<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steorn Now Being Openly Mocked</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 01:38:11 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: HH</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-2507928</link>
		<dc:creator>HH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 21:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-2507928</guid>
		<description>John Beechey,  what you don&#039;t understand does not make it false. All the examples you mention can be explained.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Beechey,  what you don&#8217;t understand does not make it false. All the examples you mention can be explained.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roch</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1533184</link>
		<dc:creator>Roch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2007 21:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1533184</guid>
		<description>John Beechey, I doubt that any of the examples you gave violate the law of conservation of energy.  Conservation of energy is well understood in gravitational systems, for example.  The sum of the potential and kinetic energy of an orbiting body remains contant.  Maybe a physicist can deal with your other examples.  It may be that gravity, light or electricity in itself is not fully understood, but this is not a reason to be skeptical of the law of conservation of energy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Beechey, I doubt that any of the examples you gave violate the law of conservation of energy.  Conservation of energy is well understood in gravitational systems, for example.  The sum of the potential and kinetic energy of an orbiting body remains contant.  Maybe a physicist can deal with your other examples.  It may be that gravity, light or electricity in itself is not fully understood, but this is not a reason to be skeptical of the law of conservation of energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John beechey</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1524887</link>
		<dc:creator>John beechey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jul 2007 09:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1524887</guid>
		<description>Laws are laws, what tosh! Im afraid many of the laws of physics are incorrect, for example, the humble light, when you look at the process behind it  ie current in / current out it is the same, but both light and heat are generated , a violation for the conservation of energy. . Gravity is another example.  What power source is there that hold the moon in earths orbit, 24/7? Or light itself. What powers light? The speed of light is 186,000 miles per sec. If light is shone into a different medium ie water, it slows down, but when it exits it resumes it full light speed, how?. Finally, currently it is believed that when energy is removed from a system, work gets harder to do. BUT, how is it possible then for freezing water to crack open metal pipes, it takes a lot of energy as we know it to crack metal.

My point is that currently , physics is unable to explain 100%  accurately the so called laws that it preaches. Anyone who is interested should read a book called THE FINAL THEORY, it shed new light on many things, inc space , time and energy. Just because the establishment say  that  it is this way, it doesn`t mean that it is so. Ever heard of Stanley Meyer? Google him, theres  energy for free out there, good luck Steorn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laws are laws, what tosh! Im afraid many of the laws of physics are incorrect, for example, the humble light, when you look at the process behind it  ie current in / current out it is the same, but both light and heat are generated , a violation for the conservation of energy. . Gravity is another example.  What power source is there that hold the moon in earths orbit, 24/7? Or light itself. What powers light? The speed of light is 186,000 miles per sec. If light is shone into a different medium ie water, it slows down, but when it exits it resumes it full light speed, how?. Finally, currently it is believed that when energy is removed from a system, work gets harder to do. BUT, how is it possible then for freezing water to crack open metal pipes, it takes a lot of energy as we know it to crack metal.</p>
<p>My point is that currently , physics is unable to explain 100%  accurately the so called laws that it preaches. Anyone who is interested should read a book called THE FINAL THEORY, it shed new light on many things, inc space , time and energy. Just because the establishment say  that  it is this way, it doesn`t mean that it is so. Ever heard of Stanley Meyer? Google him, theres  energy for free out there, good luck Steorn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charlie wonder</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1514025</link>
		<dc:creator>charlie wonder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 22:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1514025</guid>
		<description>When you stick a magnet on the fridge you are not violating the laws of thermodynamics.    It seems common sense that you set up magnets correctly with and minimize all friction and you can get what looks like perpetual motion.      I have seen other electromagnetic motors that seem a lot more convincing.     The one major question is if the motion sucks the life out of the magnets.  Steorn says it doesn´t.    I am pulling for them but am not very hopeful right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When you stick a magnet on the fridge you are not violating the laws of thermodynamics.    It seems common sense that you set up magnets correctly with and minimize all friction and you can get what looks like perpetual motion.      I have seen other electromagnetic motors that seem a lot more convincing.     The one major question is if the motion sucks the life out of the magnets.  Steorn says it doesn´t.    I am pulling for them but am not very hopeful right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vszrtifcb pocd</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1501739</link>
		<dc:creator>vszrtifcb pocd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1501739</guid>
		<description>sdqgrypi qyrtm cxnfib wotkcesq amlwkptyv jvztkb vflkc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sdqgrypi qyrtm cxnfib wotkcesq amlwkptyv jvztkb vflkc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bessed - The Human-Powered Search Engine</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1495920</link>
		<dc:creator>Bessed - The Human-Powered Search Engine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 17:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1495920</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Steorn...&lt;/strong&gt;

