is being squandered and ruined by telecom giants. 
Have you ever TRIED the wireless internet provided on most phones? It is piecemeal SHIT. They show 0 net neutrality, and prevent people from accessing google's content. THIS is google's beef, people CAN'T, on the current system, access their content because the telecom giants do not want them to. These giants are PERFECTLY happy keeping their 'competition' so long as it allows them to offer you tight contracts and force you to use THEIR content. 5 dollar ring tones? FUCK THAT. I can get the song for 99 cents on iTunes--on my PC that is, and if google wins the bid, so too on my phone.

Furthermore, the argument that 'competition' would disappear is CRAZY. Basically, the telecom industry is arguing from the broken window fallacy as pointed out by the French economist Frederic Bastiat--a broken window is NOT good, even though it forces people to put more money in the economy. This is because that money would go ELSEWHERE--if the money isn't being spent on shitty telecom services, it could be spent on OTHER things. Thus, competition for competition's sake is ridiculous and doesn't help anyone. The competition would simply shift to another sector (perhaps creation of new phones that don't use awful proprietary tech?)

Also, most people seem to forget what this might offer for cell users. MORE MONEY IN YOUR POCKETS. VOIP as used in many home phones is very, very cheap. There is NO reason why we couldn't use VOIP on next-generation phones on an open-content wireless network. Cheap, international, unlimited calling--sign me the fuck up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is, open source internet, coast-to-coast will be a breath of fresh air. The reason google is wanting to do this, is because there is a HUGE market that is being squandered and ruined by telecom giants.<br />
Have you ever TRIED the wireless internet provided on most phones? It is piecemeal SHIT. They show 0 net neutrality, and prevent people from accessing google&#8217;s content. THIS is google&#8217;s beef, people CAN&#8217;T, on the current system, access their content because the telecom giants do not want them to. These giants are PERFECTLY happy keeping their &#8216;competition&#8217; so long as it allows them to offer you tight contracts and force you to use THEIR content. 5 dollar ring tones? FUCK THAT. I can get the song for 99 cents on iTunes&#8211;on my PC that is, and if google wins the bid, so too on my phone.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the argument that &#8216;competition&#8217; would disappear is CRAZY. Basically, the telecom industry is arguing from the broken window fallacy as pointed out by the French economist Frederic Bastiat&#8211;a broken window is NOT good, even though it forces people to put more money in the economy. This is because that money would go ELSEWHERE&#8211;if the money isn&#8217;t being spent on shitty telecom services, it could be spent on OTHER things. Thus, competition for competition&#8217;s sake is ridiculous and doesn&#8217;t help anyone. The competition would simply shift to another sector (perhaps creation of new phones that don&#8217;t use awful proprietary tech?)</p>
<p>Also, most people seem to forget what this might offer for cell users. MORE MONEY IN YOUR POCKETS. VOIP as used in many home phones is very, very cheap. There is NO reason why we couldn&#8217;t use VOIP on next-generation phones on an open-content wireless network. Cheap, international, unlimited calling&#8211;sign me the fuck up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vijay kumar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1521821</link>
		<dc:creator>Vijay kumar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1521821</guid>
		<description>FCC should listen to Google and its conditions. It is actually what the public want. The wireless technology will grow fast the features will be limitless for the consumers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FCC should listen to Google and its conditions. It is actually what the public want. The wireless technology will grow fast the features will be limitless for the consumers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: packethead</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1518266</link>
		<dc:creator>packethead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 15:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1518266</guid>
		<description>Do you reallty think that google should benefit from Billions of dollar's spent on wireless networks (capex and opex), and freely ride on these networks.

Google, has no clue what is up against. 1995-2001 many companies came up against the big networks thinking they could beat them, ... they all crumbled. Its not easy to build and run such large networks. The money, and skill is beyond google's experience and they are just being arogant. These networks are barely making money at all in many cases. Wireless money is coming to a halt. Can google build a new network with $20-30B and expect to maintain it with billions more over time with ads? No #$%#$% way. 

They should put up or shut up.  Just buy the sprectrum and make it happen. Or stop putting such idiotic arogant statements to the FCC. The FCC which also ensure quality and safety for services -&#62; let them do their job.

