<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kevin v. Evan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pownce! &#171; PraveenNET</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1991730</link>
		<dc:creator>Pownce! &#171; PraveenNET</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Feb 2008 09:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1991730</guid>
		<description>[...]  I just received this mail from pownce.com, which is mostly blogged as killer for the popular twitter.com, that there is some update on the website. I happened to check [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  I just received this mail from pownce.com, which is mostly blogged as killer for the popular twitter.com, that there is some update on the website. I happened to check [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Brasil &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pownce</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1944743</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Brasil &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pownce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 19:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1944743</guid>
		<description>[...] Pownce faz de tudo para evitar a comparação inevitável com o Twitter. Há diferenças entre os serviços, é verdade. Como diferenciais, o Pownce permite enviar mensagens para grupos de amigos (o Twitter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pownce faz de tudo para evitar a comparação inevitável com o Twitter. Há diferenças entre os serviços, é verdade. Como diferenciais, o Pownce permite enviar mensagens para grupos de amigos (o Twitter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is Pownce Going To The DeadPool?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1860477</link>
		<dc:creator>Is Pownce Going To The DeadPool?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1860477</guid>
		<description>[...] on Compete.com, the difference doesn&#8217;t look quite so brutal. Still, there is probably only room for one Twitter in this world, and Twitter itself seems determined to hang in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Compete.com, the difference doesn&#8217;t look quite so brutal. Still, there is probably only room for one Twitter in this world, and Twitter itself seems determined to hang in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comparisons of Twitter versus Pownce » techipedia &#124; tamar weinberg</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1837212</link>
		<dc:creator>Comparisons of Twitter versus Pownce » techipedia &#124; tamar weinberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 07:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1837212</guid>
		<description>[...] though Michael Arrington says that it&#8217;s easier to find friends on Twitter, if you can&#8217;t easily search for them, there&#8217;s no benefit to having a more populated [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] though Michael Arrington says that it&#8217;s easier to find friends on Twitter, if you can&#8217;t easily search for them, there&#8217;s no benefit to having a more populated [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just a random blog !</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1555124</link>
		<dc:creator>Just a random blog !</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 02:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1555124</guid>
		<description>[...] while we debate whether Kevin Rose&#8217;s Pownce, another recent entrant to this space, is different enough from Twitter to become successful, yet another hopeful young gun enters the space with little to differentiate [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] while we debate whether Kevin Rose&rsquo;s Pownce, another recent entrant to this space, is different enough from Twitter to become successful, yet another hopeful young gun enters the space with little to differentiate [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Man with no blog : &#187; When is There Too Many? - Gary Barber</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1521935</link>
		<dc:creator>Man with no blog : &#187; When is There Too Many? - Gary Barber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 02:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1521935</guid>
		<description>[...] Michael Arrington has said that Pownce is the Twitter killer. All this talk is on the wrong track. Yes Pownce is like Twitter in that it has desktop applications. But its across various media and really is based on communication of information not information communication. It&#8217;s about the sharing of information (links, files, short messages, discussions) between groups of friends. But even Kevin Roses&#8217; baby Pownce has problems, its impossible to block or remove unwanted spammers or e-stalkers. There is no SMS, no RSS feeds, the notifications point to the web site, breaking the communication chain. Well we know why the communication chain is broken, as Thomas Vander Wal points out, its all dollars and site stickiness. Really just minor points, but you don&#8217;t want too many of them. On the upside, re-finding people on Pownce is very easy, with an added plus of the the friends of friends feature. This is something Facebook and a few others could do with looking at. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Michael Arrington has said that Pownce is the Twitter killer. All this talk is on the wrong track. Yes Pownce is like Twitter in that it has desktop applications. But its across various media and really is based on communication of information not information communication. It&#8217;s about the sharing of information (links, files, short messages, discussions) between groups of friends. But even Kevin Roses&#8217; baby Pownce has problems, its impossible to block or remove unwanted spammers or e-stalkers. There is no SMS, no RSS feeds, the notifications point to the web site, breaking the communication chain. Well we know why the communication chain is broken, as Thomas Vander Wal points out, its all dollars and site stickiness. Really just minor points, but you don&#8217;t want too many of them. On the upside, re-finding people on Pownce is very easy, with an added plus of the the friends of friends feature. This is something Facebook and a few others could do with looking at. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 網路創業、web2.0技術、快樂生活 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pownce&#8230;&#8230;?</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1512573</link>
		<dc:creator>網路創業、web2.0技術、快樂生活 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Pownce&#8230;&#8230;?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 01:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1512573</guid>
		<description>[...] stuff to your friends。與Twitter的比較與分析可看這篇。可學習的是他的開站完整架構，包括邀請註冊、率先採用新技術（與Adobe [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stuff to your friends。與Twitter的比較與分析可看這篇。可學習的是他的開站完整架構，包括邀請註冊、率先採用新技術（與Adobe [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Chandler</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1486619</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Chandler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 21:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1486619</guid>
		<description>I don't see Pownce losing this one.  The rapid growth of the community is obvious.  And there are no platform dependencies, like some are saying.  Pownce AIR is optional.  It's web based just like Twitter and the opening of an API is inevitable.  It's the people that make up the community that determine it's success, with usability being a secondary concern.  Pownce could be triumphant.  Ultimately, there's room for both regardless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see Pownce losing this one.  The rapid growth of the community is obvious.  And there are no platform dependencies, like some are saying.  Pownce AIR is optional.  It&#8217;s web based just like Twitter and the opening of an API is inevitable.  It&#8217;s the people that make up the community that determine it&#8217;s success, with usability being a secondary concern.  Pownce could be triumphant.  Ultimately, there&#8217;s room for both regardless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Blank: Publishing, Innovation &#38; the Web</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1483818</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Blank: Publishing, Innovation &#38; the Web</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 00:45:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1483818</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Battle for Micro-Blogging: Twitter vs. Pownce...&lt;/strong&gt;

