<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Docs Gets Folders, Now What About Gmail?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/</link>
	<description>Startup and Technology News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:07:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: no tags</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-2754945</link>
		<dc:creator>no tags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 03:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-2754945</guid>
		<description>I agree with Chris - it&#039;s important to have them removed from your inbox. If I&#039;m on 6 list servs (and I have to be) and I tag/archive them all, it cleans up my inbox. Now my archive folder has 6 listservs in it. If I just want to see one, I can&#039;t. It&#039;s the same thing.

I suspect anyone who supports tags doesn&#039;t have experience with a lot of email for work or organizations, all of which you have to keep up with at different paces. At the same time, I often don&#039;t look at one email from a list at a time; I frequently need to refer to recently sent emails which are not in the same conversation JUST FROM THAT LIST. I really need folders for this. OR, just put a list of your tags on the side of the screen so you can sort by them easily. That&#039;s really the only difference. Tags are a bitch to sort by.

Bottom line, just give us the option - conversations on/off, folders or tags. It makes life easy for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Chris &#8211; it&#8217;s important to have them removed from your inbox. If I&#8217;m on 6 list servs (and I have to be) and I tag/archive them all, it cleans up my inbox. Now my archive folder has 6 listservs in it. If I just want to see one, I can&#8217;t. It&#8217;s the same thing.</p>
<p>I suspect anyone who supports tags doesn&#8217;t have experience with a lot of email for work or organizations, all of which you have to keep up with at different paces. At the same time, I often don&#8217;t look at one email from a list at a time; I frequently need to refer to recently sent emails which are not in the same conversation JUST FROM THAT LIST. I really need folders for this. OR, just put a list of your tags on the side of the screen so you can sort by them easily. That&#8217;s really the only difference. Tags are a bitch to sort by.</p>
<p>Bottom line, just give us the option &#8211; conversations on/off, folders or tags. It makes life easy for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: folders suck</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-2644173</link>
		<dc:creator>folders suck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 02:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-2644173</guid>
		<description>You can very easily create a filter that tags AND archives incoming messages. If you can&#039;t get your head around tags and why they make more sense than folders, you can just pretend the tags ARE folders and leave the rest of us to use our tags.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can very easily create a filter that tags AND archives incoming messages. If you can&#8217;t get your head around tags and why they make more sense than folders, you can just pretend the tags ARE folders and leave the rest of us to use our tags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew1234</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-2627700</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew1234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-2627700</guid>
		<description>Please stop saying that labels perform exactly the same as folders, it&#039;s not true in any way shape or form.  Jesus, the very words &quot;Folders,&quot; and &quot;Labels&quot; should tell you that. A folder is a folder, you know, something you can put your papers in. A label is something you put on a folder, so that you know what is in the folder, or labeled item. Bet you didn&#039;t know this... Gmail does support both folders and labels! SURPRISE!!! In using Gmail&#039;s current set up you have the option to create as many labels as you want, and call them what ever you want. You also have one folder: &quot;All Mail.&quot; Please keep this in mind the next time you try to tell me folders suck, don&#039;t put them in Gmail, or they are the same as labels. If you are using a computer to store files then your are, in fact using folders.

Folders organize and make for easier searching. Labels only make for easier searching. I&#039;ll give you an example, if you have a PC this will make sense, if you have a mac sell it and buy an iPhone(great machine, still has typical Apple flaws). Imagine you go into windows explorer. Imap folders are just like folders in windows explorer they separate and group files from or with one another. Label are like the details at the top of the file explorer. If I click on &quot;Name&quot; it will order all the files in alphabetical order. Click it again and it will reverse the order. I could also do this for &quot;Date Modified,&quot; &quot;Size,&quot; etc. No imagine that you only had one folder on your hard drive &quot;C:\.&quot; That&#039;s it. Every single file you ever created, edited, viewed, played right there in front of your face. It&#039;s not organized, it&#039;s cluttered.

I remember when all the search engines were emerging and making a name for themselves, Google rose to the top over other search engines, that had much bigger bank accounts(AOL, etc) at the time. They did this with an uncluttered interface which mad for quicker searches, and better search results. This may seem a little harsh but it seems like now they are trying to pull an &quot;Apple&quot; and control every aspect, with little options.

In conclusion(someone else previously said this):
   -Folders work good to organize
   -Labels work great to search
   -How bout let me use both(folders containing e-mails that are labeled) P.S. If you don&#039;t want to use folders no one will make you.
   -If that&#039;s to much for you to handle, Google, give me an option to use folders, or labels.

