June 28, 2007

Didn’t Someone Tell Feedster They Were Dead?

Michael Arrington

28 comments »

You don’t hear the name “Feedster” very often any more, other than the occasional joke about how they managed to execute even more poorly than Technorati. I frankly assumed they were among the walking dead - the place startups go when they don’t have pressure to shut down but don’t have enough money or human assets to do anything interesting, either. The last time we wrote about them was February 2006, more than a year ago.

But it appears that Feedster is alive and kicking - they launched a major redesign today, and a new widget product that allows searchers to quickly add search results to any website. They also have a new search engine, they say, that helps reduce spam.

It looks like there are a few hiccups with the widget - I created and embedded one but it won’t load properly.

My opinion: When a company gets this sick and falls this far behind, and the market they are in is now dominated by Google, it’s generally a good idea to return what’s left of capital to shareholders and let the employees move on to more interesting projects. Nothing good is going to happen with Feedster. I’m not particularly impressed with their search results (this will not pull users from Technorati or Google Blog Search), and few people will be interested in the widget (not that Technorati releases stuff like this all the time, they just don’t talk about it).

  • Sphere It

Trackbacks/Pings (Trackback URL)

  1. Things That ... Make You Go Hmm

Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. 14Dayz

    If people believe in them, if they believe in themselves, magic can happen. What is important is they need to be able to embrace change and not stick to rusty pathways. I wish them the best.

  2. Gadgetize

    I’m not an expert, but I personally like Technorati fine. I just checked out the Google Blog Search and what I was looking for was all full of non-blog stuff like Digg. Maybe just bad luck, but I was decidedly unimpressed.

    Seems like there was another negative article about them recently, is there something behind that or are you just not a fan?

    Good luck to Feedster, as the Internet grows I don’t think you necessarily have to be #1 or #2, just profitable and growing. I don’t know their situation with investors, but I’m not a big fan of throwing in the towel, especially when what is the dominant player is so underwhelming.

  3. peter caputa

    It’s not too difficult to make a search engine profitable if they know how to buy some cheap traffic and serve cpc ads.

    I did do a few searches and got zero or unexpected results and actually a few css mistakes. I am glad it says beta. But, if there’s one thing I’ve learned… don’t promote something unless it’s ready to go.

    So, who’s over there now? Rafer left a long time ago. Who’s running the ship?

  4. Hashim

    perhaps they’re hoping to be bought

  5. Concrete Stain

    Perhaps -

    - they have nothing to lose- and therefore;

    - can be free for innovation like never before-

    Perhaps, perhaps, perhaps

    -cake

  6. Ian Bell

    Agree with Michael’s assessment.

    Feedster has gone downhill ever since Scott Johnson left the company. The new site design IMO is ugly, the product is outdated and offers very little value.

    I am suprised their investors are letting them continue.

  7. Witx

    hmm…..I was trying to decide if Feedster is really down the drain…..I guess I just got the confirmation. “We’re sorry, the content service timed out while communicating with this site. Please notify support@feedster.com.”

  8. feedstar

    Oh Ian, if you only knew. Scott is the guy that killed the original feedster, which is now actually in its third re-birth as a company. Scott sold the original investors a product and story that never existed (such as the spam filtering he touted) and everything he ever touched or wrote was quickly either thrown out or re-written.

  9. Let Hax

    Scott Johnson is a poor excuse for a human being and Mike Arrington does not score with the gender of his choice.

    Get a life, people.

  10. Sameer

    I am sure they can improve their services with little extra effort.

  11. Rudager

    I agree with feedstar though I am sure he is a homosexual.

    Blogging is stupid, you are all stupid for listening to this. This is a PARADOX.

    In the future, we will use the phrase “Johnsoned” so mean you screwed up bad. As in Scott Johnson is a moron, he really JOHNSONED up everything he went near. He is probably a loser who does not score well with the gender of his choice.”

  12. Marques

    #9 do be mad, Arrington has the right to express his opinion weather it is positive or negative. I am not a TC fanboy and Feedster should take what Arrington say as motivation to prove him wrong.

    By the way I luv the name, but I am byist b/c I own myvidster (There is nothing there to look at, come back in a few weeks).

  13. Marques

    Hate to double post, but I meant to say “don’t be mad”.

  14. Dongle Houser

    PEOPLE!

    Look, you can flame and name call all you want but the one thing we can agree on is that Scott Johnson is the greatest person in the history of man. If by greatest person you mean pasty and insipid beyond anyones wildest imagination.

    Scott Johnson is totally awesome - his contributions to society will align the planets and bring peace and harmony to all mankind for a millisecond. Then Britney Spear’s new album will realase the the Four Horsemen of the Appocalypse will come.

    I tried to make a point but I am totally Johnsoned right now.

  15. Bong Loader

    What is this website tech crunch? Hahahahah Crunch - like potato chips hahahha mmmmm potato chips.

    What were we just talking about?

  16. Todd

    Suggested new category: “Dead pool zombie” or “Dead pool zombie company”

    Context: “…we wrote about __________ more than a year ago when they were burning through VC capital like a Kevin Rose drinks beer. But even after being placed in the TechCrunch Dead Pool, they continue to operate…”

  17. tim

    Feedster had a good initial business strategy, but a psycho founder (Johnson) and clueless vcs drove the company in the wrong direction. Not sure the motivation for the new announcement and ugly facelift.

  18. Otis Gospodnetic

    I think “(not that Technorati releases stuff like this all the time, they just don’t talk about it).” was supposed to be “(note that Technorati releases stuff like this all the time, they just don’t talk about it).”

    Right?
    I’m also not sure why you say this is a Google-dominated space. Doesn’t Technorati rank above Google Blogsearch on various free and commercial traffic reports? I think this was actually covered here on TC.

  19. Janine

    Personally, I’ve always known that feedster wouldn’t die. They have a great strategy, and I use them almost everyday.
    http://news.myspace.com/techno.....em/6828960

  20. Pop

    They should redesign the redesign. I have no idea what this company does by looking at their site.

  21. anon

    I don’t recall Feedster ever being very impressive.

  22. Simon Moore

    mmmmmmmm - not booming but not dead:
    http://www.statsaholic.com/www.....crunch.com

    - being the 3000 most popular site is not that bad Michael, although I suppose your point is standing still is not great in the WWW world!

    Our little start up is way behind so you can see my perspective from that starting point!

  23. Nick Tan

    Has anybody EVER admitted failure straight up and returned the remaining capital to shareholders?

  24. Alan Marks

    “If people believe in them, if they believe in themselves, magic can happen. What is important is they need to be able to embrace change and not stick to rusty pathways. I wish them the best.”

    Good point, I think that you should never give up. Besides, this is what capitalism is all about - diversity and infinite possibilities created by entrepreneurs.

  25. Jon / BlogThot.com

    I just don’t see Feedster going away. If they ran out of money, what’s the chance we’d see a buyout? If nothing else, they do have a reputation of some kind. We’ve at least heard of them, right?

  26. David Mackey

    Have to agree that Google’s Blog Search is killing this sector.

  27. Shawn

    Tell me what business Arrington has started?

    I think it is very easy to write about other companies that fail…considering you haven’t done shit.