TechCrunch outlines the most recent battle between micro-blogging platforms, in this case: Twitter vs. Pownce:

&#8220;The main differences: Twitter is mobile-ready, allowing users to receive friend requests and new messages via text message. And Pownc...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Battle for Micro-Blogging: Twitter vs. Pownce&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>TechCrunch outlines the most recent battle between micro-blogging platforms, in this case: Twitter vs. Pownce:</p>
<p>&#8220;The main differences: Twitter is mobile-ready, allowing users to receive friend requests and new messages via text message. And Pownc&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Logan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1481845</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Logan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 17:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1481845</guid>
		<description>

Why not just use Gmail?  I haven't heard anything about Pownce that sounds unique or compelling to use.

Thanks for the review...very interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not just use Gmail?  I haven&#8217;t heard anything about Pownce that sounds unique or compelling to use.</p>
<p>Thanks for the review&#8230;very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sera</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1480004</link>
		<dc:creator>Sera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1480004</guid>
		<description>Both of their services suck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both of their services suck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aibek Esengulov</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479793</link>
		<dc:creator>Aibek Esengulov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 18:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479793</guid>
		<description>Nice review. Classic Mike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice review. Classic Mike.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noob</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479480</link>
		<dc:creator>noob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 14:44:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479480</guid>
		<description>Pownce is a waste of bandwidth.  Why should you pay for a glorified FTP client?  Oh, maybe because it offers instant messaging, that's why it's cool...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pownce is a waste of bandwidth.  Why should you pay for a glorified FTP client?  Oh, maybe because it offers instant messaging, that&#8217;s why it&#8217;s cool&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479393</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 13:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479393</guid>
		<description>Although very difficult to keep track of, I'm starting to add some of the more interesting reviews of Pownce.

Check out what people are saying about it, I've lumped them into favorable, indifferent and unfavorable.