Having said that: How can I get my email to move to a label instead of being labeled when moving from a email client? YES an email client, HTML is not much of an interactive programming language. Clients work better, they are an actual program. Not a document inside of a program such as webmail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please stop saying that labels perform exactly the same as folders, it&#8217;s not true in any way shape or form.  Jesus, the very words &#8220;Folders,&#8221; and &#8220;Labels&#8221; should tell you that. A folder is a folder, you know, something you can put your papers in. A label is something you put on a folder, so that you know what is in the folder, or labeled item. Bet you didn&#8217;t know this&#8230; Gmail does support both folders and labels! SURPRISE!!! In using Gmail&#8217;s current set up you have the option to create as many labels as you want, and call them what ever you want. You also have one folder: &#8220;All Mail.&#8221; Please keep this in mind the next time you try to tell me folders suck, don&#8217;t put them in Gmail, or they are the same as labels. If you are using a computer to store files then your are, in fact using folders.</p>
<p>Folders organize and make for easier searching. Labels only make for easier searching. I&#8217;ll give you an example, if you have a PC this will make sense, if you have a mac sell it and buy an iPhone(great machine, still has typical Apple flaws). Imagine you go into windows explorer. Imap folders are just like folders in windows explorer they separate and group files from or with one another. Label are like the details at the top of the file explorer. If I click on &#8220;Name&#8221; it will order all the files in alphabetical order. Click it again and it will reverse the order. I could also do this for &#8220;Date Modified,&#8221; &#8220;Size,&#8221; etc. No imagine that you only had one folder on your hard drive &#8220;C:\.&#8221; That&#8217;s it. Every single file you ever created, edited, viewed, played right there in front of your face. It&#8217;s not organized, it&#8217;s cluttered.</p>
<p>I remember when all the search engines were emerging and making a name for themselves, Google rose to the top over other search engines, that had much bigger bank accounts(AOL, etc) at the time. They did this with an uncluttered interface which mad for quicker searches, and better search results. This may seem a little harsh but it seems like now they are trying to pull an &#8220;Apple&#8221; and control every aspect, with little options.</p>
<p>In conclusion(someone else previously said this):<br />
   -Folders work good to organize<br />
   -Labels work great to search<br />
   -How bout let me use both(folders containing e-mails that are labeled) P.S. If you don&#8217;t want to use folders no one will make you.<br />
   -If that&#8217;s to much for you to handle, Google, give me an option to use folders, or labels.</p>
<p>Having said that: How can I get my email to move to a label instead of being labeled when moving from a email client? YES an email client, HTML is not much of an interactive programming language. Clients work better, they are an actual program. Not a document inside of a program such as webmail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-1/#comment-2620374</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-2620374</guid>
		<description>Tagging does *not* work in exactly the same way as folders.  It does not remove tagged emails from your inbox, as a folder would remove remove them.

Automatically removing emails from your inbox and placing them in a separate folder is a useful tool.  I&#039;m signed up for a couple of different listservs, some of which send me 20-30 emails a day.  I don&#039;t want all that crap clogging up my inbox and making it hard for me to easily see my important work emails.  So having a filter which automatically moves it to a different folder instead of just giving it a lame tag is crucial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tagging does *not* work in exactly the same way as folders.  It does not remove tagged emails from your inbox, as a folder would remove remove them.</p>
<p>Automatically removing emails from your inbox and placing them in a separate folder is a useful tool.  I&#8217;m signed up for a couple of different listservs, some of which send me 20-30 emails a day.  I don&#8217;t want all that crap clogging up my inbox and making it hard for me to easily see my important work emails.  So having a filter which automatically moves it to a different folder instead of just giving it a lame tag is crucial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mind Mining Medium &#187; Presentations coming to Google Docs &#38; Spreadsheets.</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-3/#comment-1565378</link>
		<dc:creator>Mind Mining Medium &#187; Presentations coming to Google Docs &#38; Spreadsheets.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 16:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1565378</guid>
		<description>[...] a snoop into the new (mentioned everywhere) Google Doc &amp; Spreadsheets javascript, I found an the icon for Presentation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a snoop into the new (mentioned everywhere) Google Doc &#38; Spreadsheets javascript, I found an the icon for Presentation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Does Gmail need folders? at SoftSaurus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1531734</link>
		<dc:creator>Does Gmail need folders? at SoftSaurus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 23:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1531734</guid>
		<description>[...] this week Google replaced Docs &amp; Spreadsheets tags with regular old folders, prompting some to ask, &#8220;What about Gmail?&#8221; So we want to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this week Google replaced Docs &amp; Spreadsheets tags with regular old folders, prompting some to ask, &#8220;What about Gmail?&#8221; So we want to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imma</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1520831</link>
		<dc:creator>imma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1520831</guid>
		<description>@Robert Mikes (93)