If you have 10+ years in running a wireless network, I would agree but until that time, you should realize the reality of the situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you reallty think that google should benefit from Billions of dollar&#8217;s spent on wireless networks (capex and opex), and freely ride on these networks.</p>
<p>Google, has no clue what is up against. 1995-2001 many companies came up against the big networks thinking they could beat them, &#8230; they all crumbled. Its not easy to build and run such large networks. The money, and skill is beyond google&#8217;s experience and they are just being arogant. These networks are barely making money at all in many cases. Wireless money is coming to a halt. Can google build a new network with $20-30B and expect to maintain it with billions more over time with ads? No #$%#$% way. </p>
<p>They should put up or shut up.  Just buy the sprectrum and make it happen. Or stop putting such idiotic arogant statements to the FCC. The FCC which also ensure quality and safety for services -&gt; let them do their job.</p>
<p>If you have 10+ years in running a wireless network, I would agree but until that time, you should realize the reality of the situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnyradio</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1516758</link>
		<dc:creator>johnyradio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 02:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1516758</guid>
		<description>"Having reviewed trends in the United States and abroad, the committee
is deeply concerned that the scientific and technological building blocks
critical to our economic leadership are eroding at a time when many other
nations are gathering strength."

-- "Rising Above The Gathering Storm" National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, 2007.
http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11463&#38;page=204

"Several nations are well ahead of the United States in broadband access. ...Congress and the administration should take action—mainly in the regulatory arena and in spectrum management ...in the very near future."

To promote innovation, we should "ensure that the United States is the premier place in the world to innovate by such actions as ...ensuring affordable broadband access."

Some recommendations "require financial support that would come from reallocation of existing funds or, if necessary, from new funds."

(So, getting a bit less $mullah on the 700 Mhz auction would be a bargain. 

But who really believes the mobile giants would just drop out of the race if Google's conditions went through?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Having reviewed trends in the United States and abroad, the committee<br />
is deeply concerned that the scientific and technological building blocks<br />
critical to our economic leadership are eroding at a time when many other<br />
nations are gathering strength.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8211; &#8220;Rising Above The Gathering Storm&#8221; National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine, 2007.<br />
<a href="http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=11463&amp;page=204" rel="nofollow">http://books.nap.edu/openbook......p;page=204</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Several nations are well ahead of the United States in broadband access. &#8230;Congress and the administration should take action—mainly in the regulatory arena and in spectrum management &#8230;in the very near future.&#8221;</p>
<p>To promote innovation, we should &#8220;ensure that the United States is the premier place in the world to innovate by such actions as &#8230;ensuring affordable broadband access.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some recommendations &#8220;require financial support that would come from reallocation of existing funds or, if necessary, from new funds.&#8221;</p>
<p>(So, getting a bit less $mullah on the 700 Mhz auction would be a bargain. </p>
<p>But who really believes the mobile giants would just drop out of the race if Google&#8217;s conditions went through?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnyradio</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1516646</link>
		<dc:creator>johnyradio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1516646</guid>
		<description>but wait-- is Japan more "competitive" than the United States? Or is the Japanese economy structured differently at a deeper level?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but wait&#8211; is Japan more &#8220;competitive&#8221; than the United States? Or is the Japanese economy structured differently at a deeper level?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shortshire</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1515676</link>
		<dc:creator>Shortshire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 16:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/22/the-fcc-needs-to-listen-to-google/#comment-1515676</guid>
		<description>Google wants to open up the airwaves to the people.  If you actually been to other countries they are way ahead of us in cellphone usage and the abilities of their cell phones dwarf ours.  Japan is at least 2 years ahead of us in cellphone technology.  AT&#38;T wants to keep the market with themselves and the other major carriers.  They don't want outsiders coming in and making airwaves public without fight, they want to cash in as much as they can.  Yay to Google for this one.  This is for the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google wants to open up the airwaves to the people.  If you actually been to other countries they are way ahead of us in cellphone usage and the abilities of their cell phones dwarf ours.  Japan is at least 2 years ahead of us in cellphone technology.  AT&amp;T wants to keep the market with themselves and the other major carriers.  They don&#8217;t want outsiders coming in and making airwaves public without fight, they want to cash in as much as they can.  Yay to Google for this one.  This is for the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.111 seconds -->