I put you as "on the fence" still.

http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/06/30/keeping-track-of-the-pownce-reviews/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although very difficult to keep track of, I&#8217;m starting to add some of the more interesting reviews of Pownce.</p>
<p>Check out what people are saying about it, I&#8217;ve lumped them into favorable, indifferent and unfavorable.</p>
<p>I put you as &#8220;on the fence&#8221; still.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2007/06/30/keeping-track-of-the-pownce-reviews/" rel="nofollow">http://www.web-strategist.com/.....e-reviews/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Solis</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479382</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Solis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 13:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479382</guid>
		<description>Pownce is no more a Twitter killer than the new Netscape was a Digg killer. I feel Pownce has potential, but it's a bit too limited in its functionality at the moment, and it's not mobile. I have to get into the app to see what's new.  Jaiku and the new groups feature is more intriguing to me at the moment. And, if I need to send files, Yousendit does a pretty good job for up to 100MB when gmail can't handle the job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pownce is no more a Twitter killer than the new Netscape was a Digg killer. I feel Pownce has potential, but it&#8217;s a bit too limited in its functionality at the moment, and it&#8217;s not mobile. I have to get into the app to see what&#8217;s new.  Jaiku and the new groups feature is more intriguing to me at the moment. And, if I need to send files, Yousendit does a pretty good job for up to 100MB when gmail can&#8217;t handle the job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Evan</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479184</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Evan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479184</guid>
		<description>Evan's a tool.  I'd go with Pounce for that reason alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan&#8217;s a tool.  I&#8217;d go with Pounce for that reason alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicole Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479183</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479183</guid>
		<description>Let's see. Twitter does have SMS - which never really work reliable over here and drain out the battery of the mobile. When I was in the States, my prepaid even refused to even get SMS or send them.

Mobile? I use mobile twitter with the web page for reduced traffic. Give me something like that and I am satisfied.

No big difference? Typical monolingual, and mono country view.

Please show me how I can have one account in twitter and separate messages by languages. Groups is not so much about really grouping for me, but reducing the clutter for some people. You do not want me engaging in German in your twitter account. Managing two accounts in two browsers is a hassle.

So far I am fine with pownce being this in beta. It has a lot of promising things in there and for a beta it is well thought out. Especially on the business side. 

Now, give me some extras and I happily pay the 20 bucks per year.  And that is what it is about: It looks expandable and with a strategy.

Am I missing things? Hell yeah. There are a lot of things missing or need revamping in the sense of user interface. But it is promising to be good - and with it coming from the maker of Digg, I expect them to understand how to deal with load ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see. Twitter does have SMS - which never really work reliable over here and drain out the battery of the mobile. When I was in the States, my prepaid even refused to even get SMS or send them.</p>
<p>Mobile? I use mobile twitter with the web page for reduced traffic. Give me something like that and I am satisfied.</p>
<p>No big difference? Typical monolingual, and mono country view.</p>
<p>Please show me how I can have one account in twitter and separate messages by languages. Groups is not so much about really grouping for me, but reducing the clutter for some people. You do not want me engaging in German in your twitter account. Managing two accounts in two browsers is a hassle.</p>
<p>So far I am fine with pownce being this in beta. It has a lot of promising things in there and for a beta it is well thought out. Especially on the business side. </p>
<p>Now, give me some extras and I happily pay the 20 bucks per year.  And that is what it is about: It looks expandable and with a strategy.</p>
<p>Am I missing things? Hell yeah. There are a lot of things missing or need revamping in the sense of user interface. But it is promising to be good - and with it coming from the maker of Digg, I expect them to understand how to deal with load &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: would you mind expanding..</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479126</link>
		<dc:creator>would you mind expanding..</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 10:20:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1479126</guid>
		<description>Mike
would you mind expanding this comparison or at least the table to have email and IM also..There is no question these are nice-smart kids  but by comparing these solutions it might seem as if there is really pressing problem that these solutions are addressing..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike<br />
would you mind expanding this comparison or at least the table to have email and IM also..There is no question these are nice-smart kids  but by comparing these solutions it might seem as if there is really pressing problem that these solutions are addressing..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478950</link>
		<dc:creator>JT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 08:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478950</guid>
		<description>10 reasons why Pounce rocks, lets solve this once and for all!

http://frostfirebuzz.com/10-reasons-why-pounce-rocks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>10 reasons why Pounce rocks, lets solve this once and for all!</p>
<p><a href="http://frostfirebuzz.com/10-reasons-why-pounce-rocks" rel="nofollow">http://frostfirebuzz.com/10-re.....unce-rocks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Rice</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478936</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 08:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478936</guid>
		<description>@29 Yeah, gotta give credit to Google being the first, too.