I note you also fail to provide an example where your folders would be useful.
what *do* *you* use a hierachy for in emails?
(i don&#039;t use one, so don&#039;t know an example situation where it would be useful)

holding ctrl down creates duplicates of a message - which is hardly the same thing

ps : that&#039;s a stupid way to try to use tags</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert Mikes (93)</p>
<p>I note you also fail to provide an example where your folders would be useful.<br />
what *do* *you* use a hierachy for in emails?<br />
(i don&#8217;t use one, so don&#8217;t know an example situation where it would be useful)</p>
<p>holding ctrl down creates duplicates of a message &#8211; which is hardly the same thing</p>
<p>ps : that&#8217;s a stupid way to try to use tags</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reader Poll: Does Gmail need folders? at SoftSaurus</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1501413</link>
		<dc:creator>Reader Poll: Does Gmail need folders? at SoftSaurus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 17:44:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1501413</guid>
		<description>[...] this week Google replaced Docs &amp; Spreadsheets tags with regular old folders, prompting some to ask, &#8220;What about Gmail?&#8221; So we want to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this week Google replaced Docs &amp; Spreadsheets tags with regular old folders, prompting some to ask, &#8220;What about Gmail?&#8221; So we want to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trikenit.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1490925</link>
		<dc:creator>trikenit.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jul 2007 15:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1490925</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Google Documents now has labels, not folders...&lt;/strong&gt;

TechCrunch posted an article about the interface overhaul over at Google Documents, welcoming the introduction of &#8216;folders&#8217;. In this article, Duncan Riley, talks about how it&#8217;s great that Google is finally embracing folders and wonder...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Google Documents now has labels, not folders&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>TechCrunch posted an article about the interface overhaul over at Google Documents, welcoming the introduction of &#8216;folders&#8217;. In this article, Duncan Riley, talks about how it&#8217;s great that Google is finally embracing folders and wonder&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naveen</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1484223</link>
		<dc:creator>Naveen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jul 2007 08:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1484223</guid>
		<description>The UI is damn good. But IMO they are just posing it as folders and they are not real folders. It doesnt have support for folders hierarchy/tree structure. Just they named it as folders instead of  labels/tags ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The UI is damn good. But IMO they are just posing it as folders and they are not real folders. It doesnt have support for folders hierarchy/tree structure. Just they named it as folders instead of  labels/tags <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Mikes</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1480072</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Mikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jul 2007 20:37:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1480072</guid>
		<description>imma (@91): Why don&#039;t you read some previous posts before u ask stupid questions? The thing that labels cannot do is the hierarchical organization. The only way to do that with tags is to name them tag.subtag.subsubtag... I tried that, my folder hierarchy would be expanded to hundreds of tags. Unusable.

BTW, there is a very simple way to put a message in multiple folders: in Outlook when you drag a message to a folder, press Ctrl and it will be copied. So you can put a copy in each &quot;category&quot;. Because of disk space, it would be nicer if this would only create a link to the message, which would only be saved into one of the folders (links are a 35-40 years old invention), but space should not matter on gmail anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>imma (@91): Why don&#8217;t you read some previous posts before u ask stupid questions? The thing that labels cannot do is the hierarchical organization. The only way to do that with tags is to name them tag.subtag.subsubtag&#8230; I tried that, my folder hierarchy would be expanded to hundreds of tags. Unusable.</p>
<p>BTW, there is a very simple way to put a message in multiple folders: in Outlook when you drag a message to a folder, press Ctrl and it will be copied. So you can put a copy in each &#8220;category&#8221;. Because of disk space, it would be nicer if this would only create a link to the message, which would only be saved into one of the folders (links are a 35-40 years old invention), but space should not matter on gmail anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: feedmashr.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1473585</link>
		<dc:creator>feedmashr.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:02:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1473585</guid>
		<description>so many angry comments saying you can&#039;t assign multiple folders to a doc. actually, um, you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so many angry comments saying you can&#8217;t assign multiple folders to a doc. actually, um, you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: imma</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1472575</link>
		<dc:creator>imma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1472575</guid>
		<description>Re: Folders will let me organize things
I have yet to see a use of folders that couldn&#039;t be easily replicated &amp; often improved by using labels instead
if you have one, please provide an example (eg what situation can&#039;t you use filters for in labels?)