Eleven of the best sites about the company Steorn, famous (or infamous) for its yet unproven claim to be able to create free energy, a la a perpetual motion machine. Know of another site that should be listed here? Leave your suggestion at the bottom o...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Steorn&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Eleven of the best sites about the company Steorn, famous (or infamous) for its yet unproven claim to be able to create free energy, a la a perpetual motion machine. Know of another site that should be listed here? Leave your suggestion at the bottom o&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atanu</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1492445</link>
		<dc:creator>atanu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:40:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1492445</guid>
		<description>certain laws of science cannot be incorrect because they are just that, &quot;laws&quot;. if it was that anyone so far was unable to prove it wrong but the possibility existed, then they&#039;d have been postulates.
the pursuit of science is to make things better. But after following this story over the different blogs, it seems a lot of people are saying &quot;one needs to keep an open mind / remember earth was declared flat/ every great inventor is ridiculed at first&quot; and so on ad nauseum. These people all seem to have a common idea that scientists, be they phycisists, chemists, or social scientists, are a bunch of arrogant close minded bunch that dreams up some &#039;laws&#039;, and imposes them on the rest of populace. Scientific conclusions have never been reached in that manner. Each and every minor discovery and claim is discussed and analysed to deatjh for decades, usually by peers all very eager to prove the guy wrong. 

Science is an ongoing process of gradually adding tiny little bits of data on top of each other. Open mindedness is a built-in requisite for the process, not an optional one. If these steorn guys think they can beat this compilation of thousands of years of human wisdom by showing two aluminum tubes and a magnet and have people come to their defense saying we should give them a chance, then thats the real disservice to the pursuit of knowledge as a noble aim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>certain laws of science cannot be incorrect because they are just that, &#8220;laws&#8221;. if it was that anyone so far was unable to prove it wrong but the possibility existed, then they&#8217;d have been postulates.<br />
the pursuit of science is to make things better. But after following this story over the different blogs, it seems a lot of people are saying &#8220;one needs to keep an open mind / remember earth was declared flat/ every great inventor is ridiculed at first&#8221; and so on ad nauseum. These people all seem to have a common idea that scientists, be they phycisists, chemists, or social scientists, are a bunch of arrogant close minded bunch that dreams up some &#8216;laws&#8217;, and imposes them on the rest of populace. Scientific conclusions have never been reached in that manner. Each and every minor discovery and claim is discussed and analysed to deatjh for decades, usually by peers all very eager to prove the guy wrong. </p>
<p>Science is an ongoing process of gradually adding tiny little bits of data on top of each other. Open mindedness is a built-in requisite for the process, not an optional one. If these steorn guys think they can beat this compilation of thousands of years of human wisdom by showing two aluminum tubes and a magnet and have people come to their defense saying we should give them a chance, then thats the real disservice to the pursuit of knowledge as a noble aim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1490917</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1490917</guid>
		<description>Not being a physicist, but why can&#039;t certain laws be incorrect? It seems.. counter productive.. that anytime people claim to have found something that could change everything for the better they are criticised. Granted, though, in this case.. well.. it does all seem to be rather err... shady. 

A good Guardian article, from Steorn&#039;s website: http://www.steorn.com/media/downloads/guardian.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not being a physicist, but why can&#8217;t certain laws be incorrect? It seems.. counter productive.. that anytime people claim to have found something that could change everything for the better they are criticised. Granted, though, in this case.. well.. it does all seem to be rather err&#8230; shady. </p>
<p>A good Guardian article, from Steorn&#8217;s website: <a href="http://www.steorn.com/media/downloads/guardian.jpg" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.steorn.com/media/downloads/guardian.jpg'>http://www.steo...ds/guardian.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor O'Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1490890</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor O'Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1490890</guid>
		<description>to be fair to Mike, he does mention our company LouderVoice which is a new site that allows people to find, publish and share reviews on blogs and micro-blogs. 

The Steorn thing was just a bit of fun in advance of allowing people to have their video reviews indexed by our site.

Right now we index/publish microformatted reviews from/to all the major blogging platforms. We also have experimental support for mini-reviews from Twitter/Jaiku and we just indexed our first TwitterGram.

Our aim is to replace all the silos and slurpers out there with the hub model which routes quality review information from those who write it to those who need it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to be fair to Mike, he does mention our company LouderVoice which is a new site that allows people to find, publish and share reviews on blogs and micro-blogs. </p>
<p>The Steorn thing was just a bit of fun in advance of allowing people to have their video reviews indexed by our site.</p>
<p>Right now we index/publish microformatted reviews from/to all the major blogging platforms. We also have experimental support for mini-reviews from Twitter/Jaiku and we just indexed our first TwitterGram.</p>
<p>Our aim is to replace all the silos and slurpers out there with the hub model which routes quality review information from those who write it to those who need it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adi</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1490251</link>
		<dc:creator>Adi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 03:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1490251</guid>
		<description>I honestly don&#039;t know why you posted this on Techcrunch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I honestly don&#8217;t know why you posted this on Techcrunch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Pospisil</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1489690</link>
		<dc:creator>John Pospisil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 19:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1489690</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been absolutely astounded by how much the media and the public have indulged these guys... here&#039;s my take on it: http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/07/07/seven-reasons-why-steorns-perpetual-machine-will-never-work/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been absolutely astounded by how much the media and the public have indulged these guys&#8230; here&#8217;s my take on it: <a href="http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/07/07/seven-reasons-why-steorns-perpetual-machine-will-never-work/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://tech.blorge.com/Structure:%20/2007/07/07/seven-reasons-why-steorns-perpetual-machine-will-never-work/'>http://tech.blo...ill-never-work/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alan p</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1489649</link>
		<dc:creator>alan p</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 18:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1489649</guid>
		<description>They clearly had not read about the Law of Thermodynamics 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They clearly had not read about the Law of Thermodynamics 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David O'Mahony</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1489202</link>
		<dc:creator>David O'Mahony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 12:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1489202</guid>
		<description>Steorn... embarrassing the nation wherever they go. I can only wonder why the company persisted with the &#039;launch&#039; when it was never going to work. 