Oh, wait.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@29 Yeah, gotta give credit to Google being the first, too.</p>
<p>Oh, wait.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: twit</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478926</link>
		<dc:creator>twit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 08:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478926</guid>
		<description>Pownce &#38; Twitter both are useless. Some blogger are using Twitter to boost their self egos, as if the world evolves around them. Get a life guys!

Although, give credit to Twitter for being the first.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pownce &amp; Twitter both are useless. Some blogger are using Twitter to boost their self egos, as if the world evolves around them. Get a life guys!</p>
<p>Although, give credit to Twitter for being the first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Harwood</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478837</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Harwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 07:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478837</guid>
		<description>Hi Michael,

"Pownce does it, too, but all the other features are really just distractions."

I've just the other day wrote a post on single-purpose applications, and their beneficial simplicity. If anyone cares to read it's at: 

http://blog.mattharwood.co.uk/2007/06/29/addressing-single-purpose-apps/

I've also just joined Pownce yesterday. I love the AIR application, but unfortunately it seems I cannot reply to messages through it. Whilst I agree on principle that Pownce's additional features are distractions, file transfer is quite useful and couldn't be done in a text-based message (whereas 'link' and 'event' could really be).

Best,
Matt</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michael,</p>
<p>&#8220;Pownce does it, too, but all the other features are really just distractions.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve just the other day wrote a post on single-purpose applications, and their beneficial simplicity. If anyone cares to read it&#8217;s at: </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.mattharwood.co.uk/2007/06/29/addressing-single-purpose-apps/" rel="nofollow">http://blog.mattharwood.co.uk/.....pose-apps/</a></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also just joined Pownce yesterday. I love the AIR application, but unfortunately it seems I cannot reply to messages through it. Whilst I agree on principle that Pownce&#8217;s additional features are distractions, file transfer is quite useful and couldn&#8217;t be done in a text-based message (whereas &#8216;link&#8217; and &#8216;event&#8217; could really be).</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Matt</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Rice</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478796</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Rice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 06:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478796</guid>
		<description>If you took the status update thingy in FB and made it its own site; or if you took iChat/Skype/etc status things and made them standalone, that's kind of what these presence apps are about. Problem with some is that they weren't designed for conversation (Twitter) and Jaiku and Pownce help that by threading a conversation, as well as sending messages to a group, without the official formation of a group.

I wanted Facebook to be a replacement but it seems it's settling into my workflow as an smart address book with a little organic activity under the hood.

Also, Jaiku brings RSS feeds inline with your status. 

Anyway, that's my .02. It's a different thing, with lots of similarities and no two are alike-- and geeks will line-by-line compare and say one sucks or is awesome because X, ergo it's gospel. 

Heh, I love this space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you took the status update thingy in FB and made it its own site; or if you took iChat/Skype/etc status things and made them standalone, that&#8217;s kind of what these presence apps are about. Problem with some is that they weren&#8217;t designed for conversation (Twitter) and Jaiku and Pownce help that by threading a conversation, as well as sending messages to a group, without the official formation of a group.</p>
<p>I wanted Facebook to be a replacement but it seems it&#8217;s settling into my workflow as an smart address book with a little organic activity under the hood.</p>
<p>Also, Jaiku brings RSS feeds inline with your status. </p>
<p>Anyway, that&#8217;s my .02. It&#8217;s a different thing, with lots of similarities and no two are alike&#8211; and geeks will line-by-line compare and say one sucks or is awesome because X, ergo it&#8217;s gospel. </p>
<p>Heh, I love this space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478783</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 06:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478783</guid>
		<description>For those of us on (and enjoying) Facebook, can someone explain how Twitter or Pownce might be useful?

Oh, and I agree with #15... enough, already, with the asinine killer this and killer that and this vs. that and so on.  Constant zero-sum thinking is for those, well, without much thinking capacity.  Or those striving to increase page views ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of us on (and enjoying) Facebook, can someone explain how Twitter or Pownce might be useful?</p>
<p>Oh, and I agree with #15&#8230; enough, already, with the asinine killer this and killer that and this vs. that and so on.  Constant zero-sum thinking is for those, well, without much thinking capacity.  Or those striving to increase page views <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478736</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 06:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/07/01/kevin-v-evan/#comment-1478736</guid>
		<description>who cares?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who cares?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.096 seconds -->