my example for labels : email to Gran about her birthday, email to Dad about his birthday
you can see your emails about birthdays or all your emails to Gran, etc

Re: Folders in Gmail
only if they don&#039;t take away labels</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Folders will let me organize things<br />
I have yet to see a use of folders that couldn&#8217;t be easily replicated &amp; often improved by using labels instead<br />
if you have one, please provide an example (eg what situation can&#8217;t you use filters for in labels?)</p>
<p>my example for labels : email to Gran about her birthday, email to Dad about his birthday<br />
you can see your emails about birthdays or all your emails to Gran, etc</p>
<p>Re: Folders in Gmail<br />
only if they don&#8217;t take away labels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1471544</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 02:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1471544</guid>
		<description>I love labels because I can assign more than one label on an email. I love folders for their hierarchical organization. Now, it would perfect if we can combine these two features together. As the list of labels grows, being able to organize the list itself hierarchically would be a great addition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love labels because I can assign more than one label on an email. I love folders for their hierarchical organization. Now, it would perfect if we can combine these two features together. As the list of labels grows, being able to organize the list itself hierarchically would be a great addition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1471086</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 19:51:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1471086</guid>
		<description>Duncan,

How about if Gmail adds the option to create a hierarchy of folders under &quot;All Mail&quot;, which are independent of labels.  Each user could then use either labels or folders (or both), according to personal preference.  Also, add drag and drop from Inbox to any folder, which is the same as pressing the Archive button to send to All Mail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan,</p>
<p>How about if Gmail adds the option to create a hierarchy of folders under &#8220;All Mail&#8221;, which are independent of labels.  Each user could then use either labels or folders (or both), according to personal preference.  Also, add drag and drop from Inbox to any folder, which is the same as pressing the Archive button to send to All Mail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigOLogN</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1471005</link>
		<dc:creator>BigOLogN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 18:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1471005</guid>
		<description>If you think Google should use a traditional structured directory system instead of tags, please sign the online petition at: 

http://www.petitiononline.com/googlefs/petition.html

To read more about the proposal, please go to: gideongoldin.googlepages.com/directorypetition</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you think Google should use a traditional structured directory system instead of tags, please sign the online petition at: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.petitiononline.com/googlefs/petition.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href='http://www.petitiononline.com/googlefs/petition.html'>http://www.peti...s/petition.html</a></p>
<p>To read more about the proposal, please go to: gideongoldin.googlepages.com/directorypetition</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1470358</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 11:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1470358</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m finding this fascinating - some people are suggesting having both - which I&#039;d also support. 

I can&#039;t see that Gmail would stop the option to tag, but I would find it useful to be able to put things in folders too.

That&#039;s why I like Thunderbird - I can have folders, but I can also have virtual folders - which are rather like tags, as something can be in many folders at the same time - but, I can also have the equivalent of Misc - which I can only create in Gmail by actively tagging things - whereas with Thunderbird, once something is in a folder, I can just see the remainder in the inbox.

For me, IF Gmail were to introduce an easy way to tag things that had no other tag automatically (if you want it), then it would be useful. Alternatively, if it had folders, then I could see what&#039;s not in a particular category &amp; find it quickly. 

Yes, tagging is useful - most of the time, but there are things that it doesn&#039;t quite work for (especially when you&#039;re trying to set up filters to auto-tag/ auto archive things), and then I&#039;d like something that addresses that problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m finding this fascinating &#8211; some people are suggesting having both &#8211; which I&#8217;d also support. </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t see that Gmail would stop the option to tag, but I would find it useful to be able to put things in folders too.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why I like Thunderbird &#8211; I can have folders, but I can also have virtual folders &#8211; which are rather like tags, as something can be in many folders at the same time &#8211; but, I can also have the equivalent of Misc &#8211; which I can only create in Gmail by actively tagging things &#8211; whereas with Thunderbird, once something is in a folder, I can just see the remainder in the inbox.</p>
<p>For me, IF Gmail were to introduce an easy way to tag things that had no other tag automatically (if you want it), then it would be useful. Alternatively, if it had folders, then I could see what&#8217;s not in a particular category &amp; find it quickly. </p>
<p>Yes, tagging is useful &#8211; most of the time, but there are things that it doesn&#8217;t quite work for (especially when you&#8217;re trying to set up filters to auto-tag/ auto archive things), and then I&#8217;d like something that addresses that problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scot Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1469804</link>
		<dc:creator>Scot Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 05:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1469804</guid>
		<description>What they really need is IMAP.  Personally, I just like to use Gmail online for e-mail, but they do need IMAP support.  Especially with the iPhone coming out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What they really need is IMAP.  Personally, I just like to use Gmail online for e-mail, but they do need IMAP support.  Especially with the iPhone coming out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Lasnik</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1469785</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Lasnik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 04:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1469785</guid>
		<description>Just a brief heads-up:  For those who love the idea of being able to tag/label/folderize (heh!) an item with more than one thing, it&#039;s easily possible:

- In the default view, just drag a doc into as many folders as you want (one at a time) and it&#039;ll be in all of them.
- In folder views, dragging a document moves it OUT of that folder and into another one.  If you want to add it to an *additional* folder, click the check box next to it, then select a folder from the Add to Folder drop-down box.

So it&#039;s basically the best of all worlds I&#039;d think :-).  People who love drag-and-drop can enjoy that, folks who are more comfortable with &quot;folders&quot; are happy, and tag-lovers can basically treat the folders as tags or labels and add as many per doc as they like.

Disclaimer:  I work for Google, but am not on the Docs team... just a very enthusiastic user of the product :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a brief heads-up:  For those who love the idea of being able to tag/label/folderize (heh!) an item with more than one thing, it&#8217;s easily possible:</p>
<p>- In the default view, just drag a doc into as many folders as you want (one at a time) and it&#8217;ll be in all of them.<br />
- In folder views, dragging a document moves it OUT of that folder and into another one.  If you want to add it to an *additional* folder, click the check box next to it, then select a folder from the Add to Folder drop-down box.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s basically the best of all worlds I&#8217;d think <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  People who love drag-and-drop can enjoy that, folks who are more comfortable with &#8220;folders&#8221; are happy, and tag-lovers can basically treat the folders as tags or labels and add as many per doc as they like.</p>
<p>Disclaimer:  I work for Google, but am not on the Docs team&#8230; just a very enthusiastic user of the product <img src='http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: "MAD" Max</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1469693</link>
		<dc:creator>"MAD" Max</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1469693</guid>
		<description>FOLDERS, FOLDERS

Folders in Gmail will give an opportunity to add my documents in an orderly manner and not piled up in one window. It will be great to tag easily, by just typing a tag in the &quot;tag&quot; area of message and not through drop down menu. It sickens me to use tags the way Google has implement it now, what were they thinking. Folders and Tags are essentially two different things in my mind and one complements each other and not other way around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FOLDERS, FOLDERS</p>
<p>Folders in Gmail will give an opportunity to add my documents in an orderly manner and not piled up in one window. It will be great to tag easily, by just typing a tag in the &#8220;tag&#8221; area of message and not through drop down menu. It sickens me to use tags the way Google has implement it now, what were they thinking. Folders and Tags are essentially two different things in my mind and one complements each other and not other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arsenalist</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1469690</link>
		<dc:creator>arsenalist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1469690</guid>
		<description>If you haven&#039;t figured out that labels can be used like folders you don&#039;t deserve to be posting about this stuff...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t figured out that labels can be used like folders you don&#8217;t deserve to be posting about this stuff&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Technology Talk - 06/27/2007 &#124; Kyle's Cove dot Com</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1469620</link>
		<dc:creator>Technology Talk - 06/27/2007 &#124; Kyle's Cove dot Com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1469620</guid>
		<description>[...] covers Google Docs newest feature: folders and brings up the interesting question of folders in GMail.  Is this something people want to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] covers Google Docs newest feature: folders and brings up the interesting question of folders in GMail.  Is this something people want to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: san</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1469491</link>
		<dc:creator>san</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 01:24:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1469491</guid>
		<description>great idea. tho i resigned fr gmail, i still think labels are just plain stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great idea. tho i resigned fr gmail, i still think labels are just plain stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dx-blogger</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1469414</link>
		<dc:creator>dx-blogger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1469414</guid>
		<description>yeahh...Gmail needs folder..both of them..label and folder..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeahh&#8230;Gmail needs folder..both of them..label and folder..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dann</title>
		<link>http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/comment-page-2/#comment-1469173</link>
		<dc:creator>Dann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/06/26/google-docs-gets-folders-now-what-about-gmail/#comment-1469173</guid>
		<description>Who needs folders when you can get labels?
Please google, don&#039;t touch in my labels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who needs folders when you can get labels?<br />
Please google, don&#8217;t touch in my labels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