Steorn has made a point of the scientific community carrying out a &quot;process of validation&quot; of the Orbo thingamajig -- anybody else think that this report (supposedly due by the end of the year) will somehow remain unreleased?

http://www.steorn.com/orbo/claim/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steorn&#8230; embarrassing the nation wherever they go. I can only wonder why the company persisted with the &#8216;launch&#8217; when it was never going to work. </p>
<p>Steorn has made a point of the scientific community carrying out a &#8220;process of validation&#8221; of the Orbo thingamajig &#8212; anybody else think that this report (supposedly due by the end of the year) will somehow remain unreleased?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.steorn.com/orbo/claim/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.steorn.com/orbo/claim/'>http://www.steo...com/orbo/claim/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1489140</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 11:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1489140</guid>
		<description>does this hoax have anything at all to do with the mission of TC? just curious...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does this hoax have anything at all to do with the mission of TC? just curious&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Chone</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1488554</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Chone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 00:57:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1488554</guid>
		<description>Not sure who is mocking who.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure who is mocking who.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Duck</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1488499</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 00:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1488499</guid>
		<description>Good report Mr. Mike.   When I first read their claims I was intrigued but of course it&#039;s a hoax a you can tell by the way they have hyped the silly &quot;launch&quot; of the gizmo.    A free energy device would be the greatest invention in the history of humankind.   You hardly need any marketing hype for that.     This is now a test of sheer human gullibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good report Mr. Mike.   When I first read their claims I was intrigued but of course it&#8217;s a hoax a you can tell by the way they have hyped the silly &#8220;launch&#8221; of the gizmo.    A free energy device would be the greatest invention in the history of humankind.   You hardly need any marketing hype for that.     This is now a test of sheer human gullibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1488498</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 00:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1488498</guid>
		<description>could this be next powerset.com hype?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>could this be next powerset.com hype?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1488491</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 00:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1488491</guid>
		<description>Steorn allegedly tried to patent the Orbo last year, without much success...

http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1861128,00.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steorn allegedly tried to patent the Orbo last year, without much success&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1861128,00.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://technology.guardian.co.uk/weekly/story/0,,1861128,00.html'>http://technolo...1861128,00.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: foobar</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1488484</link>
		<dc:creator>foobar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 00:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1488484</guid>
		<description>Yeah, openly mocking BLOWHARD LAWYERS is wayyyyy too easy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, openly mocking BLOWHARD LAWYERS is wayyyyy too easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: somaking</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1488480</link>
		<dc:creator>somaking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jul 2007 00:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1488480</guid>
		<description>Hey Mike,

At least somebody *else* is getting openly mocked !!

LOL.  Not that it matters.   LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mike,</p>
<p>At least somebody *else* is getting openly mocked !!</p>
<p>LOL.  Not that it matters.   LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jorge</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1488402</link>
		<dc:creator>Jorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 23:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1488402</guid>
		<description>I know this can be a prank, but remember that trough all history, people mocked of innovations. Google earth would be rendering a box right now... :) Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know this can be a prank, but remember that trough all history, people mocked of innovations. Google earth would be rendering a box right now&#8230; <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paddy O'Donnell</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1488321</link>
		<dc:creator>Paddy O'Donnell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 21:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1488321</guid>
		<description>What do you expect from the land of the gift of blarney?
world-class bs-ers &#039;em irish all are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you expect from the land of the gift of blarney?<br />
world-class bs-ers &#8216;em irish all are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Tools</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1488216</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1488216</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon, that was hilarious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon, that was hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Arrington</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1488201</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Arrington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1488201</guid>
		<description>Don - you should have stuck with it. About the 50 sec. mark i started laughing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don &#8211; you should have stuck with it. About the 50 sec. mark i started laughing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/comment-page-1/#comment-1488199</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2007 20:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/07/finally-the-steorn-demo-humor/#comment-1488199</guid>
		<description>Looks like the &quot;powers that be&quot; got to them by threatening their life.  Too bad they didn&#039;t have the guts to go through with it.  It&#039;s better to be brave and dead then live as a coward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like the &#8220;powers that be&#8221; got to them by threatening their life.  Too bad they didn&#8217;t have the guts to go through with it.  It&#8217;s better to be brave and dead then live as a coward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
